On 26/10/2014, Curt cu...@free.fr wrote:
On 2014-10-25, Bret Busby bret.bu...@gmail.com wrote:
which, from my understanding of a previous post or web page, relating
to Debian 6 LTS, is what is supposed to be in that file, to have
Debian 6 LTS updating as it should.
What I see here
Bret Busby wrote:
Why a web page published to provide information to the public, needs
to be https, I have no idea.
To create more https traffic. If you only encrypt important things
then if it is encrypted them it must be important. An attacker now
knows that every piece of encrypted traffic
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 11:37:32PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
On 25/10/2014, Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sb, 25 oct 14, 19:04:18, Bret Busby wrote:
:~# df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
...
/dev/sda8 77G 73G 194M 100%
On Sat 25 Oct 2014 at 11:44:32 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
On 23/10/2014, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Igor Sverkos wrote:
As you can see, it is always the Unpacking step which is taking all the
time.
dpkg has added fsync() calls after all file actions. This
significantly slows
On 25/10/2014, Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk wrote:
On Sat 25 Oct 2014 at 11:44:32 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
On 23/10/2014, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Igor Sverkos wrote:
As you can see, it is always the Unpacking step which is taking all
the
time.
dpkg has added fsync() calls
On 25/10/2014, Bret Busby bret.bu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/10/2014, Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk wrote:
On Sat 25 Oct 2014 at 11:44:32 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
On 23/10/2014, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Igor Sverkos wrote:
As you can see, it is always the Unpacking step which is
On 25/10/2014, Bret Busby bret.bu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/10/2014, Bret Busby bret.bu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/10/2014, Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk wrote:
On Sat 25 Oct 2014 at 11:44:32 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
On 23/10/2014, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Igor Sverkos wrote:
As you
On Sb, 25 oct 14, 18:17:02, Bret Busby wrote:
On 25/10/2014, Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk wrote:
Please post the output of
apt-get update
:~# apt-get update
That looks fine. Please try 'apt-get upgrade'.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Offtopic
On 25/10/2014, Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sb, 25 oct 14, 18:17:02, Bret Busby wrote:
On 25/10/2014, Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk wrote:
Please post the output of
apt-get update
:~# apt-get update
That looks fine. Please try 'apt-get upgrade'.
:~# apt-get
On 25/10/2014, Bret Busby bret.bu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/10/2014, Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sb, 25 oct 14, 18:17:02, Bret Busby wrote:
On 25/10/2014, Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk wrote:
Please post the output of
apt-get update
:~# apt-get update
That
On 25/10/14 21:17, Bret Busby wrote:
On 25/10/2014, Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk wrote:
On Sat 25 Oct 2014 at 11:44:32 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
On 23/10/2014, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Igor Sverkos wrote:
As you can see, it is always the Unpacking step which is taking all
the
time.
On 25/10/14 21:47, Bret Busby wrote:
On 25/10/2014, Bret Busby bret.bu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/10/2014, Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sb, 25 oct 14, 18:17:02, Bret Busby wrote:
On 25/10/2014, Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk wrote:
snipped
So, now I am confused, as to
On 25/10/2014, Scott Ferguson scott.ferguson.debian.u...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/10/14 21:17, Bret Busby wrote:
On 25/10/2014, Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk wrote:
On Sat 25 Oct 2014 at 11:44:32 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
On 23/10/2014, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Igor Sverkos wrote:
As you
On 25/10/2014, Scott Ferguson scott.ferguson.debian.u...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/10/14 21:47, Bret Busby wrote:
On 25/10/2014, Bret Busby bret.bu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/10/2014, Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sb, 25 oct 14, 18:17:02, Bret Busby wrote:
On 25/10/2014, Brian
On 25/10/14 22:06, Bret Busby wrote:
On 25/10/2014, Scott Ferguson scott.ferguson.debian.u...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/10/14 21:47, Bret Busby wrote:
On 25/10/2014, Bret Busby bret.bu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/10/2014, Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sb, 25 oct 14, 18:17:02,
On Sb, 25 oct 14, 19:04:18, Bret Busby wrote:
:~# df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
...
/dev/sda8 77G 73G 194M 100% /home
Can't tell if this is the source of you problems, but I've seen all
sorts of strange failures with a full /home, including X
On 10/25/14, Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sb, 25 oct 14, 19:04:18, Bret Busby wrote:
:~# df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
...
/dev/sda8 77G 73G 194M 100% /home
Can't tell if this is the source of you problems, but I've seen
Hello, Cindy.
On 25/10/2014, Cindy-Sue Causey butterflyby...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/25/14, Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sb, 25 oct 14, 19:04:18, Bret Busby wrote:
:~# df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
...
/dev/sda8 77G 73G
On 25/10/2014, Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sb, 25 oct 14, 19:04:18, Bret Busby wrote:
:~# df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
...
/dev/sda8 77G 73G 194M 100% /home
Can't tell if this is the source of you problems, but I've seen
On 2014-10-25, Bret Busby bret.bu...@gmail.com wrote:
which, from my understanding of a previous post or web page, relating
to Debian 6 LTS, is what is supposed to be in that file, to have
Debian 6 LTS updating as it should.
What I see here
https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Using
doesn't seem to
On 26/10/2014, Curt cu...@free.fr wrote:
On 2014-10-25, Bret Busby bret.bu...@gmail.com wrote:
which, from my understanding of a previous post or web page, relating
to Debian 6 LTS, is what is supposed to be in that file, to have
Debian 6 LTS updating as it should.
What I see here
On Thursday, October 23, 2014 11:10:05 AM UTC+5:30, Bob Proulx wrote:
Igor Sverkos wrote:
As you can see, it is always the Unpacking step which is taking all the
time.
dpkg has added fsync() calls after all file actions. This
significantly slows down file operations. Basically it
On 23/10/2014, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Igor Sverkos wrote:
As you can see, it is always the Unpacking step which is taking all the
time.
dpkg has added fsync() calls after all file actions. This
significantly slows down file operations. Basically it disables the
file system
On 2014-10-23, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
I expect this suggestion to be followed by many people griping that my
suggestion is unsafe and that the years and years we spent living
without fsync() were unsafe. But we did. We had at least a decade of
fast systems in the before time.
On Jo, 23 oct 14, 08:33:00, Curt wrote:
What about some of the other workarounds/solutions outlined here
(there)?
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Dpkg/FAQ#User_Questions
(Q: Why is dpkg so slow when using new filesystems such as btrfs or ext4?)
I'd be interested about the 'nodelalloc'
Hi,
I already read the FAQ, that's why I am already using the nodelalloc
mount option.
I also tried eatmydata:
# eatmydata annotate-output apt-get install --reinstall tzdata
14:02:27 I: Started apt-get install --reinstall tzdata
14:02:27 O: Reading package lists...
14:02:27 O: Building
Hi,
I've got a physical machine with jessie/sid where installing/updating
a packages takes very long:
# annotate-output strace -s 4096 -e trace=file -f -ttt -o /tmp/dpkg-debug.log
apt-get install --reinstall tzdata
20:13:28 I: Started strace -s 4096 -e trace=file -f -ttt -o
Igor Sverkos wrote:
As you can see, it is always the Unpacking step which is taking all the
time.
dpkg has added fsync() calls after all file actions. This
significantly slows down file operations. Basically it disables the
file system buffer cache causing it to operate at disk drive speeds.
28 matches
Mail list logo
