Bug #400560 (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=400560
) has been filed for this failure.
It seems to be associated with some sort of earlier
failure (power failure in one case, ``failed update'' in the
other). I had a failed update earlier, but don't remember
the
A. F. Cano wrote:
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 04:53:32PM +, John Halton wrote:
[...]
I have resisted using apg-get as I know the aptitude databases would
then be out of sync.
[...]
You could try the magic bullet aptitude keep-all to restore sane
behaviour after using apt-get. See
I'm having problems with updating/installing with aptitude, on a mixed
Etch/Sid system. When running aptitude update, the output ends with
the following:
Err http://ftp.debian.org sid/main Packages
416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable
Then when I try to install/dist-upgrade, I get the following
On 12/28/06, John Halton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having problems with updating/installing with aptitude, on a mixed
Etch/Sid system. When running aptitude update, the output ends with
the following:
Err http://ftp.debian.org sid/main Packages
416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable
Then when
John Halton wrote:
On 12/28/06, John Halton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having problems with updating/installing with aptitude, on a mixed
Etch/Sid system. When running aptitude update, the output ends with
the following:
Err http://ftp.debian.org sid/main Packages
416 Requested Range Not
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 04:53:32PM +, John Halton wrote:
On 12/28/06, John Halton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Uncaught exception:
../../../src/generic/problemresolver/problemresolver.h:2216:
generic_problem_resolverPackageUniverse::generic_problem_resolver(int,
int, int, int, unsigned
Mmm... I started digging into /etc/apt, didn't see anything obvious
and thus didn't change anything, but the next time I started up aptitude
it worked. Strange...
A.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi all,
i have a problem with apt-get. upon running apt-get update or apt-get
install, i get some error messages (are attached).
this is happening since yesterday, my apt-get used to work until then
and i dont remember changing anything of note
also sprach Martin Lemmen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.22.1732 +0200]:
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enq=%22Dynamic+MMap+ran+out+of+room%22btnI=I%27m+Feeling+Lucky
(http://justfuckinggoogleit.com/)
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Martin Lemmen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.22.1732 +0200]:
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enq=%22Dynamic+MMap+ran+out+of+room%22btnI=I%27m+Feeling+Lucky
also sprach Martin Lemmen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.22.1820 +0200]:
i just did as said page advises, and i still get the same error message.
Mh. Have you tried increasing the value to 32k?
I have never hit the 16k limit, even with
stable/testing/unstable/experimental and a bunch of other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Martin Lemmen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.22.1820 +0200]:
i just did as said page advises, and i still get the same error message.
Mh. Have you tried increasing the value to 32k?
i tried out the following,
also sprach Martin Lemmen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.22.1846 +0200]:
APT::Cache-Limit 141943904;
woho. I don't even set this anymore and:
$ grep -v '^#' /etc/apt/sources.list | wc -l
34 /etc/apt/sources.list
Anyway, I think your bzip2 problems may be related to a caching
proxy somewhere
#include hallo.h
* martin f krafft [Thu, Jun 22 2006, 02:03:55PM]:
also sprach Martin Lemmen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.22.1846 +0200]:
APT::Cache-Limit 141943904;
woho. I don't even set this anymore and:
$ grep -v '^#' /etc/apt/sources.list | wc -l
34 /etc/apt/sources.list
also sprach Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.23.0204 +0200]:
Not neccesarily. I have seen apt processing spew weird messages
WRT broken bzip2 decompression. Apparently something is buggy
there, but the problem disappears after rerunning update.
Now that you mention it, I did see this
Hello all,
I recently installed a new computer with the newest copy of the debian
testing on it. I got back in the system to add programs and update others
with apt-get and I continue to get these errors. Is there a way that I
dont know about to get around these? I have also tried to change
hi, I'm trying to change the address used by apt-get.
I changed the adddress in apt-setup, but it doesn't work: apt-get continues to search the broken address.
does any one how can I make apt-get aware of the changes?
Marcelle Santos wrote:
hi, I'm trying to change the address used by apt-get.
I changed the adddress in apt-setup, but it doesn't work: apt-get
continues to search the broken address.
does any one how can I make apt-get aware of the changes?
I usually just edit /etc/apt/sources.lst with
Hi,
It's been about a week since I can't solve this problem, despite trying
several different mirrors. This is what I see:
,-
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] apt-get update
| Ign http://apt.mepis.org unstable Release.gpg
| Ign http://apt.mepis.org unstable Release
| Ign http://apt.mepis.org
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:13:04 -0500
Sebastian Luque [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It's been about a week since I can't solve this problem, despite trying
several different mirrors. This is what I see:
,-
| Get:10 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org unstable Release.gpg [197B]
| Get:11
Seeker5528 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
The non-us repository is not used any more so this is expected and you
should remove non-us from your sources.list file.
You're right, I just found this out. I came across
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2005/06/msg00719.html that cleared
that
Sebastian Luque wrote (Wednesday 27 July 2005 7:12 am):
I don't know what's going on in the mirror system. I had some weirdness
over the last 3 or 4 days where I wasn't showing any new upgrades.
One or two days I don't think anything of it, when it stretches to 3 or
4 I start to wonder.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:26:13AM +1000, Brendon Lloyd Higgins wrote:
Sebastian Luque wrote (Wednesday 27 July 2005 7:12 am):
I don't know what's going on in the mirror system. I had some weirdness
over the last 3 or 4 days where I wasn't showing any new upgrades.
One or two days I
Where that pre-removal script is kept? I gues that problem is in permitions, what
other problems
can be with that script?
Preparing to replace finger 0.17-6 (using .../finger_0.17-7_i386.deb) ...
dpkg (subprocess): unable to execute old pre-removal script: Permission denied
dpkg: warning - old
I'm sure someone will give a better answer, but I'd use strace to find
out what file it's trying to execute.
I guess somewhere in /var/apt though.
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 02:25:34 -0700 (PDT), Jonas Jasas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where that pre-removal script is kept? I gues that problem is in
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 02:25:34AM -0700, Jonas Jasas wrote:
Where that pre-removal script is kept? I gues that problem is in permitions, what
other problems
can be with that script?
Preparing to replace finger 0.17-6 (using .../finger_0.17-7_i386.deb) ...
dpkg (subprocess): unable to
Jonas Jasas wrote:
Where that pre-removal script is kept? I gues that problem is in permitions, what
other problems
can be with that script?
Preparing to replace finger 0.17-6 (using .../finger_0.17-7_i386.deb) ...
dpkg (subprocess): unable to execute old pre-removal script: Permission denied
I hope I'm not being rude in posting here, but I have a problem with apt
on my RedHat 9 box. When I apt-get update or try to upgrade,my system
gets as far as ;
Fetched 1500kB in 27s (55.4kB/s)
Reading Package Lists... 66%
and then hangs. This came on out of nowhere though possibly when I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 07:03:23AM -0700, Dirk Ouellette wrote:
I hope I'm not being rude in posting here, but I have a problem with apt
on my RedHat 9 box. When I apt-get update or try to upgrade,my system
gets as far as ;
Well, you might want to
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 07:03:23AM -0700, Dirk Ouellette wrote:
I hope I'm not being rude in posting here, but I have a problem with apt
on my RedHat 9 box. When I apt-get update or try to upgrade,my system
gets as far as ;
# apt-get update
E: Could not get lock /var/state/apt/lists/lock
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 10:37:44AM +0100, Jan Johansson wrote:
What does this mean? All the dependencies _are_ installed. But why wont
php still install? (Debian/Testin)
php4 is currently broken in testing
Frank
scooter:~# apt-get install php4
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building
You picked the wrong time to be in testing. This is a documented bug,
read this for more details:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announc
e-200303/msg6.html
Well, I am glad that it wasn't just me then. Thankyou.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 11:11:45PM +, rehm wrote:
I'm having problems updating my software list for dselect.
Under the debian documentation, if I got anything wrong, to update my
dselect list by using iso cd's i made of Woody r3, I would go
- apt-cdrom add ..which is succesful for all
Hi,
I am a linux newbie and am attempting my first real Linux installation
from scratch. I have only the first cd of Debian woody dist and have
managed to install a very basic system from this including X.
I am behind the firewall of my University. There exists an archive with
the full
On 18/10/02 Jacques Kotze did speaketh:
I am behind the firewall of my University. There exists an archive with
the full resource of Debian behind the firewall that I would like to get
access to using apt-get inorder to complete a full package installation
of my system.
I have
Pretty often actually. Have multiple sources, be prepared to comment out
the ones that don't work right now, and re-update and re-upgrade if the
situation occurs again. Basically, http.us.debian.org is never the most
trustworthy under the best of circumstances, and sometimes can be a real
Am 04. Sep, 2001 schwäzte John Galt so:
Pretty often actually. Have multiple sources, be prepared to comment out
the ones that don't work right now, and re-update and re-upgrade if the
situation occurs again. Basically, http.us.debian.org is never the most
trustworthy under the best of
@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: apt problems with http.us.debian.org?
Mike Kuhar wrote:
Good evening Fellow Debians,
I went to do an apt-get upgrade, just a few moments ago, after doing an upda
te
on unstable. It told me I had 54 packages to upgrade. The problem is that
only
Good evening Fellow Debians,
I went to do an apt-get upgrade, just a few moments ago, after doing an update
on unstable. It told me I had 54 packages to upgrade. The problem is that only
half actually downloaded and upgraded from http.us.debian.org. The rest 404'd
on me. What gives? Any one
Mike Kuhar wrote:
Good evening Fellow Debians,
I went to do an apt-get upgrade, just a few moments ago, after doing an upda
te
on unstable. It told me I had 54 packages to upgrade. The problem is that
only
half actually downloaded and upgraded from http.us.debian.org.
Forrest English [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Preparing to replace libc6-dev 2.2.2-4 (using
.../libc6-dev_2.2.3-5_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libc6-dev ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6-dev_2.2.3-5_i386.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/rpcgen', which is also
On Tue, 05 Jun 2001 at 11:32:55 -0700, Forrest English wrote:
thneed:/usr/bin# apt-get -o DPkg::Options::--force-overwrite -f install
E: Option DPkg::Options::--force-overwrite: Configuration item
sepecification must have an =val.
did i do somthing stupid? i'm not real familier with what
thneed:~# apt-get -f install
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
libc6-dev libstdc++2.10-dev libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2
3 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 306 not
On Tue, 05 Jun 2001 at 13:53:07 -0700, Forrest English wrote:
didn't seem to change anything, same results exactly.
Bleh. If that didn't work, then 'dpkg -i --force-overwrite
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6-dev_2.2.3-5_i386.deb' definitely should.
You could edit /var/lib/dpkg/info/netbase.files,
didn't seem to change anything, same results exactly. is there a way to
disasociate that file with netbase?
thneed:~# apt-get -o DPkg::Options=--force-overwrite -f install
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following extra packages
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get the following error message
home:/home/daniel# apt-get -f install
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Correcting dependencies... failed.
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
libesd0: Depends: esound-common but it
I had something similar happen when I did woody-sid dist-upgrade.
Anyway, make sure that the 2 other 'esound' packages are selected for
installation also. This solved (one of) my problem(s) - hope it works
for you :)
R.
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 03:55:39AM +0200, Daniel Mashao wrote:
I get the
Maybe esound-common is still an old version. You could try a apt-get
update before trying again, because esound-common could have been
updated.
Wouter
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 09:12:50AM -0500, Raymond Wood wrote:
I had something similar happen when I did woody-sid dist-upgrade.
Anyway, make
I get the following error message
home:/home/daniel# apt-get -f install
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Correcting dependencies... failed.
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
libesd0: Depends: esound-common but it is not installed
E:
on Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 02:41:24PM -0500, Michelle Murrain ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
The result of a dumb mistake:
I wanted to upgrade a particular package from woody, and in the middle, it
stopped because it didn't have a newer copy of libc6. I decided at that point
that I would forgo
The result of a dumb mistake:
I wanted to upgrade a particular package from woody, and in the middle, it
stopped because it didn't have a newer copy of libc6. I decided at that point
that I would forgo the upgrade. However, somehow, part of it got installed
somehow, and now I can't install
Hi!
I recently ran apt-get update and apt-get dist-upgrade (I have woody).
I get this message:
/usr/bin/perl: error while loading shared library: libdb.so.3 : cannot open
shared object file: no such file or library
E: Write error - write (32 Broken pipe)
E: Failure running script:
On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 01:36:38AM -0500, eric k. wolven wrote:
Hi!
I recently ran apt-get update and apt-get dist-upgrade (I have woody).
I get this message:
/usr/bin/perl: error while loading shared library: libdb.so.3 : cannot open
See debian weekly news:
Be careful. If you have
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Neilen Marais wrote:
trick. But what then is the function of the apt.conf file? What am I
missing out on? I like fiddling in conf files G
You fiddled it wrong.. That config file is not ment for general use, it
does 'weird' things.
Jason
Hi All
I can't seem to get my dselect and apt-get to play niceley.
If I choose the apt method in dselect, and do an update, I get the
following problem after the package files have been downloaded:
Get:1 ftp://ftp.cdrom.com potato/main Packages [847kB]
Get:2 ftp://ftp.cdrom.com potato/main
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Neilen Marais wrote:
If I choose the apt method in dselect, and do an update, I get the
following problem after the package files have been downloaded:
'rm /etc/apt/apt.conf'
Jason
Whenever I use apt-get install or use apt method in dselect,
I get the following error after the files are downloaded:
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
/bin/sh: dpkg-preconfig: command not found
E: Sub-process dpkg-preconfig --apt --priority=low --frontend=dialog
returned an error code (127)
E:
I am having a bit of trouble getting some packages installed from the slink
distribution.
I have main and contrib on CD, and I have non-free in a separate partition on
one of my hard drives (I wasn't able to find CD's for this). This was not a
problem under the last version, as I could tell
On Sat, 5 Jun 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have main and contrib on CD, and I have non-free in a separate
partition on one of my hard drives (I wasn't able to find CD's for
this). This was not a problem under the last version, as I could tell
dselect that I was mounting from a directory
Hi all,
when I run dselect using apt as the method, I go to update and I get these
errors.
Get http://www.debian.org frozen/contrib Packages
Error http://www.debian.org frozen/contrib Packages
404 Not Found
Get http://www.debian.org frozen/main Packages
Error
I don't believe www.debian.org is a site containing Debian packages. The
apt package includes a sources.list which contains both us and non-us
sites which will work.
I have attached a copy.
There are others, such as llug.sep.bnl.gov (hopefully README.mirrors will
list them some day).
Bob
On
On Thu, 16 Jul 1998, Robert Kerr wrote:
I think the problem may lie in my sources.list. does anyone have an
example one that I could look at? I would like to access the frozen us
sections, and the non-us section.
You need another package installed to do the ftp transfers (see the apt
Hello again,
I'm having a problem with apt. I've just done an upgrade of my hamm
system with a few updated packages, and now everytime I run apt, it wants
to remove its own package. The following is a sample session with apt:
mort:~# apt-get update
Get ftp://ftp.questnet.net.au
Chris,
I ran into this same problem after updating to the lastest
libc6_2.0.7r-2. The dependency in the latest apt is looking for
something = 2.0.7pre1-0. I guess that it doesn't see 2.0.7r-2 as being
greaterthan or equal to.G
Something was posted on this list a few days ago about this
On Fri, 26 Jun 1998, Steve Mayer wrote:
Chris,
I ran into this same problem after updating to the lastest
libc6_2.0.7r-2. The dependency in the latest apt is looking for
something = 2.0.7pre1-0. I guess that it doesn't see 2.0.7r-2 as being
greaterthan or equal to.G
Something was
On Fri, Jun 26, 1998 at 08:36:09AM -0700, Steve Mayer wrote:
I ran into this same problem after updating to the lastest
libc6_2.0.7r-2. The dependency in the latest apt is looking for
something = 2.0.7pre1-0. I guess that it doesn't see 2.0.7r-2 as being
greaterthan or equal to.G
Bob Nielsen wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 1998, Steve Mayer wrote:
Chris,
I ran into this same problem after updating to the lastest
libc6_2.0.7r-2. The dependency in the latest apt is looking for
something = 2.0.7pre1-0. I guess that it doesn't see 2.0.7r-2 as being
greaterthan or
67 matches
Mail list logo
