On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 10:38:28AM -0500, Anthony Mapes wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> While we're on the topic of signatures, what do you consider to be good
> and bad to include in signatures?
Very amusing! You've made my day. :)
> - --
> Anthony Mapes
>
On Thu, 24 Dec 2015 10:38:28 -0500, Anthony Mapes
wrote:
> (Are there email clients out there that don't display who the sender
> was?)
If such a mail client exists, its users should not be forgiven.
On Thu, Dec 24 2015,The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2015-12-24 at 07:37, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 23 2015,The Wanderer wrote:
>>
>> [snipped 32 lines]
>
> This is standard practice; you don't usually need to indicate that
> you've snipped at all (except maybe by leaving a blank line
On 2015-12-24 at 07:37, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23 2015,The Wanderer wrote:
>
> [snipped 32 lines]
This is standard practice; you don't usually need to indicate that
you've snipped at all (except maybe by leaving a blank line in between
the quoted bits where the snip was), much
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
While we're on the topic of signatures, what do you consider to be good
and bad to include in signatures? I've seen a lot of conflicting
opinions online, particularly surrounding whether or not to include your
email address. (Are there email
5 matches
Mail list logo