On 29 June 2012 23:41, Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote:
On 06/29/2012 05:29 PM, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
From: Domto...@rpdom.net
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:02:45 +0100
Ok, I've just tested this. It is a FAT filesystem limitation.
/snip/
I've looked at this thread a number of
Keith McKenzie km3...@gmail.com wrote:
It was about cp reporting 'no space left on device', whilst df said that
there was space available.
The OS reported No space left on device (or more accurately, errno 28:
ENOSPC) to cp. Rather than trying to guess whether this really meant
what it said or
From: Dom to...@rpdom.net
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:02:45 +0100
Ok, I've just tested this. It is a FAT filesystem limitation.
Nice analysis!
On FAT12 (and FAT16, iirc) there is a limit of 512 files in the root
directory. Other directories don't have this limit.
I found additional
On 06/29/2012 05:29 PM, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
From: Domto...@rpdom.net
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:02:45 +0100
Ok, I've just tested this. It is a FAT filesystem limitation.
/snip/
I've looked at this thread a number of times, but I was then and
still am puzzled. According to Linux in a
4 matches
Mail list logo
