Re: Frozen, Potato or Woody?

2000-04-26 Thread Robert Braddock
You probably should link /var/cache/apt/archives to some bigger partition. Is there any chance apt is going to get a little smarter about upgrade space usage, or is that one of those things I'll have to do myself to get?

Re: Frozen, Potato or Woody?

2000-04-25 Thread Marshal Wong
montefin == montefin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ...snip... My partition table looks like this: / 50Mb 23Mb Available /usr 512Mb 190Mb Available /var 50Mb 21Mb Available /home 150Mb 56Mb Available swap 50Mb I've tried upgrading with apt-get, but it complains about too

Frozen, Potato or Woody?

2000-04-24 Thread montefin
Gentlepeople, Some guidance please? _If_ tomorrow, I were to sit down at my 486DX, 66, 24Mb RAM, 514Mb HDD computer and attempt a dselect ftp upgrade beyond Slink (Debian 2.1). Which bodes the greater likelihood of a successful upgrade: Frozen, Potato or Woody? Though I have a year's Red Hat

Re: Frozen, Potato or Woody?

2000-04-24 Thread Jeff Noxon
Frozen and Potato are the same thing (for now). You probably don't want to mess with Woody, particularly without doing a Potato upgrade first. In other words, upgrade to Potato. Apt-get is your best bet for a successful upgrade. You will need more disk space -- enough to hold new versions of

Re: Frozen, Potato or Woody?

2000-04-24 Thread Martin Fluch
On Mon, 24 Apr 2000, Jeff Noxon wrote: Frozen and Potato are the same thing (for now). You probably don't want to mess with Woody, particularly without doing a Potato upgrade first. Not quite ... they are already getting different, but not much. In other words, upgrade to Potato.