Re: OT: signatures (was Re: removing TexLive Docs packages)

2015-12-26 Thread Chris Bannister
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 10:38:28AM -0500, Anthony Mapes wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > While we're on the topic of signatures, what do you consider to be good > and bad to include in signatures? Very amusing! You've made my day. :) > - -- > Anthony Mapes >

Re: OT: signatures (was Re: removing TexLive Docs packages)

2015-12-25 Thread Adam Wilson
On Thu, 24 Dec 2015 10:38:28 -0500, Anthony Mapes wrote: > (Are there email clients out there that don't display who the sender > was?) If such a mail client exists, its users should not be forgiven.

Re: OT: signatures (was Re: removing TexLive Docs packages)

2015-12-24 Thread Sivaram Neelakantan
On Thu, Dec 24 2015,The Wanderer wrote: > On 2015-12-24 at 07:37, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 23 2015,The Wanderer wrote: >> >> [snipped 32 lines] > > This is standard practice; you don't usually need to indicate that > you've snipped at all (except maybe by leaving a blank line

OT: signatures (was Re: removing TexLive Docs packages)

2015-12-24 Thread The Wanderer
On 2015-12-24 at 07:37, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23 2015,The Wanderer wrote: > > [snipped 32 lines] This is standard practice; you don't usually need to indicate that you've snipped at all (except maybe by leaving a blank line in between the quoted bits where the snip was), much

Re: OT: signatures (was Re: removing TexLive Docs packages)

2015-12-24 Thread Anthony Mapes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 While we're on the topic of signatures, what do you consider to be good and bad to include in signatures? I've seen a lot of conflicting opinions online, particularly surrounding whether or not to include your email address. (Are there email