Sven Arvidsson wrote:
On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 00:27 -0800, Erik Steffl wrote:
it takes few minutes to open /usr/bin here (almost no load on
machine), next time (I assume cache helps a lot) it takes 10-20 seconds.
system:
debian unstable
icedove 1.5.0.9.dfsg1-1
pentium 2.4
On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 15:53 -0800, Erik Steffl wrote:
Sven Arvidsson wrote:
[...]
Seems like the problem is getting mime type (as mentioned here
before) or something of that nature...
erik
It would be nice if it was possible to turn this feature off.
I really don't need the
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Nyizsnyik Ferenc wrote:
I really don't need the little pictures in front of the file names. Does
anybody?
Sure. The typical user GNOME wants to target does. They don't know enough
to properly add extensions to their file names without coaxing by the
applications, and
Wim De Smet wrote:
... gnome file chooser discussion snipped ...
indeed very annoying) but I don't think it's open()ing every file in
those directories. This would require an ordinate amount of processing
power not to mention disk I/O which I'm just not seeing.
it takes few minutes to open
On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 00:27 -0800, Erik Steffl wrote:
it takes few minutes to open /usr/bin here (almost no load on
machine), next time (I assume cache helps a lot) it takes 10-20 seconds.
system:
debian unstable
icedove 1.5.0.9.dfsg1-1
pentium 2.4 GHz
1GB RAM
On 1/10/07, Erik Steffl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wim De Smet wrote:
... gnome file chooser discussion snipped ...
indeed very annoying) but I don't think it's open()ing every file in
those directories. This would require an ordinate amount of processing
power not to mention disk I/O which I'm
On 1/5/07, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wim De Smet wrote:
You're saying two things here. First you're saying it open()'s every
file you come across, then you say it lists every directory. I've
noticed it does list all files in a directory on the path you type
(which on a system with
On Friday 05 January 2007 08:02, Geoff Reidy wrote:
Googling gnome file picker gives you a fair idea what people think of
it. But wait, I just found a way to stop iceweasel using it, add this to
user.js:
The GNOME file picker is so bad, I'd rather run Firefox on Windows XP in
Qemu than use
On 1/5/07, Wesley J. Landaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 05 January 2007 08:02, Geoff Reidy wrote:
Googling gnome file picker gives you a fair idea what people think of
it. But wait, I just found a way to stop iceweasel using it, add this to
user.js:
The GNOME file picker is so bad,
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007, Wim De Smet wrote:
To be honest, I actually like it. The newest incarnation of it anyway.
I think all those hits you'll come up will be at least partly based on
the older one, which had a bit too many big buttons and a bit too
little functionality.
No, you got it wrong.
On 1/5/07, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007, Wim De Smet wrote:
To be honest, I actually like it. The newest incarnation of it anyway.
I think all those hits you'll come up will be at least partly based on
the older one, which had a bit too many big
On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 08:43 -0700, Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
On Friday 05 January 2007 08:02, Geoff Reidy wrote:
Googling gnome file picker gives you a fair idea what people think of
it. But wait, I just found a way to stop iceweasel using it, add this to
user.js:
The GNOME file picker
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 05:38:15PM +0100, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
I don't really like the concept of file pickers at all, but as far as
they go, the GNOME one is probably one of the best ones I've used.
Could you list some advantages that counter the Requires three times as
many clicks as all
On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 11:42 -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
Could you list some advantages that counter the Requires three times as
many clicks as all other file pickers problem? Oh, and the displays
information in tiny subwindows that don't relate to each other in obvious
ways problem? Or the What
Wim De Smet wrote:
You're saying two things here. First you're saying it open()'s every
file you come across, then you say it lists every directory. I've
noticed it does list all files in a directory on the path you type
(which on a system with sufficient ram only goes slow once but is
indeed
15 matches
Mail list logo
