Op 01-03-17 om 20:24 schreef Richard Lucassen:
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 15:53:38 +0100
> Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>
>>> Aan een VPN had ik nog niet aangedacht.
>>
>> Ik had het ook genoemd, het is een goede optie!
>>
>>> Ik denk echter dat het een oplossing is voor een ander
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 15:53:38 +0100
Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> > Aan een VPN had ik nog niet aangedacht.
>
> Ik had het ook genoemd, het is een goede optie!
>
> > Ik denk echter dat het een oplossing is voor een ander probleem.
>
> Nee, het is hier heel bruikbaar voor. Een
Op 28-02-17 om 22:00 schreef Geert Stappers:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:53:39PM +0100, Richard Lucassen wrote:
>> On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 17:00:12 +0100
>> Geert Stappers wrote:
>> } Het idee is om Alice een SSH verbinding naar Mike te laten maken.
>> } Bob gaat zelf ook naar
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:53:39PM +0100, Richard Lucassen wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 17:00:12 +0100
> Geert Stappers wrote:
> } Het idee is om Alice een SSH verbinding naar Mike te laten maken.
> } Bob gaat zelf ook naar Mike om vervolgens via de SSH verbinding
> } van
On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 17:00:12 +0100
Geert Stappers wrote:
> B --- M === A
>
> Wat bestaat er aan Debian packages voor zulke situaties?
Zet bij jou een OpenVPN server neer en laat de client er naartoe
connecten. Dan heb je een volledige verbinding, alsof die
Op 25-02-17 om 18:42 schreef Geert Stappers:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 05:50:54PM +0100, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>> Verder het bijbehorende simpele paswoord wat ik regelmatig wijzig, maar
>> een key is wellicht beter.
>
> "user management" op Mike is inderdaad iets om in te plannen.
> Als in
Op 25-02-17 om 18:11 schreef Geert Stappers:
> Misschien is mijn probleem ook wel: Welk package maakt het makkelijk om
> aan de Alice kant de juiste zaken klaar te zetten voor reverse SSH?
Naar zoiets ben ik al lang op zoek, het is er volgens mij nog niet.
Maar, ik zou het best willen maken. Ik
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 05:50:54PM +0100, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> Op 25-02-17 om 17:00 schreef Geert Stappers:
> >
> > Het idee is om Alice een SSH verbinding naar Mike te laten maken.
> > Bob gaat zelf ook naar Mike om vervolgens via de SSH verbinding
> > van Alice naar haar computer te gaan.
Hoi,
En hier dan het plaatje
B --- M === A
Wat bestaat er aan Debian packages voor zulke situaties?
Dat zou je toch kunnen oplossen met reverse ssh?
Lees bv: https://www.howtoforge.com/reverse-ssh-tunneling
MJ
Hoi,
Eerst een verhaal om een plaatje te kunnen schetsen.
Vijftig kilometer verderop staat een "huis-tuin-en-keuken-computer".
Ter plekke is een Internet aansluiting m.b.v. een consumentenrouter.
Je weet wel, van die "routers" die modem zijn en NAT doen.
Laten die plaats/computer "Alice"
ArcticFox wrote:
On Jul 10, 2007, at 11:32 PM, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 11:20:09PM -0500, ArcticFox wrote:
The problem with DD-WRT is that as far as I can tell it only works on
WRT-routers, I don't have one of those I can mess with. As far as I can
tell, there isn't
, and I think it's great. The package
management system is very flexible, and the software is *very* stable.
I tried the other Linux-on-router distros and none seemed to be as
polished, robust and flexible as OpenWRT.
Please check the webif^2 web interface also (http://www.x-wrt.org/).
J
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 11:41:45PM -0500, ArcticFox wrote:
On Jul 10, 2007, at 11:32 PM, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
What about using an old computer? If you need wireless then it has to
have the bus to take a wireless NIC but if its wired then almost any
computer will do.
What is it you
I know suggested that I try
Linux on the router and I was wondering if anyone out there knows/has
experience/suggestions for doing something like this.
The router is a Linksys BEFW11S4 v.4 The only client system I have is
MacOS X 10.3.9
Check here:
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/linksys
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bob escreveu:
ArcticFox wrote:
On Jul 10, 2007, at 11:32 PM, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 11:20:09PM -0500, ArcticFox wrote:
The problem with DD-WRT is that as far as I can tell it only works on
WRT-routers, I don't have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cassiano Bertol Leal escreveu:
Bob escreveu:
ArcticFox wrote:
On Jul 10, 2007, at 11:32 PM, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 11:20:09PM -0500, ArcticFox wrote:
The problem with DD-WRT is that as far as I can tell it
only
I've been having a heck of a time trying to keep my internet connection
active. It likes to drop on me for no apparent reason. I've managed to
narrow the problem down to the router, but Linksys wants to charge me
~$30 to troubleshoot the router. Someone I know suggested that I try
Linux
to troubleshoot the router. Someone I know suggested that I try
Linux on the router and I was wondering if anyone out there knows/has
experience/suggestions for doing something like this.
The router is a Linksys BEFW11S4 v.4 The only client system I have is
MacOS X 10.3.9
I think that OpenWRT can
to the router, but Linksys wants to charge me
~$30 to troubleshoot the router. Someone I know suggested that I try
Linux on the router and I was wondering if anyone out there knows/has
experience/suggestions for doing something like this.
The router is a Linksys BEFW11S4 v.4 The only client system I have
. I've
managed to
narrow the problem down to the router, but Linksys wants to
charge me
~$30 to troubleshoot the router. Someone I know suggested that I try
Linux on the router and I was wondering if anyone out there knows/
has
experience/suggestions for doing something like this.
The router
connection
active. It likes to drop on me for no apparent reason. I've
managed to
narrow the problem down to the router, but Linksys wants to
charge me
~$30 to troubleshoot the router. Someone I know suggested that I try
Linux on the router and I was wondering if anyone out there knows
a heck of a time trying to keep my internet
connection
active. It likes to drop on me for no apparent reason. I've
managed to
narrow the problem down to the router, but Linksys wants to
charge me
~$30 to troubleshoot the router. Someone I know suggested that I
try
Linux on the router and I
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 11:20:09PM -0500, ArcticFox wrote:
The problem with DD-WRT is that as far as I can tell it only works on
WRT-routers, I don't have one of those I can mess with. As far as I can
tell, there isn't a Linux dest that will run on the router I do have.
What about using an
On Jul 10, 2007, at 11:32 PM, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 11:20:09PM -0500, ArcticFox wrote:
The problem with DD-WRT is that as far as I can tell it only works on
WRT-routers, I don't have one of those I can mess with. As far as I
can
tell, there isn't a Linux dest
On Sun, Nov 12, I asked for help connecting my new AMD 64
to the Internet. The help I got. The postings I received were
printed and then deleted. so please excuse that i do neither
top quote nor post quote.
Douglas Tutty suggested to use ipmasq or shorewall for the basic
firewall and dnsmasq
Hans Vogelsberger wrote:
Some weeks ago I bought an AMD64 X2 which now I must connect to
the internet, using my old Pentium 4 as router to the dynamic
address I receive from my cable provider whenever I boot. Having
used Testing since it came up in Potato times, I never needed and
never acquired
Some weeks ago I bought an AMD64 X2 which now I must connect to
the internet, using my old Pentium 4 as router to the dynamic
address I receive from my cable provider whenever I boot. Having
used Testing since it came up in Potato times, I never needed and
never acquired networking knowledge.
* Hans Vogelsberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [061112 14:52]:
Some weeks ago I bought an AMD64 X2 which now I must connect to
the internet, using my old Pentium 4 as router to the dynamic
address I receive from my cable provider whenever I boot. Having
used Testing since it came up in Potato times, I
Hans Vogelsberger:
Some weeks ago I bought an AMD64 X2 which now I must connect to
the internet, using my old Pentium 4 as router to the dynamic
address I receive from my cable provider whenever I boot. Having
used Testing since it came up in Potato times, I never needed and
never acquired
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 09:48:03PM +0100, Hans Vogelsberger wrote:
After three weeks of studying books, manuals and HOWTOS and try-
ing to configure the two computers, I am constantly running in
circles. I can ping from one computer to the other and from the
old computer to the internet, and
Hi!
Ich habe einen Linux Rechner mit einer statischen IP-Adresse von meinen
ISP gekriegt die in meinem rechner folgende eintragungen hat:
# The primary network interface
iface eth0 inet static
address 81.10.53.22
netmask 255.255.255.252
network 81.10.53.20
broadcast 81.10.53.23
gateway
einen 2. Rechner anschliessen?
Wenn deine Linux-Box Router spielen soll brauchst du im Normalfall 2
Netzwerkkarten da drin.
Welche konfiguration habe ich auf den Windows Rechner mit der
IP-Addresse 192.168.215.2 vorzunehmen, damit dieser über meinen Linux
Rechner ins Netz springen kann?!
Wie
Topoplogie:
Switch - DSL-Router
Switch - Linux Rechner mit
eth0:
iface eth0 inet static
address 81.10.53.22
netmask 255.255.255.252
network 81.10.53.20
broadcast 81.10.53.23
gateway 81.10.53.21
und alias eth0:0:
192.168.215.1
mit route Netz 192.158.215.0 auf gateway 81.10.53.21
und rechner2
am 09.03.2006, um 17:15:02 +0200 mailte Tamer Higazi folgendes:
und will aber das ein zweiter rechner über mein Linux Rechner ins Netz
springt. Also, habe ich ein eth0:0 Alias erstellt, IP-Forwarding
aktiviert und mit route den Befehl gegeben, die alle Packete ins Netz zu
routen..
Das reicht
Gruesse!
* Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [09.03.06 16:44]:
On 09.03.06 17:15:02, Tamer Higazi wrote:
Ich habe einen Linux Rechner mit einer statischen IP-Adresse von meinen
ISP gekriegt die in meinem rechner folgende eintragungen hat:
Wo ist da DSL?
und will aber das ein
am 09.03.2006, um 17:54:01 +0200 mailte Tamer Higazi folgendes:
Topoplogie:
Lern quoten.
Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer(Kontakt: siehe Header)
Heynitz: 035242/47215, D1: 0160/7141639
GnuPG-ID 0x3FFF606C http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net
===Schollglas Unternehmensgruppe===
--
Hallo Tamer,
* Tamer Higazi schrieb [09-03-06 17:15]:
und will aber das ein zweiter rechner über mein Linux Rechner ins Netz
$Suchmaschinen-Stichwort: Masquerading.
springt. Also, habe ich ein eth0:0 Alias erstellt, IP-Forwarding
aktiviert und mit route den Befehl gegeben, die alle Packete
Andreas Kretschmer wrote:
am 09.03.2006, um 17:54:01 +0200 mailte Tamer Higazi folgendes:
Topoplogie:
Lern quoten.
Andreas
Kapiere ich nicht!
Aber ich ziehe mir gerade die netfilter doku rein.
Was meinst du mit Quoten im Bezug der Stern topologie die ich für mein
Heimnetzwerk gewählt
Tamer Higazi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Andreas Kretschmer wrote:
Lern quoten.
Kapiere ich nicht!
Aber ich ziehe mir gerade die netfilter doku rein.
Was meinst du mit Quoten im Bezug der Stern topologie die ich für mein
Heimnetzwerk gewählt habe?!
Liege ich hier auch voll daneben?
Gruesse!
* Tamer Higazi [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [09.03.06 16:54]:
Topoplogie:
Switch - DSL-Router
Switch - Linux Rechner mit
Wenn du anregungen hast, wie ich ohne einer zweiten NIC über ein alias das
ganze lösen könnte wäre
ich dir dankbar.
Ich weiß nicht, ob das über aliase
On 09.03.06 17:54:01, Tamer Higazi wrote:
Topoplogie:
Switch - DSL-Router
Switch - Linux Rechner mit
Wenn ich mich nicht irre dann hat doch dein DSL-Router aufm externen IF
die oeffentliche statische IP. Was du auf der internen Seite fuer IP's
einstellst ist erstmal egal.
Wieso muss der
Am Donnerstag, 9. März 2006 16:44 schrieb Andreas Pakulat:
[...]
Damit ich das richtig verstehe: eth0 ist deine Verbindung ins Internet,
da haengt ein DSL-Modem oder sonstirgendwas dran richtig? Wie willst du
denn an diesselbe Netzwerkkarte noch einen 2. Rechner anschliessen?
Das könnte
Hi,
hast du mal dnsmasq und masquerade ausprobiert? Brauchst allerdings 2
Netzwerkkarten in dem Rechner, der ins Internet geht, ist aber eine saubere
Lösung. ;-)
Eigentlich musst du nur das Skript /usr/sbin/masquerade für deine
Internet-Schnittstelle (z.B. eth0) anpassen und die IP davon in
Es hat funktioniert!
topologie und konfiguration:
Linux Rechner an der switch mit
eth0: 81.10.53.22
gateway: 81.10.53.23
eth0:0 192.168.215.1
DNS:
DSL Modem an der switch
Windows Machine an der Switch:
192.168.215.2
Gateway:
192.168.215.1
DNS
mit ifconfig die routing tabelle
El dom, 02-10-2005 a las 18:31 -0500, Marco Rangel escribió:
Como configurar Debian/Linux a un router DSL
Sere mas explicito.
Tengo configurada mi Tarjeta de red sin problemas,
mi red con los usuarios funciona bien.
Dare mas aspectos tecnicos.
IP Adress: 192.168.1.5
Submascara
10:38 +0200, Antonio Trujillo Carmona escribió:
El dom, 02-10-2005 a las 18:31 -0500, Marco Rangel escribió:
Como configurar Debian/Linux a un router DSL
Sere mas explicito.
Tengo configurada mi Tarjeta de red sin problemas,
mi red con los usuarios funciona bien.
Dare mas
El mar, 04-10-2005 a las 16:27 +0200, Pedro escribió:
Por lo que yo se las ip's estan bien configuradas y se encuentran en la
misma red 192.168.0.0/16 aunque es poco habitual tener una red tan
amplia para un router DSL
Ahora debes comprobar la configuración del router si tiene la misma
El 2/10/05, Marco Rangel[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Como configurar Debian/Linux a un router DSL
Sere mas explicito.
Tengo configurada mi Tarjeta de red sin problemas,
mi red con los usuarios funciona bien.
Dare mas aspectos tecnicos.
IP Adress: 192.168.1.5
Submascara: 255.255.0.0
Como configurar Debian/Linux a un router DSL
Sere mas explicito.
Tengo configurada mi Tarjeta de red sin problemas,
mi red con los usuarios funciona bien.
Dare mas aspectos tecnicos.
IP Adress: 192.168.1.5
Submascara: 255.255.0.0
Gateway: 192.168.0.5 que es la IP del router
Esta informacion
El dom, 02-10-2005 a las 18:31 -0500, Marco Rangel escribió:
Como configurar Debian/Linux a un router DSL
Sere mas explicito.
Tengo configurada mi Tarjeta de red sin problemas,
mi red con los usuarios funciona bien.
Dare mas aspectos tecnicos.
IP Adress: 192.168.1.5
Submascara
En /etc/network/interfaces cambia el Gateway por el que te dice Windows
(192.168.0.1).
Ésta es la IP del ruter.
Seguramente con esto bastará.
Saludos
En/na Marco Rangel ha escrit:
Como configurar Debian/Linux a un router DSL
Sere mas explicito.
Tengo configurada mi Tarjeta de red sin
Hallo Debianer,
Ich hoffe, das hier schonmal jemand was von DECNet
gehört hat ;-)
Ja ja .. sowas haben wir auch noch ...
derzeit bastell ich gerade an einen DECNet-Router,
welcher auf einer Firewall mit diversen VLANs
laufen soll.
Problem ist es, das wir Rechner haben, die im VLAN
12
Hola:
Llegaron a mis manos dos routers. Creo que tienen DOS, pero la persona
que me los dió, no sabía el password, se va a fijar si puede darme los
manuales (que no sabe donde estan, y creé que se tiraron).
¿Puedo ponerle debian? ¿Qué versión me recomiendan? Y lo que más me
era bastante raro, estoy acostumbrado a ver 386, 486 y otras más nuevas
(incluso tenía una XT que fue mi primer computadora), y por dentro es muy
distinta (cables y placas). ¿Puede ser alguna otra arquitectura?¿cual?
Uff! A ver danos algun dato mas. Desde luego, si tenia DOS es bastante
Brian Boonstra wrote:
You might want to try the Debian-based Linux Router Project, at
http://www.linuxrouter.org/
The whole thing runs off a write-protected floppy, so you can't be hacked as
badly as with a HD. The docs on the official site are not too good
On Fri, Nov 19, 1999 at 07:16:40AM +0700, Oki DZ wrote:
BTW, would using a floppy for the system be better than a HD in terms of
security? Or, it just means that a floppy will have less data so that
even if the system badly hacked, the recovery would be pretty simple
(just make a copy from the
Hi,
I have an Intel/486 and want to set it up as a router.
I have installed the base slink system on it, but I'm still having
problem with the NE2K network card; the module for it can't be loaded.
But since Satan is not available for slink and the system is currently
non functional (nowadays, if
You wrote:
I have an Intel/486 and want to set it up as a router.
You might want to try the Debian-based Linux Router Project, at
http://www.linuxrouter.org/
The whole thing runs off a write-protected floppy, so you can't be hacked as
badly as with a HD. The docs
58 matches
Mail list logo