Re: [Kris.VanHeurck@siemens.atea.be: i810 chipset on potato]

2001-05-29 Thread Derya PALANCI
Sorry for old wrong mail.. :((

Dear Jim,

I did the same thing you said because i had the same problem... But my
debian couldnt find Glibc_2.0 package... I couldnt find anywhere so i
decided to ask. Do you remember where did you fing it ? Intel's rpm requires
that file... Any idea?

Thanks in advance...



 I'm not sure if our two situations are similar, but a couple of months
 ago I had to install Debian (potato) on a Dell Optiplex, which has an
 on-board video card which uses the i810 chipset.

 It worked beautifully in the end, but the only way I found to make it
 work well was to use the version of the agpgart module available from
 the Intel site itself, along with the XFCom_i810 server from the same
 site (support.intel.com).

 There's a PDF document at the Intel site which provides very clear
 step by step instructions for all of this. I still have a copy which
 I'll be happy to mail you if you want it.

 I have a worry that having set the system up this way is going to
 complicate the upgrade to woody and XFree 2.4; but at the time it was
 the only solution that I could actually make work. And it worked
 really well.

 Jim


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [Kris.VanHeurck@siemens.atea.be: i810 chipset on potato]

2001-05-29 Thread Derya PALANCI
Dear Paul

You wrote to Kris 

 You should upgrade the entire distribution to Woody.  Do the following:


Do i have to upgrade to woody? Cant i just use the potato and configure my x
server  with a i810 chipset? I've downloaded the rpm from the intel's site.
Now i'm downloading the glibc  but i was hoping that everything would be
ok when i downloaded it...



[Kris.VanHeurck@siemens.atea.be: i810 chipset on potato]

2001-05-27 Thread Jim McCloskey

| I am currently installing Debian GNU/Linux potato on a machine in
| our labs.  I found out (by opening the case, since I had no
| documentation on the machine) that there is a i810 chipset inside.

I'm not sure if our two situations are similar, but a couple of months
ago I had to install Debian (potato) on a Dell Optiplex, which has an
on-board video card which uses the i810 chipset.

It worked beautifully in the end, but the only way I found to make it
work well was to use the version of the agpgart module available from
the Intel site itself, along with the XFCom_i810 server from the same
site (support.intel.com).

There's a PDF document at the Intel site which provides very clear
step by step instructions for all of this. I still have a copy which
I'll be happy to mail you if you want it. 

I have a worry that having set the system up this way is going to
complicate the upgrade to woody and XFree 2.4; but at the time it was
the only solution that I could actually make work. And it worked
really well.

Jim



[Kris.VanHeurck@siemens.atea.be: i810 chipset on potato]

2001-05-26 Thread Branden Robinson
Can someone help this guy out, please?

- Forwarded message from Van Heurck Kris [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

From: Van Heurck Kris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:  i810 chipset on potato
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 15:00:39 +0200
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Dear X Strike Force,

I am currently installing Debian GNU/Linux potato on a machine in our labs.
I found out (by opening the case, since I had no documentation on the
machine) that there is a i810 chipset inside.
I found the debian-page on this matter (XFree86 with i810 chipset) but had
no succes so far on inserting the module which I succesfully compiled from
i810-agpgart-module.tar.gz into my kernel which is kernel-image-2.2.18pre21
(and I also compiled succesfully myself). It reports unresolved symbols.
Should I upgrade my xserver to woody or sid, since you say on your webpage:
[23 Dec 2000] This has been removed since the official Linux kernel and
XFree86 4.x are now in sync with each other.. what does this mean ??
Can you help me out by getting my xserver running ?

thanks,
Kris

Kris Van Heurck
Software Engineer 
Network Solutions - Communication Services
Siemens IC D NC C
current project: Mobile applications level 1
tel. +32 (0)14/25 3966
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Linux... every EE should consider it

- End forwarded message -

-- 
G. Branden Robinson |   You don't just decide to break Kubrick's
Debian GNU/Linux|   code of silence and then get drawn away
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |   from it to a discussion about cough
http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |   medicine.



Re: [Kris.VanHeurck@siemens.atea.be: i810 chipset on potato]

2001-05-26 Thread Paul Wright
Branden forwarded this to debian-user:


Dear X Strike Force,

I am currently installing Debian GNU/Linux potato on a machine in our labs.
I found out (by opening the case, since I had no documentation on the
machine) that there is a i810 chipset inside.
I found the debian-page on this matter (XFree86 with i810 chipset) but had
no succes so far on inserting the module which I succesfully compiled from
i810-agpgart-module.tar.gz into my kernel which is kernel-image-2.2.18pre21
(and I also compiled succesfully myself). It reports unresolved symbols.
Should I upgrade my xserver to woody or sid, since you say on your webpage:
[23 Dec 2000] This has been removed since the official Linux kernel and
XFree86 4.x are now in sync with each other.. what does this mean ??
Can you help me out by getting my xserver running ?

thanks,
Kris


Hi Kris,

I think I can help.

Should I upgrade my xserver to woody or sid...

You should upgrade the entire distribution to Woody.  Do the following:

1. change your /etc/sources.list to look like this:

deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free
deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US testing/non-US main contrib non-free

(you may use your favorite mirror if you wish)

2. issue the commands: apt-get update and: apt-get dist-upgrade  if you 
run into any difficulties (the dependancies issue can get complicated, but 
you should't have any problems) try running:
apt-get --fix-missing dist-upgrade

3. make certain you have the correct packages for xfree86-4.0

4. get the kernel-source-2.2.4 package

 XFree86 4.x are now in sync with each other.. what does this mean ?

It means that the xfree86 developers are coordinating with the kernel 
developers. (and contributing code for the kernel agpart modules.

re-compile and install the kernel from the 2.2.4 source. 

configure xfree86 (use xf86config -- despite what some may claim, it works 
well with xfree86-4)

Start your xserver and have fun.

If you have any problems or questions post to the debian-user list, 
there's many extremely talented souls who will tell you where I've gone 
wrong ;)

 


-- 
Paul T. Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-currently seeking employment-