Well, I have looked at your config and read this
http://www.pantz.org/software/cpufreq/usingcpufreqonlinux.html and I don't
seem to have `/sys/devices/system/cpu/*/cpufreq/conservative/freq_step', even if
the conservative governor is loaded. Any ideas on what might cause this?
Francesco
--
To
At Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:50:05 +,
Francesco Mazzoli wrote:
At Thu, 15 Nov 2012 19:40:07 -0200,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Francesco Mazzoli wrote:
At Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:17:18 -0200,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
That said, Linux coordinates
On 16/11/12 11:02, Francesco Mazzoli wrote:
Well, I have looked at your config and read this
http://www.pantz.org/software/cpufreq/usingcpufreqonlinux.html and I don't
seem to have `/sys/devices/system/cpu/*/cpufreq/conservative/freq_step', even
if
the conservative governor is loaded. Any
At Fri, 16 Nov 2012 20:54:33 +0200,
Adrian Fita wrote:
I don't have freq_step in that path either. Instead, I have it in
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/conservative/freq_step . That document is
kinda' old and some info from there might be outdated or things might have
been moved around (find
Francesco wrote:
I have installed Debian testing on a X1 Carbon, processor i5-3427U.
My problem is the following: when the `ondemand' governor is active, the
processor clock never scales up, it always stays at 800Mhz. The situation
changes when using the `conservative' or the `performance'
-Original Message-
From: Mark Allums [mailto:m...@allums.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 12:34 PM
To: 'debian-user@lists.debian.org'
Subject: RE: CPU scaling problems
Francesco wrote:
I have installed Debian testing on a X1 Carbon, processor i5-3427U.
My problem
On Thursday, November 15, 2012 01:34:11 PM Mark Allums wrote:
Francesco wrote:
I have installed Debian testing on a X1 Carbon, processor i5-3427U.
My problem is the following: when the `ondemand' governor is active, the
processor clock never scales up, it always stays at 800Mhz. The
Hi Mark,
At Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:36:48 -0600,
Mark Allums wrote:
Sorry, I should have said, Have you tried *another* monitor tool besides
'stress'?
`stress' is not a monitor tool, it just spawns processes doing `sqrt' in a loop
or something like that. I also tried with `openssl speed' and a
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Neal Murphy wrote:
At a guess, I would assume a configuration problem. Or no problem. Is
your machine sluggish or unresponsive? How do you know it stays at 800
MHz? What tool do you use to monitor it? Maybe your monitor is wrong. I
am not sure how to troubleshoot
Dne, 15. 11. 2012 03:54:31 je Francesco Mazzoli napisal(a):
Does anybody have any idea on how to troubleshoot such a problem? I
suspect
that the problem is either in the kernel or in some other software
which is
regulating the scaling.
Just an idea. Have you tried explicitly running
At Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:17:18 -0200,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
That said, Linux coordinates with the platform through ACPI. If the BIOS is
tuned for maximum battery life, it will interfere with Linux cpufreq.
This is a good hint - there is something in the BIOS as I mentioned. So you
At Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:29:18 +0100,
Klistvud wrote:
Just an idea. Have you tried explicitly running 'cpufreq-set -g ondemand' and
then checking your currently active governor with 'cpufreq-info'?
Yes.
AFAIK, the ondemand governor has been deprecated/abandoned/superseded/whatever
for specific
At Thu, 15 Nov 2012 19:40:07 -0200,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Francesco Mazzoli wrote:
At Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:17:18 -0200,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
That said, Linux coordinates with the platform through ACPI. If the BIOS
is
tuned for
On 15/11/12 21:06, Francesco Mazzoli wrote:
With `conservative' or `performance' the CPU scales up correctly (well, with
performance it is always scaled up). With `ondemand' it doesn't.
This has noticeable consequences: compiling is slow, flash videos are
sluggish.
So I do have a problem.
At Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:16:22 +0200,
Adrian Fita wrote:
Actually I use 'conservative' over the 'ondemand' governor. It can be
tweaked to react more quickly, close to the speed of 'ondemand', but it
has the nice feature of providing a cool-down period during which if
some task comes along and
Hi,
I have installed Debian testing on a X1 Carbon, processor i5-3427U.
My problem is the following: when the `ondemand' governor is active, the
processor clock never scales up, it always stays at 800Mhz. The situation
changes when using the `conservative' or the `performance' governors. More
16 matches
Mail list logo
