On Jul 30, Buddha Buck wrote:
If you truely want to minimize the number of packages, you could remove
-all- the packages you listed (with the possible exception of the two
MIME packages), and use Netscape Mail. It will handle receiving mail
via POP3, sending it via SMTP, etc. I wouldn't
Victor Torrico wrote:
Hello All,
Connected intermittantly to internet using PPP to an ISP who uses POP3 for
mail. I am attempting to minimize the number of packages needed to run mail.
It seems there are many mail packages but not a great deal of information on
their
Hello All,
Connected intermittantly to internet using PPP to an ISP who uses POP3
for mail. I am attempting to minimize the number of packages needed
to run mail. It seems there are many mail packages but not a great
deal of information on there interrelationships.
Am running on X the
On Jul 30, Igor Grobman wrote
Now that you mention it, mutt has some POP3 support which I never tried. I
assume it's quite inflexible though, so I would recommend leaving fetchmail
on
your system.
Last time I looked, mutt recommended using fetchmail or something like
that. I think the
Hello All,
Connected intermittantly to internet using PPP to an ISP who uses POP3
for mail. I am attempting to minimize the number of packages needed
to run mail. It seems there are many mail packages but not a great
deal of information on there interrelationships.
Basic
HTML
I would appreciate it if you lose HTML tags.
PHello All,
PConnected intermittantly to internet using PPP to an ISP who uses POP3
for mail.nbsp; I am attempting to minimize the number of packages needed
to run mail.nbsp; It seems there are many mail packages but not a great
deal
Buddha Buck wrote:
...
With the exception of qmail instead of exim, your mail packages are
identical to mine. I also have procmail installed, but I haven't
converted my slocal setup to procmail yet, so I'm not actually -using-
procmail.
Put
| preline procmail
in your ~.qmail and
7 matches
Mail list logo
