On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 12:11:17PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
On 5/14/19 4:23 AM, Michael Stone wrote:
On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 10:48:31PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
2019-05-09 22:00:27 root@po /mnt/scratch
# time dd if=/dev/urandom of=foo bs=1M count=1K conv=fsync
don't bother
On 5/14/19 4:23 AM, Michael Stone wrote:
On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 10:48:31PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
2019-05-09 22:00:27 root@po /mnt/scratch
# time dd if=/dev/urandom of=foo bs=1M count=1K conv=fsync
don't bother doing this, urandom will be the bottleneck and it will just
confuse
On 5/14/19 12:34 AM, Lothar Schilling wrote:
Thanks for your help, David. But to boot the machine from a live CD I
will have to pay a visit to the computing centre in Frankfurt anyway. So
instead of running a diagnostic tool I am going to install the system
from scratch, this time using a 64bit
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:58:45AM +0200, Lothar Schilling wrote:
Am 13.05.2019 um 10:51 schrieb Tixy:
On Mon, 2019-05-13 at 10:30 +0200, Lothar Schilling wrote:
[...]
# uname -a
Linux [my.server.com] 4.9.0-9-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 4.9.168-1
(2019-04-12) i686 GNU/Linux
So you're running a
On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 10:48:31PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
2019-05-09 22:00:27 root@po /mnt/scratch
# time dd if=/dev/urandom of=foo bs=1M count=1K conv=fsync
don't bother doing this, urandom will be the bottleneck and it will just
confuse things
Thanks for your help, David. But to boot the machine from a live CD I
will have to pay a visit to the computing centre in Frankfurt anyway. So
instead of running a diagnostic tool I am going to install the system
from scratch, this time using a 64bit version.
On 5/13/19 1:30 AM, Lothar Schilling wrote:
# cat /etc/debian_version
9.9
Okay.
# uname -a
Linux [my.server.com] 4.9.0-9-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 4.9.168-1
(2019-04-12) i686 GNU/Linux
As other readers have noted, you are running 32-bit Debian GNU/Linux.
It should not matter for what we're
On 2019-05-13, Lothar Schilling wrote:
> Am 13.05.2019 um 10:51 schrieb Tixy:
>> On Mon, 2019-05-13 at 10:30 +0200, Lothar Schilling wrote:
>> [...]
>>> # uname -a
>>> Linux [my.server.com] 4.9.0-9-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 4.9.168-1
>>> (2019-04-12) i686 GNU/Linux
>> So you're running a 32-bit
On Mon, 2019-05-13 at 10:58 +0200, Lothar Schilling wrote:
> Am 13.05.2019 um 10:51 schrieb Tixy:
> > On Mon, 2019-05-13 at 10:30 +0200, Lothar Schilling wrote:
> > [...]
> > > # uname -a
> > > Linux [my.server.com] 4.9.0-9-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 4.9.168-1
> > > (2019-04-12) i686 GNU/Linux
> >
> >
Am 13.05.2019 um 10:51 schrieb Tixy:
> On Mon, 2019-05-13 at 10:30 +0200, Lothar Schilling wrote:
> [...]
>> # uname -a
>> Linux [my.server.com] 4.9.0-9-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 4.9.168-1
>> (2019-04-12) i686 GNU/Linux
> So you're running a 32-bit system, not 64-bit. Is that because you're
> running
On Mon, 2019-05-13 at 10:30 +0200, Lothar Schilling wrote:
[...]
> # uname -a
> Linux [my.server.com] 4.9.0-9-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 4.9.168-1
> (2019-04-12) i686 GNU/Linux
So you're running a 32-bit system, not 64-bit. Is that because you're
running on very old hardware or a decision for some
Am 10.05.2019 um 10:51 schrieb Lothar Schilling:
> Am 10.05.2019 um 07:48 schrieb David Christensen:
>> On 5/9/19 1:49 AM, Lothar Schilling wrote:
>>> Hi everybody,
>>>
>>> for years I have used CentOS for our server landscape. Now I decided to
>>> give Debian a try. I just set up a Stretch 9.8
Am 10.05.2019 um 07:48 schrieb David Christensen:
> On 5/9/19 1:49 AM, Lothar Schilling wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> for years I have used CentOS for our server landscape. Now I decided to
>> give Debian a try. I just set up a Stretch 9.8 system supposed to become
>> our main backup server. So I
On 5/9/19 1:49 AM, Lothar Schilling wrote:
Hi everybody,
for years I have used CentOS for our server landscape. Now I decided to
give Debian a try. I just set up a Stretch 9.8 system supposed to become
our main backup server. So I set up a backup job wih rsync. But the
going is really very very
Hi,
Lothar Schilling wrote:
> Fast enough...
> dd if=/daten/testfile bs=1G oflag=direct of=/daten/testfile2
> 10737418240 Bytes (11 GB, 10 GiB) kopiert, 72,7297 s, 148 MB/s
So this is sufficiently fast, but
cp /daten/testfile /daten/testfile2
lasts 2000 seconds ?
> dd if=/daten/testfile
On Thursday 09 May 2019 10:28:10 am Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
> On Thu, 9 May 2019, at 15:17, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > ... and its one of the reasons
> > an SSD seems so much faster because they seek in a microsecond
>
> In what sense does an SSD have "seek time"? Seek time is
> a tightly defined
Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
> On Thu, 9 May 2019, at 15:17, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > ... and its one of the reasons
> > an SSD seems so much faster because they seek in a microsecond
>
> In what sense does an SSD have "seek time"? Seek time is
> a tightly defined thing.
>
> There must be delays in
On Thu, 9 May 2019, at 15:17, Gene Heskett wrote:
> ... and its one of the reasons
> an SSD seems so much faster because they seek in a microsecond
In what sense does an SSD have "seek time"? Seek time is
a tightly defined thing.
There must be delays in SSD firmware's processing, I suppose,
On Thursday 09 May 2019 04:49:32 am Lothar Schilling wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> for years I have used CentOS for our server landscape. Now I decided
> to give Debian a try. I just set up a Stretch 9.8 system supposed to
> become our main backup server. So I set up a backup job wih rsync. But
>
Am 09.05.19 um 14:43 schrieb Lothar Schilling:
> Am 09.05.2019 um 13:27 schrieb Martin:
>> [..]
>>> hdparm -tT /dev/sda
>>> /dev/sda:
>>> Timing cached reads: 13348 MB in 2.00 seconds = 6683.42 MB/sec
>>> Timing buffered disk reads: 1014 MB in 3.00 seconds = 337.72 MB/sec
>>>
>>> iotop -o
Am 09.05.2019 um 13:23 schrieb Keith Christian:
> What is the rsync command line, could there be a —bwlimit option in it?
No, there isn't. Anyway, cp has the same problem.
Am 09.05.2019 um 13:27 schrieb Martin:
> [..]
>> hdparm -tT /dev/sda
>> /dev/sda:
>> Timing cached reads: 13348 MB in 2.00 seconds = 6683.42 MB/sec
>> Timing buffered disk reads: 1014 MB in 3.00 seconds = 337.72 MB/sec
>>
>> iotop -o (for rsync and cp)
>> Total DISK READ : 0.00 B/s |
[..]
> hdparm -tT /dev/sda
> /dev/sda:
> Timing cached reads: 13348 MB in 2.00 seconds = 6683.42 MB/sec
> Timing buffered disk reads: 1014 MB in 3.00 seconds = 337.72 MB/sec
>
> iotop -o (for rsync and cp)
> Total DISK READ : 0.00 B/s | Total DISK WRITE : 476.15 K/s
> Actual DISK
What is the rsync command line, could there be a —bwlimit option in it?
Am 09.05.2019 um 12:50 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> [ replying to list, not discretely ]
>
> Quoting Lothar Schilling (2019-05-09 12:36:55)
>> Am 09.05.2019 um 12:26 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
>>> Quoting Lothar Schilling (2019-05-09 11:46:00)
Am 09.05.2019 um 11:14 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
[ replying to list, not discretely ]
Quoting Lothar Schilling (2019-05-09 12:36:55)
> Am 09.05.2019 um 12:26 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> > Quoting Lothar Schilling (2019-05-09 11:46:00)
> >> Am 09.05.2019 um 11:14 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> >>> Quoting Lothar Schilling (2019-05-09 10:49:32)
>
Quoting Lothar Schilling (2019-05-09 11:46:00)
> Am 09.05.2019 um 11:14 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> > Quoting Lothar Schilling (2019-05-09 10:49:32)
> >> I just set up a Stretch 9.8 system supposed to become our main
> >> backup server. So I set up a backup job wih rsync. But the going is
> >>
Am 09.05.2019 um 11:51 schrieb Kevin DAGNEAUX:
> Le 09/05/2019 à 11:46, Lothar Schilling a écrit :
>> Am 09.05.2019 um 11:14 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
>>> Quoting Lothar Schilling (2019-05-09 10:49:32)
for years I have used CentOS for our server landscape. Now I decided
to give Debian a
Le 09/05/2019 à 11:46, Lothar Schilling a écrit :
Am 09.05.2019 um 11:14 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
Quoting Lothar Schilling (2019-05-09 10:49:32)
for years I have used CentOS for our server landscape. Now I decided
to give Debian a try.
Welcome to Debian!
I sincerely hope you will appreciate
Am 09.05.2019 um 11:14 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> Quoting Lothar Schilling (2019-05-09 10:49:32)
>> for years I have used CentOS for our server landscape. Now I decided
>> to give Debian a try.
> Welcome to Debian!
>
> I sincerely hope you will appreciate Debian.
>
>
>> I just set up a Stretch
Quoting Lothar Schilling (2019-05-09 10:49:32)
> for years I have used CentOS for our server landscape. Now I decided
> to give Debian a try.
Welcome to Debian!
I sincerely hope you will appreciate Debian.
> I just set up a Stretch 9.8 system supposed to become our main backup
> server. So I
Hi everybody,
for years I have used CentOS for our server landscape. Now I decided to
give Debian a try. I just set up a Stretch 9.8 system supposed to become
our main backup server. So I set up a backup job wih rsync. But the
going is really very very slow. Trying to figure out what's
32 matches
Mail list logo
