Re: -ltermcap option...

1998-09-02 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On Wed, Sep 02, 1998 at 10:44:14PM +0100, Nuno Emanuel F. Carvalho wrote:
  I'm trying to compile pine4.02.tar.gz but I can't resolve the following
 problem:
 
 cc   -g -DDEBUG  -Dlnx -DJOB_CONTROL -DPOSIX -DMOUSE main.o libpico.a
 -ltermcap -o pico
 ld: cannot open -ltermcap: No such file or directory
 make: *** [pico] Error 1
 
  What should I do !?
 
  If I remove -ltermcap option on makefile it still doesn't work !
  I already had installed termcap-compat package.

-lncurses

-- 
|   Live never to be ashamed if
   Scott K. Ellis   |   anything you do or say is published
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   | around the world -- even if what
| is published is not true.


Re: non-free software

1998-03-31 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On Mon, 30 Mar 1998, King Lee wrote:

 May I suggest that you might make a non-free_1 and
 non-free_2 directory.  The non-free_1 directory  would
 contain software for which there is no possible legal
 liability for the cdrom vendor and  cdrom vendors would
 be encouraged to include.  The directory non-free_2 
 would contain packages with more restrictive licenses.B

Everything that is in non-free is there because it has a problematic
license.  Some stuff prohibits charging for distribution, some only a
reasonably copying fee.  It's too much effort for someone to look
through to decide on.

 Some of stuff in non-free is, in my opinion, rather basic and 
 cdrom vendors should be encouraged to include it. Especially
 since other vendors include it with their distribution.

Are you volunteering to read all the licenses carefully?  I considered
that once, but gave up after realizing how poorly a lot of the non-free
licences were constructed.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Deity looks AWESOME

1998-03-29 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On Sat, 28 Mar 1998, Bob Nielsen wrote:

 On Sat, 28 Mar 1998, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
 
  On Sat, 28 Mar 1998, Bob Nielsen wrote:
  
   I thought it was an additional method and dselect was going to
   remain for the graphically-impaired (IIRC deity runs under X). 
  
  This is Debian we are talking about... ;-)
 
 Yes, that is one of the things which caused me to switch from Red Hat.
 I'm glad to see it still runs in a text VC.

Yes, we're still concerned about those without X running (although I must
admit that I haven't looked at the test interface in a few months).

  deity runs both under X11 and text. I have got used to dselect,
  but Deity is way way better from the current previews.
 
 I'll grab a copy and have a look.  Are there any known, serious bugs?

Well, other than not actually installing packages? :)

The graphical interface is coming along nicely, but we haven't quite bound
it to the actual package installation routines (although those are also
very close to completion).

Scott 
(note, I just compile the Deity snapshots and haven't actually contributed
significant code).


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Deity looks AWESOME

1998-03-29 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On Sun, 29 Mar 1998, Rick Macdonald wrote:

 Scott K. Ellis wrote:
  
  The graphical interface is coming along nicely, but we haven't quite bound
  it to the actual package installation routines (although those are also
  very close to completion).
 
 Scott -- are there screenshots somewhere that we can look at?

No screenshots, but there is a snapshot of the program in
project/experimental on the archive.  I expect we'll get screenshots once
we're closer to completion (and someone gets around to it).


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Debian 2.0 unstable

1998-03-08 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On Sun, 8 Mar 1998, Henry Hollenberg wrote:

 I didn't see any mention of downloading the latest hamm version of libc5
 _BEFORE_ you run the script.  All that was mentioned was doing a clean
 install of 1.3.1 and then running the script.
 
 I haven't done this yet but have been reading up on it and following the
 discussion on the devel list.could this be the problem?

It is a known bug with the current version of the script that just hasn't
been fixed yet.  The script is supposed to download libc5 from hamm, but
it was left out by mistake.


--
E-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble?  E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: where is killall? (hamm)

1998-01-12 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On Sun, 11 Jan 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Sun, 11 Jan 1998, Scott K. Ellis wrote:
 
  Moved from procps to psutils by the upstream source.  psutils is stuck in
  incoming.
 
 I thought that was psmisc (retrieved from incomming last night):
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED](p2):bhmit1$ dpkg -c deb/psmisc_16-1_i386.deb 
 ...
 -rwxr-xr-x root/root  8956 1998-01-05 21:33 usr/bin/killall

I stand corrected.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: where is killall? (hamm)

1998-01-11 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On 11 Jan 1998, Joerg Plate wrote:

 
 1 dpkg -S killall
 sysvinit: /usr/man/man8/killall5.8.gz
 sysvinit: /sbin/killall5
 
 ii  sysvinit2.73-2 System-V like init.
 
 Maybe another package?

Moved from procps to psutils by the upstream source.  psutils is stuck in
incoming.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Netscape helpers, or replacing /bin/sh

1998-01-07 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On 6 Jan 1998, Mark Montague wrote:

 I had the same problem and ended up replacing sh with bash 1.14.5(1),
 which I had lying around from an old slackware backup or something. I
 don't think this is a good solution, though.
 
 I saw some old discussion claiming that this is a netscape bug, but
 after further research, I think it's really a bash bug... run from
 tcsh, the command
 
 bash -c '( ( echo foo ) ; echo bar )'
 
 produces the expected
 
 foo
 bar
 
 output, while
 
 bash -c '(( echo foo ) ; echo bar )'
 
 says
 
 bash: -c: line 1: missing closing `)' for arithmetic expression
 bash: -c: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `;'
 bash: -c: line 1: `(( echo foo ) ; echo bar )'
 
 Under HPUX 9.05 and 10.20, OSF1 v3.0, IRIX 6.3, SunOS 5.5.1, SunOS
 4.1.4, and AIX 2.3 (? AIX uname is weird), the command
 
  sh -c '(( echo foo ) ; echo bar )'
 
 produces
 
 foo
 bar
 
 so I think this is a bash bug, and a Debian bug if sh is to be a link
 to bash. Someone claimed earlier on debian-user that bash's behavior
 is correct, but it seems like a goal of bash is to be compatible with
 sh. I don't know what the sh specs say about such things, but this
 seems to be non-standard with respect to sh on every system I've
 tried.
 
 I'm cc'ing this to gnu.bash.bugs, so I'll mention that Debian GNU
 linux 1.3.1 exhibits this bug on i386 systems, which is bash
 v2.00.0(1), according to bash -version. bash v.1.14.5(1) does not have
 the problem.
 
 Of course, it's probably also a bug that this sh code is hard-compiled
 into netscape, but I think that's secondary.

The bug is already known and fixed by bash 2.01, which is provided in the
hamm (unstable) section of the Debian archive.  However, bash is linked
against libc6, so you'll need to read http://www.gate.net/~storm/FAQ/
for tips on how to upgrade.




--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: fetchmail fails with smtp error

1998-01-06 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Robert D. Hilliard wrote:

  On my hamm system, fetchmail fails with the following message:
 
 bob:vc-2:bobfetchmail
 fetchmail: 29 messages at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 reading message 1 (4310 bytes) ..fetchmail: SMTP connect to (null)
 failed
 fetchmail: SMTP transaction error while fetching from
 post.metrolink.net
 
  I have installed fetchmail_4.3.4-1.deb, ppp_2.3.2-2.deb, a
 custom-compiled 2.0.32 kernel, and bash_2.01-5.deb.
 
  My .fetchmailrc file is:
 poll post.metrolink.net proto pop3 user hilliard password mypw smtp 
 localhost
 
  I have used this .fetchmailrc file in bo for at least six months
 with no difficulties.  (The man page in hamm lists smtphost instead
 of smtp; I tried this without effect.)
 
  Has anyone encountered this?  Does anyone know what is wrong?

Yep, the latest smail package messes up if you want it installed in
/etc/inetd.conf instead of as a daemon.  Uncomment the line in inetd.conf
and HUP inetd.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Weird /tmp permission/ownership problem

1998-01-06 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Alexander Stavitsky wrote:

 
 I'm using relatively current hamm.
 All of a sudden my /tmp is owned by user 1000, group 1000 permission 755
 That led to discovery of unfixed bug with dpkg  dpkg-dev (all their files
 are owned by user/group 1000/1000).
 But that doesn't explain the mysterious change of ownership/permission of
 /tmp. I've changed all incorrect files from dpkg/dpkg-dev to root.root
 Shortly after /tmp went back to permission 755 but now without change in
 ownership. All of this is really weird.
 
 Has anybody else experienced this?
 Also - how can track down the process that changes /tmp permissions?


You did dpkg -x dpkg.deb /tmp didn't you?  That's what broke your /tmp
permissions, you need to make a subdirectory to extract into, the root of
the directory you extract the package into has its permissions changed.
This is not a bug but a feature


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Yet Another libc5-libc6 question..

1998-01-06 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Damir J. Naden wrote:

 Yes, I did exactly that: put both packages on the same dpkg --install
 line (thanks to Scott Ellis for responding within an hour of my original
 post). Everything installed cleanly and the system works as expected.
 Next hurdle seems to be installing of the libc6-dev to be able to
 compile my own kernel in the libc6 enviroment. Does anyone know if
 kernel-source package that libc6-dev depends on is going to be available
 this week, or alternatively, can I *safely* force the libc6-dev to
 install with 2.0.32_2.0.32-1 kernel source?

Well, the kernel itself doesn't actually need libc at all (although the
makefiles need it to get ready to compile the kernel).  In any case, the
missing kernel-headers package is stuck in the incoming directory which is
mirrored at ftp://ftp1.us.debian.org/pub/debian/Incoming (among other
places).  And forcing the installation with an earlier version of the
headers will leave many header files broken when the references they
expect don't exist (read /usr/doc/libc6/FAQ.debian.gz for the reason).


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Yet Another libc5-libc6 question..

1998-01-04 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On Sun, 4 Jan 1998, Damir J. Naden wrote:

 I have spent last hour going thru the mailing list archives and still
 came out empty-handed:
 I have installed a base system froma the current base disks from hamm
 which point to the current bo disks. Those include libc5_5.4.33-6
 library. Next step was to try and upgrade to ldso_1.9.6-2.deb. No
 problem. Trying to upgrade to libc6_2.0.6-2.deb - with no success: it
 conflicts with any libc5 package less or equal to libc5_5.4.33-7. So, I
 downloaded libc5_5.4.38-0.1.deb from hamm/oldlibs, but dpkg-deb --info
 cmd tells me that this package depends on libc6_2.0.6.
 I use dpkg manually, no dselect as I'm more familiar with dpkg...Dpkg is
 from the current bo disks for i386 dist.
 So, which is the right order of upgrading?
 BTW, I downgraded to libc5_5.4.33-3 from Scott Ellis's ftp site in an
 attempt to make libc6 not conflicting with it - no success.

You'll need to install both libc5 and libc6 from hamm on the same dpkg
command line.  This will probably also require removing libc5-dev, as well
as any packages which depend on it.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: reading HOWTO files

1998-01-04 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On Sun, 4 Jan 1998, Catouch wrote:

 I have had great success, so far installing and configuring my Debian system. 
 However, I cannot access the HOWTO files.  They are in /usr/doc/HOWTO and are
 gz.  How can I read them?  Thank you.

If you've installed less, the 'zless' command will view compressed files.
Otherwise, 'zcat file.gz | more' will also work.  If you have the less
from hamm installed, the lesspipe program provides a way to get less to
view compressed files without intervention.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: apache 1.3b3-9 ignores .htaccess

1998-01-03 Thread Scott K. Ellis
Quick sanity check, does /etc/apache/access.conf have the correct
AllowOverride line? 

On Fri, 2 Jan 1998, Jeff Noxon wrote:

 I hate me too posts, but since you asked, me too.  I'm using passwd files
 instead of db files; same problem...
 
 On Sat, Jan 03, 1998 at 01:05:58PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
  I have just upgraded to apache 1.3b3-9; I have the following .htaccess
  in one directory:
  
  
  AuthDbGroupFile /etc/apache/groups.db
  AuthDbUserFile /etc/apache/users.db
  AuthName staff access
  AuthType basic
  
  Limit GET
  require group staff
  /Limit
  
  This seems to be ignored! Pages from the directory are served
  without any authentication at all. Has anyone else experienced this?
  
  Does anyone have a copy of the last Debian 1.2.4 package?
  I don't think I can afford to be running the Debian Apache 1.3 packages
  on my production system, but I need something better than 1.1.3.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Man Pages -- Section 2?

1997-12-27 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On Fri, 26 Dec 1997, Paul Serice wrote:

 Where did the Section 2 man pages go?  They had been located in the
 manpages package.

They were moved to manpages-dev so that people who don't need the syscall
info don't have to install it.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: bo to hamm upgrade

1997-12-27 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On Sat, 27 Dec 1997, Randy Edwards wrote:

 Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
 
  http://www.gate.net/~storm/FAQ/libc5-libc6-Mini-HOWTO.html
 
Thanks Marcus!  One quick question if you don't mind: When installing
 libc6 in place of libc5, should I force the removal of the essential
 libc5 package first or force the installation of libc6 in addition to
 libc5?  I'm assuming it's the former, but want to make sure first. 
 Thanks in advance.

Neither.  If you remove libc5, you will break your system and have to
reinstall completely.  I repeat, DO NOT FORCE THE REMOVAL OF LIBC5 UNDER
ANY CIRCUMSTANCES.  Either downgrade to the earlier version of libc5 I
list at the end of the howto, or upgrade both libc5 and libc6 from hamm on
the same dpkg command line.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: dselect ftp upgrade

1997-12-25 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On Wed, 24 Dec 1997, PATRICK DAHIROC wrote:

 I would like to upgrade to libc6 and I tried to do so via dselect ftp, but
 I can not find the unstable or hamm directory at ftp.debian and dselect
 just quits on me.  Can someone tell me how to upgrade packages via ftp.
 
 I am also insearch of an efficient web browser, and I am considering the
 latest version of Amaya.  Is there a .deb binary yet?  Any comments on
 this particular browser is welcomed.

Someone else already mentioned my upgrade howto, but seems to have
forgotten to tell you where to find it :)

http://www.gate.net/~storm/FAQ/


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: libc5 to libc6: purge or install

1997-12-24 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On Tue, 23 Dec 1997, Jameson Burt wrote:

 This seems the correct approach.  So, the libc5-libc6-Mini-HOWTO should say 
 not just
The minimum list of packages to install to be able to run unstable-
branch packages is below.  Install these packages one at a time in
exactly the order listed.  When versions are mentioned, that is a
minimum suggested version, any later version should also be
acceptable.
 o  ldso_1.9.5-1
 o  libc6_2.0.4-1
 
 but should also include something like
 o  ldso_1.9.5-1
 o  libc5_5.4.38  from unstable hamm **
 o  libc6_2.0.4-1
 
 The need for the above appeared to me again today, in my office, when  a 
 colleague tried to install Debian Linux.  As recommended in the HOWTO, he did 
 not use dselect.  However, haveing followed the libc5-libc6-Mini-HOWTO two 
 times, he is about to try installing Debian Linux for the third time in one 
 day.   The first recommended package ldso_1.9.6-2 installed properly.  The 
 second package libc6_2.0.5c-0.1 failed to install, responding that dpkg COULD 
 NOT REMOVE libc5!  He knew not to use a -force option, so he used a --purge 
 option on libc5.  He followed this by again having dpkg install 
 libc6_2.0.6c-0.1.  All seemed well, except that the purging of libc5 removed 
 /lib/libreadline.so.2, so he could no longer log on --time to reinstall 
 Debian 
 Linux.

I plan on mentioning this when I update the howto over the holidays.  I am
also going to plaster said howto with large warnings for

DO NOT PURGE LIBC5 WHEN UPGRADING.
DO NOT USE --force FOR ANY REASON when doing the libc5-libc6 upgrade.

(not shouting at you, just at anyone else out there considering it)


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Next release of Debian - when?

1997-12-16 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On Tue, 16 Dec 1997, Mark Phillips wrote:

 When is Debian 1.4 coming out officially?  I thought Debian was now
 working on roughly a three month cycle time for new releases - are we
 giving up on this strategy?

Hamm (Debian 2.0) will be released when we're finished with it.  It
doesn't look like we'll be able to do a release before late January,
possibly later.  There are several reasons for the lag in development,
primarily the fact that all our packages are being converted to use the
new libc6 (glibc2) library instead of the old libc5.  While it may appear
like RedHat is moving faster, we actually have more than twice the number
of packages they do.  In addition, we're an entirely volunteer force, so
we can't muster quite the speed as someone who is being paid to work on
their upgrade full-time.  You can see our work so far (which is reasonably
stable) by checking out the unstable tree on our archives.  Please read
the howto available at http://www.gate.net/~storm/FAQ/ before attempting
to install packages from unstable however.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Debian libc5 to libc6 Mini-HOWTO - purging -dev packages

1997-12-11 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On Wed, 10 Dec 1997, Robert D. Hilliard wrote:

  Section 3. of the Mini-HOWTO says:
  If you wish to do libc6 development, you should first purge all the
  '-dev' packages on your system
 
  Please confirm that this does not include dpkg-dev_1.4.0.19.deb,
 which was installed under Section 2.3.

Correct, you don't need to purge dpkg-dev


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: The GIMP problems

1997-12-08 Thread Scott K. Ellis
Quick suggestion, if you've upgraded GIMP recently, you need to do 
rm -rf ~/.gimp
since the new version of gimp doesn't cope with the files left by the
older versions.

On Mon, 8 Dec 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I can't draw anything in the gimp.  Lines don't show up, using the pencil,
 brush, or other drawing tools.  The spline tool does lines, but when I
 switch over to pencil or brush, etc., the lines disappear.  I get some
 messages, including 
 
 ** WARNING **: XGetWindowProperty failed
 
 This message I got the first time I tried to start up gimp on this session.
 Subsequent attempts got these messages (and so on):
 
 parsing /home/lex/.gimp/gtkrc
 parsing /usr/share/gimp/0.99.14/gimprc
 parsing /home/lex/.gimp/gimprc
 parsing /home/lex/.gimp/pluginrc
 Starting extensions: 
 Not enough colors to satisfy requested color cube.
 Reduced color cube shades from
 [6 of Red, 6 of Green, 4 of Blue, 24 of Gray] == [5 of Red, 5 of Green, 4
 of Bl
 ue, 24 of Gray]
 /usr/bin/X11/gimp warning: No brushes available for use with this tool.
 /usr/bin/X11/gimp warning: No brushes available for use with this tool.
 /usr/bin/X11/gimp warning: No brushes available for use with this tool.
 /usr/bin/X11/gimp warning: No brushes available for use with this tool.
 /usr/bin/X11/gimp warning: No brushes available for use with this tool.
 /usr/bin/X11/gimp warning: No brushes available for use with this tool.
 /usr/bin/X11/gimp warning: No brushes available for use with this tool.
 directory is ok
 
 ** ERROR **: sigsegv caught
 
 I wasn't running Netscape.  I had started emacs between the two invocations
 of the Gimp.
 
 I reinstalled gimp 0.99.14-1 and the gimp-data-extra, gimp-data-min, and
 gimp-non-free packages of this version.  I also installed the up-to-date
 libgtk1. 
 
 I am using x11 3.3.1 with a matrox millenium.  I have been having some
 freaky problems with the SVGA server, streaks and lines dancing on the
 screen.  I am now wondering if there is a problem with my X11 installation.
 Alot of the x11 problems seemed to happen after the first time I started up
 uxing xdm.  The character of the screen is way different (not just colors)
 when I start up with xdm.  
 
 Thought these might be related?
 
 I am sending to the users list, even thought I am using a pretty nearly
 completely hamm system.  


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: tar

1997-12-07 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On Sun, 7 Dec 1997, Steve Koop wrote:

 Just Was wondering how to, or what is the switch to untar a file to
 overwrite and replace the existing files? 

No switch required, tar automatically overwrites files when extracting.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: tar

1997-12-07 Thread Scott K. Ellis
I think so.  tar isn't a shell command, so shell parameters shouldn't
effect it.

On Sun, 7 Dec 1997, George Bonser wrote:

 Even if someone has noclobber set in their shell?
 
 On 07-Dec-97 Scott K. Ellis wrote:
  On Sun, 7 Dec 1997, Steve Koop wrote:
  
  Just Was wondering how to, or what is the switch to untar a file to
  overwrite and replace the existing files? 
  
  No switch required, tar automatically overwrites files when extracting.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Simple Unix utility?

1997-12-06 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On 5 Dec 1997, Jim Pick wrote:

 One task I do commonly is monitor my system log files using
 'tail -f'.
 
 I was wondering if there was a commonly used method for doing the
 same thing, but filtering it at the same time.
 
 For example, I like to view the logs on the LinuxHQ website as they are
 being generated, but I don't care about gif's and jpeg's, or accesses
 from my domain.  So I end up using something like this (in a wide xterm):
 
 $ watch -n 10 'tail -100 /opt/linuxhq/livesite/var/log/access.log |
 grep -v gif|jpg|jimpick\.com | tail -20 | cut -c1-175'
 
 It works - but it obviously isn't the most efficient way of doing this.
 
 I was wondering if there was a Unix utility I may have overlooked
 that does the same sort of thing.  I know I could probably write a
 Perl script to do the same thing - but it seems like a general enough
 problem that there is probably something that handles it already.

Umm, you had the right idea when using tail -f.  Try

tail -f file | grep pattern



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Simple Unix utility?

1997-12-06 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On Sat, 6 Dec 1997, [iso-8859-1] Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:

  Now I notice that cut seems to buffer everything up.
 
  You should file a bug against cut, it should do line buffering when output
 is a tty.

It may be something in the middle of the pipe doing the buffering.  Not
certain how to handle that case.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: file-rc problem?

1997-10-13 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On Sat, 11 Oct 1997, Darin Johnson wrote:

 I was installing 1.3.1, and had selected file-rc.  It unpacked the
 files, but when setting them up, I had quite a few packages give
 warnings/errors in update-rc.d.  Was this a bug?  If I reinstall
 without file-rc, then install it by itself later, is it safe to use?

The version of file-rc in 1.3.1 is very unusable (and in fact was removed
from the latest revision of stable).  It is an experimental development
package and shouldn't have gotten into stable in the first place.

-- 
   | Do not, I beg you,
  Scott K. Ellis   |look for anything behind phenomena.
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |   They are themselves their own lesson.
   | -- Goethe


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Debian libc5 to libc6 Mini-HOWTO (regular posting, updated)

1997-10-11 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

  Debian libc5 to libc6 Mini-HOWTO
  Scott K. Ellis, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  $Id: libc5-libc6-Mini-HOWTO.sgml,v 2.8 1997/10/11 03:02:12
  storm Exp $

  1.  Introduction

  The Debian project is currently in the process of putting together the
  next release of the Debian system.  This version will utilize the new
  libc6, a replacement for the prior libc5 which includes many
  enhancements and brings the Linux C library back into sync with the
  GNU project.  We are doing this in a way to allow you to continue to
  utilize your older software by providing development and operating
  environments for both C libraries.  However, all packages in the new
  release will be linked with the new C library.  This has made it
  slightly more difficult to install packages from the unstable branch
  of our development tree into a working system.  There is a slight
  possibility of making your system unbootable in the process, this
  guide is intended to help you avoid such problems.

  1.1.  Recent Changes:

  o  Note about vthunk change with glibc 2.0.5c.

  o  Seperated bash upgrade from required upgrade.

  o  Note on how to upgrade via dpkg-ftp.

  o  Notes about NIS and libgdbm (perl) issues.

  o  Note about libc6-based e2fsck being bad for large partitions.

  1.2.  Finding updates

  The latest version of this Mini-HOWTO should be available in the
  following locations:

  o  http://www.gate.net/~storm/FAQ/libc5-libc6-Mini-HOWTO.html

  o  http://www.gate.net/~storm/FAQ/libc5-libc6-Mini-HOWTO.txt

  o  http://www.gate.net/~storm/FAQ/libc5-libc6-Mini-HOWTO.sgml

  o  ftp://ftp.debian.org/pub/debian/doc/libc5-libc6-Mini-HOWTO.txt

  o  ftp://ftp.debian.org/pub/debian/doc/libc5-libc6-Mini-
 HOWTO.html.tar.gz

  1.3.  Copyright and Disclaimer

  This Mini-HOWTO is covered by the copyright of and may be further
  redistibuted under the same terms as other HOWTOs from the LDP.

  As always, this document comes with NO WARRANTY.  These comments are
  based on my personal experience and experimentation.  While this
  worked for me off a freshly installed v1.3.1 system, you mileage may
  vary.  Please send any comments or corrections to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  2.  Requirements

  2.1.  Minimum Requirements

  The minimum list of packages to install to be able to run unstable-
  branch packages is below.  Install these packages one at a time in
  exactly the order listed.  When versions are mentioned, that is a
  minimum suggested version, any later version should also be
  acceptable.

  o  ldso_1.9.5-1

  o  libc6_2.0.4-1

  2.2.  Upgrading bash

  While you can install many libc6 package with just ldso and libc6, you
  will probably want to upgrade a few other packages as well.  Since
  bash-2.01 fixes problems experienced with Netscape and helper
  applications, it is one of the more likely packages to need updated.
  However, it is also one of the few packages that is capable of
  rendering your system useless if upgraded incorrectly.  Install the
  packages below one at a time in exactly the order listed.

  IMPORTANT: If you use dselect to do the initial upgrade of these
  packages, there is a very good possibility of breaking bash and
  therefore making your system unusable.

  o  ncurses3.0_1.9.9e-2

  o  ncurses3.4_1.9.9g-3

  o  libreadline2_2.1-4

  o  libreadlineg2_2.1-4

  o  bash_2.01-2

  2.3.  Other Suggested Packages

  These packages are not absolutely essential for the functioning of the
  packages in unstable, but are still very useful.  The new dpkg-dev may
  be necessary for unpacking source archives from unstable, and the new
  dpkg-ftp is needed if you wish to use the ftp method of dselect to
  upgrade your system to the unstable distribution.

  o  libg++272_2.7.2.5-2

  o  dpkg_1.4.0.19

  o  dpkg-dev_1.4.0.19

  o  dpkg-ftp_1.4.9

  2.4.  Other Possible Conflicts

  Since perl is used in many package installation scripts, problems with
  with library upgrades may temporarily break perl, which may break
  other package installations.  To be safe, install the new libgdbm1 and
  then the new libgdbmg1 packages by hand before upgrading perl.

  3.  Development

  If you wish to do libc6 development, you should first purge all the
  '-dev' packages on your system, the new development system will use
  packages with the suffix '-dev' for libc6 development and '-altdev'
  for libc5 development.  You will wish to install the latest libc5
  package, and altgcc if you wish continue to do libc5 development as
  well.  Some libraries haven't been recompiled for the new libc6 yet,
  check that all your vital libraries are available before upgrading.
  Linking libc5-based libraries with libc6-based programs will have
  unpredictable results.

  4.  Concerns

  4.1.  Upgrading to libc6_2.0.5c-0.1

  Due to a change in the vthunk handling code in libc6 and libg++, you
  must upgrade to at least libg++272_2.7.2.8-0.1 when upgrading libc6.

  4.2.  Upgrading bash

Re: update-menus: segmentation faults

1997-10-08 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Tue, 7 Oct 1997, Paul Miller wrote:

 update-menus is giving me segmentation faults (core dumped) ... I recently
 upgraded several programs (dselect wanted to/hamm distribution) and now it
 doesn't work.  Anyone have an idea on what could be wrong? 

Yes, upgrading libc6 broke libg++272.  The new libg++272 should have
gotten to the mirrors (or will soon).  Upgrade that and it should work
again.

- -- 
Scott K. Ellis  |  The world is its own magic.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |   -- Shunryu Suzuki


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNDsKrKCk2fENdzpVAQFptQP/dqzPJay/js0XVxiJX5jhRF19nlwr9Nnp
OUlMcrG8uRciHBhmf2X+st9U4Tff/F5h8qYbmbEiUmWBhcslTK4ArUN/0lIJ1y6t
wu5lrjvKbqk8QsAAl8E1sFKM8OCjnOfPGv31hZEb5nRPjrXw+ZN3r4kO7L5gCr7C
z5keUGfsOiw=
=7zCU
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: xcontrib and xproc packages

1997-10-05 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Sat, 4 Oct 1997, Paul Miller wrote:

 I need to install the xproc package for xcontrib, but it requires
 elf-x11r6lib which is not available..  Where can I find this package or
 another verion of xproc which doesn't require elf-x11r6lib?

The xproc package, as well as several other packages, has an obsolete
dependancy on the virtual package elf-x11r6lib.  This virtual package used
to be provided by xlib6, but it was removed almost a year after it had
been announced as obsolete.  Installing the package with the
- --force-depends option to dpkg will allow you to install it anyway.

- -- 
   | Do not, I beg you,
  Scott K. Ellis   |look for anything behind phenomena.
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |   They are themselves their own lesson.
   | -- Goethe

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNDbc4qCk2fENdzpVAQEbfAP+LFLjo8LV3llD4421ftonw31cmHXZQNR2
316q2Ya3YEl8eHq53lk1qK0AOGZFkaSiJkVcQWxV+iasvwo3UH1fAuENQi3+hNum
gmwU0kriH+5la8iy9MAQuFH/kjhmAwEqKxsuR7D1N25vnOCYGa1poZqWeN3F1J9Z
N7Woc6xYSpk=
=Vn0R
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: xcontrib and xproc packages

1997-10-05 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Sat, 4 Oct 1997, Paul Miller wrote:

 On Sat, 4 Oct 1997, Scott K. Ellis wrote:
  On Sat, 4 Oct 1997, Paul Miller wrote:
  The xproc package, as well as several other packages, has an obsolete
  dependancy on the virtual package elf-x11r6lib.  This virtual package used
  to be provided by xlib6, but it was removed almost a year after it had
  been announced as obsolete.  Installing the package with the
  --force-depends option to dpkg will allow you to install it anyway.
 If I run force-depends, won't dselect decide that the elf-x11r6lib package
 no longer exists, therefore uninstalling xproc and xcontrib?  Dselect is
 too much of a helpful tool to give up.

dselect will bring up a conflict resolution screen whenever you exit from
it complaining about the unresolved dependancy.  It should however, leave
them selected.  You can exit that screen by using 'Q' to tell it to
override.

- -- 
Scott K. Ellis  |  The world is its own magic.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |   -- Shunryu Suzuki

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNDbtbaCk2fENdzpVAQFgoQP+K7kvB9bTQ/6f8O1nrb51exByLrC7c0x/
akfSPUHtt6/tjyCxWsy+oc3G+UfS3WOYhr9alnOq7TeBG5PM3C/SdtOauYU6tudN
GnlO63nTYn1njPJm4j2vgujidDDYWJF4BfeiT88p+f/knydlzMzvxWUBpFrv4TCE
IXta21BGyb8=
=qYBC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Announcing TIND: This Is Not Dselect

1997-10-01 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On Tue, 30 Sep 1997, Will Lowe wrote:
 Ahh yes,  found it.  The problem is that it depends on xlib6g,  which
 conflicts with xlib6.  Is there a bad side to removing xlib6 in favor of
 xlib6g?

Yes, you'll break all your X packages.  The proper solution is to upgrade
to a version of xlib6 that xlib6g doesn't conflict with.  That is also
located in unstable.  If you haven't upgraded yet, check out my howto at
http://www.gate.net/~storm/FAQ/

-- 
 |The mark of your ignorance is the depth of
   Scott K. Ellis|   your belief in injustice and tragedy.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]| What the caterpillar calls the end of the world,
 |   the master calls a butterfly.
 |   -- Illusions


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Translation Table Syntax Errors?

1997-09-28 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On Sun, 28 Sep 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   I have encountered the same problem. I have downgraded several packages
   and then re-upgraded them. I have tracked it down to be either 
   xlib6_3.3-6
   or xlib6g_3.3-6 that is causing this problem. Downgrading xlib6 to 3.3-4
   and downgrading enough packages so that I could remove xlib6g (because it
   conflicts with xlib6_3.3-4) solved the problem. I have been using
   xlib6_3.3-5 and xlib6g_3.3-5 without this problem, but I couldn't find
   these packages anywhere. If anybody knows where I can download 
   xlib6_3.3-5
   and/or xlib6g_3.3-5, I could take an even more close look at it.
  
  Sorry, but unfortunately, I don't have the -5 version of the libraries.
  
  Since I only have a couple of packages that I use which are affected I will
  wait.  I can do without Mosaic and nedit temporarily until things are 
  fixed.
 
  This also caused Netscape to crash with bus-error, without even starting. 
  Downgrading to xlib6_3.3-5 cured this totally. If you want all 700k of it, 
 it's
  still in my backup-mirror-storage-whatever partition. 

This definatly looks like you've been bit by the same bug I've discovered
and reported (xlib6 wasn't linked with '-lc').  A quick mostly-fix of
the problem is to make sure that '/usr/lib/libc5-compat' is below
'/usr/X11R6/lib' in your /etc/ld.so.conf file and rerun ldconfig.  This
may temporarily remedy the problem.

  BTW. Where are (if any) the changelogs for the X packages?



-- 
   Scott K. Ellis|The reason angels can fly is that
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]| they take themselves so lightly.
 |-- G.K. Chesterson


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Motif and libc6

1997-09-27 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Sat, 27 Sep 1997, Lawrence wrote:

 I heard from the lists there is a problem compiling a Motif program with
 libc6.  I have contacted RedHat and they said that they may release
 their Motif development kit compatible with libc6 very later this year. 
 Meanwhile, is it possible to install libc6 and still able to compile
 Motif program?

Yes, but not by linking them to libc6.  You will need to install the
altgcc and libc5-altdev packages, as well as the various other '-altdev'
packages for the libraries you need (xlib6-altdev, etc.).  If you're
planning on upgrading (or partially upgrading) to libc6, check out my
Debian libc5 to libc6 Mini-HOWTO which I post here about weekly and which
can be found at http://www.gate.net/~storm/FAQ/

- -- 
 |If you will practice being fictional for a while,
   Scott K. Ellis|you will understand that fictional
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]|  characters are sometimes more real than
 |people with bodies and heartbeats.
 |   -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNCxj1KCk2fENdzpVAQHO0gP/dsFXfVWiuv7NvL1zo+bxtamz24J00ux1
s0PvRKcGaXh4ic1e6BeDBmMvSOYDzl9O1x6H/x2B9PLP97A0/ln+75fr/Ne1KmJE
tjGNqkUUAXs0YbNwXCGCNEgXeilD56GXZLQICSRAb8kxc6y8rpCevZrttCc6J8ap
/Bi7KSPNCkA=
=muNp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: dpkg other assorted questions...

1997-09-27 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Fri, 26 Sep 1997, jd? wrote:
 Also how do i make fvwm2  my default windows manager and how do i add
 programs to my menus.or where do i find documentation on how to
 customize X...

Default window managers are found in /etc/X11/window-manager.  The first
one found will be used.  For menus, install the menu package and check out
the documentation in /usr/doc/menu.  Also check out the documentation in
/usr/doc/fvwm2 (well /usr/doc/*).

 one last thinghow do i force my machine to start up to the x windows
 login box..thanx in advanced.

For that you want the documentation in /usr/doc/xbase/debian.README.  You
want to start xdm on system startup.

- -- 
 |If you will practice being fictional for a while,
   Scott K. Ellis|you will understand that fictional
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]|  characters are sometimes more real than
 |people with bodies and heartbeats.
 |   -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNCxlnaCk2fENdzpVAQGfDAQAnv2+mRDJxkfe6qGE7Vrs9SgjV339zAHA
TYeOlRzK0pNNBCmrvCuo6s40Ui2m1EeguZjLGjZELOlJ33mq07h23ROwQcbPuc6c
74r/LHE0stzRw/030ZjG2Qpm9Wvci7r5TfjhGtTpWumn55UMekY1v7SVLb9F+8Wx
oCuspomQiQc=
=Rchh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Stable means not-changing?

1997-09-26 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Fri, 26 Sep 1997, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
 On Tue, Sep 23, 1997 at 10:06:09PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
  Do not remove libc4 until you are sure there is not program on
   your machine that depends on libc4.
 
 It is my understanding (and experience) that ld.so 1.9, needed for libc6,
 will not run a.out binaries anyway.

Due to popular outcry, ldso still includes support for a.out, although it
is unsupported and unmaintained.  As far as I know, it works at the moment
though.

- -- 
 |The mark of your ignorance is the depth of
   Scott K. Ellis|   your belief in injustice and tragedy.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]| What the caterpillar calls the end of the world,
 |   the master calls a butterfly.
 |   -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNCsdxaCk2fENdzpVAQFTDQQAhnrpkdvIJLkU72/e7M5dPgr0RdBPhcTo
KdZhtVwEVCh7Etzsi0wZoC1r1QKwB0+RXoDvdE3sDxPGeHMSZ4/1oZd+CUyhGR1k
p9vgxH/okwsAP8aI4CPW3Gtvguad1RoJ4u+yaZuVRNiEqjKk/nZ0WHyLrHUPf81Q
rMskFgxrttI=
=I921
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Debian libc5 to libc6 Mini-HOWTO (regular posting, updated)

1997-09-21 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Note that some of the updated material (information about perl and NIS) is
very rough, and I should be cleaning up the information in the next draft.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me and I'll try to be more
specific.

- - begin howto -
  Debian libc5 to libc6 Mini-HOWTO
  Scott K. Ellis, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  $Id: libc5-libc6-Mini-HOWTO.sgml,v 2.5 1997/09/16 03:31:27
  storm Exp $

  1.  Introduction

  The Debian project is currently in the process of putting together the
  next release of the Debian system.  This version will utilize the new
  libc6, a replacement for the prior libc5 which includes many
  enhancements and brings the Linux C library back into sync with the
  GNU project.  We are doing this in a way to allow you to continue to
  utilize your older software by providing development and operating
  environments for both C libraries.  However, all packages in the new
  release will be linked with the new C library.  This has made it
  slightly more difficult to install packages from the unstable branch
  of our development tree into a working system.  There is a slight
  possibility of making your system unbootable in the process, this
  guide is intended to help you avoid such problems.

  1.1.  Recent Changes:

  o  Notes about NIS and libgdbm (perl) issues.

  o  Note about libc6-based e2fsck being bad for large partitions.

  o  Reorganized slightly and added more information about possible
 problems.

  o  Moved ldso above libc6, incase they have an ancient ldso.

  o  Raised versions required for bash and libreadline(g)2 to the
 official maintainer versions to avoid possible version mismatch
 breakage.

  o  Added a note saying that allowing dselect to upgrade the listed
 packages might result in an unbootable system.

  o  Added ncurses3.0 to list of packages after realizing that
 libreadline2 depended on it.  This may not be necessary, as
 everyone should already have ncurses3.0 installed.

  1.2.  Finding updates

  The latest version of this Mini-HOWTO in HTML format should be located
  at http://www.gate.net/~storm/FAQ/libc5-libc6-Mini-HOWTO.html.  The
  SGML source should also be available as libc5-libc6-Mini-HOWTO.sgml in
  the same directory.

  1.3.  Disclaimer

  As always, this document comes with NO WARRANTY.  These comments are
  based on my personal experience and experimentation.  While this
  worked for me off a freshly installed v1.3.1 system, you mileage may
  vary.  Please send any comments or corrections to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  2.  Requirements

  2.1.  Minimum Requirements

  The minimum list of packages to install to be able to run unstable-
  branch packages is below.  Install these packages one at a time in
  exactly the order listed.  When versions are mentioned, that is a
  minimum suggested version, any later version should also be
  acceptable.

  IMPORTANT: If you use dselect to do the initial upgrade to these
  packages, there is a very good possibility of breaking bash and
  therefore making your system unusable.

  o  ldso_1.9.5-1

  o  libc6_2.0.4-1

  o  ncurses3.0_1.9.9e-2

  o  ncurses3.4_1.9.9g-3

  o  libreadline2_2.1-4

  o  libreadlineg2_2.1-4

  o  bash_2.01-2

  2.2.  Other Suggested Packages

  These packages are not absolutely essential for the functioning of the
  packages in unstable, but are still very useful.  The new dpkg-dev may
  be necessary for unpacking source archives from unstable, and the new
  dpkg-ftp is needed if you wish to use the ftp method of dselect to
  upgrade your system to the unstable distribution.

  o  libg++272_2.7.2.5-2

  o  dpkg_1.4.0.19

  o  dpkg-dev_1.4.0.19

  o  dpkg-ftp_1.4.9

  2.3.  Other Possible Conflicts

  Since perl is used in many package installation scripts, problems with
  with library upgrades may temporarily break perl, which may break
  other package installations.  To be safe, install the new libgdbm1 and
  then the new libgdbm1g packages by hand before upgrading perl.

  3.  Development

  If you wish to do libc6 development, you should first purge all the
  '-dev' packages on your system, the new development system will use
  packages with the suffix '-dev' for libc6 development and '-altdev'
  for libc5 development.  You will wish to install the latest libc5
  package, and altgcc if you wish continue to do libc5 development as
  well.  Some libraries haven't been recompiled for the new libc6 yet,
  check that all your vital libraries are available before upgrading.
  Linking libc5-based libraries with libc6-based programs will have
  unpredictable results.

  4.  Concerns

  4.1.  Upgrading bash

  The package bash_2.01-1 requires that you have libreadlineg2_2.1-3 or
  greater installed.  If you install the new bash package before
  installing the new libreadlineg2, you will break your system.
  bash_2.01-2 has the appropriate predepends lines, but may not yet be
  to your mirror.

  4.2.  /sbin/e2fsck

Re: Upgrade to libc6 ok?

1997-09-21 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Mon, 22 Sep 1997, Jim Thomas wrote:

 I am considering upgrading to libc6, from my debian 1.3.1 distribution. 
 Are there any problems with this, breaks of already installed software
 etc.?  I need to do this as perl-5.004 needs it.

The libc5 to libc6 upgrade isn't that hard, although there are a few
pitfalls.  If you follow the Mini-HOWTO which I just reposted (and which
is available at http://www.gate.net/~storm/FAQ/), you should have few
problems.  You will need to manually install several packages before
installing perl, including the latest versions of the libgdbm1 and
libgdbm1g package from unstable.

- -- 
   |   The bond that links your true family is not
Scott K. Ellis |  one of blood, but of respect and joy in each
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | other's life. Rarely do members of one
   |   family grow up under the same roof.
   |  -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNCV+ZaCk2fENdzpVAQHU5AP7Bo99AINyFEysKE+sxPk4wuROBIoVZ5sr
e+98yNF8XNrGxLv1pOrh3+i96pH8FIstyLVR4a8NnzX7rDgG4EuUCoe9paeGuuzB
jJSubSYqaI3uZXj15hUiNAQGE0USrkmiiTwuE5j7AS62xl5svTBPn7ic4RoukRcV
iCpcHTj6HKc=
=6sUV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: sendmail errors on console

1997-09-20 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On Sat, 20 Sep 1997, Ralph Winslow wrote:

 I've been seeing many message pairs of the form:
 
 sendmail: /etc/smail/transports: check_path: unknown attribute
 sendmail: mail moved to /var/spool/smail/error/)xCNcr-0003CsC
 
 on my console.  It's a bit annoying (I avoid tty1 and work tty2-tty6)
 and I'd like to make it stop.  Can anyone advise me what to do? TIA

Yes, fix your smail config, which is what is generating the messages.
Running smailconfig as root should allow you do configure it for most
common setups

 
 And BTW what does IIRC mean?  I doubt it's related to Internet Relay
 Chat.

Stands for If I Recall Correctly

-- 
   |Your friends will know you better in the
Scott K. Ellis | first minute you meet than your acquaintances
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   will know you in a thousand years.
   |  -- Illusions


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: HELP! what debian package provides 'elf-x11r6lib'??

1997-09-14 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On Sat, 13 Sep 1997, Paul Miller wrote:

 Help! what debian package provides 'elf-x11r6lib'??
 
 For some reason ftp.debian.org doesn't have the unstable directory.. and
 dselect decided to uninstall tons of my programs.. :(  .. I changed the
 unstable directory in ftp to hamm/hamm .. I still need that package
 though.

xlib6 used to provide it.  It should have been fazed out a long time ago.
The latest xlib6 removed the provides, any package that depends on it is
broken.  I filed a list of bugs when the latest xlib6 hit incoming, you
might want to check and file bugs against the packages I missed (I only
filed against packages on my system).  You should be able to force dselect
to leave them installed, a 'Q' when the conflict screen comes up (after
making sure they're still selected as installed) should do it.

-- 
   Scott K. Ellis|The reason angels can fly is that
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]| they take themselves so lightly.
 |-- G.K. Chesterson


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: A problem compiling Qpopper

1997-09-10 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Tue, 9 Sep 1997, Bruno O. M. Simoes wrote:

 I can't compile qpopper because it asks a library called *lshadow*. With
 this, qpopper could recognize shadow passwords (and that's what I want).
 The debian compiled qpopper can do this, so they have this lib.
 Where do I find this lib?
 Is this lib in some package that I can install?

Shadow is built into the C library under linux, simply tell it that you
have shadow passwords and remove the -lshadow definition from the
makefile.

- -- 
 |The mark of your ignorance is the depth of
   Scott K. Ellis|   your belief in injustice and tragedy.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]| What the caterpillar calls the end of the world,
 |   the master calls a butterfly.
 |   -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNBXTraCk2fENdzpVAQGe5QQArck4eurD+wE1b1zINcBf8E/AJwXgFRL5
TE4eqWrwDElQ/MP2W1irowAzZmFEftCkOm1TuUjb70yGgMHM39yhizTVFtNDM+0X
O/VaWUt677hGKEQnoCNNsvIdpsrQolSnqWcIa35KN96yaJJF6CVOMKr3LtR4jdil
AtNj0HcuZ/8=
=wSiG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Debian libc5 to libc6 Mini-HOWTO (regular posting)

1997-09-08 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

  Debian libc5 to libc6 Mini-HOWTO
  Scott K. Ellis, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  $Id: libc5-libc6-Mini-HOWTO.sgml,v 2.4 1997/08/28 22:02:32
  storm Exp $

  1.  Introduction

  The Debian project is currently in the process of putting together the
  next release of the Debian system.  This version will utilize the new
  libc6, a replacement for the prior libc5 which includes many
  enhancements and brings the Linux C library back into sync with the
  GNU project.  We are doing this in a way to allow you to continue to
  utilize your older software by providing development and operating
  environments for both C libraries.  However, all packages in the new
  release will be linked with the new C library.  This has made it
  slightly more difficult to install packages from the unstable branch
  of our development tree into a working system.  There is a slight
  possibility of making your system unbootable in the process, this
  guide is intended to help you avoid such problems.

  1.1.  Recent Changes:

  o  Note about libc6-based e2fsck being bad for large partitions.

  o  Reorganized slightly and added more information about possible
 problems.

  o  Moved ldso above libc6, incase they have an ancient ldso.

  o  Raised versions required for bash and libreadline(g)2 to the
 official maintainer versions to avoid possible version mismatch
 breakage.

  o  Added a note saying that allowing dselect to upgrade the listed
 packages might result in an unbootable system.

  o  Added ncurses3.0 to list of packages after realizing that
 libreadline2 depended on it.  This may not be necessary, as
 everyone should already have ncurses3.0 installed.

  1.2.  Finding updates

  The latest version of this Mini-HOWTO in HTML format should be located
  at http://www.gate.net/~storm/FAQ/libc5-libc6-Mini-HOWTO.html.  The
  SGML source should also be available as libc5-libc6-Mini-HOWTO.sgml in
  the same directory.

  1.3.  Disclaimer

  As always, this document comes with NO WARRANTY.  These comments are
  based on my personal experience and experimentation.  While this
  worked for me off a freshly installed v1.3.1 system, you mileage may
  vary.  Please send any comments or corrections to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  2.  Requirements

  2.1.  Minimum Requirements

  The minimum list of packages to install to be able to run unstable-
  branch packages is below.  Install these packages one at a time in
  exactly the order listed.  When versions are mentioned, that is a
  minimum suggested version, any later version should also be
  acceptable.

  IMPORTANT: If you use dselect to do the initial upgrade to these
  packages, there is a very good possibility of breaking bash and
  therefore making your system unusable.

  o  ldso_1.9.5-1

  o  libc6_2.0.4-1

  o  ncurses3.0_1.9.9e-2

  o  ncurses3.4_1.9.9g-3

  o  libreadline2_2.1-4

  o  libreadlineg2_2.1-4

  o  bash_2.01-2

  2.2.  Other Suggested Packages

  These packages are not absolutely essential for the functioning of the
  packages in unstable, but are still very useful.  The new dpkg-dev may
  be necessary for unpacking source archives from unstable, and the new
  dpkg-ftp is needed if you wish to use the ftp method of dselect to
  upgrade your system to the unstable distribution.

  o  libg++272_2.7.2.5-2

  o  dpkg_1.4.0.19

  o  dpkg-dev_1.4.0.19

  o  dpkg-ftp_1.4.9

  3.  Development

  If you wish to do libc6 development, you should first purge all the
  '-dev' packages on your system, the new development system will use
  packages with the suffix '-dev' for libc6 development and '-altdev'
  for libc5 development.  You will wish to install the latest libc5
  package, and altgcc if you wish continue to do libc5 development as
  well.  Some libraries haven't been recompiled for the new libc6 yet,
  check that all your vital libraries are available before upgrading.
  Linking libc5-based libraries with libc6-based programs will have
  unpredictable results.

  4.  Concerns

  4.1.  Upgrading bash

  The package bash_2.01-1 requires that you have libreadlineg2_2.1-3 or
  greater installed.  If you install the new bash package before
  installing the new libreadlineg2, you will break your system.
  bash_2.01-2 has the appropriate predepends lines, but may not yet be
  to your mirror.

  4.2.  /sbin/e2fsck

  The e2fsck program in e2fsprogs_1.10-4 has a bug in it which will
  cause it to destroy data on partitions above 2GB in size.  The version
  in e2fsprogs_1.10-5 has fixed this bug.  IMPORTANT: If you run the
  older libc6-based e2fsck on a 2 GB or greater partition, YOU WILL LOSE
  DATA.

  4.3.  /usr/bin/gencat

  Note also that both the man-db and the libc6-dev packages currently
  include /usr/bin/gencat.  The version of gencat in libc6-dev has been
  reported to cause segfault problems with man-db, you may wish to
  reinstall man-db after libc6-dev if you experience these problems.

- -- 
   Scott K. Ellis

Re: libc6 upgrade

1997-09-06 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Fri, 5 Sep 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Im trying to upgrade to libc6 and following the howto, the problem Im
 getting is this:
 
  Shadow:~# dpkg -B --install libc6_2.0.4-1.deb
  dpkg: considering removing libc5 in favour of libc6 ...
  dpkg: no, debianutils is essential, will not deconfigure
   it in order to enable removal of libc5.
  dpkg: regarding libc6_2.0.4-1.deb containing libc6:
   libc5 conflicts with libc6
libc6 (version 2.0.4-1) is to be installed.
  dpkg: error processing libc6_2.0.4-1.deb (--install):
   conflicting packages - not installing libc6
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   libc6_2.0.4-1.deb

Okay, what version of libc5 do you have?  This shouldn't happen, libc5
and libc6 coexist quite peacefully.  Make sure you're using the latest
libc5 from bo.

- -- 
   |   The bond that links your true family is not
Scott K. Ellis |  one of blood, but of respect and joy in each
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | other's life. Rarely do members of one
   |   family grow up under the same roof.
   |  -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNBDNpaCk2fENdzpVAQFnWQP/VQsq80vtm57E+wWkLpl9pFFQ5M+WCaLH
39l5hHnWTg3wbWPgt9vISF6gzr17mWjJzcPHTI9+CFM697pmKEgR1uspGbAzJadU
6PcvNiyNC6Gtrpic/LITd8Su4cKdwPLL1+LrmPN6MapQkIJ1bJIjAMynBvYTeL6R
E6D2eG09VAE=
=xd8m
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Netscape installation problems

1997-09-02 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Mon, 1 Sep 1997, Dave Neuer wrote:

 I am trying to install Netscape 3.01 on my Debian system.  The machine
 running debian has no connection to the Internet, so to transfer files
 to the Debian box, I have to first download them onto my PowerMac, and
 then transfer them over my local network.  The mac doesn't like the name
 netscape-v301-export.x86-unknown-linux-elf.tar.gz, and so truncates it
 to netscape-v301-export.x86-unknow.  I transfered the file to the
 Linux box, and then attempted to run the Debian netscape installer, and
 got the following message:
 
 ERROR: The Netscape archive must be in /tmp under the name:
/tmp/netscape-v301-export.x86-unknown-linux-elf.tar.[gz|Z]
 
Do NOT simply rename the archive of another version in order to
force it to install with this package.  It will not work.
 
Archive files can be found on ftp.netscape.com.
 
 dpkg: error processing netscape (--install):
  subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
 Errors were encountered while processing:
  netscape

Um, rename the archive to what it's expecting.  The warning is to make
sure you don't try to install a DIFFERENT VERSION of Netscape with this
installer package.  Correcting a mangled filename can't change anything.

- -- 
   |In order to live freely and happily,
  Scott K. Ellis   | you must sacrifice boredom.
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   | It is not always an easy sacrifice.
   |-- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNAszxaCk2fENdzpVAQHvaAQAg13k7AelwZP+7g3SCJ30gTTvqxqH2hC5
WRErp7lBMU0T560PlpC53OlkhhJ5dFSvIwoMHgO7Z+VgeMBWaH0TAJsBk3/pt71R
qOqs+hoRz0KpLbkQ+eHilgZsMh33b4EWJtUxh6IzuPKmZHa/gjwCahwyoAyHV6O9
4zMTZelzkb8=
=jTvI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Lost the POP in smail.

1997-09-02 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Tue, 2 Sep 1997, Anthony Landreneau wrote:

   While doing some software upgrades to my debian box I lost the POP3
 ability.  Tried to reinstall smail, nothing, sendmail, nothing.  Eudora
 will connect to the box, but as it starts to log in it will just hang.
   Any ideas on what could have happened and were I could look to respovle
 the situation?
   I am still getting incoming mail, and the outgoing mail does not seem to
 be effected in any way, just can't get the mail with an outside reader.
 All help would be MUCH appreciated.

What happened is that the POP3 server was removed from the netstd package
since both qpopper and cucipop are far superior.  Install one of those
packages and you'll get your POP3 server back.

- -- 
   Scott K. Ellis|The reason angels can fly is that
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]| they take themselves so lightly.
 |-- G.K. Chesterson

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNAxZt6Ck2fENdzpVAQHKBAP+Iy5JeZuh9yWzgDO0cUunlQOftJhvIjR1
EK2roQx8jZfra6/PABcFkNaGtRSKjejgbSzMqE+ZeBUqc8DAV4+SpRqKzctXDIDW
AE8nbDl2ZqocEospiBIW2Zi2KwuvyYUu8bXfBmEXdmhaViemDLKIxKF1UChIo8iI
KMdfieZHxCs=
=Ga3B
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Debian libc5 to libc6 Mini-HOWTO

1997-09-02 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

  Debian libc5 to libc6 Mini-HOWTO
  Scott K. Ellis, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  $Id: libc5-libc6-Mini-HOWTO.sgml,v 2.4 1997/08/28 22:02:32
  storm Exp $

  1.  Introduction

  The Debian project is currently in the process of putting together the
  next release of the Debian system.  This version will utilize the new
  libc6, a replacement for the prior libc5 which includes many
  enhancements and brings the Linux C library back into sync with the
  GNU project.  We are doing this in a way to allow you to continue to
  utilize your older software by providing development and operating
  environments for both C libraries.  However, all packages in the new
  release will be linked with the new C library.  This has made it
  slightly more difficult to install packages from the unstable branch
  of our development tree into a working system.  There is a slight
  possibility of making your system unbootable in the process, this
  guide is intended to help you avoid such problems.

  1.1.  Recent Changes:

  o  Note about libc6-based e2fsck being bad for large partitions.

  o  Reorganized slightly and added more information about possible
 problems.

  o  Moved ldso above libc6, incase they have an ancient ldso.

  o  Raised versions required for bash and libreadline(g)2 to the
 official maintainer versions to avoid possible version mismatch
 breakage.

  o  Added a note saying that allowing dselect to upgrade the listed
 packages might result in an unbootable system.

  o  Added ncurses3.0 to list of packages after realizing that
 libreadline2 depended on it.  This may not be necessary, as
 everyone should already have ncurses3.0 installed.

  1.2.  Finding updates

  The latest version of this Mini-HOWTO in HTML format should be located
  at http://www.gate.net/~storm/FAQ/libc5-libc6-Mini-HOWTO.html.  The
  SGML source should also be available as libc5-libc6-Mini-HOWTO.sgml in
  the same directory.

  1.3.  Disclaimer

  As always, this document comes with NO WARRANTY.  These comments are
  based on my personal experience and experimentation.  While this
  worked for me off a freshly installed v1.3.1 system, you mileage may
  vary.  Please send any comments or corrections to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  2.  Requirements

  2.1.  Minimum Requirements

  The minimum list of packages to install to be able to run unstable-
  branch packages is below.  Install these packages one at a time in
  exactly the order listed.  When versions are mentioned, that is a
  minimum suggested version, any later version should also be
  acceptable.

  IMPORTANT: If you use dselect to do the initial upgrade to these
  packages, there is a very good possibility of breaking bash and
  therefore making your system unusable.

  o  ldso_1.9.5-1

  o  libc6_2.0.4-1

  o  ncurses3.0_1.9.9e-2

  o  ncurses3.4_1.9.9g-3

  o  libreadline2_2.1-4

  o  libreadlineg2_2.1-4

  o  bash_2.01-2

  2.2.  Other Suggested Packages

  These packages are not absolutely essential for the functioning of the
  packages in unstable, but are still very useful.  The new dpkg-dev may
  be necessary for unpacking source archives from unstable, and the new
  dpkg-ftp is needed if you wish to use the ftp method of dselect to
  upgrade your system to the unstable distribution.

  o  libg++272_2.7.2.5-2

  o  dpkg_1.4.0.19

  o  dpkg-dev_1.4.0.19

  o  dpkg-ftp_1.4.9

  3.  Development

  If you wish to do libc6 development, you should first purge all the
  '-dev' packages on your system, the new development system will use
  packages with the suffix '-dev' for libc6 development and '-altdev'
  for libc5 development.  You will wish to install the latest libc5
  package, and altgcc if you wish continue to do libc5 development as
  well.  Some libraries haven't been recompiled for the new libc6 yet,
  check that all your vital libraries are available before upgrading.
  Linking libc5-based libraries with libc6-based programs will have
  unpredictable results.

  4.  Concerns

  4.1.  Upgrading bash

  The package bash_2.01-1 requires that you have libreadlineg2_2.1-3 or
  greater installed.  If you install the new bash package before
  installing the new libreadlineg2, you will break your system.
  bash_2.01-2 has the appropriate predepends lines, but may not yet be
  to your mirror.

  4.2.  /sbin/e2fsck

  The e2fsck program in e2fsprogs_1.10-4 has a bug in it which will
  cause it to destroy data on partitions above 2GB in size.  The version
  in e2fsprogs_1.10-5 has fixed this bug.  IMPORTANT: If you run the
  older libc6-based e2fsck on a 2 GB or greater partition, YOU WILL LOSE
  DATA.

  4.3.  /usr/bin/gencat

  Note also that both the man-db and the libc6-dev packages currently
  include /usr/bin/gencat.  The version of gencat in libc6-dev has been
  reported to cause segfault problems with man-db, you may wish to
  reinstall man-db after libc6-dev if you experience these problems.

- -- 
   Scott K. Ellis

Debian libc5 to libc6 Mini-HOWTO (regular posting)

1997-08-28 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

  Debian libc5 to libc6 Mini-HOWTO
  Scott K. Ellis, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  v2.1, August 22, 1997

  1.  Introduction

  The Debian project is currently in the process of putting together the
  next release of the Debian system.  This version will utilize the new
  libc6, a replacement for the prior libc5 which includes many
  enhancements and brings the Linux C library back into sync with the
  GNU project.  We are doing this in a way to allow you to continue to
  utilize your older software by providing development and operating
  environments for both C libraries.  However, all packages in the new
  release will be linked with the new C library.  This has made it
  slightly more difficult to install packages from the unstable branch
  of our development tree into a working system.  There is a slight
  possibility of making your system unbootable in the process, this
  guide is intended to help you avoid such problems.

  1.1.  Recent Changes:

  o  Note about libc6-based e2fsck being bad for large partitions.

  o  Reorganized slightly and added more information about possible
 problems.

  o  Moved ldso above libc6, incase they have an ancient ldso.

  o  Raised versions required for bash and libreadline(g)2 to the
 official maintainer versions to avoid possible version mismatch
 breakage.

  o  Added a note saying that allowing dselect to upgrade the listed
 packages might result in an unbootable system.

  o  Added ncurses3.0 to list of packages after realizing that
 libreadline2 depended on it.  This may not be necessary, as
 everyone should already have ncurses3.0 installed.

  1.2.  Disclaimer

  As always, this document comes with NO WARRANTY.  These comments are
  based on my personal experience and experimentation.  While this
  worked for me off a freshly installed v1.3.1 system, you mileage may
  vary.  Please send any comments or corrections to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  2.  Requirements

  2.1.  Minimum Requirements

  The minimum list of packages to install to be able to run unstable-
  branch packages is below.  Install these packages one at a time in
  exactly the order listed.  When versions are mentioned, that is a
  minimum suggested version, any later version should also be
  acceptable.

  IMPORTANT: If you use dselect to do the initial upgrade to these
  packages, there is a very good possibility of breaking bash and
  therefore making your system unusable.

  o  ldso_1.9.5-1

  o  libc6_2.0.4-1

  o  ncurses3.0_1.9.9e-2

  o  ncurses3.4_1.9.9g-3

  o  libreadline2_2.1-4

  o  libreadlineg2_2.1-4

  o  bash_2.01-2

  2.2.  Other Suggested Packages

  These packages are not absolutely essential for the functioning of the
  packages in unstable, but are still very useful.  The new dpkg-dev may
  be necessary for unpacking source archives from unstable, and the new
  dpkg-ftp is needed if you wish to use the ftp method of dselect to
  upgrade your system to the unstable distribution.

  o  libg++272_2.7.2.5-2

  o  dpkg_1.4.0.19

  o  dpkg-dev_1.4.0.19

  o  dpkg-ftp_1.4.9

  3.  Development

  If you wish to do libc6 development, you should first purge all the
  '-dev' packages on your system, the new development system will use
  packages with the suffix '-dev' for libc6 development and '-altdev'
  for libc5 development.  You will wish to install the latest libc5
  package, and altgcc if you wish continue to do libc5 development as
  well.  Some libraries haven't been recompiled for the new libc6 yet,
  check that all your vital libraries are available before upgrading.
  Linking libc5-based libraries with libc6-based programs will have
  unpredictable results.

  4.  Concerns

  4.1.  Upgrading bash

  The package bash_2.01-1 requires that you have libreadlineg2_2.1-3 or
  greater installed.  If you install the new bash package before
  installing the new libreadlineg2, you will break your system.
  bash_2.01-2 has the appropriate predepends lines, but may not yet be
  to your mirror.

  4.2.  /sbin/e2fsck

  The e2fsck program in e2fsprogs_1.10-4 has a bug in it which will
  cause it to destroy data on partitions above 2GB in size.  The version
  in e2fsprogs_1.10-5 has fixed this bug.  IMPORTANT: If you run the
  older libc6-based e2fsck on a 2 GB or greater partition, YOU WILL LOSE
  DATA.

  4.3.  /usr/bin/gencat

  Note also that both the man-db and the libc6-dev packages currently
  include /usr/bin/gencat.  The version of gencat in libc6-dev has been
  reported to cause segfault problems with man-db, you may wish to
  reinstall man-db after libc6-dev if you experience these problems.

- -- 
   Scott K. Ellis | Argue for your limitations, and
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] |   sure enough, they're yours.
  |   -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNAWWkKCk2fENdzpVAQH1swP/ffZzw213MhQRrqIJxwfjLIErbs4UzVLP

Re: Debian libc5 to libc6 Mini-HOWTO (regular posting)

1997-08-28 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Thu, 28 Aug 1997, Bart Schuller wrote:

 You might also want to mention perl and libgdbm. I can't tell you
 exactly what went wrong, but both machines I upgraded had a core-dumping
 perl. With lots of install scripts written in perl that makes a fine
 mess.
 
 I think the first time perl crashed it was because the old perl couldn't
 handle the new locale files. The second time was due to a wrong
 libgdbm-something.

I'd be happy to if you can provide me with some details, I haven't
experienced that particular problem myself.  If you can give me package
version numbers (and assuming that the current packages in the archive are
broken), I'd be happy to write about it.  I've got a spare partition that
I don't mind breaking to test stuff, but I need versions and installation
order.

- -- 
   |Your friends will know you better in the
Scott K. Ellis | first minute you meet than your acquaintances
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   will know you in a thousand years.
   |  -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNAWxYqCk2fENdzpVAQEKEgQAnmOwA/pDP0EqD8yOhbJ4Sox0oUsRCb/V
Ld6V4fv33HnW45HACmZn0tYzbpRAoU7FpgGtvkU9AHM+JYJDW20I9MPvSLrQTyWH
bFDB9LSiALdEDrnFUhX3TdIfMayNmNhq4DxMt447HWJ368wUkl5r45he0k9PMbyf
A6XJaYCH/80=
=gfdJ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Qmail package, where?

1997-08-27 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Wed, 27 Aug 1997, Paulo Almeida wrote:

 I am looking for the qmail package so that I can install it on a debian
 platform. Unfortunately I was unable to find it so far. Can anyone
 please tell me where I might find the package. (the complete url would
 be appreciated)

It is available in your local debian mirror at
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/project/experimental/qmail*

- -- 
   |Your friends will know you better in the
Scott K. Ellis | first minute you meet than your acquaintances
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   will know you in a thousand years.
   |  -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNAQ6XqCk2fENdzpVAQFBmwP/aNtMJuuLhXdIzdtSHgdGlF80MFhYM9RK
VfIXMMfwK9dgZ0x5qJ7CUmu0MlZldysfR3Je+zVDOqrzq9Xf1AsKUlF8wqO/vD3x
DspzRzqkz9QayCP8iTC4kjg+xUrYeHkNU17OT4/NqsKPgaMnNoafs693gsLThUgn
wwLS7o+XYxQ=
=MoZH
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Debian only like larger businesses

1997-08-22 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Fri, 22 Aug 1997, Paul Wade wrote:

 It's time to face the music. Your Official CD program will not work. After
 all, if I press 2000 sets tomorrow will you hold the release numbers for
 another month? Do you have to check in with multiple vendors and get their
 'blessing' before 1.3.next is released? If you keep this up, another
 Debian group will emerge and it will all become very counter-productive.

The official CD worked for me, it helped me FINALLY get a CD from a vendor
that actually worked the first time around, unlike the last two mistakes
from InfoMagic.  In fact, now I have 2 of them, the 1.3.0 one from LSL,
and the 1.3.1 one from CheapBytes.  If you want to start a different
Debian-based group and engineer the releases your way, GO AHEAD!

I think I echo the sentiment of most of the developers when I say that I'm
sick of someone who hasn't put an ounce of work into adding anything into
Debian complaining about something this minor.  There is nothing stopping
you from making an updated CD, the tools even exist to merge all of
bo-updates into the main tree and generate new package files.  Do that if
you wish, but in any case, GO AWAY!

- -- 
   |In order to live freely and happily,
  Scott K. Ellis   | you must sacrifice boredom.
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   | It is not always an easy sacrifice.
   |-- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM/2doKCk2fENdzpVAQFyvgP/fAxFo9jhh/w4N7unKivE1v9dvoD++z59
ec5pTP/JXpSQyoNvs1Cz6Nc5yRUrIj3lJ9+ELU1PChC2DaNhtCbad3EDQxFun3qA
sXEHRVfRaP1PiyHxgYE/T8d32tQLbt+jSyG96iuoJDceG9YqCcnF6znxnsj4dBrV
16BsfIY71kc=
=1zwd
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Forking debian-user?

1997-08-22 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

[First off, fix your reply-to address.]

On Fri, 22 Aug 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Certainly as a longstanding kibitzer on this list, it is none of my business.
 However, I would like nevertheless to point out the following, relevent to
 recent suggestions that the list splinter into two or more offspring:
 
 Over approximately a 12 hour period today, I received debian-user digests
 containing approximately the following balance of postings:
 
Discussion of debian administrative matters, etc.: 60 posts.
Help requests, and responses:  44 posts.
 
 The discussions have been lively and interesting, by the way.  Flames were
 (needlessly) thrown.  

The admin stuff really belonged in debian-devel or debian-policy, no real
need to split the group.  Just that a certain person decided to start the
flamewar in this group and it's a little hard to move without the
possibility of being flamed for trying to conceal the discussion.

 The Debian watchword has been from early on, a system that can be painlessly
 upgraded.  At least twice, this watchword has failed---when a.out moved over
 to ELF, and when libc5 moved over to libc6.  In between these big changes,
 have been an endless stream of smaller changes.  

Well, libc5 to libc6 can be fairly painless, although it does require a
special procedure.  However, the procedure is documented in the Mini-HOWTO
which I post here and on debian-devel from time to time.  We've done it
better than anyone else, is there another distribution you could upgrade
past a.out without reinstalling?  I think we'll have the best libc6 
upgrade procedure too, but since we're the only ones with it public, I
really can't tell for sure.

- -- 
   |In order to live freely and happily,
  Scott K. Ellis   | you must sacrifice boredom.
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   | It is not always an easy sacrifice.
   |-- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCUAwUBM/2fbKCk2fENdzpVAQF4egP46ayHNCV45xwz/pfNHAeFcH3FZCrS8t7I
yaQ3URt6f0srBJTFqBmS1LFUy0If/XzuPKSDVxQvMsBc9X9TV7o6HKQgJUBKDh1o
mjtb99gz6qGYoPjI7i10NsIF0alJlZZDJP7InzR19CcCeBZX1v41CNaNtnJo1uJ2
s3sESpOWZg==
=1QL/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Debian libc5 to libc6 Mini-HOWTO (regular posting, updated)

1997-08-20 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

  Debian libc5 to libc6 Mini-HOWTO
  Scott K. Ellis, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  v2.0, August 19, 1997

  1.  Introduction

  The Debian project is currently in the process of putting together the
  next release of the Debian system.  This version will utilize the new
  libc6, a replacement for the prior libc5 which includes many
  enhancements and brings the Linux C library back into sync with the
  GNU project.  We are doing this in a way to allow you to continue to
  utilize your older software by providing development and operating
  environments for both C libraries.  However, all packages in the new
  release will be linked with the new C library.  This has made it
  slightly more difficult to install packages from the unstable branch
  of our development tree into a working system.  There is a slight
  possibility of making your system unbootable in the process, this
  guide is intended to help you avoid such problems.

  1.1.  Recent Changes:

  o  Reorganized slightly and added more information about possible
 problems.

  o  Moved ldso above libc6, incase they have an ancient ldso.

  o  Raised versions required for bash and libreadline(g)2 to the
 official maintainer versions to avoid possible version mismatch
 breakage.

  o  Added a note saying that allowing dselect to upgrade the listed
 packages might result in an unbootable system.

  o  Added ncurses3.0 to list of packages after realizing that
 libreadline2 depended on it.  This may not be necessary, as
 everyone should already have ncurses3.0 installed.

  1.2.  Disclaimer

  As always, this document comes with NO WARRANTY.  These comments are
  based on my personal experience and experimentation.  While this
  worked for me off a freshly installed v1.3.1 system, you mileage may
  vary.  Please send any comments or corrections to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  2.  Requirements

  2.1.  Minimum Requirements

  The minimum list of packages to install to be able to run unstable-
  branch packages is below.  Install these packages one at a time in
  exactly the order listed.  When versions are mentioned, that is a
  minimum suggested version, any later version should also be
  acceptable.

  IMPORTANT: If you use dselect to do the initial upgrade to these
  packages, there is a very good possibility of breaking bash and
  therefore making your system unusable.

  o  ldso_1.9.5-1

  o  libc6_2.0.4-1

  o  ncurses3.0_1.9.9e-2

  o  ncurses3.4_1.9.9g-3

  o  libreadline2_2.1-3

  o  libreadlineg2_2.1-3

  o  bash_2.01-1

  2.2.  Other Suggested Packages

  These packages are not absolutely essential for the functioning of the
  packages in unstable, but are still very useful.  The new dpkg-dev may
  be necessary for unpacking source archives from unstable, and the new
  dpkg-ftp is needed if you wish to use the ftp method of dselect to
  upgrade your system to the unstable distribution.

  o  libg++272_2.7.2.5-2

  o  dpkg_1.4.0.19

  o  dpkg-dev_1.4.0.19

  o  dpkg-ftp_1.4.9

  3.  Development

  If you wish to do libc6 development, you should first purge all the
  '-dev' packages on your system, the new development system will use
  packages with the suffix '-dev' for libc6 development and '-altdev'
  for libc5 development.  You will wish to install the latest libc5
  package, and altgcc if you wish continue to do libc5 development as
  well.  Some libraries haven't been recompiled for the new libc6 yet,
  check that all your vital libraries are available before upgrading.
  Linking libc5-based libraries with libc6-based programs will have
  unpredictable results.

  4.  Concerns

  4.1.  Upgrading bash

  The package bash_2.01-1 requires that you have libreadlineg2_2.1-3 or
  greater installed.  If you install the new bash package before
  installing the new libreadlineg2, you will break your system.
  bash_2.01-2 has the appropriate predepends lines, but may not yet be
  to your mirror.

  4.2.  /usr/bin/gencat

  Note also that both the man-db and the libc6-dev packages currently
  include /usr/bin/gencat.  The version of gencat in libc6-dev has been
  reported to cause segfault problems with man-db, you may wish to
  reinstall man-db after libc6-dev if you experience these problems.

- -- 
   |In order to live freely and happily,
  Scott K. Ellis   | you must sacrifice boredom.
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   | It is not always an easy sacrifice.
   |-- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM/pT9qCk2fENdzpVAQFNggP/XPw2QZ5AU0cGb4sYAy2a1JcaiKPjKzKr
xRQcLDI688KtGkBjoZTkkY6BTll+/yyyJBzTV58TuXzibwfjQ3ElNbdXeYI8zppL
DF8VYXtJmpLdJ6ieFtlndL+2egKM61ISCT9m686a7DbNLrX0eKGrKydeH2FCiRtl
cKBJ9pkOiLM=
=WYUb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: rl_get_string_value_hook in bash 2.01-1 (unstable) question

1997-08-19 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Tue, 19 Aug 1997, Frits Daalmans wrote:

 I nearly crashed my system today when, after a successfull upgrade to
 libc6 (according to the mini-HOWTO described in Debian-user)
 I upgraded from bash 2.01-0.1 to bash 2.01-1.
[snipped]
 My question is:
 In which library does rl_get_string_value_hook() reside?
 What does it do?

That is a known problem of upgrading your bash to 2.01-1 before upgrading
libreadlineg2 to 2.1-3.  Version 2.01-2 of bash will have predepends to
prevent that from happening.  Basically, you need to upgrade libreadlineg2
first.

- -- 
   |   The bond that links your true family is not
Scott K. Ellis |  one of blood, but of respect and joy in each
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | other's life. Rarely do members of one
   |   family grow up under the same roof.
   |  -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM/nQu6Ck2fENdzpVAQFEFQQAlyJYNr5X1e8cZxCA4uhPOHQZyGiigSBB
vO4KrzzUQ82PSNISIjZXwM/LInKnWBlztpY2lrf2NTrTUMolKVcZH0OAoHdoqEdb
rEVCSPnD7WB4kGh0/THbYi1Cr6KluWlOC7YSa0T7KFtA0su2ma29oWtzYGU0yIMI
5zn9hikHwPw=
=l+1/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: FTP Server

1997-08-18 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Sun, 17 Aug 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi, I just switched from slackware to debian linux.  In slackware when I
 typed ftp localhost I could test to see if my ftp connection was working, but
 in debian I type ftp localhost I get a error message saying connection
 refused, the same applies to telnet.  Also, I only have the base package
 installed right now.  Do I need another package to accept ftp connections?

Yes, the netstd package includes all the daemons for ftp, telnet, etc.
The base packages are intended to get the system to a state where it is
bootable, you should install the required and recommended packages (at
least) with dselect.

- -- 
   |   The bond that links your true family is not
Scott K. Ellis |  one of blood, but of respect and joy in each
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | other's life. Rarely do members of one
   |   family grow up under the same roof.
   |  -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM/e0nKCk2fENdzpVAQGdGgP+NNVkh215ctSiXWxqBLbQMEDi7Jdwb2XS
eITOJHmyFqnRwdDhw2cBChXkE0qTnbKAn46zlRUwdAONYdC5o+Sl9y3W00BHLCoK
TRfvlxc/mRSVLaDsVsoAZvcgs/mfWCXfduCXcJL5/enpKm8K6/pvxtHSNmMwNtbP
fC6MQ0YzTII=
=vEY0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Debian libc5 to libc6 Mini-HOWTO (regular posting)

1997-08-17 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Sat, 16 Aug 1997, Brandon Mitchell wrote:

 Scott, I had some problems.  Specifically:
 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED](p1):bhmit1$ /bin/bash
   /bin/bash: error in loading shared libraries
   : undefined symbol: rl_get_string_value_hook
 
o  libc6_2.0.4-1  - check
o  ldso_1.9.5-1   - check
o  ncurses3.4_1.9.9g-3- check
o  libreadline2_2.1-2.1   - check
o  libreadlineg2_2.1-2.1  - check
o  bash_2.01-0.1  - failed in post install from above error
 
 I also installed libdl1-dev_1.9.5-1.deb because of an ldconfig error:

Okay, I'm pretty much stumped by this problem.  I can't manage to get it
to reproduce itself.  If possible, could you back out those packages to
the stable ones (where applicable, remove the others) and try again with
the new bash and libreadline packages that were recently uploaded
(bash_2.01-2 and libreadline*-4 I think) and see if you have the same
problem?  If the problem goes away, I'll modify the mini-howto to specify
the later versions of the packages.

[I'd also appreciate it if someone with better knowledge of the
appropriate packages could take a look at this, where is that symbol
hiding and what might have broken it?]

 ldconfig: warning: can't open /usr/lib/libreadline.so (No such file or
 directory), skipping
 [ started after libreadline, fixed after libreadlineg ]
 
 ldconfig: warning: can't open /usr/lib/libhistory.so (No such file or
 directory), skipping
 [ same as above ]
 
 ldconfig: warning: can't open /usr/lib/libdl.so (No such file or
 directory), skipping
 [ started after ldso I think, probably an earlier problem with my system.
 It was fixed by installing libdl1-dev ]

Those ldconfig warnings are usually a symptom of a package being out of
sync with its coresponding '-dev' package.  It can be safely ignored until
you upgrade the '-dev' package, just don't compile programs with those
libs until then.

- -- 
   Scott K. Ellis|The reason angels can fly is that
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]| they take themselves so lightly.
 |-- G.K. Chesterson

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM/aEaKCk2fENdzpVAQEg4gQArKmlKQMVHtChlF+i1e1sHa6um59aE2+/
G3IhECVtFUbHV4R1cXJWpnAVyaicJTcNAnnvfTBs5Se+mJNWDQNsoGrnS92eGziO
2+K9UzjFwnKm6zWjBEuBVG+YDJKRop4H1141H/32ZSozj2tr1FPJap37zv9halob
taLGrPFvyJk=
=wLx/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Debian libc5 to libc6 Mini-HOWTO (regular posting, updated)

1997-08-17 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

  Debian libc5 to libc6 Mini-HOWTO
  Scott K. Ellis, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  v1.6, August 17, 1997

  Recent Changes:

  o  Moved ldso above libc6, incase they have an ancient ldso.

  o  Raised versions required for bash and libreadline(g)2 to the
 official maintainer versions to avoid possible version mismatch
 breakage.

  o  Added a note saying that allowing dselect to upgrade the listed
 packages might result in an unbootable system.

  o  Added ncurses3.0 to list of packages after realizing that
 libreadline2 depended on it.  This may not be necessary, as
 everyone should already have ncurses3.0 installed.

  1.  Introduction

  The Debian project is currently in the process of putting together the
  next release of the Debian system.  This version will utilize the new
  libc6, a replacement for the prior libc5 which includes many
  enhancements and brings the Linux C library back into sync with the
  GNU project.  We are doing this in a way to allow you to continue to
  utilize your older software by providing development and operating
  environments for both C libraries.  However, all packages in the new
  release will be linked with the new C library.  This has made it
  slightly more difficult to install packages from the unstable branch
  of our development tree into a working system.  There is a slight
  possibility of making your system unbootable in the process, this
  guide is intended to help you avoid such problems.

  2.  Requirements

  2.1.  Minimum Requirements

  The minimum list of packages to install to be able to run unstable-
  branch packages is below.  Install these packages one at a time in
  exactly the order listed.  When versions are mentioned, that is a
  minimum suggested version, any later version should also be
  acceptable.

  IMPORTANT: If you use dselect to do the initial upgrade to these
  packages, there is a very good possibility of breaking bash and
  therefore making your system unusable.

  o  ldso_1.9.5-1

  o  libc6_2.0.4-1

  o  ncurses3.0_1.9.9e-2

  o  ncurses3.4_1.9.9g-3

  o  libreadline2_2.1-3

  o  libreadlineg2_2.1-3

  o  bash_2.01-1

  2.2.  Other Suggested Packages

  These packages are not absolutely essential for the functioning of the
  packages in unstable, but are still very useful.  The new dpkg-dev may
  be necessary for unpacking source archives from unstable, and the new
  dpkg-ftp is needed if you wish to use the ftp method of dselect to
  upgrade your system to the unstable distribution.

  o  libg++272_2.7.2.5-2

  o  dpkg_1.4.0.19

  o  dpkg-dev_1.4.0.19

  o  dpkg-ftp_1.4.9

  3.  Development

  If you wish to do libc6 development, you should first purge all the
  '-dev' packages on your system, the new development system will use
  packages with the suffix '-dev' for libc6 development and '-altdev'
  for libc5 development.  You will wish to install the latest libc5
  package, and altgcc if you wish continue to do libc5 development as
  well.  Some libraries haven't been recompiled for the new libc6 yet,
  check that all your vital libraries are available before upgrading.
  Linking libc5-based libraries with libc6-based programs will have
  unpredictable results.

  4.  Concerns

  Note also that both the man-db and the libc6-dev packages currently
  include /usr/bin/gencat.  The version of gencat in libc6-dev has been
  reported to cause segfault problems with man-db, you may wish to
  reinstall man-db after libc6-dev if you experience these problems.

  5.  Disclaimer

  As always, this document comes with NO WARRANTY.  These comments are
  based on my personal experience and experimentation.  While this
  worked for me off a freshly installed v1.3.1 system, you mileage may
  vary.  Please send any comments or corrections to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

- -- 
  |   You are never given a wish without also
 Scott K. Ellis   |being given the power to make it true.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |You may have to work for it, however.
  | -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM/csw6Ck2fENdzpVAQFOjwP9FCB2X967RwVrt6sTis3BFJpNN36o9X+v
SLT56Cp179FiuM2p+DIRzUxbZEQoLZJMvMe842kpL16hd3iVGcxkG5hyyiNWiZeU
CvVYKRqmi3sSP7+MJBCPDxNK6gCGvP0ER5zR4x6o/eOx/6TefKpOBIJA+cNuomi8
gv+TSk/7tvU=
=6uh0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: ? about Debian libc5 to libc6 Mini-HOWTO

1997-08-16 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Sat, 16 Aug 1997, Ricardo Muggli wrote:

 Two days or so ago the  Debian libc5 to libc6 Mini-HOWTO was posted here.
 I was wondering if it is okay to 
 1. use dselect and connect to a local ftp mirror
 2. When prompted for Enter space seperated list of distributions to get
during setting up the FTP Access Method, enter hamm/hamm
 3. update the package list
 4. unselect everything that is selected by default
 5. select the packages that are listed in the Mini-HOWTO
 6. and install
 
 My main concern is that each of these packages have many depencies. Should
 I accept the default dependencies or should I override them so I ONLY
 install the packages listed in the Mini-HOWTO?

The packages listed to be installed are complete to themselves, they need
to be installed manually.  If you use dselect-ftp to upgrade them, you
stand a high risk of breaking bash and making your system unbootable.  The
list I posted, when installed one-at-a-time in the exact order listed,
doesn't mess up your system.  I wrote the list after several people
encountered problems upgrading.  The base problem is with new libreadline
packages screwing up if installed in the wrong order.  I've run the
install as listed on a clean v1.3.1 system and it worked flawlessly.

- -- 
   |   The bond that links your true family is not
Scott K. Ellis |  one of blood, but of respect and joy in each
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | other's life. Rarely do members of one
   |   family grow up under the same roof.
   |  -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM/YleqCk2fENdzpVAQFVqwP+Nm+DeIPW4lRLnPxUzuxw/L+SVL8KQUy+
IxYsuCoVnhBh/LtRui/LA39GBUkbjWy7rEl37cMEnND9D2Z0ttNkW526mBL4V+hG
1SnrKjUJeSpEiDfs/u4ERZbtbz09G9P0ONoFliK0WwvYgQYrnfeD6dpEyo5bL6bu
c893FCeflvE=
=2IG6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Debian libc5 to libc6 Mini-HOWTO (regular posting)

1997-08-15 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

  Debian libc5 to libc6 Mini-HOWTO
  Scott K. Ellis, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  v1.3, August 14, 1997

  1.  Introduction

  The Debian project is currently in the process of putting together the
  next release of the Debian system.  This version will utilize the new
  libc6, a replacement for the prior libc5 which includes many
  enhancements and brings the linux C library back into sync with the
  GNU project.  We are doing this in a way to allow you to continue to
  utilize your older software by providing development and operating
  environments for both C libraries.  However, all packages in the new
  release will be linked with the new C library.  This has made it
  slightly more difficult to install packages from the unstable branch
  of our development tree into a working system.  There is a slight
  possibility of making your system unbootable in the process, this
  guide is intended to help you avoid such problems.

  2.  Minimum requirements

  The minimum list of packages to install to be able to run unstable-
  branch packages is below.  Install these packages one at a time in
  exactly the order listed.  When versions are mentioned, that is a
  minimum suggested version, any later version should also be
  acceptable.

  o  libc6_2.0.4-1

  o  ldso_1.9.5-1

  o  ncurses3.4_1.9.9g-3

  o  libreadline2_2.1-2.1

  o  libreadlineg2_2.1-2.1

  o  bash_2.01-0.1

  3.  Development

  If you wish to do libc6 development, you should first purge all the
  '-dev' packages on your system, the new development system will use
  packages with the suffix '-dev' for libc6 development and '-altdev'
  for libc5 development.  You will wish to install the latest libc5
  package, and altgcc if you wish continue to do libc5 development as
  well.  Some libraries haven't been recompiled for the new libc6 yet,
  check that all your vital libraries are available before upgrading.
  Linking libc5-based libraries with libc6-based programs will have
  unpredictable results.

  4.  Concerns

  Note also that both the man-db and the libc6-dev packages currently
  include /usr/bin/gencat.  The version of gencat in libc6-dev has been
  reported to cause segfault problems with man-db, you may wish to
  reinstall man-db after libc6-dev if you experience these problems.

  5.  Disclaimer

  As always, this document comes with NO WARRANTY.  These comments are
  based on my personal experience and experimentation.  While this
  worked for me off a freshly installed v1.3.1 system, you milage may
  vary.  Please send any comments or corrections to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

- -- 
 |The mark of your ignorance is the depth of
   Scott K. Ellis|   your belief in injustice and tragedy.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]| What the caterpillar calls the end of the world,
 |   the master calls a butterfly.
 |   -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM/PGC6Ck2fENdzpVAQFzRwP7Bx5JP0We8k2vBeXS+49kwHKX6K/KPLPC
CtGsvae3V628PIS+6dQZlMhU2rNTRNjhTa2SHbzkrefv7kEJMLnJVja8IIlzxr4y
5Yhh0iKvc6S5Cp2tXzCSYQ6piYJg2nhR2sq2b67FmOmPR/0uPAwlYnhyQuplbjGS
4JXjP7055as=
=hQzr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: system rescued, some quirks left

1997-08-15 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On 14 Aug 1997, Martin Steigerwald wrote:

 One problem is left... some of the new installed packages fail to
 post-install (dosemu for example) cause the command
 
 suidregister
 or
 suidunregister
 
 is not found, but needed by the script.
 
 These commands are actually not here, I tried in a shell. I
 re-installed all base packages with dpkg and there a no dependency
 problems anymore. 
 
 In which package can I find the above two commands?

suidmanager

Any package that doesn't put the suid(un)register commands in a
conditional statement should have a bug report filed against it, although
you may want to check that the package in unstable has the bug too before
reporting it.

- -- 
   |  Live never to be ashamed if anything
Scott K. Ellis | you do or say is published around the world --
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | even if what is published is not true.
   |  -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM/SBWaCk2fENdzpVAQHwVAP/b+8Bb8zL9baE/25b7PEGgDgJK/yEy6qQ
Tp1QbD37MvobL4bPFcMmYPVv73BBRtHWXbB9opyjwWgw2Or/E0xSszjYAgZEMklT
xa7Wm0NjQ+A+5JK8rOEhqeM3w2LLH9zUK7bHzVK+8HQlNeYY798Ithho75Uv1X11
mO+MyRimxj8=
=3mly
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Hamm?

1997-08-13 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Tue, 12 Aug 1997, Rick Jones wrote:

 I've been out of the loop for quite a while.  How do I install Hamm?  When
 I use debian/hamm for the start point and use hamm non-free contrib for
 packages I get the packages files but when I tell dselect to fetch it goes
 looking for a dists/main directory for every file, which it says doesn't
 exist.  This is using the ftp.debian.org site.

Use hamm/main hamm/contrib hamm/non-free for your distributions.

- -- 
   |Your friends will know you better in the
Scott K. Ellis | first minute you meet than your acquaintances
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   will know you in a thousand years.
   |  -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM/GzRaCk2fENdzpVAQF2qAP/VSey3I9hNgmjbfNiPTrJXKfXdVBen0io
AQ1qImN/dJZqx4JW8r4ZpeBmcmKBKu3QMbdAz889IiMazPUBWE+X+ZF3nDcqW4Ux
prEDO8Qtlo3IsgET+JXP0O8+0E2BsGGTKEjszwnRm2phzpeV0aQdMWPb/XqkQq74
Lv7maXkCECg=
=FPcU
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: 128MB of RAM?

1997-08-12 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Mon, 11 Aug 1997, Dan Dooher wrote:

 Gang,
 
 I'm testing the viability of a Debian Linux server and am having trouble
 with the OS *seeing* all the RAM.  The BIOS checks all 128MB
 of RAM.  But when I run dmesg it reports:
 
 $ dmesg |grep Memory
 Memory: 62740k/65536k available (1004k kernel code, 384k reserved, 1408k
 data)
 
 top also shows only 64MB of RAM.  Anybody have any ideas?

in /etc/lilo.conf
append=mem=128M

- -- 
   |Your friends will know you better in the
Scott K. Ellis | first minute you meet than your acquaintances
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   will know you in a thousand years.
   |  -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM+/GsKCk2fENdzpVAQEsKAQApgeiAiL4ggsIJVnVfuy3pFC6kEJ6Xe/h
rJ0B1adBzs0JNb6wBuAFatOcynnskNB6/DzVmQWaSZRBsMgpr/1WfX61wK4QKY0W
lU32J0YbQ5yNVN3Ucz+7rQ5gN8QxqCuC8ELsiGkLQpESTNdGj4f7xzjy3qVIl2qt
EYm303FVs6Y=
=JW6B
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Howto run glibc2.0 compiled programs on 1.3.1 system?

1997-08-12 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Tue, 12 Aug 1997, Peter Weiss wrote:

 Is there a safe way to install packages from hamm on a 1.3.1 system, that
 are linked with libc6?
 
 There are some (like gimp and gv) versions where only out-of-time
 versions exist for 1.3.1.

Note that this is a tenative draft of what will most likely become a
regular posting on this list as well as debian-devel.  If anyone sees any
glaring errors, please contact me about them.  I'd also like to know if
there'd be any interest in me packaging up a tar file with all the
relavant packages and a short script to install them in the correct order

Debian 1.3.x to Debian-unstable (codename hamm) guide (***DRAFT***)
===

The Debian project is currently in the process of putting together the next
release of the Debian system.  This version will utilize the new libc6, a
replacement for the prior libc5 which includes many enhancements and brings
the linux C library back into sync with the GNU project.  We are doing this
in a way to allow you to continue to utilize your older software by
providing development and operating environments for both C libraries. 
However, all packages in the new release will be linked with the new C
library.  This has made it slightly more difficult to install packages from
the unstable branch of our development tree into a working system.  There is
a slight possibility of making your system unbootable in the process, this
guide is intended to help you avoid such problems.

The minimum list of packages to install to be able to run unstable-branch
packages is below.  Install these packages one at a time in exactly the
order listed.  When versions are mentioned, that is a minimum suggested
version, any later version should also be acceptable.

libc6_2.0.4-1
ldso_1.9.5-1
libreadline2_2.1-2.1
ncurses3.4_1.9.9g-3
libreadlineg2_2.1-2.1
bash_2.01-0.1

If you wish to do libc6 development, you should first purge all the -dev
packages on your system, the new development system will use packages with
the suffix '-dev' for libc6 development and '-altdev' for libc5 development. 
You will wish to install the latest libc5 package, and altgcc if you wish
continue to do libc5 development as well.  Some libraries haven't been
recompiled for the new libc6 yet, check that all your vital libraries are
available before upgrading.  Linking libc5-based libraries with libc6-based
programs will have unpredictable results.

Note also that both the man-db and the libc6-dev packages currently include
/usr/bin/gencat.  The version of gencat in libc6-dev has been reported to
cause segfault problems with man-db, you may wish to reinstall man-db after
libc6-dev if you experience these problems.

- -- 
   |   The bond that links your true family is not
Scott K. Ellis |  one of blood, but of respect and joy in each
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | other's life. Rarely do members of one
   |   family grow up under the same roof.
   |  -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM/CRfKCk2fENdzpVAQHgwwP8DRgJBTkX56pvHU6klrti6jZZOdY2c6Vo
veYHy7lx35Wdcu+20ft09AxohJBPXSf69K8kzFAyw8GYCs/hL3krH15+uhFZscRE
4kkGAfrjqusafItAP5NwCCaaQ3GYdYqV1M6L/USaKDb7eUWaF/8++kvN9U8GaLXw
fNI4bzmb0XI=
=4v+U
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: kernal-package in stable not including config in /boot

1997-08-12 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Tue, 12 Aug 1997, Peter S Galbraith wrote:

 I see that the Debian `way' of placing kernels is:
 
 /vmlinuz - boot/vmlinuz-2.0.30
 /boot/vmlinuz-2.0.30
 /boot/psdatabase-2.0.30
 /boot/psdatabase - /boot/psdatabase-2.0.30
 /boot/System.map-2.0.30
 
 Why does my system appear to work fine without copying the System.map
 file anywhere?   What's its purpose?

System.map is a map of where various symbols are located in the kernel,
useful for lsof and a few other programs.  I believe klogd also uses it.

 What's the purpose of psdatabase?

psdatabase used to be used for the 'ps' and related commands and is most
likely obsolete now.  It has been removed from the latest kernel-package
generated kernels.

- -- 
   |   The bond that links your true family is not
Scott K. Ellis |  one of blood, but of respect and joy in each
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | other's life. Rarely do members of one
   |   family grow up under the same roof.
   |  -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM/CSKqCk2fENdzpVAQHf9wP/RbXWmt3+D84x7B6gFHhdi7h5w7u1RaHM
h87+1m2GIQJjus+7POAfkCrkIrLxLz6aF5lKEnEBGnDvmLFmDxCMJYIw8E4uWj9Y
GhDE9khrBJ8p4uvq8BOxLqmpIzVJzEbu9U9E2jLHYXKpx6kJjLbVNVARRirB6pmc
uu5kCyVmK74=
=G6i7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: mv directories to new partition; rm directories

1997-08-11 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Sun, 10 Aug 1997, Gary L. Dolan wrote:

 On Sun, Aug 10, 1997 at 05:21:23PM -0400, Scott K. Ellis wrote:
  On Sun, 10 Aug 1997, Gary L. Dolan wrote:
   When I attempted to remove (as root) an old subdirectory under
   /usr/local using  'rm -d', I got an Operation not permitted
   response. The info reference on 'rm' gives the '-d' option.
  
  You ABSOLUTLY NEVER want to use the -d option to rm.  That will seriously
  corrupt your filesystem (it deletes the directory inode without deleting
  the files in the directory).  The proper way to remove a directory and its
  comments is 'rm -rf dirname'
 Thanks for the information. If this is really a *bad* idea, it ought not
 to be in the info program as a viable option to rm without some explanation.

The man page at least, and I believe the info file, mention that any files
in the directory won't be deleted and you should run fsck.  The fact that
only root is allowed to use that option should also be a tip-off.

- -- 
 Scott K. Ellis  |  Thinking is more interesting than knowing,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  but less interesting than looking.
 |   -- Goethe

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM+6DjqCk2fENdzpVAQG9QgQAnAdf33Dk7px4ZecmMXFPcl+J65ulO46z
D1TAWbea7LYjD0uYu0csIDWjg2LUPrSfy/cerSjs2I2Q0geqWvtVoUpaUJwQG2d2
3l7hPbn+3XiFyo4nz+IIKpqIRiv+mh/gUdK/+39eipXss9QyLejPIpthrHa+XF3w
1+1jDmxnGWU=
=s9HO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: mv directories to new partition; rm directories

1997-08-10 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Sun, 10 Aug 1997, Gary L. Dolan wrote:

 In doing a bit of experimenting before the big step, I have
 copied the directory, including permissions, to the new
 partition (which is presently mounted at /hdb4). I used
 (cd /source; tar cf - .) | (cd /dest; tar xvfp -)
 When I attempted to remove (as root) an old subdirectory under
 /usr/local using  'rm -d', I got an Operation not permitted
 response. The info reference on 'rm' gives the '-d' option.

You ABSOLUTLY NEVER want to use the -d option to rm.  That will seriously
corrupt your filesystem (it deletes the directory inode without deleting
the files in the directory).  The proper way to remove a directory and its
comments is 'rm -rf dirname'

- -- 
 |The mark of your ignorance is the depth of
   Scott K. Ellis|   your belief in injustice and tragedy.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]| What the caterpillar calls the end of the world,
 |   the master calls a butterfly.
 |   -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM+4w1aCk2fENdzpVAQEdzwP+LbhKtf7tIOOfeLXuEVASkF7eKBgjMmlL
J73FcIK+1VkUSEVVB4mC8jPF4u/6rfwNmJ9jxnbXaPVEHmC7pfyV66Tu6Pf4y7c+
+SqaUJiIQl+N2lKH8Oom7yjZLctGLm3TJvGrJz9+3yuBle/lE+rY32qBaXybe/Jt
d0TWUYiHPfc=
=VANx
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: File impossible to delete

1997-08-08 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Fri, 8 Aug 1997, Peter S Galbraith wrote:

  Somehow, I got a corrupted file on my system:
  
   bash-2.00# ls -l /root/Mail/
   total 269488144
   c---r- 8240 8224 8224  32,  48 Aug  2  1995 drafts
  
  I can't delete it!
 
 I just booted the rescue disk and ran `e2fsck -f' on the partition.
 After it fixed lots of stuff, including /root/Mail/drafts and files in
 /dev,  I thought I'd be okay.
 
 After rebooting the file was still there, and still undeletable.
 What's worse, I looked at /dev and found unsavory things:
 
 c---r-   1 1157612589115, 100 Oct  4  1997 MAKEDEV
 c---r-   1 8224 12320 32,  32 Feb 11  1987 beep
 c---r-   1 8224 8224  10,  48 Aug  2  1995 watchdog
 
 I can't delete those either, in order to restore them using dpkg.

Check out chattr, they may have the immutable (+i) bit set.  Remove it and
you may be able to delete them.

- -- 
   |In order to live freely and happily,
  Scott K. Ellis   | you must sacrifice boredom.
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   | It is not always an easy sacrifice.
   |-- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM+te8KCk2fENdzpVAQGqEwP+KIHwPPCaDIdP3yiszeC7vrQWzaba5vQc
RR6HpHOi3UhVU519Ic1+DQ3hsKDRpOeV6t1R1k6WruFkOePI6Sah3+me/nvCIK79
iDnffgPw6finSYvH7rPZ98H1kmXbwbvB4xAl/ij6XwpBBCFU/btNi+Xm4CfC+woD
UuMQ1tr2nCg=
=W63T
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: A question about debian oficial CDs!!!

1997-08-07 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Wed, 6 Aug 1997, Eliezer Figueroa wrote:

 Can I run the packages in the debian CDs directly from the CD-ROM
 like in Slackware distribution.

No, Debian is too large and diversified to make it practical to build a
generic live image on CD, several different packages conflict with each
other and couldn't both be installed.  However, since Debian is much more
granular than Slackware, you can install only what you need.

- -- 
   | Do not, I beg you,
  Scott K. Ellis   |look for anything behind phenomena.
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |   They are themselves their own lesson.
   | -- Goethe

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM+lRJ6Ck2fENdzpVAQGcXQP+OmhD0ZyjTX2nd16PBRO2ADtpHze2TEB2
UVGdpwCo6CBcQyC/KI0WFCepWJLB6Ubw7dJb78Bu3T8fkLcgD+tZSC/5Jxrook94
32mh+mXRej2GEn7x3NTefk6XxZxVj+iytGh89jg2QUXO+FqDIArOfm4hMxDGouz/
swHuKiIhHI4=
=emlY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: /etc/crontab.daily and the security hole in find | xargs

1997-08-07 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On 7 Aug 1997, Jan Vroonhof wrote:

 I was checking out the files in /etc/crontab.daily and there it says
 above the standard
  find old tmp files | xargs rm
 lines something to the effect of These lines commented out because of
 the obvious security hole.
 
 What security hole?
 
 The only one I think I can see would be that xargs actually passes
 it's command line to the shell without properly escaping the filenames
 it puts in.
 
 Regardless of the nature of the hole: Is this fixed somehwere? The above
 hole would be fixed by making xargs call rm directly I think.

The problem is that there is a race condition involving running a 
find | xargs rm or similar command on any world-writable directory.  A
malicious person could construct a extremely long directory path, and then
between the time that find passes the name of the path and the time rm
gets around to removing the file, replacing some component of the path
with a symlink.  This provides the potential to remove any file on the
system.  This isn't changed by makeing find call rm directly, that only
shortens the race.  The only solution is to come up with a program that
never follows syslinks, and checks that the i-node of the file it is
removing remains the same.

- -- 
   |Your friends will know you better in the
Scott K. Ellis | first minute you meet than your acquaintances
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   will know you in a thousand years.
   |  -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM+oUt6Ck2fENdzpVAQElTgP+KO5TVrpgZpGoIf+sgQ62kklVfzLiqfha
YHSoDkFrqpNeFv6eToMBDSL6p9+ccHQD617aSbf3+Tmh4yWIa7J8zqpZoJ17Xzvp
p9JWpkDMhFBTAsEvVilUQEyoNYJhR5eEoVVwfDvDa10fBt/9xI5qQZyC1GkBMDaG
/8Ixx+YGbnY=
=Lpxh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Netscape plugins don't work

1997-08-05 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Mon, 4 Aug 1997, James D. Freels wrote:

 A dialog box appears with an error message
 
 sh: -c: line 1: missing closing ')' for arithmetic expression
 sh: -c: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token ';'
 sh: -c: line 1: '((acroread file.pdf);rm file.pdf)'
 
 I suspect the wrong shell is loaded, but I haven't a clue how to
 correct the problem.  Anyone else fixed this problem?

Established bug in bash-2.00.  The solution would be to upgrade to
bash-2.01, but that is a libc6-based release available only in unstable,
so it will be a little more trouble.  Check the archive for postings on
installing libc6 and the new libraries required for bash.

- -- 
  |   You are never given a wish without also
 Scott K. Ellis   |being given the power to make it true.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |You may have to work for it, however.
  | -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM+avIKCk2fENdzpVAQF9KAQAoVN6HszIJy6YquF8PTd5l+F+TZQ/LqK2
eesVl3kXiUNGSLiAwh13u8qhtUmilX6Jm17Baxf976qRrjOrLA1wzCEMrxGzYCfM
YxTxMw6D16jJwYeHttMg+hBuKHvfFxymFiSU4/9Cz58bTy+wGKB2nbczdkRl5Fqj
gzQIVz0cUgU=
=5hUK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Netscape plugins don't work

1997-08-05 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Mon, 4 Aug 1997, Rick Macdonald wrote:

 On Tue, 5 Aug 1997, Scott K. Ellis wrote:
  Established bug in bash-2.00.  The solution would be to upgrade to
  bash-2.01, but that is a libc6-based release available only in unstable,
  so it will be a little more trouble.  Check the archive for postings on
  installing libc6 and the new libraries required for bash.
 
 Yikes! After my fiasco, I'd be inclined to get the bash sources and
 compile myself with libc5 on 1.3.1.

My best suggestion is to pull the source package from the debian archives
and build it from there.  It shouldn't be too much trouble to do so.

- -- 
 |The mark of your ignorance is the depth of
   Scott K. Ellis|   your belief in injustice and tragedy.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]| What the caterpillar calls the end of the world,
 |   the master calls a butterfly.
 |   -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM+dg4qCk2fENdzpVAQE0cQP6A51/t/piGsRDHBBEjdI01y1FdsoPnLHo
veOsDYbZanpm/OAOjTZ2Pb4atIx//d6TfIrtzGDpyPGmWDJ/h5enFvNirI5H38Kh
5t6j0m+QTP5nSB3iGt/xyki106Fl89d5pdksvNA0r+3NXNHrTQQ5XJZLquqX+ZDC
QedfQY51M6k=
=t05C
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: newaliases

1997-08-04 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Mon, 4 Aug 1997, Bruno O. M. Simoes wrote:

 Where do I find the program newaliases?

It is part of sendmail, if you have smail installed, you don't need it.
It regenerates the /etc/aliases.db file for sendmail, but smail
interperates /etc/aliases directly.  Simply ignore any instructions
telling you to run it.

- -- 
 |The mark of your ignorance is the depth of
   Scott K. Ellis|   your belief in injustice and tragedy.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]| What the caterpillar calls the end of the world,
 |   the master calls a butterfly.
 |   -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM+YKMqCk2fENdzpVAQHIVwQAsPcLsihRqoKq7jtWSXREjR60Wvdb8prI
2JIDv0jNkji71ygoBCEaaYqx28Xq7s+DH60PdU9K32NCNzSmV+2tzsuqBHHZV/XZ
roB4qwecViCaa+A6UaA1bw9Wh2cpT90wFrs3BMOADqJ3pTkWj7lYZT7gOP0dOBar
5XuSSp3/cpY=
=tTY5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Easing security on public server.

1997-08-04 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Mon, 4 Aug 1997, Chris Brown wrote:

  I don't want to be too open, but on this machine I would 
 like to loosen the access a bit.  One thing that I am aware of is 
 that there are some options during compile of tcpd so that it 
 doesn't worry about DNS.  During setup of NFS I learned a bit about 
 the host.allow and host.deny files.  I really don't have a good feel 
 for the extent of control that is available thru these files and 
 possibly others.

The ALL: PARANOID line in /etc/hosts.deny is what causes the login
failure, as it causes tcpwrappers to do a reverse lookup on the connecting
IP, and then a forward lookup on the name it gets to make sure that the
host isn't trying to DNS spoof.  This may be removable, but not if you're
doing any kind of hostname-based access.

- -- 
 |The mark of your ignorance is the depth of
   Scott K. Ellis|   your belief in injustice and tragedy.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]| What the caterpillar calls the end of the world,
 |   the master calls a butterfly.
 |   -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM+YJqaCk2fENdzpVAQGD7wP+KcsJmTerlvbV+uLnNiox4Ud5J684Es8X
OWtuYVYsGkGxLSa84TKeWre/hdC659tcOhbaV5CckLuQ5nok6QyiIDNXA2NkQSRa
B7GMF33o9tZ2qOfZIFZOJHQGvtqLi5D4G80LUYgt9ix23i6+kHwA0ql91DTFvnjk
YlHnrySzCNc=
=Jb2A
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: sambades_1.9.16p11-1.deb

1997-08-04 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Sun, 3 Aug 1997, Oz Dror wrote:

 Why sambades_1.9.16p11-1.deb is not in ftp.debian.org?

Because DES is US export restricted.  Look for it on the sites mentioned
in README.non-US.

- -- 
   |Your friends will know you better in the
Scott K. Ellis | first minute you meet than your acquaintances
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   will know you in a thousand years.
   |  -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM+XbsKCk2fENdzpVAQH4cwP/R/uCWKBf4GciVGHGmoepzAfne+5bz1gP
KcWLyRDpaf1PcdRyBtsGsdJWQHqQZet9LiabbNr1+yCIgE2i+arFWzKv+kLYLLqC
iL6zzQLJJgA2GLyZMO4zIgzmuiqDRzy1Gs0FC6hRU924jL2g7VbSAp2es3l6tNv7
Va9CY40+a0M=
=u7XK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: More problems with unstable/base

1997-08-04 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On 4 Aug 1997, Dale Martin wrote:

 I have a raid0 md partition that consists of two 2G partitions
 striped together.  Today, I ran my machine out of virtual memory and
 it locked up (might be a problem with 2.0.14 and/or SMP) and lo and
 behold, the filesystem on my striped partition was trashed.  What's
 even worse was that I couldn't make a new filesystem on it!  I kept
 getting _weird_ errors - I was starting to think I had a hardware
 problem.  Anyways, I downgraded from e2fstools version 1.10-4 to
 1.10-2, and voila, problem fixed!  It looks like version 1.10-4
 doesn't like partitions greater than 2G or something.

Actually, the problem with e2fstools is known, it is a problem with the
llseek implementation in glibc.


WARNING TO ALL *** IF YOU HAVE FILESYSTEMS GREATER THAN 2G, DO NOT USE
E2FSTOOLS_1.10-4 UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, BACK OUT TO THE VERSION IN
STABLE.

- -- 
   |Your friends will know you better in the
Scott K. Ellis | first minute you meet than your acquaintances
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   will know you in a thousand years.
   |  -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM+Y/RKCk2fENdzpVAQHSEAP/RRj/Zho6PTvE4YFYNKcCuQXsMbMeF3y1
URTswV5+N7Z7wVNGixLTp0f7kFN5Moy9lu3SD+iHGANqLrebZAinnHq4Iewf4OpB
TT1bj+Yz1N617ckAeefVQ4NEmVgpgrLYgVbW4zzFEIk4TuwPRFA/kILsxG0RX0+v
Mh78eQbt+aY=
=V2kt
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Installing the new libreadline and Packages that depend on the old libreadline

1997-08-01 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Thu, 31 Jul 1997, Paul Serice wrote:

 I'm being careful in installing libreadlineg2.  I see where bash
 depends on the new libreadline.  So, I assume it is safe to use bash
 with the new libreadline; however, I see where netstd still depends
 on the old libreadline.  Will a package like netstd work with the new
 libreadline, or should I just wait until I see netstd to have an
 explicit dependency on the new libreadline?

What you need to do is install the new libreadline2 and libreadlineg2
packages at the same time, after making sure you also have the latest ldso
package.  libreadlineg2 only conflicts with older versions of
libreadline2, not the one in hamm.

- -- 
 |If you will practice being fictional for a while,
   Scott K. Ellis|you will understand that fictional
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]|  characters are sometimes more real than
 |people with bodies and heartbeats.
 |   -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM+EqQ6Ck2fENdzpVAQGA9gP/e6DEY8A2O1mi7nB10mUcrKVRU2e7a2TW
RklAqq3Vpb5U/7Sdy5RubysQfe8Adth7wMpjms5dUu4NYtWc9QHN2lw2Fdr0vbT0
98WPpAXNPHG+yOlzUhsq9spS9Hd1llqFSs4ohn5JOyZlh4qiMY+8noC1psQtX6Y7
LQZpukuMjMc=
=Ztcm
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Libc6 Upgrade Howto?

1997-08-01 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On 31 Jul 1997, Philip Rangel wrote:

 The bash upgrade broke some of the scripts i had, after a while i
 found out i had to change this line:
 
   . $BASE || { echo -e \a base file missing; exit 1 }
 
 to
 
   . $BASE || { echo -e \a base file missing; exit 1 
   }
 
 is there any other known differences between the different versions.

That is a know difference in bash2, the alternate solution would just be
to provide the semicolon at the end of the last statement before the }.  I
believe this is a POSIXism

 I updated the following packages 
 ii  bash2.0-3  The GNU Bourne Again SHell
 ii  locales 2.0.4-1Locale data files and utilities.
 ii  libc6   2.0.4-1The GNU C library version 2 (run-time 
 files)
 ii  libreadline22.1-2.1GNU readline and history libraries, 
 run-time
 ii  libreadlineg2   2.1-2.1GNU readline and history libraries, 
 run-time
 
 when trying to install libc5 5.4.33-5 the postinst-script exits with
 an error, the problem seems to be when setting up some of the locales
 stuff. After commenting the offending lines 
  
 #do_locale fr_BE ISO-8859-1
 #do_locale gr_GR ISO-8859-7
 #do_locale hr_HR ISO-8859-4
 #do_locale iw_IL ISO-8859-8
 #do_locale kl_GL ISO-8859-1
 #do_locale nl_BE ISO-8859-1
 #do_locale ro_RO ISO-8859-1
 #do_locale ru_RU ISO-8859-5
 
 i coudlt set up libc5. I know this isn't the right solution
 but i found no other way. Maybe sombody can tell me where else to
 look. 

Known bug with the latest libc5 package, I believe it is a problem with
locales.  If you don't need them, don't worry about it, it should clear
itself up with future upgrades.

 After this little problems and the fakt that my inet.conf desapeard
 the upgrade seems to work, even compiling (libc6) is no problem.
 Haven't tried to compile a kernel jet. Any hints? 

There was a postinst bug in one package that caused it to eat your
inetd.conf file, grepping for all of the update-inetd commands in the
various postinst scripts in /var/lib/dpkg/info and running them should
rebuild your inetd.conf.

- -- 
 |If you will practice being fictional for a while,
   Scott K. Ellis|you will understand that fictional
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]|  characters are sometimes more real than
 |people with bodies and heartbeats.
 |   -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM+Er1aCk2fENdzpVAQFTuQP/f0xte7JTjvcXy3QHd8H/oC9pZgULRFX0
/SZN+G/i6jGHlfvBXPcTg5TUZ55IgrbVpj2zog+KvQY1j6uI5xKlulqZV/Ew8V1w
+AkqEif/kanZOIqRlmIT4NaIrH4CnFlPVbKyBi3K4EtfmdbJf/mBYxIyoBb9zZMF
uh+WdgjIz5Q=
=SlQL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: 3Com Vortex freezes

1997-08-01 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Fri, 1 Aug 1997, Remco van de Meent wrote:

 I'm using a 3Com Vortex ethernet device on a 10BaseT network:
 
 eth0: 3Com 3c595 Vortex 100baseTX at 0xe400, 00:20:af:ed:16:c5, IRQ 12
   Internal config register is 101001b, transceivers 0xe10a.
   64K word-wide RAM 3:1 Rx:Tx split, autoselect/10baseT interface.
 3c59x.c:v0.25 5/17/96 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 It looks like that this card freezes the network i/o after a couple of days
 
 eth0: Infinite loop in interrupt, status e011.  Disabling functions (78ee)
 
 
 Is there any way to get around with it? Or having the computer automatically
 reboot when this happens?

Known problem with the older drivers, try getting the latest driver from
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/ (look for network drivers and Vortex, I've
forgotten the exact page).  As for clearing the condition, you could have
a cron task that watches the syslog files, and reboots the machine when
the message appears.  I understand that if you load the driver as a
module, ifconfig eth0 down ; rmmod 3c59x ; sleep 5 ; insmod 3c59x ;
ifconfig eth0 up ; route clears the problem.

- -- 
 |The mark of your ignorance is the depth of
   Scott K. Ellis|   your belief in injustice and tragedy.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]| What the caterpillar calls the end of the world,
 |   the master calls a butterfly.
 |   -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM+JSO6Ck2fENdzpVAQGRmAP+O0xMYNV1iEmtwwjRoZe/4wfifh90nh+j
XYikncTV6moxVwIr0dqfzMRSmFje+AFl0NKJMP27SSy0dnS7bR5k3KjtwAXE4Wnk
cLdQZmGeqq4h7riwBFeY1sHMA4QkalxR2474l4hnzbvzvMvBhRmdDGzs0+76ZFqy
thqfKBl1REk=
=TyZD
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Libc6 Upgrade Howto?

1997-07-30 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Tue, 29 Jul 1997, Steve Phillips wrote:

 Is there a HOWTO on howto upgrade from 1.3.x to unstable with libc6? 
 I'm the new maintainer for uudeview and now have a machine available to
 run as a developement machine.  I tried to upgrade to unstable with
 dselect, first upgrading dpkg, but just ran into a maze of dependicies
 that left my machine a mess.  I had to re-install 1.3.1 on it.

Okay, a few tricks I can think of first off.

1) Use dselect to purge all of the -dev packages on your system, they will
   all need to be replaced with libc6 based packages, most likely included
   in hamm.  Getting rid of the bo -dev packages will solve a majority of
   your dependancy problems.
2) Manually retrieve and install the latest libc6 package.  This will save
   a lot of headaches in trying to install all the new libc6 based stuff.
3) Manually retrive the latest bash, libreadline2, and libreadlineg2
   packages.  Install all of them on one dpkg command line.

Most of the rest of the packages should upgrade with no problem.  You may
want to install altgcc and the various -altdev packages if you wish to
continue to compile libc5 based programs.  Library packages with g at the
end of their names are the libc6 linked libraries, if libraries are linked
with a different version of libc than the program they're linked to,
strange problems may develop.

- -- 
 |If you will practice being fictional for a while,
   Scott K. Ellis|you will understand that fictional
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]|  characters are sometimes more real than
 |people with bodies and heartbeats.
 |   -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM960iaCk2fENdzpVAQHdbwQAq4MKog8jxBRPisyaQkv9b4vtcTGZQuMi
2Uyxfq50Z3YRuG41WqhI07KpPL+mRMgE0mCEwQCt2F6c1WiVvP2pKGydk5Ghw01q
tiEux2roJwAGm948RaUR+Y4Ao2f0FyON9PwExuipow0BUuWZK3jfmNxpYfGDahob
dYEm9pjuBI8=
=t1m9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: atd - at daemon?

1997-07-29 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On 28 Jul 1997, Eloy A. Paris wrote:

 just for curiosity: in Debian versions prior to 1.3 there was not
 at daemon (atd). After I upgraded to 1.3 there is an atd process
 hanging around. Does anyone know why? I guess at processing was done
 by crond in previous version, why did it change?

Before, cron was set to call atrun every 1 or 5 minutes, forcing disk
reads and basically making any power-management functions useless without
disabling at.  Now atd can cache its state, and doesn't need to read the
drive (changing an atime stamp) every minute, so disks can cycle down.  If
you aren't running any at tasks, atd will get itself swapped out and stay
there in any memory crunch.

- -- 
   |  Live never to be ashamed if anything
Scott K. Ellis | you do or say is published around the world --
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | even if what is published is not true.
   |  -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM91BPqCk2fENdzpVAQGkowQAplMyVdvhaRKIgENVOKlZo4UfPLkIAB83
Y8EEKoXTiCObCbbHw9CucJI0C3mhH+8L3l6c11Zd9XHI5L9hvfPcwpgNEnd6Dn3k
6Dvsq3+ri3s0o+yuEFLpfmREnY0mDDrGBRZPnDM/De+mg8W6oKmI6u5QotXJ3A4b
KVb89H5I97o=
=NR9m
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: compiling apache 1.2.1 - where is -lcrypt??

1997-07-28 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Sat, 26 Jul 1997, Amos Shapira wrote:

 I'm trying to build Apache 1.2.1 as a debian package based on
 the .diff.gz found in project/experimental, and the compilation
 process (./debian/rules build as root) bombs because the loader
 can't find a library for -lcrypt used when linking htpasswd.
 
 Could someone please point me to the package which contains this
 library?  I'm outside the U.S. and can't find anything which
 mentions this in the non-US sites.

IIRC, libcrypt was seperated out of libc6, but is integral to libc5.  If
you're compiling for libc5, just remove the -lcrypt from the link command.

- -- 
   Scott K. Ellis | Argue for your limitations, and
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] |   sure enough, they're yours.
  |   -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM9twCaCk2fENdzpVAQGNjwP9EbXOnbQ67hfidi45tTrrnrnG+VMokXQu
aZuqgnd3Qo/gB6ndnpKWli54g/5EsZDDqxx4LWuFxat3rJgnH/10nG8w/su6PC7V
aRogA4jbr/8RVnBOe1kfU4UEah9kcAaNg7sFvRTRzv4Z5TR2m4nEaX8ISuQ94UY6
jtePgjMe1wo=
=O4en
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Removing packages

1997-07-28 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Fri, 25 Jul 1997, Vitor Beires Nogueira wrote:

   dpkg --purge --force-depends  babel latex
 
 I get these errors:
 
 /var/lib/dpkg/info/latex.prerm: install-fmt-base: command not found
 /var/lib/dpkg/info/babel.postrm: install-fmt-base: command not found
 
 Already searched for this utility and doesn't seem to be anywhere.

install-fmt-base was in one of the other old TeX packages, the easiest
solution for this problem is to symlink /usr/bin/install-fmt-base to
/bin/true, run the dpkg --purge command, then delete the symlink.

- -- 
 |If you will practice being fictional for a while,
   Scott K. Ellis|you will understand that fictional
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]|  characters are sometimes more real than
 |people with bodies and heartbeats.
 |   -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM9lqfKCk2fENdzpVAQF8TAP/Z44UIOPO8VfPrcHHhI/okud/mnVaiQ47
DK1sjkEN+8HP2W2KaRjzQuYPy2VACrDpSla/TceGxVL6y/0N8Pnldu0AtBtm59oF
WAKrfBNsI0waWgp7VUXvDcTCKjcV4ZqUYLJymupp/yL64o1NRtZ6YZIHfhLHXdbx
zTrhAbD3NmU=
=Mbfd
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: update-menues 1.5

1997-07-28 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Fri, 25 Jul 1997, Adrian Bridgett wrote:

  It looks like it is trying to execute /usr/lib/menu/fvwm95. 
  How comes?
 
 It has execute permission on, do chmod -x /usr/lib/menu/fvwm95
 
 I had this problem with one of my packages - maybe menu should be written
 so that it this will not happen if a file has execute permission.

Actually, this is a new FEATURE in menu, to allow a program to generate a
menu file to be used.  However, this exposed bugs in a few packages with
execute permissions on their menu files, change the permissions, and check
to see if a bug has been filed against them for it.

- -- 
 |If you will practice being fictional for a while,
   Scott K. Ellis|you will understand that fictional
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]|  characters are sometimes more real than
 |people with bodies and heartbeats.
 |   -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM9lu46Ck2fENdzpVAQHSMwP/dgGCR8fTK5RA9HoOkeaYmQpHDZxyr3jn
SJ0fhth/dR1ijVnxK+37iE1BrLczmTxIipTEe+kjHI28+ix4jSy4swNwJc907NQm
W8ByRfCnF3jFlslElv/aUloYaxVUuDtgOBJGb7PpG444LMQyopXlALmTszIsBVVH
ACAbnOcctms=
=Ne3y
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: smartlist

1997-07-28 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Mon, 28 Jul 1997, dada wrote:

 Hi..I installed Smarlist and I create and list called test (as is
 explain in Quick Start file).The last step in this process must be
 execute newaliases...but when I doing the shell answer me that
 command not found...why?
 
 I have intalled Smail and when I don't see newaliases in nowhere.
 Where's new aliases?
 Is it in Sendmail pakage? (I hate sendmail...too much tricy to me).

smail doesn't require the newaliases command to be run when updating the
alias file.  Just skip the last step.  Technically, the Debian policy for
MTAs requires that the command be provided, even if it is a no-op, but
smail has a bug in that regard.  This has already been reported to the
maintainer.

- -- 
  |   You are never given a wish without also
 Scott K. Ellis   |being given the power to make it true.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |You may have to work for it, however.
  | -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM9yj9qCk2fENdzpVAQGK6QP/fewjTiUe1rkK2Me3QdwhypJJdsCP04VP
z5DX8KsBFV/4VCn46fQZ38V87D6yYsg9QM0c4np5aQso0rCDBCw5e+SzCE3eFBbF
XDSJnPW1kX1qnmI35dHlc7ZvQi7LCYbXHDf8TvUL0GD/b2foUg558eUyZXyV9RoW
nb0iVQe6Aqk=
=LJ8m
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: libreadlineg2

1997-07-24 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Thu, 24 Jul 1997, Paul Serice wrote:

 The nifty search feature doesn't know where libreadlineg2 is, and
 neither do I.  Would someone mind letting me know where to look?
 
 Also, I'm curious about the trailing g.  What should it be telling 
 me?

libreadlineg2 is hiding in the Incoming directory of our ftp server,
where it should make its way out once our archive maintainer catches up
after his vacation.

The g suffix on many new library packages is an indication that they are
linked with libc6 (glibc2) instead of libc5.  We are working on migrating
to libc6 for Debian 2.0, while also assuring backwards compatibility and
hopefully providing both libc5 and libc6 development environments.

- -- 
  |   You are never given a wish without also
 Scott K. Ellis   |being given the power to make it true.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |You may have to work for it, however.
  | -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM9dgLKCk2fENdzpVAQH0FQP/TgH8KmOAt2hrlz4dHDdo02qvQJ0fvtuH
5CasqWSMkjm1wdLpNmIW4lIC3uA2TDbEE7KVq18l3XFwcPQ3Y8QEB5XPddAzTISo
Hz6YV9q/wJQ8j1AjgfABwl7CjeUnif3kuVD0902M7eF1vz1nmO8AqPviVnoZ8qYp
u2FdK03hHJ0=
=MSHe
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Uh oh! After dselect installed the new kernel... the system does not boot...

1997-07-24 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Fri, 25 Jul 1997, David M wrote:

 Guess what?  I used dselect to install a few (well quite a few) packages 
 including the kernel sources and utilities.  As it requested me to 
 compile the new 2.0.30 kernel I replied yes.  All went ok till I rebooted!
 
 Now just as I get to the lilo prompt all I get is 
 
 01 01 01 01
 
 for ever and ever, nonstop.
 
 I guess I'll have to revert back to the old kernel.  I have some idea on 
 how to do that but I would like some expert advise so that I don't 
 damage the system even more ;)  I would say that changing the symlinks 
 to point to boot/the old kernel should work... right?

Your problem is most likely that you didn't rerun lilo when replacing the
kernel.  Lilo needs run everytime you change a kernel image.

- -- 
   |   The bond that links your true family is not
Scott K. Ellis |  one of blood, but of respect and joy in each
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | other's life. Rarely do members of one
   |   family grow up under the same roof.
   |  -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM9eUXKCk2fENdzpVAQE6BAQAn6GFFgf+qP52+jgrkexz4gW/5+QyoTas
c/3noIxAEhjf6LR6UNm/NGvUH+obuqd50VlfeecSfvGnwjlsbG095cVf3HAJ0N7x
dNHIqtOgAksUf3V2cNELkg0/q48T1u1ThGRQzni3OPdrQCxkeUWX4P477ZY0LKyG
AgZd7HyzIHQ=
=Vxmi
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Question on libc5 5.4.33-5

1997-07-24 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Thu, 24 Jul 1997, G. Kapetanios wrote:

 I am trynig to upgrade my libc5 to 5.4.33-5 from unstable 
 When  I do dpkg it tries to replace libc5-dev with libc5-altdev . However
 stuff dependes on libc5-dev and dpkg doesn't know that libc5-altdev
 contains the same stuff as libc5-dev . So it crushes I tried to remove
 anything that dependes on libc5-dev before changing to libc5-altdev but
 but I get an unspecifief post-installation error when I try to replace
 libc5-5.23 with libc5-33.3-5

The thing is, libc5-altdev DOESN'T contain exactly the same information as
libc5-dev, it is a seperate package and all the include information and
such is in a new tree.  This is due to our migration of the next release
of Debian to the new libc6 (glibc2), while preserving the capability to
continue to compile and develop libc5 stuff as well.  Unfortunatly,
librarys that were compiled with libc5 may be subtly incompatible with
libc6.

Basically, the upgrade to the development set of unstable requires you to
remove all of your old dev packages and replace them.  I'd suggest you
read debian-devel or its archives for further information.  Also note that
we aren't completely finished migrating the libraries, so if you use some
estoric libraries, you may have to wait.

- -- 
   |   The bond that links your true family is not
Scott K. Ellis |  one of blood, but of respect and joy in each
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | other's life. Rarely do members of one
   |   family grow up under the same roof.
   |  -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM9eUF6Ck2fENdzpVAQGSdQQAjQDUeYcl22Y5L2gvx84Sqf40iBMSMMPw
uFUpD1OKMODHrhAVP3yknr2I4PepRsehUNxqCDuVvU32/TqsqWHmcmIGpZ2fZLFV
UhkEyPJ+e+goBU8GVoVu2igYjbH6Dc00FSIEEyX/yIqBaLINFOGqBwhD9z0yheWN
5o88VXlvkQE=
=O8UU
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: naming convention question

1997-07-23 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On 22 Jul 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Buddha Buck writes:
  Thus there are two good reasons why the distribution _name_ (be it rex or
  bo or unreleased-1.3) shouldn't change.
 
 Nor did I suggest that it should.
 
  Because of that, it is good to choose names that don't reflect the
  release status of the distribution.
 
 But why is it good to choose names that don't reflect *anything*?

They do, they are the codename for the version, similar to the codenames
that Microsoft or IBM use for their new products under development.  The
sequence (buzz, rex, bo, hamm) follows names of characters in the Pixar
animated movie, Toy Story.  There was some brief discussion of calling
Debian 2.0 woody, after the main character of the movie, but we quickly
realized the possible unwanted confusion that would result.

- -- 
 |If you will practice being fictional for a while,
   Scott K. Ellis|you will understand that fictional
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]|  characters are sometimes more real than
 |people with bodies and heartbeats.
 |   -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM9YphKCk2fENdzpVAQEA2QP/aoYYRkQZgWe7LO5bu/vAzvEhIcZpw5vo
KCetbg9KF/4XO2Rf3thP8CNNffj9aXZ+3V35wPWYyrSpTGvkhjf39bmSH8U/N2jA
+sxASLnHpP5edEu1sR90F8HoJvosXA7u0fzHeHocAjwOdiEi/RVbozZwPbvLDagW
tX/VOPFO9G4=
=0VRe
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Gcc errors while compiling 3com updated driver 3c59x.c

1997-07-23 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Wed, 23 Jul 1997, Jens B. Jorgensen wrote:

 W Paul Mills wrote:

 Actually mine *is* a 3c905. Like I say, it works great and I haven't
 patched the kernel. I just use the 2.0.30 kernel-source package.

You didn't, but Debian did.  The kernel-source package replaces the
3c59x.c file with a slightly more recent one from the author that works
under reasonable network load.  If you have exceptionally high load,
especially with 100baseT networking, the driver can lock up under stress
and you should check out the author's site for a more recent driver which
should fix it.

- -- 
 |If you will practice being fictional for a while,
   Scott K. Ellis|you will understand that fictional
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]|  characters are sometimes more real than
 |people with bodies and heartbeats.
 |   -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM9YnqqCk2fENdzpVAQGVxwP/fvP/4Uo9BXE/JFQOWU5p13R0yI5BpjTm
HdY1uNMwrDdbLG9Aoqu8iYBsqGCIuMSTNPi9o69wawlBxIUn4c61FDQlfoO5tRps
c930qCgSuA20tInfxbW5IjwftANeA/6MQv0KPxT9bE7ZXing8HD3ru54CB5uckIg
upRkb4RBdEI=
=mWpX
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: StarOffice3.1 and libc5

1997-07-23 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Wed, 23 Jul 1997, Tim O'Brien wrote:

 At 09:19 AM 7/23/97 +0200, you wrote:
 I have a Debian 1.3.1 system with libc5.4.33 installed:
 
 Package : 
  libc5 
 
 Why do you think there is no package with libc5.4.  5.4.4 ?
 
 Well... I thought a version 5.4.33 would be less than 5.4.4... Is this not
 correct? If not, could someone set me straight on this? 

The numbers increment after each dot sequencially, therefore 5.4.10 would
be after 5.4.9, and 5.4.33 is the latest release version of libc5.

- -- 
 |If you will practice being fictional for a while,
   Scott K. Ellis|you will understand that fictional
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]|  characters are sometimes more real than
 |people with bodies and heartbeats.
 |   -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM9YqAKCk2fENdzpVAQFzQAP/T9rvaQrpaG/CECstHy2RLk07XiSfEITS
kGxfxpz3N+RzhLfV9sgaAPY/+kOPHrptnIU+8Ov/Rws9+sbh9me2QqV7TLtqyMP/
jRxOe0Tzaz4670q81Z9SSfNb3B8ReauNjHqcGqBOj3qc5nGDJzDJe+CGIYe5t9J4
FIsQ4Mut0pI=
=6ycO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: changing dpkg depends/tcl7.6-dev

1997-07-19 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Fri, 18 Jul 1997, Paul Miller wrote:

 There are many packages which depend on libc5-dev.  In the hamm version
 libc5-dev was changed to libc5-altdev to work around conflicts w/
 libc6...  How can I change some of the packages (such as tcl7.6-dev)
 which depend on libc5-dev to libc5-dev | libc5-altdev?  or are there
 tcl7.6-dev/tk4.2-dev packages for libc6-dev?

Basically, you need to wait for the libc6 versions of those packages and
those development libraries.  Packages linked with libc6 also need all
their support libs linked with libc6, or strange things will happen.  We
(the developers) are working on getting libc6 versions of all the
libraries put out as soon as possible, but that is why we have unstable.

If you really need to develop for stuff not yet available for libc6, I'd
suggest backing out all the libc6-dev packages, and installing the older
libc5 stuff on hold until we finish shaking down libc6 support.

- -- 
   |   The bond that links your true family is not
Scott K. Ellis |  one of blood, but of respect and joy in each
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | other's life. Rarely do members of one
   |   family grow up under the same roof.
   |  -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM9DPaqCk2fENdzpVAQG9EgQAq9e0F5KQqOaiq8qtRCh9yr0PnKmGgE7I
OTYaxXwepiCuXU7u/GTdb+FGTouCCzxFHgBbPXwieBJCpEDPMYH5j1ZdvJpKHOyg
MIfScE4strO0oevJqlKZNdGwe53N2WGc6SP2PiAo/akrCS1gKvxKs0DtL0hU7wrK
GuE2/cm+oq4=
=cNWL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: compiling ftools on debian machine

1997-07-18 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Wed, 16 Jul 1997, Debian email wrote:

 I have tried changing -ltermcap to -lncurses, but get:
 
 ld: cannot open -lncurses: No such file or directory

Quick check, do you have the ncurses-dev package installed?

- -- 
   |Your friends will know you better in the
Scott K. Ellis | first minute you meet than your acquaintances
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   will know you in a thousand years.
   |  -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM896/aCk2fENdzpVAQEgYwQArFgsQd1Vz/YheyFI5OaYdcBZpKazFVYq
Us86STa/24CwAk6aqNaF1ldvtOzLMA0ZXvgDON+xEPVgFVaaGRqTQX1UDdF1XKPV
8UGv9dtyD4t0y9jraVslFYLNJf3plNCO6b1TYNyJV37LxqjYs23z/3gC/MSR1wZN
57d9RwJr8Ng=
=qXpb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: cua vs ttyS and diald

1997-07-18 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Fri, 18 Jul 1997, Alan Hyde wrote:

 If I understand these device details correctly, the ttyS devices are
 setup for incoming calls (denoted by the 4) and the cua devices for
 outgoing calls (denoted by the 5). I don't have any ttyS0 device.
 
 Therefore how do I setup a ttyS0 device for dialing out?
 Also should I change the setup for the existing ttyS devices?

You don't need to make any changes, the values are correct.  The cua
devices exist for compatibility reasons, and are considered obsolete.
They were around before a good locking scheme was developed for the ttyS
devices, simply use the ttyS devices instead of the cua ones.

- -- 
   |Your friends will know you better in the
Scott K. Ellis | first minute you meet than your acquaintances
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   will know you in a thousand years.
   |  -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM897i6Ck2fENdzpVAQHKmgQAqdavPl2SYOwJ4odTEBp7MKDcsyaxqJxv
uVxKj4YD6bssVijtbuKIhjGJ649q/BUox+T6ddizNOHfrKVG5dXk746qsakfeWfd
o+pbpxlkEeFUNdSvdApxXoceFFIpaeBFuMuttZwqLSvoGb4TFsZJYE+0vfMHdrZ5
4/A+x2zyqyE=
=bh/c
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Anacron/Cron

1997-07-15 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Mon, 14 Jul 1997, Robert D. Hilliard wrote:

  Now that anacron is taking over the daily, weekly and monthly
 cron jobs, can I safely remove cron, or is it required for other
 system functions? 

I wouldn't particuarly recomend removing cron.  Most of the time it is
sitting blocked and gets paged out anyway.  smail uses cron to run its
mail que.  And it is useful for running tasks every x/minutes or whatever.

- -- 
 |The mark of your ignorance is the depth of
   Scott K. Ellis|   your belief in injustice and tragedy.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]| What the caterpillar calls the end of the world,
 |   the master calls a butterfly.
 |   -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM8rD+KCk2fENdzpVAQGNkQP/QTqyOzAEx7uEivuTTNBoSe2e1ny3FonY
1lUhFXQbNQpAeVz5hu7N5ryBLAKS7w1PzrnAuhvJ7mEvQKnBo+HIndDxSaifPz2u
g3i/qp7goS7MxuPZwh6Tpu0C1atKBS3/CI4pfTzrgi7r3x4iutoz0q1egNKOKU1l
Hac1d74wVoQ=
=KuMy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: man pages, etc.

1997-07-15 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Mon, 14 Jul 1997, larry ives wrote:

 I just used the Debian installation for linux and it was a pleasure =
 compared to slackware! There are a couple of things that don't work =
 however.
 I can't seem to execute a man page session. When I look for the man =
 executable I can't find it, all though I do have some gziped man pages.
 The file command doesn't seem to be present either. Can anyone help =
 me?

Those commands are located in the man-db and file packages respectively. 

- -- 
 |The mark of your ignorance is the depth of
   Scott K. Ellis|   your belief in injustice and tragedy.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]| What the caterpillar calls the end of the world,
 |   the master calls a butterfly.
 |   -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM8rEiaCk2fENdzpVAQFPtQQApmmWHA/By/HjL+MQpJHG2hLOEevikWdA
ulKgSBldtSAZUmiiujWdyQRVd9zh2KC/NLoFaX4lJo+jZ7TbpyUz/W5CyyKvOMM1
U/7TTHaaaCi8icVsBABpy+z3Ef0L9JVx4HFiicN/a8KN4LEmXfz0uz47pJuFI2ng
tckuZhhaQZ0=
=5cCA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: man permissions

1997-06-28 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Wed, 25 Jun 1997, joost witteveen wrote:

  
  After installing 1.3, man failed to work for ordinary users:
  
man bash
   man: can't create a temporary filename: No such file or directory  
  
  The permissions on /tmp were:
  drwxr-xr-t   4 root root 1024 Jun 25 16:47 tmp
  
  so I changed them to:
  drwxrwxrwt   2 root root 1024 Jun 25 16:51 tmp
  
  This fixes it anyway.  Is this okay?  
 
 Yes, it's OK. 
 
 What's not OK is that the permissions were wrong in the
 first place. Something strange must have happened on your system, as
 I don't remember seeing floods of messages like this on debian-user.
 
 Do you remember anything interesting about your install? Anything
 that could have triggered this?

This is frequently a relic of unpacking archives directly into /tmp.  This
may inadvertantly change the permissions of the directory, causing the
problems observed.  Doing dpkg -x pkgname /tmp would do that.  Create a
temporary directory to unpack the archive into.

- -- 
   Scott K. Ellis   |  Argue for your limitations, and
http://www.gate.net/~storm/ |sure enough, they're yours.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |-- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM7GzTqCk2fENdzpVAQHNhQP/d9gNFNGUD9taiqmLm8pIWz7e6mpaa9uS
XGLpllPIaJhiM7GzeBM9+blnpYMVPa+6gMmR8DrBSuAUAlcEDTRfW+B1lZlYlAGy
DshnC5IkCtcolF/Xk2b83wJrQhWMyXcpC7uFclotM3kr5vq6HqlTFvlc5WScyQhj
DXwtigkRFAI=
=hKMD
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: libgpc problem

1997-06-28 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Thu, 26 Jun 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 When I attempted to install libgpc2, I got the following error:
 
 ldconfig: warning: can't open /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so (No such file or 
 directory), skipping
 ldconfig: warning: can't open /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so (No such file or 
 directory), skipping
 
 I have two questions.
 
 1. What is pascal doing with Xwin libs?

ldconfig goes through all the libraries.

 2. What am I missing that it can't find?

Version mismatch between xlib6 and xlib6-dev will cause those errors.

- -- 
|The mark of your ignorance is the depth of
   Scott K. Ellis   |   your belief in injustice and tragedy.
http://www.gate.net/~storm/ | What the caterpillar calls the end of the world,
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |   the master calls a butterfly.
|   -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM7MSwKCk2fENdzpVAQFxrQP/ajeLbW35kmHhtHzoUFqKLMu5WbLee+pU
WW8u2QBT0a2Dedi5FxWZhXt3al2VfFk/YYbKQ+Cs157YyQyGp7+HHduOW0UZNn3p
NSMM0SJQ2FMW6FF029+NNxk/Oj5D66MTbrGoy2uMeOe4ssNDTKAekNphFfXl4jC1
vMID6+YXIhc=
=1lNC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: message problems...

1997-06-28 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Thu, 26 Jun 1997, dpk wrote:

 But I have also just realized that my cdrom device doesn't exist:
 
 Jun 25 18:05:44 brainiac kernel: Detected scsi CD-ROM sr0 at scsi0,
 channel 0, id 3, lun 0
 Jun 25 18:05:44 brainiac kernel: scsi : detected 1 SCSI cdrom 4 SCSI disks
 total.
 
 And /dev/sr0 does not exist.  How do I create it?  Thanks in advance for
 any help. 

/dev/scd0

- -- 
|The mark of your ignorance is the depth of
   Scott K. Ellis   |   your belief in injustice and tragedy.
http://www.gate.net/~storm/ | What the caterpillar calls the end of the world,
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |   the master calls a butterfly.
|   -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM7MS7qCk2fENdzpVAQFu2wP/ck3P7pbAsMLjHNVxF4i3m2UFZQhRQzRT
amdcNRLWyZ8qz0h7EqW5gbSOG+vG/jnJnwo4uNk0uOZYsYcUwZmU8LBvAuIEX/kn
KrNyWU2kaKZ7s8N6dxDRcfFWZIsFrBErIwK6/zAJxLzeU6mJgVchcNSCS3cZ9tVo
JRpLKae7C68=
=U1QE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Problem with scalable fonts

1997-06-27 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Fri, 27 Jun 1997, Antonio M. Roldan wrote:

 I've upgraded to xfree3.3 using the packages located in bo-updates
 and found the following error messages when installing scalable fonts:
 
 ---
 # dpkg -i xfntscl_3.3-3_all.deb 
 (Reading database ... 23014 files and directories currently installed.)
 Preparing to replace xfntscl 3.2-6 (using xfntscl_3.3-3_all.deb) ...
 Unpacking replacement xfntscl ...
 dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
 dpkg: error processing xfntscl_3.3-3_all.deb (--install):
  subprocess dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile returned error exit status 2
 Adjusting font index in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo...
 Adjusting font index in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1...
 Errors were encountered while processing:
  xfntscl_3.3-3_all.deb
 ---
 
 The efect is that the scalable fonts aren't upgraded and the xserver
 seems to need them. For example, netscape seems horrible, because it
 uses these fonts.

This may be a problem with the switch from compressed to gziped fonts
between xfree3.2 and xfree3.3.  Did you install xbase and xlib6 first?
Try reinstalling all the font packages and see if that helps.

- -- 
   |  Live never to be ashamed if anything
Scott K. Ellis | you do or say is published around the world --
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | even if what is published is not true.
   |  -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM7PY5KCk2fENdzpVAQGnRwP+PAomDT3gceR5i9jCRy7C4mxPkLLZviwh
t5qnv3N/I07EhnMD6MUf9Fxl8MFfC9kxro5RWgWy+QkyEsMi7atBYOCsOluAdTxo
hZY5BVRbRC1VXmOMRhPc0BOXpP2ZyVYBE5QWGLxO6P13msPqpiUfexgBp3auzZUz
8Rs+I+Hs02Q=
=4Ol2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: What good is the default .alias file?

1997-06-24 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Tue, 24 Jun 1997, Dave Cinege wrote:

 What good is the default .alias file in /etc/skel?
 
 It by default isn't, and I can see my way to execute the damn thing.
 If it was in the format:
 
 alias lsa=ls -a
 
 it would be useful. How is this any good?
 
 alias   a   alias
 alias   loada   'source ~/.alias'
 alias   loadalias   loada
 alias   log watchlog

It is good because it contains csh/tcsh aliases, not bash aliases.  A
slightly different beast.

- -- 
  Scott K. Ellis  |In order to live freely and happily,
   http://www.gate.net/~storm/| you must sacrifice boredom.
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | It is not always an easy sacrifice.
  |-- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM6/wRqCk2fENdzpVAQF3awQAk/fdi6lPL8rdxiiHNfqrCoSj8i9J8i1M
U1nIy4v5rnUmO9T35RsbxOhRahnIOakLU0lP1sJmB4YaxwLcdlQs1ZddlNhRYnIK
HvlkAI/4eiurP2j+kv/CxBYdd+ebsra+b/MHnbcRtWSLDse1ERK3Lg1QQIYV3BZ3
NBaA1RR5E8E=
=YLH3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: libshadow.a ?

1997-06-24 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Tue, 24 Jun 1997, Roger Endo wrote:

 Hi,
 Looking for libshadow.a.  Does not seem to be in Debian 1.3 as 
 I checked the Contents file.  It was in the experimental shadow
 package in earlier versions.  Can anybody tell me where it is?

If I'm not mistaken, shadow support is built into both libc5 and libc6,
and there is no need for a libshadow as the functions already are
included.  The shadow support was merges into the default login and passwd
packages.

- -- 
   Scott K. Ellis|   Live never to be ashamed if anything
http://www.gate.net/~storm/  |  you do or say is published around the world --
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]|  even if what is published is not true.
 |   -- Illusions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM7AuHqCk2fENdzpVAQHGJAQAjvdJDV6L7EQqW/r9kn6kXv77sftmHYMt
UR38i8tOMXeN9PE3D6/CvNGrxbTl/YLyActHvIANYHS8u7U5tNXcABVoVVmVjEgL
Jzl9uyn8OWouQYjNQ9XkNuP3j7+XE/XUE+jELQTsM+rmqQKo7JlbppwY+Pkj7a2H
kASFHAPE4So=
=2U0O
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Cron root@yogi atrun -d -l 0.5 (fwd) What does this error mean ?

1997-06-23 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Mon, 23 Jun 1997, Stan Brown wrote:

   I sudenly started getting this message from my Debian box. I have not
   chnaged anythig on the Debian box. I did reboot anothermachine on the
   network yesterday. Does anyone have any ideas what this might mean ?
 
   Thanks.
 
 Forwarded message:
 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 23 05:34:13 EDT 1997
 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 05:34:10 -0400 (EDT)
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cron Daemon)
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Cron [EMAIL PROTECTED] atrun -d -l 0.5
 X-Cron-Env: SHELL=/bin/sh
 X-Cron-Env: 
 PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin
 X-Cron-Env: HOME=/root
 X-Cron-Env: LOGNAME=root
 
 yp_first: clnt_call: RPC: Timed out

The atrun call in your crontab (which is set to run every minute by
default), had a problem talking to your NIS/YP server.  Transient failure.
The version of at in Debian 1.3 uses a seperate daemon rather than
depending on cron now.

++
||  Your friends will know you better in the |
|   Scott K. Ellis   |   first minute you meet than your acquaintances   |
|   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   | will know you in a thousand years.|
||-- Illusions   |
++

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM66lvaCk2fENdzpVAQFnEgP9ErZf2kV1D9VIDMVWh1/02WGnFbc7SoKY
9knC6uydhR3cqaETcJ3GsuplFFJmD8iSqNxzSJog3lo4CMVGJMCaZpeorKVGEr4M
bQ6bnwE6JWgUM3YelnlQ9CiV2Y1QsLEMYHhyePAq0mVLrKCQqXlTaq1YUpks6jUE
dsXtksUsqOk=
=YB2X
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


  1   2   >