On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 09:41 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 27 aug 12, 21:47:08, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >
> > I often build vanilla + patch-rt. Usually I copy the Debian's default
> > kernel config, change some settings to fit to rt needs and then run
> > "make oldconfig".
>
> Have you trie
On Lu, 27 aug 12, 21:47:08, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> I often build vanilla + patch-rt. Usually I copy the Debian's default
> kernel config, change some settings to fit to rt needs and then run
> "make oldconfig".
Have you tried the new rt flavour of Debian kernels?
$ uname -a
Linux think 3.2.0-3
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 15:38 -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 01:04:39 -0500
> Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
> > On 8/26/2012 6:39 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
> >
> > > Experimental kernels are probably better than downloading the source
> > > from kernel.org and compiling it.
> >
> > I disagree.
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 15:31 -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:39:42 -0400
> Gary Dale wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > Experimental kernels are probably better than downloading the source
> > from kernel.org and compiling it. At least some attempt is made to make
> > it work in the Debian eco
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 01:04:39 -0500
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 8/26/2012 6:39 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
>
> > Experimental kernels are probably better than downloading the source
> > from kernel.org and compiling it.
>
> I disagree. I've been running late model vanilla kernels with Stable
> for many
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:39:42 -0400
Gary Dale wrote:
...
> Experimental kernels are probably better than downloading the source
> from kernel.org and compiling it. At least some attempt is made to make
> it work in the Debian ecosystem.
As Stan points out in another message in this thread, the
On 08/27/2012 08:45 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 16:51:54 -0500, Alex Robbins wrote:
I am running Debian testing, which currently has kernel 3.2.23-1, same
as unstable. experimental has 3.5.something. I am looking to run
kernel version 3.3 or higher.
As I understand it, there are
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 01:25:11 -0500
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 8/26/2012 7:44 PM, Alex Robbins wrote:
>
> > need something more recent than testing
>
> Why? IIRC you previously mentioned you *needed* 3.3 or higher. Can you
> tell use what feature it is you need that was introduced in 3.3?
>
>
Pertti Kosunen writes:
> On 27.8.2012 6:32, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>> That will get him the latest kernel for his particular distribution
>> ("testing", "wheezy", etc). The current kernel for either testing or
>> unstable is 3.2; the current for experimental is 3.4; the current at
>> kernel.org is
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 16:51:54 -0500, Alex Robbins wrote:
> I am running Debian testing, which currently has kernel 3.2.23-1, same
> as unstable. experimental has 3.5.something. I am looking to run
> kernel version 3.3 or higher.
>
> As I understand it, there are 2 ways to go about this. I could
On 27.8.2012 6:32, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
That will get him the latest kernel for his particular distribution
("testing", "wheezy", etc). The current kernel for either testing or
unstable is 3.2; the current for experimental is 3.4; the current at
kernel.org is 3.5.
http://packages.debian.org/exp
On 8/26/2012 7:44 PM, Alex Robbins wrote:
> need something more recent than testing
Why? IIRC you previously mentioned you *needed* 3.3 or higher. Can you
tell use what feature it is you need that was introduced in 3.3?
> not asking which of the above options is stable and secure (I know it
>
On 8/26/2012 6:39 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
> Experimental kernels are probably better than downloading the source
> from kernel.org and compiling it.
I disagree. I've been running late model vanilla kernels with Stable
for many years without issue. Currently I'm running vanilla 3.2.6
w/Squeeze sinc
Charles Kroeger writes:
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:00:01 +0200
> Alex Robbins wrote:
>
>> As I understand it, there are 2 ways to go about this. I could build
>> from the kernel.org source, or I could install from unstable.
>
> or you could install:
>
> linux-headers-amd64
>
> linux-image-amd64
Charles Kroeger writes:
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:00:01 +0200
> Alex Robbins wrote:
>
>> As I understand it, there are 2 ways to go about this. I could build
>> from the kernel.org source, or I could install from unstable.
>
> or you could install:
>
> linux-headers-amd64
>
> linux-image-amd64
On 27/08/12 05:30, lina wrote:
On Monday 27,August,2012 11:13 AM, Alex Robbins wrote:
On 08/26/2012 09:48 PM, Charles Kroeger wrote:
or you could install: linux-headers-amd64 linux-image-amd64 this would
insure you always had the latest kernel and headers. Your architecture
may be different s
On Monday 27,August,2012 11:13 AM, Alex Robbins wrote:
> On 08/26/2012 09:48 PM, Charles Kroeger wrote:
>> or you could install: linux-headers-amd64 linux-image-amd64 this would
>> insure you always had the latest kernel and headers. Your architecture
>> may be different so you might want to look t
On 08/26/2012 09:48 PM, Charles Kroeger wrote:
or you could install: linux-headers-amd64 linux-image-amd64 this would
insure you always had the latest kernel and headers. Your architecture
may be different so you might want to look to that in regard to my
examples.
This does not at all answer
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:00:01 +0200
Alex Robbins wrote:
> As I understand it, there are 2 ways to go about this. I could build
> from the kernel.org source, or I could install from unstable.
or you could install:
linux-headers-amd64
linux-image-amd64
this would insure you always had the lat
On 08/26/2012 06:39 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
I'm confused. You said that unstable has the same version as testing,
so installing from SID wouldn't get you anything.
You're right, it wouldn't. I misspoke. I meant to say, "or I could
install
from *experimental*"
If you are looking for stability and
On 26/08/12 05:51 PM, Alex Robbins wrote:
I am running Debian testing, which currently has kernel 3.2.23-1, same
as unstable. experimental has 3.5.something. I am looking to run
kernel version 3.3 or higher.
As I understand it, there are 2 ways to go about this. I could build
from the kern
I am running Debian testing, which currently has kernel 3.2.23-1, same
as unstable. experimental has 3.5.something. I am looking to run
kernel version 3.3 or higher.
As I understand it, there are 2 ways to go about this. I could build
from the kernel.org source, or I could install from unst
22 matches
Mail list logo
