On Mi, 12 feb 20, 17:55:52, Dennis Wicks wrote:
> Greetings;
>
> I have 4TB running on an AMD Ryzen under Buster. What is the current
> consensus of the best file system to use for general data usage? I have been
> using xfs but that is based on info from many years ago.
If yo
On 2/13/20 14:50, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 01:57:49PM -0700, Tom Dial wrote:
>> XFS is excellent, and so also is JFS.
>
> Yes on XFS, no on JFS. (XFS is very actively developed; JFS is moribund,
> has no really compelling benefits over other filesytems, and gets much
>
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 04:00:34PM -0700, Tom Dial wrote:
> I think that ZFS, although different, is no less complicated or
> inflexible than the other identified options. Adding mdraid
> probably would not decrease complexity.
It is far easier to reshape mdraid arrays (in terms of number
On 2/13/20 10:31, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi Dennis,
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 05:55:52PM -0600, Dennis Wicks wrote:
>> I have 4TB running on an AMD Ryzen under Buster. What is the current
>> consensus of the best file system to use for general data usage?
>
>
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 01:57:49PM -0700, Tom Dial wrote:
XFS is excellent, and so also is JFS.
Yes on XFS, no on JFS. (XFS is very actively developed; JFS is moribund,
has no really compelling benefits over other filesytems, and gets much
less testing due to very low adoption. I don't
On 2/13/20 06:53, Didar Hossain wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 12:18:42PM +0100, deloptes wrote:
>> Dennis Wicks wrote:
>>
>>> I have been using xfs but that is based on info
>>> from many years ago.
>>
>> If you have had no issues with xfs, why not use it in the future too?
>
> I have been
Didar Hossain wrote:
> I have been using XFS for data on dual HDD (RAID1->LVM->LUKS->XFS) on
> Debian Stretch for more than a year, haven't experienced issues yet. OS is
> on Ext4 on SDD. I use Urbackup (www.urbackup.org) to backup multiple
> Windows machines to this box as well as Samba for
Hi Dennis,
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 05:55:52PM -0600, Dennis Wicks wrote:
> I have 4TB running on an AMD Ryzen under Buster. What is the current
> consensus of the best file system to use for general data usage?
If your 4TB isn't composed of at least one more drive for redundancy
then for
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 12:18:42PM +0100, deloptes wrote:
> Dennis Wicks wrote:
>
> > I have been using xfs but that is based on info
> > from many years ago.
>
> If you have had no issues with xfs, why not use it in the future too?
I have been using XFS for data on dual HDD
Dennis Wicks wrote:
> I have been using xfs but that is based on info
> from many years ago.
If you have had no issues with xfs, why not use it in the future too?
On 13/02/2020 12:55, Dennis Wicks wrote:
I have 4TB running on an AMD Ryzen under Buster. What is the current
consensus of the best file system to use for general data usage? I have
been using xfs but that is based on info from many years ago.
With apologies to Samuel L Jackson (as Beaumont
On 2020-02-12 15:55, Dennis Wicks wrote:
I have 4TB running on an AMD Ryzen under Buster. What is the current
consensus of the best file system to use for general data usage? I have
been using xfs but that is based on info from many years ago.
I was using btrfs for system drives (boot, swap
Greetings;
I have 4TB running on an AMD Ryzen under Buster. What is the
current consensus of the best file system to use for general
data usage? I have been using xfs but that is based on info
from many years ago.
Many TIA!
Dennis
13 matches
Mail list logo
