On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 07:39, Peter Lebbing pe...@digitalbrains.com wrote:
Hello all,
Since some time I get the message
swapon: [...]: insecure permissions 1660, 0660 suggested.
[1] is related to this. I'm not worried, but there are two things I wonder:
1) Foremost, what does the sticky
I tried it on a couple of Debian Squeeze machines and only saw
shm d
Which makes sense.
What release are you running?
Rick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On 16/02/12 17:54, Rick Thomas wrote:
I tried it on a couple of Debian Squeeze machines and only saw
shm d
Which makes sense.
Correct, that is also what I see on Squeeze boxes.
What release are you running?
This is on Wheezy (testing). This behaviour is relatively new in testing.
Grepping the debian udev source gives:
udev/udevd.c:
udev/udev-rules.c:
udev/udev-event.c:
/* set sticky bit, so we do not remove the node on module unload */
And in line 426-429 of udev/udev-node.c, version 175-3, function
int udev_node_remove(struct udev_device *dev):
if (stats.st_mode
On Feb 16, 2012, at 12:32 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote:
On 16/02/12 17:54, Rick Thomas wrote:
I tried it on a couple of Debian Squeeze machines and only saw
shm d
Which makes sense.
Correct, that is also what I see on Squeeze boxes.
What release are you running?
This is on Wheezy
Hello all,
Since some time I get the message
swapon: [...]: insecure permissions 1660, 0660 suggested.
[1] is related to this. I'm not worried, but there are two things I wonder:
1) Foremost, what does the sticky bit on character or block device files even
_mean_? I'm guessing it's
6 matches
Mail list logo
