On Tuesday 11 November 2003 11:56 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> At first this new system seemed really great. For example, to
> support mailmain I created three files:
>
> conf.d/main/01_local_mailman_macros
> conf.d/router/350_local_listdirector
> conf.d/transport/30_local_mailmain
>
> Whi
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 20:20, Greg Folkert wrote:
> Personally I love the stuff Andreas Metzler has done with the config.
> Makes it TONS more managable. Might I even suggest that Philip Hazel
> (Exim's author) adopt it... or include at least a way to do that.
I would agree with that, though
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 01:44, Bill Moseley wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:25:02AM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 November 2003 17:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > What do people think of exim4-config? It splits the exim config file
> > > into parts and when exim4 is (r
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:25:02AM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 November 2003 17:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > What do people think of exim4-config? It splits the exim config file
> > into parts and when exim4 is (re)started a new config file is built from
> > all the parts, test
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 18:36, Bill Moseley wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 02:20:47PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > Personally I love the stuff Andreas Metzler has done with the config.
> > Makes it TONS more managable.
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> Can you explain why you think it's more managable? I'm not
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 17:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What do people think of exim4-config? It splits the exim config file
> into parts and when exim4 is (re)started a new config file is built from
> all the parts, tested that it's valid and then exim4 is started with the
> new config.
A
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 02:20:47PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> Personally I love the stuff Andreas Metzler has done with the config.
> Makes it TONS more managable.
Hi Greg,
Can you explain why you think it's more managable? I'm not arguing that
it isn't, I'm just curious what you find better a
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 12:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What do people think of exim4-config? It splits the exim config file
> into parts and when exim4 is (re)started a new config file is built from
> all the parts, tested that it's valid and then exim4 is started with the
> new config.
>
>
What do people think of exim4-config? It splits the exim config file
into parts and when exim4 is (re)started a new config file is built from
all the parts, tested that it's valid and then exim4 is started with the
new config.
The file that is written is stripped of comments. I guess that's
9 matches
Mail list logo
