Il 29/08/2018 10:34, to...@tuxteam.de ha scritto:
> My recommendation over here in Germany (which should be as accessible
> to you as an Italian, but perhaps there are equivalent Italian offers,
> which I'd tend to support, were I you)
>
> - posteo.de
> - mailbox.org
>
> Each of them cost
Thank you for all your precious advices and considerations, expecially
for privacy-releaded concerns. Indeed, I'm very well aware of this
aspects, but perhaps you're missing my point: the mailbox will be used
*only* for mailing lists, which content is (usually) of public domain,
on the web. So
Il 28/08/2018 18:25, Mark Rousell ha scritto:
> Instead I'd say that running your own mail server would be best for this
Sorry, I forgot to mention that I dont't want to run a mail server by
myself.
Il 28/08/2018 18:39, John Hasler ha scritto:
> I can personally recommend a paid email service:
Ciao,
As a member of this mailing list, I have a little (OT) question for you:
which is the best free email service around to receive mailing lists?
I mean, somethihng that has a good Imap server, good enough to be
accessed by a MUA like Thunderbird without issues, and good spam filter
which
On 16/02/2017 21:26, Glenn English wrote:
> No. I've never used it, but a friend of mine does. And it takes forever
> for him to do a backup. So I assumed it was dd. Maybe it's that other
> OS X disk clone 'backup.'
>
> But when he's done, he doesn't have an incremental backup, just a clone.
>
On 16/02/2017 18:27, Glenn English wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 3:42 AM, Francesco Porro <fra...@gmail.com
> <mailto:fra...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> When I was on Mac OS X, several years ago, I used to use CCC (carbon
> copy cloner) whic
On 16/02/2017 17:33, Erwan David wrote:
>> I've already tried the latter before, when I was on Ubuntu (it comes
>> preinstalled in ubuntu). The thing I didn't like too much of deja-dup
>> was the inability to set a threshold for the backups to keep. I mean: i
>> wasn't able to say: hey, keep N
On 16/02/2017 17:36, Boyan Penkov wrote:
>
>
> On 02/16/2017 11:27 AM, Francesco Porro wrote:
>> On 16/02/2017 15:03, Boyan Penkov wrote:
>>> I similarly found this to be a pain, and then decided to wrap a few
>>> calls to duplicity-clean, and --keep-all-but-
On 16/02/2017 14:50, Hans wrote:
> Yes, of course. I did not see, that you meant "daily backups". For daily
> backups try "back-in-time", it is nicely configurable and is based on rsync
> and
> some other tools. And you can configure time based backups and restores.
Yes I forgot to say some
On 16/02/2017 15:03, Boyan Penkov wrote:
> I similarly found this to be a pain, and then decided to wrap a few
> calls to duplicity-clean, and --keep-all-but-N in a shell script that
> gets anacron'd...
Well this is the workaround! :) I'll try it later. Thanks!
--
fp
pgp: 0x45399C26
On 16/02/2017 14:45, Boyan Penkov wrote:
>
> On 02/16/2017 08:33 AM, Francesco Porro wrote:
>>
>> If I'm not wrong, this one is based on "dup" and works the same way?
>
> I don't think so; which "dup" are you referring to? -- the most I know
> is th
On 16/02/2017 12:18, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> Hi, Francesco
Hi Daniel
> Another alternative could be to use Dirvish.
As stated in Dirvish' website:
«Dirvish is a fast, disk based, rotating network backup system. With
dirvish you can maintain a set of complete images of your filesystems
with
On 16/02/2017 13:14, Boyan Penkov wrote:
> http://duplicity.nongnu.org/
>
> I use it on remote backups when I don’t trust the destination
> (therefore, all encryption happens locally), and on local-to-local
> copies (copy home to, say, another partition).
>
> About the only caveat is it cannon
On 16/02/2017 12:23, Hans wrote:> Has anybody already mentioned
"clonezilla"?
>
> Just usefull in case at also physical defects.
Hi, I've used Clonezilla a couple of months ago for cloning my sister's
Windows partition. But perhaps this tools is more recommended for
cloning disks/partitions than
On 16/02/2017 12:04, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> Now if you are talking about "Real Snapshots" (i.e. files don't change
> during backup and stuff)
> With rsync you'll always have some skew (i.e. the world is changing
> while the backup is running).
Well, with the word "snapshot" I meant a "dump"
Sorry guys, I'm new to mailings list so I made a little mess sending
replies first to you mailbox and than to the correct mailinglist
address, resulting in two copies...
--
fp
pgp: 0x45399C26
On 16/02/2017 09:15, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> rsync.
>
> To a LUKS-encrypted USB drive (my laptop's drive is LUKS, so it seemed
> to be a majot weak point to have all on an unencrpted thumb I could lose
> anytime ;-)
> [cut]
that's very similar to my current backup-style, I use rsync with a
On 16/02/2017 03:39, Martin McCormick wrote:
> I use rsnapshot.
Very nice one! This has what I was looking for, indeed there's a link in
the main page to the article that I posted before. I'll give it a try,
for sure!
Thank you Martin!
--
fp
pgp: 0x45399C26
On 16/02/2017 06:44, solitone wrote:
> I'm happy with backup2l [1]. It's very simple to configure, supports
> incremental backups, and it's fully automated.
A bit of configuration is required but it seems ok and easy enough!
> I also like it because it is simple to extract specific files you
Hi Greg!
On 15/02/2017 23:42, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Why? What do you want to do that your existing solution doesn't do?
> Just swapping out a working solution for something more complex without
> some compelling reason is not a good idea.
Two reason:
1) In my home environment I'd like to
Hi guys, It's the first time I'm posting here. I'm both a Fedora and
Debian user.
Which backup tool do you use?
At this time I feel comfortable with rsync, which I use to sync my home
to an external Usb drive. No automation, no scheduling for now. I just
launch rsync from the command line and let
21 matches
Mail list logo
