Re: Re: dhcpcd weirdness

2005-08-29 Thread brandee kinney-hurd
did you once live in apple valley?





Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: dhcpcd weirdness

2000-10-11 Thread Jan Martin Mathiassen
 Oct 11 00:08:36 isharagi dhcpcd[188]: timed out waiting for a valid DHCP
 server response

 It gets the address instantly if I start it as follows:

 isharagi:/# dhcpcd -h (hostname)

 Whereas just typing dhcpcd causes it to pause for a long time,
 as it does
 when it tries running it at boot time.  The cable modem shows activity so
 it's doing something.  What am I failing to configure properly?  If these
 configurations are ok, what's doing this?  It used to work so I figure I
 must have
 changed something and made it broken.

some dhcp servers apparently need you to add -h hostname for some obscure
reason (i don't know why, i just remember hearing something about that
somewhere), so i suggest you check out its config man file for the
equivalent.

on an almost related note, i had a weird issue when i tried to use dhcp on
my linux box... it'd send a dhcpdiscover, get a dhcpoffer ... and then
nothing. then, one day it worked, out of the blue. *shrug*

ps: you could always run tcpdump while trying to start dhcpcd, to see just
wtf it's doing.

-m



Re: dhcpcd weirdness

2000-10-11 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 07:46:59AM +0200, Jan Martin Mathiassen wrote:

 some dhcp servers apparently need you to add -h hostname for some obscure
 reason (i don't know why, i just remember hearing something about that
 somewhere), so i suggest you check out its config man file for the
 equivalent.

But he's adding one, via his config files, no? I'm using dhcpcd and the
config files, and with rogers it often takes me multiple tries to finally get
an IP address. They really suck.

Mike

-- 
Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...the word HACK is used as a verb to indicate a massive amount
of nerd-like effort.  -Harley Hahn, A Student's Guide to UNIX
PGP Public Key: http://www.storm.ca/~msoulier/personal.html



Re: dhcpcd weirdness

2000-10-11 Thread Jason Hammerschmidt
I have no problems with [EMAIL PROTECTED] service and my DHCP service, albiet, 
I use
the command line -h not config files.  I've never had a problem at all except
for when the power goes out, then I have to power cycle the cable ethernet
bridge and then use dhcpcd -h hostname

I just put
dhcpcd -h cr-your#'s 
in rc.local and all is fine.  Doesn't debian use pump though?

  some dhcp servers apparently need you to add -h hostname for some obscure
  reason (i don't know why, i just remember hearing something about that
  somewhere), so i suggest you check out its config man file for the
  equivalent.

 But he's adding one, via his config files, no? I'm using dhcpcd and the
 config files, and with rogers it often takes me multiple tries to finally
 get
 an IP address. They really suck.

--
Jason Hammerschmidt - Sapere Aude - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MacLaren McCann Interactive - direct 416.643.8560





Re: dhcpcd weirdness

2000-10-11 Thread Gary Hennigan
Jason Hammerschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 I have no problems with [EMAIL PROTECTED] service and my DHCP service,
 albiet, I use the command line -h not config files.  I've never had
 a problem at all except for when the power goes out, then I have to
 power cycle the cable ethernet bridge and then use dhcpcd -h
 hostname
 
 I just put
 dhcpcd -h cr-your#'s 
 in rc.local and all is fine.  Doesn't debian use pump though?

I think by default pump is used, but you can install any one of, to my
knowledge, three DHCP clients.

Gary



Re: dhcpcd weirdness

2000-10-11 Thread Andrew Whitlock
Well, I guess I _could_ use a shell script to start it, but it bothers me
that it used to work yet suddenly does not.  The config files sure seem to
be written correctly.  I have installed other packages since dhcpcd that
mess with network things, such as ssh and oidentd, but I don't see how this
would affect dhcpcd since it has its own config file??

Debian does default to pump, but I removed it as I could never get it to
work.  dhcpcd worked on the first try, with the caveat that -h (hostname)
must be used with my ISP.  The config file even worked, back then...

Does anybody think that upgrading to the version in unstable might do
something?  I've already tried purging and reinstalling potato's version
(including the files in /etc/dhcpc).

Andrew W.

 Original Message -
From: Jason Hammerschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 9:22 AM
Subject: Re: dhcpcd weirdness


 I have no problems with [EMAIL PROTECTED] service and my DHCP service, 
 albiet, I
use
 the command line -h not config files.
SNIP
 I just put
 dhcpcd -h cr-your#'s 
 in rc.local and all is fine.  Doesn't debian use pump though?



Re: dhcpcd weirdness (resolution)

2000-10-11 Thread Andrew Whitlock
Problem: dhcpcd wouldn't run with config files, only when configured on
command line

Solution: the format given in the example config file in /etc/dhcpc seems to
either be incorrect or, at least, it doesn't work for my ISP (@home).  The
format _given_ is as follows:

OPTIONS='-h (hostname)'

This doesn't work for me.  I have to do it this way:

OPTIONS='-h (hostname)'

So it turned out to be really simple after all.  Thanks for the responses!

Andrew W.



Re: dhcpcd weirdness (resolution)

2000-10-11 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 11:57:11AM -0400, Andrew Whitlock wrote:
 Problem: dhcpcd wouldn't run with config files, only when configured on
 command line
 
 Solution: the format given in the example config file in /etc/dhcpc seems to
 either be incorrect or, at least, it doesn't work for my ISP (@home).  The
 format _given_ is as follows:
 
 OPTIONS='-h (hostname)'
 
 This doesn't work for me.  I have to do it this way:
 
 OPTIONS='-h (hostname)'
 
 So it turned out to be really simple after all.  Thanks for the responses!

With Rogers I have to use -I for the client ID. Not sure what the
difference is from hostname, but apparently there is one.

Mike

-- 
Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...the word HACK is used as a verb to indicate a massive amount
of nerd-like effort.  -Harley Hahn, A Student's Guide to UNIX
PGP Public Key: http://www.storm.ca/~msoulier/personal.html