Hi, Paul:
On Saturday 21 November 2009 00:36:12 Paul E Condon wrote:
On 20091120_212056, Jes?s M. Navarro wrote:
[...]
Unfortunately? I'd better say by design. Unstable/Testing is not
there to provide a product to final users but to provide a testbed for
software integration. If
Hi Gerfried:
On Thursday 19 November 2009 13:55:25 Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Hi!
Thanks to Sven for bringing the thread to my attention.
* Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de [2009-11-19 08:42:49 CET]:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:16:15PM +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
I have searched backport,
On 20091120_212056, Jes?s M. Navarro wrote:
Hi Gerfried:
On Thursday 19 November 2009 13:55:25 Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Hi!
Thanks to Sven for bringing the thread to my attention.
* Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de [2009-11-19 08:42:49 CET]:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:16:15PM
currently I'm in a bit of time constrain trouble myself and have
to priorize other things, it's not like if I wouldn't like to continue
on that front. :/
Additionaly there is a backports-security-announce list where
backporters announce security relevant uploads.
And there is support in the security
Good day.
I have searched backport, wiki web sites and still can not understand: does
debian security team works with its packages or not? In other words, using
stable only and desiring the same security quality, I would not use the
backports repo? Am i correct?
Thank You for Your time.
--
is responsible to care for
uploads in case of security issue. So it doesn't hurt if you keep an eye on
the backports aswell that you install. Since you should install only selected
backports where needed you've to monitor just those very few selected packages.
Additionaly there is a backports-security-announce
* Johannes Wiedersich [2006-06-01 17:53]:
Felix C. Stegerman wrote:
Do you know what would be the best way to make sure I don't miss any
of those updates? If I backport e.g. mysql from unstable/testing,
will I be able to rely on security announcements to debian-security,
or do I need
* Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-01 16:33]:
Felix C. Stegerman wrote:
I'm running unstable on my desktop (well, actually a laptop), so I'm
accustomed to the occasional breakage and could probably live with it.
I'm just reluctant to use unstable on a production server
Felix C. Stegerman writes:
I'll stick with stable and backport mysql, vim and the kernel myself.
First check backports.org. Someone probably has already done it (and there
are 2.6 kernels in Stable).
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
* John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-04 18:34]:
Felix C. Stegerman writes:
I'll stick with stable and backport mysql, vim and the kernel
myself.
First check backports.org. Someone probably has already done it
(and there are 2.6 kernels in Stable).
backports.org has mysql-server 5.0,
Felix C. Stegerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Also, since even backports.org does not seem to have vim 7.0 and
kernel 2.6.16 (yet), what would be the best way/place to get these
from ? Should I (try to) backport them myself ?
It is said that compiling your own kernel with make-kpkg
* Andrei Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-01 08:10]:
* Also, since even backports.org does not seem to have vim 7.0 and
kernel 2.6.16 (yet), what would be the best way/place to get these
from ? Should I (try to) backport them myself ?
It is said that compiling your own kernel
* Robert Van Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-01 08:41]:
* Are you using unofficial repositories (e.g. backports.org) on
production servers ?
* Do you (and can I) trust backports.org ?
* Also, since even backports.org does not seem to have vim 7.0 and
kernel 2.6.16 (yet),
Felix C. Stegerman wrote:
I'm about to install sarge on a (production) server of my own, and
would rather like to have the latest versions of:
* mysql (5.0)
* vim (7.0)
* the Linux kernel (2.6.16) [ppc]
The latter will probably cause the most problems. The Debian packages of
the
Felix C. Stegerman wrote:
Hi,
I'm about to install sarge on a (production) server of my own, and
would rather like to have the latest versions of:
* mysql (5.0)
* vim (7.0)
* the Linux kernel (2.6.16) [ppc]
Since these are not in sarge, I'm considering using backported
versions from
Felix C. Stegerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Andrei Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-01 08:10]:
* Also, since even backports.org does not seem to have vim 7.0 and
kernel 2.6.16 (yet), what would be the best way/place to get these
from ? Should I (try to) backport them
Felix C. Stegerman wrote:
I've thought about using unstable (see an earlier thread I started),
and decided to go with stable instead. But it's nice to know that
unstable can be used with very little problem.
In general, there are not too many problems or breakages with unstable.
* Johannes Wiedersich [2006-06-01 12:39]:
I'm about to install sarge on a (production) server of my own, and
would rather like to have the latest versions of:
* mysql (5.0)
* vim (7.0)
* the Linux kernel (2.6.16) [ppc]
Since these are not in sarge, I'm considering using
* George Borisov [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-01 11:39]:
Felix C. Stegerman wrote:
I'm about to install sarge on a (production) server of my own, and
would rather like to have the latest versions of:
* mysql (5.0)
* vim (7.0)
* the Linux kernel (2.6.16) [ppc]
The latter will
* Roberto C. Sanchez [2006-06-01 14:59]:
Felix C. Stegerman wrote:
I've thought about using unstable (see an earlier thread I
started), and decided to go with stable instead. But it's nice to
know that unstable can be used with very little problem.
In general, there are not too
* Andrei Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-01 14:47]:
It is said that compiling your own kernel with make-kpkg should
be pretty easy. It generates a kernel package which you can than
install with dpkg -i. Never tried it myself though ...
Compiling smaller software is generally just a
Felix C. Stegerman wrote:
I'm running unstable on my desktop (well, actually a laptop), so I'm
accustomed to the occasional breakage and could probably live with it.
I'm just reluctant to use unstable on a production server connected to
the internet, because I don't want to leave the
Felix C. Stegerman wrote:
Wouldn't mixing stable and testing be less secure than using
backports? Or is security support for testing good enough to rely on
for (some packages on) production servers?
Supposedly testing gets security updates now. It is in
security.debian.org together with
George Borisov wrote:
Felix C. Stegerman wrote:
Wouldn't mixing stable and testing be less secure than using
backports? Or is security support for testing good enough to rely on
for (some packages on) production servers?
Supposedly testing gets security updates now. It is in
Felix C. Stegerman wrote:
Do you know what would be the best way to make sure I don't miss any
of those updates? If I backport e.g. mysql from unstable/testing,
will I be able to rely on security announcements to debian-security,
or do I need to check for new vulnerabilities upstream?
Just
Hi,
I'm about to install sarge on a (production) server of my own, and
would rather like to have the latest versions of:
* mysql (5.0)
* vim (7.0)
* the Linux kernel (2.6.16) [ppc]
Since these are not in sarge, I'm considering using backported
versions from backports.org. I was however
26 matches
Mail list logo
