06.03.20, 10:33 CET Markus Schönhaber:
> 04.03.20, 14:44 CET Brad Rogers:
>
>> Is anybody else having issues with hplip 3.20.0?
> There might be an upstream issue with hplip 3.20.
According to this comment
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/1866291/comments/6
to the bug report, hplip 3.20.3
On Fri, 6 Mar 2020 13:01:39 - (UTC)
Curt wrote:
Hello Curt,
>https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/65697
>The above might be related (Andreas thinks so anyway).
Certainly bears a striking similarity. I'll add the info to the Debian
bug report.
Thanks for the info, Curt.
--
Regards _
On 2020-03-06, Brad Rogers wrote:
>
>>I'm on Arch and since the upgrade of hplip to 3.20.2 I was unable to
>>print. My MFP 377dw spit out multiple pages - some blank, some showing a
>>line or two of gibberish - when trying to print something.
> Different symptoms from the one I experience
On Fri, 6 Mar 2020 10:33:56 +0100
Markus Schönhaber wrote:
Hello Markus,
>There might be an upstream issue with hplip 3.20.
At the time I searched, I saw no mention of problems. That was several
days ago now, and I confess to not having searched again since.
>I'm on Arch and since the
04.03.20, 14:44 CET Brad Rogers:
> Is anybody else having issues with hplip 3.20.0?
There might be an upstream issue with hplip 3.20.
I'm on Arch and since the upgrade of hplip to 3.20.2 I was unable to
print. My MFP 377dw spit out multiple pages - some blank, some showing a
line or two of
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 07:37:19PM +, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 19:24:02 +
>
> The printer is connected via an ethernet cable to a switch, which is in
> turn connected to the router/modem. The computer is connected to the
> router/modem via ethernet.
>
> Again, thank you
On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 19:24:02 +
Brian wrote:
Hello Brian,
>Would you confirm (or otherwise) that the computer you are printing from
>is USB-connected to the printer?
I should have imported the other subthread to here. :-)
The printer is connected via an ethernet cable to a switch, which
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 06:53:10PM +, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 17:12:00 +
> Brian wrote:
>
> Hello Brian,
>
> >isn't quite what I meant by having the printer on the network. I assume
> >the printer is USB-connected to the server. Strictly speaking, it is the
>
> The
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 07:24:02PM +, Brian wrote:
>
> Would you confirm (or otherwise) that the computer you are printing from
> is USB-connected to the printer?
Forget about that. Got your other post.
--
Brian.
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 06:57:02PM +, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:29:11 +
> Brian wrote:
>
> Hello Brian,
>
> >It's useful in that it shows a fully functioning filtering system for
> >3.19.12, but a log for 3.20.2 is what is really required.
>
> Attached is the output
On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 17:12:00 +
Brian wrote:
Hello Brian,
>isn't quite what I meant by having the printer on the network. I assume
>the printer is USB-connected to the server. Strictly speaking, it is the
The printer is connected via ethernet, rather than USB.
>For a useful output, wireless
On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:29:11 +
Brian wrote:
Hello Brian,
>It's useful in that it shows a fully functioning filtering system for
>3.19.12, but a log for 3.20.2 is what is really required.
Attached is the output for when 3.20.2 is installed.
AFAICS, the only differences are the order in
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:23:16PM +, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:08:38 +
>
> Hello Brian,
Hello Brad,
> > avahi-browse -rt _ipp._tcp
>
> Output is in the attached file to avoid (hopefully) horrendous word wrap
> issues.
The output is from the DNS-SD broadcasts made
Quoting Brad Rogers (2020-03-04 16:04:07)
> On Wed, 04 Mar 2020 15:47:45 +0100
> Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> >Thanks for clarifying. Yes, the two bugs filed today relates only to
>
> I was too wrapped up in details to see the blindingly obvious
>
> >unstable, and your explicitly omitting
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:13:05PM +, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 15:51:18 +
> a...@cityscape.co.uk wrote:
>
> Hello a...@cityscape.co.uk,
>
> >Execute (as root):
> >cupsfilter -p /etc/cups/ppd/XXX.ppd -m printer/foo -e
> >/etc/nsswitch.conf > out.dat 2>log
>
> I'll point
On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 15:51:18 +
a...@cityscape.co.uk wrote:
Hello a...@cityscape.co.uk,
>Execute (as root):
>cupsfilter -p /etc/cups/ppd/XXX.ppd -m printer/foo -e
>/etc/nsswitch.conf > out.dat 2>log
I'll point out that this is with the 3.19.12 (i.e. things working)
version of hplip installed,
On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:08:38 +
Brian wrote:
Hello Brian,
> avahi-browse -rt _ipp._tcp
Output is in the attached file to avoid (hopefully) horrendous word wrap
issues.
> avahi-browse -rt _uscan._tcp
Results in no output. However, about 1 second passes before the command
prompt
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 03:40:57PM +, Brad Rogers wrote:
>
> The printer is an OfficeJet 6700 Premium (an all in one device).
Thanks.
With the 6700 on the network provide what you get for
avahi-browse -rt _ipp._tcp
and
avahi-browse -rt _uscan._tcp
avahi-browse is in the avahi-utils
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 03:04:07PM +, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Mar 2020 15:47:45 +0100
> Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> Should I still go ahead and file a report?
>
> >Thanks for bringing it up here first.
>
> I prefer to ask around first, just in case I'm doing something wrong.
> DD's
On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 15:27:12 +
Brian Potkin wrote:
Hello Brian,
>There are none. The hplip package simply ceases to be a recommends of
>other packages.
Thanks for the info.
>> Should I be removing hplip, for example?
>No. Perhaps. It depends on what your printer model is. It is
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 02:18:47PM +, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Mar 2020 09:03:04 -0500
> The Wanderer wrote:
>
> Hello The,
>
> >I wonder whether this might therefore be the result of a change in cups,
> >rather than in hplip.
>
> Thanks for the pointer. Frankly, I have no idea
On Wed, 04 Mar 2020 15:47:45 +0100
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Hello Jonas,
>Thanks for clarifying. Yes, the two bugs filed today relates only to
I was too wrapped up in details to see the blindingly obvious
>unstable, and your explicitly omitting details about suppressed
>recommended
Quoting Brad Rogers (2020-03-04 15:18:47)
> On Wed, 04 Mar 2020 09:03:04 -0500
> The Wanderer wrote:
> >I wonder whether this might therefore be the result of a change in
> >cups, rather than in hplip.
>
> Thanks for the pointer. Frankly, I have no idea what the change in
> CUPS means. That
Quoting Brad Rogers (2020-03-04 15:20:00)
> On Wed, 04 Mar 2020 15:00:39 +0100
> Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >Please mention when you use testing/unstable.
> I'm on testing, and there are no reports at Debian's hplip page. Nor
> can I find reports at the HP hplip support site.
Thanks for
On Wed, 04 Mar 2020 09:03:04 -0500
The Wanderer wrote:
Hello The,
>I wonder whether this might therefore be the result of a change in cups,
>rather than in hplip.
Thanks for the pointer. Frankly, I have no idea what the change in CUPS
means. That is, what are the implications WRT to hplip?
On Wed, 04 Mar 2020 15:00:39 +0100
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Hello Jonas,
>Please mention when you use testing/unstable.
Of course. Stupid of me; I'm on testing, and there are no reports at
Debian's hplip page. Nor can I find reports at the HP hplip support
site.
--
Regards _
/ )
On 2020-03-04 at 08:44, Brad Rogers wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Is anybody else having issues with hplip 3.20.0? The upgrade
> resulted in me not being able to print anything. Jobs were,
> apparently, being sent to the printer (its display panel lit up, to
> indicate that there was something about
Hi Brad,
Quoting Brad Rogers (2020-03-04 14:44:55)
> Is anybody else having issues with hplip 3.20.0?
Please mention when you use testing/unstable.
When you do use testing/unstable then please check yourself for reported
bugs before asking here.
Also, please mention if you have suppressed
Hello All,
Is anybody else having issues with hplip 3.20.0? The upgrade resulted
in me not being able to print anything. Jobs were, apparently, being
sent to the printer (its display panel lit up, to indicate that there
was something about to happen), but the jobs never completed and
eventually
29 matches
Mail list logo
