- Original Message -
From: Andrei POPESCU
Sent: 05/17/14 05:06 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Security updates for hold package
You haven't yet stated why you need the backports kernel, but if you
want to keep using it install the backports meta-package.
I HAD
On Jo, 15 mai 14, 19:35:40, Theodore Alcapotaxis wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Andrei POPESCU
Sent: 05/15/14 04:50 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Security updates for hold package
Assumptions:
1. You did not change the default priority
- Original Message -
From: Andrei POPESCU
Sent: 05/15/14 04:50 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Security updates for hold package
Assumptions:
1. You did not change the default priority for backports
How does one change default priority for backports? What
Hi,
can anybody explain to me what exactly happens if I place a package on
hold? I have an application which unfortunately requires an older php
version.
If I now mark the package hold does this mean no major upgrade will be
performed for this package or do I prevent security updates as well,
with
On Mi, 14 mai 14, 11:00:30, Frank wrote:
Hi,
can anybody explain to me what exactly happens if I place a package on
hold? I have an application which unfortunately requires an older php
version.
If I now mark the package hold does this mean no major upgrade will be
performed for this package
On Wed, 14 May 2014 11:00:30 +0200
Frank fr...@dead-link.org wrote:
Hi,
can anybody explain to me what exactly happens if I place a package on
hold? I have an application which unfortunately requires an older php
version.
If I now mark the package hold does this mean no major upgrade will be
On 05/14/2014 11:35 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
APT does not differentiate between major or security or whatever
upgrade, just about version numbers.
However, if you're on stable (or oldstable) there will be no major
upgrades (whether you want them or not) unless you point your sources to
On Wed, 14 May 2014 11:40:04 +0200
Frank fr...@dead-link.org wrote:
On 05/14/2014 11:35 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
APT does not differentiate between major or security or whatever
upgrade, just about version numbers.
However, if you're on stable (or oldstable) there will be no major
On 05/14/2014 11:53 AM, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
Pin php packages to a=oldstable, 500 Pin-Priority 990. But to
receive security support for squeeze past this month, you have to
include squeeze-lts repo.
Excellent, thanks!
Cheers
Frank
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 2014-05-14, Marko Randjelovic marko...@eunet.rs wrote:
Pin php packages to a=oldstable, 500 Pin-Priority 990. But to
receive security support for squeeze past this month, you have to
include squeeze-lts repo.
There is a specific squeeze-lts repository? If so, what should be put in
On Wed, 14 May 2014 14:16:37 + (UTC)
Curt cu...@free.fr wrote:
On 2014-05-14, Marko Randjelovic marko...@eunet.rs wrote:
Pin php packages to a=oldstable, 500 Pin-Priority 990. But to
receive security support for squeeze past this month, you have to
include squeeze-lts repo.
On 2014-05-14, Marko Randjelovic marko...@eunet.rs wrote:
There is a specific squeeze-lts repository? If so, what should be put in
/etc/apt/sources.list to benefit from the long term support?
https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Development
Thank you; I did search* but, contrary to the biblical
What happens if I am using Debian current stable but my linux-image is 3.12
(wheezy-backports)?
- Original Message -
From: Andrei POPESCU
Sent: 05/14/14 05:35 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Security updates for hold package
However, if you're on stable
On Mi, 14 mai 14, 15:59:08, Theodore Alcapotaxis wrote:
I wrote:
However, if you're on stable (or oldstable) there will be no major
upgrades (whether you want them or not) unless you point your sources to
the next release.
What happens if I am using Debian current stable but my
14 matches
Mail list logo
