On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:47:29PM +0100, Chris Davies wrote:
Steve Dowe s...@warpuniversal.co.uk wrote:
The issue I'm having, using wheezy, is that if I set up a bridged
ethernet interface for eth0 (br0), as per instructions on the Debian
wiki etc, NetworkManager can no longer manage my
Jon Dowland j...@debian.org wrote:
You don't need to remove NM. I have it managing my wifi and 3G connections,
but manage eth0 via ifupdown (and attach it to a bridge).
That's what I have at the moment, and NM gets itself in a tizzy when I
want to use eth0 as my primary connection and borks my
I'm sorry for the tardy response - IceDove hid a load of Debian list
mail in Junk.
On 29/06/12 18:06, Camaleón wrote:
Maybe is time now for you to tell us more about the kind of VM you are
planning to use...
Testing on the same subnet :)
I still don't see the relation of using N-M and the
On 29/06/12 17:34, Neal Murphy wrote:
(...)
another program running whose sole purpose is to slurp CPU cycles, take up
screen real estate
I'm all for machine efficiency, but I don't find NM to do either of
those. On a laptop, I find it sacrifices my human efficiency to /not/
have it.
and
On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:14:02 +0100, Steve Dowe wrote:
I'm sorry for the tardy response - IceDove hid a load of Debian list
mail in Junk.
On 29/06/12 18:06, Camaleón wrote:
Maybe is time now for you to tell us more about the kind of VM you are
planning to use...
Testing on the same
On 29/06/12 23:47, Chris Davies wrote:
Steve Dowe s...@warpuniversal.co.uk wrote:
The issue I'm having, using wheezy, is that if I set up a bridged
ethernet interface for eth0 (br0), as per instructions on the Debian
wiki etc, NetworkManager can no longer manage my wired ethernet connection.
On 02/07/12 17:34, Camaleón wrote:
Testing on the same subnet :)
Yes but what solution? KVM, VMware, Xen, VirtualBox...
Oh heck, sorry. It's KVM. I thought I'd mentioned that. Oops.
Basically, you need eth0 bridged (using br0) to allow other virtual
machines to pick up an IP address on
On Monday 02 July 2012 12:30:32 Steve Dowe wrote:
On 29/06/12 17:34, Neal Murphy wrote:
The bridge device (e.g. br0) is a network interface. The NIC is a network
interface. The tap device (e.g. tap0) appears as a network interface to
the VM. A bridge device doesn't need a real NIC to
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Steve Dowe s...@warpuniversal.co.uk wrote:
Hello,
I have absolutely no doubt that someone reading this list knows more
than I do on this.. :)
The issue I'm having, using wheezy, is that if I set up a bridged
ethernet interface for eth0 (br0), as per
Arun Khan a écrit :
When you use bridge: To the best of my knowledge - the IP is assigned
to the bridge and *not* eth0 the physical interface. eth0 should
*not* have any IP assigned to it.
Except in some very specific situations.
Exemple : you want the box act as a bridge with some
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Steve Dowe s...@warpuniversal.co.uk wrote:
The issue I'm having, using wheezy, is that if I set up a bridged
ethernet interface for eth0 (br0), as per instructions on the Debian
wiki etc, NetworkManager can no longer manage my wired ethernet connection.
If I
Hello,
I have absolutely no doubt that someone reading this list knows more
than I do on this.. :)
The issue I'm having, using wheezy, is that if I set up a bridged
ethernet interface for eth0 (br0), as per instructions on the Debian
wiki etc, NetworkManager can no longer manage my wired
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 15:02:57 +0100, Steve Dowe wrote:
(...)
If I edit /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf and change
[ifupdown]
managed=false
to
[ifupdown]
managed=true
then eth0 and br0 both pick up the same IP address.
Mmm... and what's what you want to bridge? Remember
On 29/06/12 15:34, Camaleón wrote:
If I edit /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf and change
[ifupdown] managed=false
to
[ifupdown] managed=true
then eth0 and br0 both pick up the same IP address.
Mmm... and what's what you want to bridge? Remember that any bridge
needs at
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:08:26 +0100, Steve Dowe wrote:
On 29/06/12 15:34, Camaleón wrote:
Mmm... and what's what you want to bridge? Remember that any bridge
needs at least two end points.
My intention is allow my ethernet interface to be allocated as many IPs
on my local network as
On 29/06/12 16:54, Camaleón wrote:
Ah, then maybe you don't need a bridge but a virtual addressing layout:
http://wiki.debian.org/NetworkConfiguration#Multiple_IP_addresses_on_One_Interface
But that fixes the IP addresses both to my local network. The intended
NM approach was to allow the
On 29/06/12 17:19, Steve Dowe wrote:
On 29/06/12 16:54, Camaleón wrote:
Ah, then maybe you don't need a bridge but a virtual addressing layout:
http://wiki.debian.org/NetworkConfiguration#Multiple_IP_addresses_on_One_Interface
But that fixes the IP addresses both to my local network. The
On Friday 29 June 2012 10:02:57 Steve Dowe wrote:
Hello,
I have absolutely no doubt that someone reading this list knows more
than I do on this.. :)
The issue I'm having, using wheezy, is that if I set up a bridged
ethernet interface for eth0 (br0), as per instructions on the Debian
wiki
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 17:19:27 +0100, Steve Dowe wrote:
On 29/06/12 16:54, Camaleón wrote:
Ah, then maybe you don't need a bridge but a virtual addressing layout:
http://wiki.debian.org/NetworkConfiguration#Multiple_IP_addresses_on_One_Interface
But that fixes the IP addresses both to my
Steve Dowe s...@warpuniversal.co.uk wrote:
The issue I'm having, using wheezy, is that if I set up a bridged
ethernet interface for eth0 (br0), as per instructions on the Debian
wiki etc, NetworkManager can no longer manage my wired ethernet connection.
You can't do that :-(
If you need a
20 matches
Mail list logo
