Brian M. Rectanus wrote:
At 09:38 AM 11/22/97 +, Chuma Agbodike wrote:
Do diald and ipmasquerading serve the same purpose ?
Or do I have to use both ? I have a 3 node ethernet lan.
The all had windows on them. Now I installed Linux 2.0.29 (debian 1.3)
on the unit
On Sat, Nov 22, 1997 at 09:38:55AM +, Chuma Agbodike wrote:
Do diald and ipmasquerading serve the same purpose ?
Or do I have to use both ? I have a 3 node ethernet lan.
The all had windows on them. Now I installed Linux 2.0.29 (debian 1.3)
on the unit that has the modem on it. And would
At 09:38 AM 11/22/97 +, Chuma Agbodike wrote:
Do diald and ipmasquerading serve the same purpose ?
Or do I have to use both ? I have a 3 node ethernet lan.
The all had windows on them. Now I installed Linux 2.0.29 (debian 1.3)
on the unit that has the modem on it. And would like the
Brian M. Rectanus wrote:
At 09:38 AM 11/22/97 +, Chuma Agbodike wrote:
Do diald and ipmasquerading serve the same purpose ?
Or do I have to use both ? I have a 3 node ethernet lan.
The all had windows on them. Now I installed Linux 2.0.29 (debian 1.3)
on the unit that has
Oliver Elphick wrote:
That _may_ involve a nameserver lookup across the network or it may be
relovable from cached data.
^
Sorry. That isn't an English word; I meant to say `recoverable'.
--
Oliver Elphick[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Isle of Wight
Do diald and ipmasquerading serve the same purpose ?
Or do I have to use both ? I have a 3 node ethernet lan.
The all had windows on them. Now I installed Linux 2.0.29 (debian 1.3)
on the unit that has the modem on it. And would like the other units
to access the internet via the modem on LINUX
At 09:38 AM 11/22/97 +, Chuma Agbodike wrote:
Do diald and ipmasquerading serve the same purpose ?
Or do I have to use both ? I have a 3 node ethernet lan.
The all had windows on them. Now I installed Linux 2.0.29 (debian 1.3)
on the unit that has the modem on it. And would like the other
7 matches
Mail list logo
