stalled WIN98 system ?
>>
>> If the goal is just to experiment then you could run an older version of
>> debian. (I think there's not enough memory for the current install
>> routine.) OpenBSD or NetBSD or a linux distribution oriented toward
>> small systems would run. Nothi
e Files for every Locale in the World! It
> took a while to clean this up!
>
> > On Fri, 3 Jul 2020, Davide Lombardo wrote:
> > > Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 13:17:33
> > > From: Davide Lombardo
> > > To: Debian-user List Debian
> > > Subject: Very old hard
On Friday, 3 July 2020 20:01:50 CEST Christian Groessler wrote:
> 3000 Lire?
>
> Did you mean 3.000,000 Lire?
>
> regards,
> chris
>
> On 2020-07-03 19:17, Davide Lombardo wrote:
> > Good evening Debian User, I have found an old PC with these specs:
> > CPU: Pentium III 700 Mhz;
> > DRAM: 64 MB
On 7/3/20 5:40 PM, Kenneth Parker wrote:
> This is, actually something I would like to do. Anyone know of good
> Computer Museums in areas they've been in? (I remember a good one,
> South of San Francisco, but that's on the other side of the Country from
> North Carolina).
>
> I have a couple
On Friday, 3 July 2020 22:57:06 CEST Charles Curley wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Jul 2020 19:17:33 +0200
>
> Davide Lombardo wrote:
> > Good evening Debian User, I have found an old PC with these specs:
> > CPU: Pentium III 700 Mhz;
>
> It might be useful to identify the manufacturer of the computer or
On Fri, 03 Jul 2020 19:17:33 +0200
Davide Lombardo wrote:
> Good evening Debian User, I have found an old PC with these specs:
> CPU: Pentium III 700 Mhz;
> DRAM: 64 MB SDDR
> GPU: RIVA TNT-2
> HARDISK: 10 GB
> FLOPPY DISK DRIVE
> MODEM 56K
> In the receipt is written 3,000 Lire (1,500) Euro of
Davide Lombardo wrote:
> Maybe I can just setup this PC as a Tor's Relay
Perhaps you did not understand correctly. The old 386 architecture is not
likely to be supported by recent kernels. The power consumptioned to
processing power ratio is below reasonable value.
It is not likely it makes
run an older version of
> debian. (I think there's not enough memory for the current install
> routine.) OpenBSD or NetBSD or a linux distribution oriented toward
> small systems would run. Nothing will give you a good experience with a
> GUI and web browser on that hardware. For pra
e you a good experience with a
> GUI and web browser on that hardware. For practical purposes, you'd be
> better off with a $35 raspberry PI.
I was also thinking of this. It is so old, that it is not worth the
electricity it consumes.
W light bulb.
>
> +1
agreed with all those too.
much easier to work with more memory and more recent
processor/graphics.
give it to the recycler and move on.
i finally gave up a closet full of old hardware and a
huge monitor that was taking up so much space on my desk
that weighed abo
On 07/03/2020 06:40 PM, Kenneth Parker wrote:
This is, actually something I would like to do. Anyone know of good
Computer Museums in areas they've been in? (I remember a good one, South
of San Francisco, but that's on the other side of the Country from North
Carolina).
I don't know of a
On 2020-07-03 11:08, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Friday 03 July 2020 13:17:33 Davide Lombardo wrote:
Good evening Debian User, I have found an old PC with these specs:
Donate it to the curbside pickup.
+1
On 2020-07-03 11:58, Michael Stone wrote:
> For practical purposes, you'd be better off
ardo wrote:
>
> > Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 13:17:33
> > From: Davide Lombardo
> > To: Debian-user List Debian
> > Subject: Very old hardware...
> >
> > Good evening Debian User, I have found an old PC with these specs:
> > CPU: Pentium III 700 Mhz;
> >
This is, actually something I would like to do. Anyone know of good
Computer Museums in areas they've been in? (I remember a good one, South
of San Francisco, but that's on the other side of the Country from North
Carolina).
I have a couple that I REALLY want to make work, in a Museum
On Fri, 03 Jul 2020 19:17:33 +0200
Davide Lombardo wrote:
> Good evening Debian User, I have found an old PC with these specs:
> CPU: Pentium III 700 Mhz;
It might be useful to identify the manufacturer of the computer or
motherboard, and search the Internet for documentation.
You may want to
kett wrote:
> Donate it to the curbside pickup.
When the Big Entropy Re-Collector reboots you in the year 1,000,000 AD
you will be accused of cruelty to hardware. Have a good excuse ready.
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
small systems would run. Nothing will give you a good experience with a
GUI and web browser on that hardware. For practical purposes, you'd be
better off with a $35 raspberry PI.
On 7/3/20 8:17 PM, Davide Lombardo wrote:
> Good evening Debian User, I have found an old PC with these specs:
> CPU: Pentium III 700 Mhz;
> DRAM: 64 MB SDDR
> GPU: RIVA TNT-2
> HARDISK: 10 GB
> FLOPPY DISK DRIVE
> MODEM 56K
> In the receipt is written 3,000 Lire (1,500) Euro of today...
> Do you
3000 Lire?
Did you mean 3.000,000 Lire?
regards,
chris
On 2020-07-03 19:17, Davide Lombardo wrote:
Good evening Debian User, I have found an old PC with these specs:
CPU: Pentium III 700 Mhz;
DRAM: 64 MB SDDR
GPU: RIVA TNT-2
HARDISK: 10 GB
FLOPPY DISK DRIVE
MODEM 56K
In the receipt is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, July 3, 2020 12:08 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 03 July 2020 13:17:33 Davide Lombardo wrote:
>
> > Good evening Debian User, I have found an old PC with these specs:
> > CPU: Pentium III 700
!
OpenGl-games might run, but the Riva TNT-2 is hardware accelerated, but
compared to modern cards --slow!
Problems might come in hardware, for example sound, but alsa should do it. If
it runs pulseaudio? Do not know.
I would give it a try. As I said above, LXDE would be my choice for a window
On Friday 03 July 2020 13:17:33 Davide Lombardo wrote:
> Good evening Debian User, I have found an old PC with these specs:
> CPU: Pentium III 700 Mhz;
> DRAM: 64 MB SDDR
> GPU: RIVA TNT-2
> HARDISK: 10 GB
> FLOPPY DISK DRIVE
> MODEM 56K
> In the receipt is written 3,000 Lire (1,500) Euro of
Debian with xfce or mate or cinnamon may install and run well. I don't
recommend gnome.
On Fri, 3 Jul 2020, Davide Lombardo wrote:
> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 13:17:33
> From: Davide Lombardo
> To: Debian-user List Debian
> Subject: Very old hardware...
>
> Good evening Debian
Good evening Debian User, I have found an old PC with these specs:
CPU: Pentium III 700 Mhz;
DRAM: 64 MB SDDR
GPU: RIVA TNT-2
HARDISK: 10 GB
FLOPPY DISK DRIVE
MODEM 56K
In the receipt is written 3,000 Lire (1,500) Euro of today...
Do you think I can install something different than the already
Miles Fidelman wrote:
> On 7/1/20 7:04 AM, Reco wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 08:49:09PM +1000, elvis wrote:
> > > On 1/7/20 4:51 am, Dan Ritter wrote:
[attributions snipped]
> > > > > No.. if you want to be pedantic, the proper terminology is "Linux
> > > > > Raid" or
> > > > > "md
On 7/1/20 8:15 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
On 7/1/20 7:04 AM, Reco wrote:
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 08:49:09PM +1000, elvis wrote:
On 1/7/20 4:51 am, Dan Ritter wrote:
Miles Fidelman wrote:
On 6/29/20 7:20 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
Miles Fidelman wrote:
On 6/29/20 9:10 AM, Dan Ritter wrote:
On 7/1/20 7:04 AM, Reco wrote:
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 08:49:09PM +1000, elvis wrote:
On 1/7/20 4:51 am, Dan Ritter wrote:
Miles Fidelman wrote:
On 6/29/20 7:20 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
Miles Fidelman wrote:
On 6/29/20 9:10 AM, Dan Ritter wrote:
Miles Fidelman wrote:
Now who's being
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 08:49:09PM +1000, elvis wrote:
>
> On 1/7/20 4:51 am, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > Miles Fidelman wrote:
> > > On 6/29/20 7:20 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > >
> > > > Miles Fidelman wrote:
> > > > > On 6/29/20 9:10 AM, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Miles Fidelman wrote:
>
On 1/7/20 4:51 am, Dan Ritter wrote:
Miles Fidelman wrote:
On 6/29/20 7:20 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
Miles Fidelman wrote:
On 6/29/20 9:10 AM, Dan Ritter wrote:
Miles Fidelman wrote:
Now who's being pedantic?
Precisely.
And isn't this exactly what I said??? mdadm is an admin program, it
Miles Fidelman wrote:
> On 6/29/20 7:20 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> > Miles Fidelman wrote:
> > > On 6/29/20 9:10 AM, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > >
> > > > Miles Fidelman wrote:
> > > Now who's being pedantic?
> > Precisely.
> >
> > > And isn't this exactly what I said??? mdadm is an admin program, it
On 6/29/20 7:20 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
Miles Fidelman wrote:
On 6/29/20 9:10 AM, Dan Ritter wrote:
Miles Fidelman wrote:
Now who's being pedantic?
Precisely.
And isn't this exactly what I said??? mdadm is an admin program, it doesn't
perform the raid function.
And it's OK to refer to the
Miles Fidelman wrote:
> On 6/29/20 9:10 AM, Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> > Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Now who's being pedantic?
Precisely.
> And isn't this exactly what I said??? mdadm is an admin program, it doesn't
> perform the raid function.
And it's OK to refer to the whole thing as an mdadm RAID.
On 2020-06-29 10:40, echo test wrote:
> On 2020-06-28 18:58, David Christensen wrote:
ZFS requires a different way of thinking,
At what level do we have to change our mind?
Thus far, I have had to re-think operations, maintenance, and disaster
recovery. As I develop software, I must
Actually, he seems to be designing a central database to support 2000
retail restaurants.
And based on most recent posts, seems to be pre-startup designing a product.
My sense is that what he really needs is somebody on the team who
understands distributed enterprise architectures.
Miles
On 6/29/20 9:10 AM, Dan Ritter wrote:
Miles Fidelman wrote:
Just to be clear... mdadm is NOT raid - it's an admin program for managing
linux raid (md) devices.?? And then you need to worry about LVM (logical
volume manager), and a network file system on top of them.
Just to be clear, you are
:
> > > > > > I'm curious, although I don't know much about, and have little
> > > > > > experience with, enterprise hardware. Am I correct in my
> > > > > > understanding
> > > > > > that it is actually possible
for the relevant fields, and the query took a few minutes.
Powerful hardware is nice, but using it efficiently is even better.
ZFS beeing a filesystem and mdadm an utility software, I think I'll go
for mdadm. I didn't know that Debian was supporting ZFS I always used
Ext4.
For ZFS on Debian, install
On Lu, 29 iun 20, 09:25:03, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
>
> Il 29/06/20 09:02, Andrei POPESCU ha scritto:
> > On Du, 28 iun 20, 00:16:05, David Christensen wrote:
> > > I have yet to
> > > hear of an "enterprise" environment built on Debian, but you can tell us
> > > about yours when you build it.
roduct we are going to build will
cover all those aspects a.k.a building this means our product is ready and
we gained more experience on the subject.
> I added indexes for the relevant fields, and the query took a few
minutes. Powerful hardware is nice, but using it efficiently is even better
Infi
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 18:32:40 +0200
MAS Jean-Louis wrote:
...
> We have about 100 servers now, mostly Dell, and we are working with
> Dell for about 17 years, without any troubles. We owned several hundred
> Dell's servers during those years, mostly running on Debian.
>
> Everything work fine
Le 29/06/2020 à 17:31, Reco a écrit :
> I see nothing wrong with Dell servers per se. If one really needs
> something relatively cheap and durable - there's nothing wrong with
> Dell (or Supermicro, but that's politics again). But, it's Tier 2, not
> 1. So - my quote at the top.
We have about
bout, and have little
> > > > > experience with, enterprise hardware. Am I correct in my understanding
> > > > > that it is actually possible to run (more-or-less) Debian on a switch
> > > > > by using OpenSwitch (OPX) on an Open Networking switch.
> > >
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 18:58:18 +0300
Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:51:52AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > > > I'm curious, although I don't know much about, and have little
> > > > experience with, enterprise hardware.
Hi.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:51:52AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > > I'm curious, although I don't know much about, and have little
> > > experience with, enterprise hardware. Am I correct in my understanding
> > > that it is actually possible to run (more-
gt; All of those duties except the switch can reasonable be run on
> > > Debian servers.
> >
> > I'm curious, although I don't know much about, and have little
> > experience with, enterprise hardware. Am I correct in my understanding
> > that it is actually possi
n reasonable be run on
> > > Debian servers.
> >
> > I'm curious, although I don't know much about, and have little
> > experience with, enterprise hardware. Am I correct in my understanding
> > that it is actually possible to run (more-or-less) Debian on a switch
> > by u
Hi.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:22:21AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > Anything else is at least one tier lower so why bother discussing it?
>
> What do you have against Dell?
I have a troubled past with EMC :)
> Everything I've read indicates that their enterprise gear is very
> good, and
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 16:45:48 +0300
Reco wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 01:27:05AM +1200, Richard Hector wrote:
> > > I'll be original here. Try SunFire X-series (aka SunServer X). Somewhat
> > > costly, and the hardware quality is a hit or miss in newer models, but
>
> 2 web servers
> > a database server
> > a mail server
> > a general utility box with lots of storage to handle backups
> >
> > All of those duties except the switch can reasonable be run on
> > Debian servers.
>
> I'm curious, although I don'
t; a mail server
> > a general utility box with lots of storage to handle backups
> >
> > All of those duties except the switch can reasonable be run on
> > Debian servers.
>
> I'm curious, although I don't know much about, and have little
> experience with, enterpris
ps
>
> All of those duties except the switch can reasonable be run on
> Debian servers.
I'm curious, although I don't know much about, and have little
experience with, enterprise hardware. Am I correct in my understanding
that it is actually possible to run (more-or-less) Debian on a switch
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 01:27:05AM +1200, Richard Hector wrote:
> > I'll be original here. Try SunFire X-series (aka SunServer X). Somewhat
> > costly, and the hardware quality is a hit or miss in newer models, but
> > runs Debian stable like it was designed for it.
>
> I
ion that they support Debian.
> I'll be original here. Try SunFire X-series (aka SunServer X). Somewhat
> costly, and the hardware quality is a hit or miss in newer models, but
> runs Debian stable like it was designed for it.
I'm a little unclear what you're suggesting here - Sun Fire
Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Just to be clear... mdadm is NOT raid - it's an admin program for managing
> linux raid (md) devices.?? And then you need to worry about LVM (logical
> volume manager), and a network file system on top of them.
Just to be clear, you are being pedantic bordering on wrong
D. R. Evans wrote:
> Dan Ritter wrote on 6/26/20 1:41 PM:
> > echo test wrote:
> >
> >> Note: I will need some RAID solution hard or soft.
> >
> > We are firmly of the opinion that mdadm or ZFS are the best
> > solutions here.
> >
>
> Absolutely.
>
> Actually I'd go further and differentiate
On 2020-06-29 00:02, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Du, 28 iun 20, 00:16:05, David Christensen wrote:
I have yet to
hear of an "enterprise" environment built on Debian, but you can tell us
about yours when you build it. (URL's for examples of such are welcome.)
Maybe some of the deployments here
Il 29/06/20 09:02, Andrei POPESCU ha scritto:
On Du, 28 iun 20, 00:16:05, David Christensen wrote:
I have yet to
hear of an "enterprise" environment built on Debian, but you can tell us
about yours when you build it. (URL's for examples of such are welcome.)
Maybe some of the deployments
On Du, 28 iun 20, 00:16:05, David Christensen wrote:
> I have yet to
> hear of an "enterprise" environment built on Debian, but you can tell us
> about yours when you build it. (URL's for examples of such are welcome.)
Maybe some of the deployments here fit your definition of "enterprise".
rt beyond security updates for its
packages and this list.
You either do it yourself or you hire a third-party (see
https://www.debian.org/consultants).
2. Hardware vendors don't certify their products with Debian (there is
no incentive to do so). This matters if you want / must use specialized
prod
Not necessarily, and in particular not given his needs, if I recall
them correctly. LVM is fine for many purposes, but it is not required,
nor is a network file system. My servers at home have no partitions and
no LVM, and I have the RAID system for the data volume formatted as XFS.
I use
On 2020-06-28 19:19, David Christensen wrote:
On 2020-06-28 11:24, Miles Fidelman wrote:
RAID is easy - Debian supports a number of software RAID options, and
most motherboards support some form of hardware RAID (as to many
external drive enclosures).
Yes. I avoid them.
Correction -- I
king in the wrong place. Look at the Debian site, for the
list of supported hardware. Look at the installation documents for
driver installation (which is more an issue for peripheral support - is
there a driver for every device that you plan to install?).
I looked for certified hardware. De
On 6/28/20 3:58 PM, D. R. Evans wrote:
Dan Ritter wrote on 6/26/20 1:41 PM:
echo test wrote:
Note: I will need some RAID solution hard or soft.
We are firmly of the opinion that mdadm or ZFS are the best
solutions here.
Absolutely.
Actually I'd go further and differentiate the two by
Dan Ritter wrote on 6/26/20 1:41 PM:
> echo test wrote:
>
>> Note: I will need some RAID solution hard or soft.
>
> We are firmly of the opinion that mdadm or ZFS are the best
> solutions here.
>
Absolutely.
Actually I'd go further and differentiate the two by suggesting that if you
use ECC
ng with a dozen or more other file systems.
Sorry if I'm misunderstanding, are you saying that Debian cannot
scale in a bigger enterprise ?
Can you tell me what happened with hardware RAID solutions?
> small" could be anything from 10 to 1000 users. Mentioning some numbers
>
in the last ~20 years. (But, it is
common for the "stable" version not to work on recently designed
hardware.) I also have a Ubiquitti Networks Unifi Controller
application stack running on a Debian VPS on the Internet ($5/month).
I am the only user and it has never failed. Other peopl
upporting ZFS I always used Ext4.
> Well, this might be heresy, but at that size, consider a Raspberry Pi
running Raspian
> I use a 3+ because I want to give the 4 a couple years to get its
hardware and software debugged.
I already have some raspberry pi running at home and even if I found
David Christensen wrote:
> There have been 16 responses to your post in the past 36+ hours. You
> should reply to at least some of them.
>
>
> David
Excellent reading (at least for me) even if OP does not reply, it is not
wasted.
regards
center for my company for hosting a web
app and a mail server. It's the first time I'm going to buy some hardware
for this.
Please specify the architecture of your services, your current
development/ test/ staging/ production infrastructure and facilities,
your current workload for each service
Hello,
>>>
>>> First of all, please don't ask me why I simply don't want to
use aws
>>> or gcp.
>>>
>>> Then, I want to build a small data center for my company for
hosting
>>> a web app and a mail server. It's the first ti
't want to use aws
> >>> or gcp.
> >>>
> >>> Then, I want to build a small data center for my company for hosting
> >>> a web app and a mail server. It's the first time I'm going to buy
> >>> some hardware for this. I tried looking for it on the we
or gcp.
Then, I want to build a small data center for my company for hosting
a web app and a mail server. It's the first time I'm going to buy
some hardware for this. I tried looking for it on the web in order to
compare them but it seems that hardware vendors never want to talk
abou
Miles Fidelman wrote:
> One other alternative: A lot of people seem to swear by Mac Minis as
> servers.?? They're already BSD under the hood, and I've run all kinds of
> Linux distros on Macs, under virtualization.?? You should be able to run
> Debian directly, though I've never tried it.
I
all data center for my company for hosting
a web app and a mail server. It's the first time I'm going to buy
some hardware for this. I tried looking for it on the web in order to
compare them but it seems that hardware vendors never want to talk
about Debian on their websites.
Seriously, I prefer
hosting a web
> > app and a mail server. It's the first time I'm going to buy some hardware
> > for this. I tried looking for it on the web in order to compare them but it
> > seems that hardware vendors never want to talk about Debian on their
> > websites.
>
> &
On Vi, 26 iun 20, 20:34:07, echo test wrote:
> Hello,
>
> First of all, please don't ask me why I simply don't want to use aws or gcp.
>
> Then, I want to build a small data center for my company for hosting a web
> app and a mail server. It's the first time I'm going to
mode and then create and manage the array with
mdadm. I have been burned more than once with hardware RAID solutions.
On 6/26/2020 1:34 PM, echo test wrote:
Hello,
First of all, please don't ask me why I simply don't want to use aws or gcp.
Then, I want to build a small data center for my
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, June 26, 2020 12:34 PM, echo test wrote:
> Then, I want to build a small data center for my company for hosting
a web app and a mail server. It's the first time I'm going to buy some
hardware for this. I tried looking for it on the web in or
Hi.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 04:43:15PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > > Note: I will need some RAID solution hard or soft.
> >
> > Anything that's made by LSI if you need a hardware RAID controller.
> > Mdraid if whatever they sold you is not made by LSI.
>
r mention that they support Debian.
>
> I'll be original here. Try SunFire X-series (aka SunServer X). Somewhat
> costly, and the hardware quality is a hit or miss in newer models, but
> runs Debian stable like it was designed for it.
>
>
> > Note: I will need some RAID solu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, June 26, 2020 12:34 PM, echo test wrote:
> Then, I want to build a small data center for my company for hosting a web
> app and a mail server. It's the first time I'm going to buy some ha
original here. Try SunFire X-series (aka SunServer X). Somewhat
costly, and the hardware quality is a hit or miss in newer models, but
runs Debian stable like it was designed for it.
> Note: I will need some RAID solution hard or soft.
Anything that's made by LSI if you need a hardware RAI
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020, 2:41 PM Dan Ritter wrote:
> echo test wrote:
> > Then, I want to build a small data center for my company for hosting a
> web
> > app and a mail server. It's the first time I'm going to buy some hardware
> > for this. I tried looking for it on the
at
> kind of issues can I encounter with such hardwares except simple cases
> like having to install missing drivers with some already available
> firmwares.
>
I decided to not spend money on server hardware (data volume and load are
really minimal), because this hardware is
a) more e
echo test wrote:
> Then, I want to build a small data center for my company for hosting a web
> app and a mail server. It's the first time I'm going to buy some hardware
> for this. I tried looking for it on the web in order to compare them but it
> seems that hardware vendors never
Hello,
First of all, please don't ask me why I simply don't want to use aws or gcp.
Then, I want to build a small data center for my company for hosting a web
app and a mail server. It's the first time I'm going to buy some hardware
for this. I tried looking for it on the web in order to compare
On 2020-05-14 12:22, Yvan Masson wrote:
Le 13/05/2020 à 02:30, David Christensen a écrit :
On 2020-05-12 08:04, Yvan Masson wrote:
Le 12/05/2020 à 03:37, David Christensen a écrit :
On 2020-05-11 10:28, Yvan Masson wrote:
What is the model/ part number of your computer?
It is an Acer
Le 14/05/2020 à 21:22, Yvan Masson a écrit :
Le 13/05/2020 à 02:30, David Christensen a écrit :
On 2020-05-12 08:04, Yvan Masson wrote:
Le 12/05/2020 à 03:37, David Christensen a écrit :
On 2020-05-11 10:28, Yvan Masson wrote:
Was the memory in your computer installed by Acer?
I believe
Le 13/05/2020 à 02:30, David Christensen a écrit :
On 2020-05-12 08:04, Yvan Masson wrote:
Le 12/05/2020 à 03:37, David Christensen a écrit :
On 2020-05-11 10:28, Yvan Masson wrote:
Was the memory in your computer installed by Acer?
I believe so.
Okay.
Have you removed or inserted any
On 2020-05-12 08:04, Yvan Masson wrote:
Le 12/05/2020 à 03:37, David Christensen a écrit :
On 2020-05-11 10:28, Yvan Masson wrote:
Was the memory in your computer installed by Acer?
I believe so.
Okay.
Have you removed or inserted any memory modules?
Not before the issue arose.
Le 12/05/2020 à 03:37, David Christensen a écrit :
On 2020-05-11 10:28, Yvan Masson wrote:
Hi,
I installed Debian 10 on a Acer AspireOne (32 bits processor, 1GB RAM).
Installation failed two times with corrupted packages, each time on
same package (tcllib). I finally manage to re-download and
On 2020-05-11 10:28, Yvan Masson wrote:
Hi,
I installed Debian 10 on a Acer AspireOne (32 bits processor, 1GB RAM).
Installation failed two times with corrupted packages, each time on same
package (tcllib). I finally manage to re-download and install it by hand
in another TTY so that the
I do not know well the subject but RAM problems can be a nightmare and I
suppose yours could be -for example- caused by a particular area of the
RAM that does not systematically fail under workload (transiant fault)
and thus is not detected
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_tester
Le 11/05/2020 à 20:03, didier gaumet a écrit :
Hello,
perhaps try to install in text mode and lowmem:
https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch05s03.en.html
perhaps you have a RAM problem in a particular area that is not reported
by the RAM verifying tool you used.
If the installation
Hello,
perhaps try to install in text mode and lowmem:
https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch05s03.en.html
perhaps you have a RAM problem in a particular area that is not reported
by the RAM verifying tool you used.
If the installation succeeds, it could mean you have to replace the
Hi,
I installed Debian 10 on a Acer AspireOne (32 bits processor, 1GB RAM).
Installation failed two times with corrupted packages, each time on same
package (tcllib). I finally manage to re-download and install it by hand
in another TTY so that the installer could finish. However, after the
On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 12:00:58 -0700
"Neil E. Hodges" <47hasbe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Does anybody know the status of hardware-accelerated video playback in
> Chromium on Debian as of 2020? There's a lot of outdated information
> out there, and
Hello everyone,
Does anybody know the status of hardware-accelerated video playback in
Chromium on Debian as of 2020? There's a lot of outdated information
out there, and the only recent stuff I've seen has involved a PPA on
Ubuntu.
Thank you,
- Neil
On Sun, 15 Mar 2020 22:04:09 +0100
Geert Stappers wrote:
> > Ik vermoed dat het geen probleem is, maar voor service en garantie
> > is Richard op vakantie.
>
> Kort: Het bleek inderdaad geen probleem te zijn.
>
> Schema van het developmentboard laat zien dat er een
> stroombegrenzerchip zit
On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 03:11:12PM +0100, Richard Lucassen wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 13:59:18 +0100 Geert Stappers wrote:
>
> > Een developmentboard met 5Volt voeding op eigen connector,
> > dat ook een USB-OTG connector met 5Volt heeft,
> > durf ik niet beide tegelijk aansluiten.
> >
> > Hoe
501 - 600 of 5220 matches
Mail list logo
