On Wed, 8 Oct 1997, Bob wrote:
I recently add X to my debian box. My debian version still shows 1.3
Shouldn't this now read 1.3.1??
No. The most recent releases have been 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 while the
upcomming release is to be 2.0 (which may explain the fairly long
developement cycle for
I recently add X to my debian box. My debian version still shows 1.3
Shouldn't this now read 1.3.1??
Bob
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
On Wed, 8 Oct 1997, Bob wrote:
I recently add X to my debian box. My debian version still shows 1.3
Shouldn't this now read 1.3.1??
Bob
I think it's a Debian policy not to publicize the patch level of the
version. (My /etc/issue, and /etc/issue.net files all report 1.3 as
well, and
Thanks for the info. I never really thought in terms of security.
Should the file /etc/debian_version show 1.3.1. Mine shows 1.3.
I know this is a very minor point, I'm just curious.
Bob
On Wed, 8 Oct 1997, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Wed, 8 Oct 1997, Bob wrote:
I recently add X to my
On Wed, 8 Oct 1997, Bob wrote:
No, I don't think so, for the same reason issue and issue.net aren't
updated:
[0] 654 apocalypse ~ dpkg -S issue
manpages: /usr/man/man5/issue.5.gz
base-files: /etc/issue.net
netstd: /usr/man/man5/issue.net.5.gz
base-files: /etc/issue
[0] 655 apocalypse ~ dpkg -S
On Wed, 8 Oct 1997 22:06:25 -0400 (EDT), Bob wrote:
I recently add X to my debian box. My debian version still shows 1.3
Shouldn't this now read 1.3.1??
It should actualy read somewhere around 1.3.5, but some people in the project
have found it to be more important to have a static rev number
On Wed, Oct 08, 1997 at 10:06:25PM -0400, Bob wrote:
I recently add X to my debian box. My debian version still shows 1.3
Shouldn't this now read 1.3.1??
Bob
The problem is: what makes your system 1.3.1? If you have one old package
installed (or one new from hamm), or a mixture up to 0.93,
7 matches
Mail list logo
