Re: Webkit2 (was Re: Epiphany browser continues to get worse and worse)
On 4/19/2010 11:24 PM, Mark Allums wrote: On 4/19/2010 10:20 PM, Ron Johnson wrote: On 2010-04-19 21:47, Mark Allums wrote: [snip] Webkit 2.0 is imminent. Perhaps they are considering moving to it. According to various sources, it is the bee's knees. Beyond crude process separation, what are it's benefits over v1? I don't know. I read the blurb (Slashdot) but was too disinterested to read the article. Saw similar blurbs in about six other places. *Somebody's* excited. MAA (It must be good, it's 2.0!) Let me amend: I forget. I knew the answer to your question when I read it in the blurb, but I'm no longer young, and the reasons for 2.0 have escaped me. MAA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4bcdcb16.5020...@allums.com
Re: Webkit2 (was Re: Epiphany browser continues to get worse and worse)
On 2010-04-20 10:41, Mark Allums wrote: On 4/19/2010 11:24 PM, Mark Allums wrote: On 4/19/2010 10:20 PM, Ron Johnson wrote: On 2010-04-19 21:47, Mark Allums wrote: [snip] Webkit 2.0 is imminent. Perhaps they are considering moving to it. According to various sources, it is the bee's knees. Beyond crude process separation, what are it's benefits over v1? I don't know. I read the blurb (Slashdot) but was too disinterested to read the article. Saw similar blurbs in about six other places. *Somebody's* excited. MAA (It must be good, it's 2.0!) Let me amend: I forget. I knew the answer to your question when I read it in the blurb, but I'm no longer young, and the reasons for 2.0 have escaped me. Even though I'm an official Grumpy Old Man, the know the reasons for 2.0. It's just that now I know that most of them are screaming piles of horse manure. -- Dissent is patriotic, remember? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4bce1a23.5020...@cox.net
Re: Webkit2 (was Re: Epiphany browser continues to get worse and worse)
On 4/20/2010 4:18 PM, Ron Johnson wrote: On 2010-04-20 10:41, Mark Allums wrote: On 4/19/2010 11:24 PM, Mark Allums wrote: On 4/19/2010 10:20 PM, Ron Johnson wrote: On 2010-04-19 21:47, Mark Allums wrote: [snip] Webkit 2.0 is imminent. Perhaps they are considering moving to it. According to various sources, it is the bee's knees. Beyond crude process separation, what are it's benefits over v1? I don't know. I read the blurb (Slashdot) but was too disinterested to read the article. Saw similar blurbs in about six other places. *Somebody's* excited. MAA (It must be good, it's 2.0!) Let me amend: I forget. I knew the answer to your question when I read it in the blurb, but I'm no longer young, and the reasons for 2.0 have escaped me. Even though I'm an official Grumpy Old Man, the know the reasons for 2.0. It's just that now I know that most of them are screaming piles of horse manure. That won't stop them from moving to it. MAA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4bce26b5.1000...@allums.com
Re: Webkit2 (was Re: Epiphany browser continues to get worse and worse)
On 2010-04-20 17:12, Mark Allums wrote: On 4/20/2010 4:18 PM, Ron Johnson wrote: [snip] Even though I'm an official Grumpy Old Man, the know the reasons for 2.0. It's just that now I know that most of them are screaming piles of horse manure. That won't stop them from moving to it. Because there will always be Eager Young Geeks who think they know better. -- Dissent is patriotic, remember? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4bce2ea7.7060...@cox.net
Webkit2 (was Re: Epiphany browser continues to get worse and worse)
On 2010-04-19 21:47, Mark Allums wrote: [snip] Webkit 2.0 is imminent. Perhaps they are considering moving to it. According to various sources, it is the bee's knees. Beyond crude process separation, what are it's benefits over v1? -- Dissent is patriotic, remember? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4bcd1d63.8080...@cox.net
Re: Webkit2 (was Re: Epiphany browser continues to get worse and worse)
On 4/19/2010 10:20 PM, Ron Johnson wrote: On 2010-04-19 21:47, Mark Allums wrote: [snip] Webkit 2.0 is imminent. Perhaps they are considering moving to it. According to various sources, it is the bee's knees. Beyond crude process separation, what are it's benefits over v1? I don't know. I read the blurb (Slashdot) but was too disinterested to read the article. Saw similar blurbs in about six other places. *Somebody's* excited. MAA (It must be good, it's 2.0!) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4bcd2c79.90...@allums.com
