Original Message:
-
From: johnny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 05:06:01 -0800 (PST)
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Movies, household network and 54g limits... (maybe...)
I have no experience with wifi range extenders but it seems to me it
should
Well, an 802.11g network has max throughput of 54Mb/s = 6.75 MB/s It
normally has an average throughput of 19Mb/s = 2.4MB/s
So, either you are getting very slow MegaBITS per second or your test
shows bad MegaBYTE readings :-)
I can assure you that I can't get more than max 10Mbps (standard
On Thu, January 17, 2008 10:30, johnny wrote:
I can assure you that I can't get more than max 10Mbps (standard 8/9).
Maybe depends upon a range extender I have in my location: I read that
this kind of thing takes the global throughput to half, is it true?
I have no experience with wifi range
I have no experience with wifi range extenders but it seems to me it
should really just 'resend' the signal. If the extender is a 802.11g
device, I'd expect it to produce the same throughput as the original
source. I can imagine there might be some problems with both devices using
the same
johnny:
I can assure you that I can't get more than max 10Mbps (standard 8/9).
Maybe depends upon a range extender I have in my location: I read that
this kind of thing takes the global throughput to half, is it true?
Yes. There is a (more or less) fixed throughput available for both
sending
On Jan 17, 2008, at 4:24 AM, Peter Teunissen wrote:
I have no experience with wifi range extenders but it seems to me it
should really just 'resend' the signal. If the extender is a 802.11g
device, I'd expect it to produce the same throughput as the original
source.
When dealing with a
Copying a 1GB file...
... **only n-devices active**
... 10MB/S average throughput
Copying a 1GB file...
... **with one other g-device active**
... 7MB/S average throughput.
I dunno, I copy movies server - laptop for a considerable test time
and mrtg says I stay about 8/9Mbps.
I would say
On Wed, January 16, 2008 10:20, johnny wrote:
Copying a 1GB file...
... **only n-devices active**
... 10MB/S average throughput
Copying a 1GB file...
... **with one other g-device active**
... 7MB/S average throughput.
I dunno, I copy movies server - laptop for a considerable test time
Because... I did some more testing...
- Ok, thanks Peter for your observations. I gotta do other tests too
(I'm gonna think about yours).
- yeah, your architecture doesn't add but is pro ;)
- Only one doubt: in a wireless network, if the router and the nics
are N except one G card, I'd expect
On 14-jan-2008, at 10:33, johnny wrote:
- Only one doubt: in a wireless network, if the router and the nics
are N except one G card, I'd expect the last one drag all back (my
usual idea about CSMA/CD signal-caching collisions: MAC level
saturation), am I right?
That's right. I'm by no means a
In particular, the hidden transmitter problem really bites 802.11b/g.
If computer A , Computer B, and access point P...
1. Ok, but do you know papers or scientist engineers talking about a
possible solution (b/g) and indicating a way (eg. drivers
change)?
2. Does the story change as to n
On 11-jan-2008, at 22:57, johnny wrote:
For example, Peter, with N, you say is better, but may I ask you the
architecture of your network? (fast: only you or...)
Because of your question and the level of the discussion, I did some
more testing. My original remark was just based on small
Hi,
in my flat there are 1 router, 1 range extender, 2 vista, 1 XP and my
2 linux ubuntu (one of which is mail/samba/nfs/etc server, is
monitored via mrtg and contains a lot of music/movies). All, wireless.
The problem: when I listen to music or watch movies from my laptop (my
flatmates idem)
On 11-jan-2008, at 19:03, johnny wrote:
Hi,
in my flat there are 1 router, 1 range extender, 2 vista, 1 XP and my
2 linux ubuntu (one of which is mail/samba/nfs/etc server, is
monitored via mrtg and contains a lot of music/movies). All, wireless.
The problem: when I listen to music or watch
On Jan 11, 2008, at 10:03 AM, johnny wrote:
Hi,
in my flat there are 1 router, 1 range extender, 2 vista, 1 XP and my
2 linux ubuntu (one of which is mail/samba/nfs/etc server, is
monitored via mrtg and contains a lot of music/movies). All, wireless.
The problem: when I listen to music or
It's actually pretty hard to get the full bandwidth that 802.11g promises.
Sorry if I cut a bit but your objection is fondamentally this way
(possible factors: close wireless networks, 2.4GHz devices, ..., ok,
but all linked to your mother reasoning).
But I am telling you that if you see mrtg
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 10:03:41AM -0800, johnny wrote:
The graphs say it is clearly not bandwith fault. Reading around:
It is well known
that the medium access control (MAC) layer is the main bottleneck for
the IEEE 802.11 wireless LANs.
On 01/11/08 17:28, Rob Sims wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 10:03:41AM -0800, johnny wrote:
The graphs say it is clearly not bandwith fault. Reading around:
It is well known
that the medium access control (MAC) layer is the main bottleneck for
18 matches
Mail list logo
