Quoting deloptes (2020-03-03 21:07:44)
> David wrote:
>
> > [...]
> >
> >> But the codes, alas, are not interpretable according to the
> >> ref given. An exercise for the reader :)
> >>
> >> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DHCP#Options
> >
> > My guess (untested) would be per Section 8.4 in
>
David wrote:
> [...]
>
>> But the codes, alas, are not interpretable according to the
>> ref given. An exercise for the reader :)
>>
>> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DHCP#Options
>
> My guess (untested) would be per Section 8.4 in
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2132
> with the leading
On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 10:35:51PM +1100, David wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 19:38, wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 12:36:42AM +0100, deloptes wrote:
>
> > > The trick was to add following line to the dhcpd.conf
> > >
> > >option vendor-encapsulated-options
> > >
On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 19:38, wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 12:36:42AM +0100, deloptes wrote:
> > The trick was to add following line to the dhcpd.conf
> >
> >option vendor-encapsulated-options
> > 6:1:3:a:4:0:50:58:45:9:14:0:0:11:52:61:73:70:62:65:72:72:79:20:50:69:20:42:6f:6f:74:ff;
> >
On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 12:36:42AM +0100, deloptes wrote:
> john doe wrote:
[...]
> The trick was to add following line to the dhcpd.conf
>
>option vendor-encapsulated-options
> 6:1:3:a:4:0:50:58:45:9:14:0:0:11:52:61:73:70:62:65:72:72:79:20:50:69:20:42:6f:6f:74:ff;
>
> This could be added
>
>
> The trick was to add following line to the dhcpd.conf
>
>option vendor-encapsulated-options
>
6:1:3:a:4:0:50:58:45:9:14:0:0:11:52:61:73:70:62:65:72:72:79:20:50:69:20:42:6f:6f:74:ff;
>
> This could be added to a class, but I have only one rpi4, so added
> directly to the client
john doe wrote:
> On 2/29/2020 6:20 PM, deloptes wrote:
>> john doe wrote:
>>
>>> I would rather look there to get it working with your current setup.
>>>
>>
>> looks like dnsmasq is more cooperative - I don't know how to do it with
>> the current setup :/
>>
It seems however dnsmasq does
On 2/29/2020 6:20 PM, deloptes wrote:
> john doe wrote:
>
>> I would rather look there to get it working with your current setup.
>>
>
> looks like dnsmasq is more cooperative - I don't know how to do it with the
> current setup :/
>
>>> It seems however dnsmasq does the job
>>> with just few
john doe wrote:
> I would rather look there to get it working with your current setup.
>
looks like dnsmasq is more cooperative - I don't know how to do it with the
current setup :/
>> It seems however dnsmasq does the job
>> with just few lines in the configuration.
>> So I am wondering if I
On 2/29/2020 4:08 PM, deloptes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running isc-dhcp-server, bind9 and tftp-hpa. All machines can do
> diskless boot (i386, amd64 and rpi3) except rpi4. I couldn't bring the dhcp
> and tftp server to work together.
I would rather look there to get it working with your current
Hi,
I am running isc-dhcp-server, bind9 and tftp-hpa. All machines can do
diskless boot (i386, amd64 and rpi3) except rpi4. I couldn't bring the dhcp
and tftp server to work together. It seems however dnsmasq does the job
with just few lines in the configuration.
So I am wondering if I can
11 matches
Mail list logo
