Bill Leach wrote:
Joost Kooij wrote:
On Tue, 3 Mar 1998, joost witteveen wrote:
[A very interesting and informative expose, thanks Joost!]
As it works now (as I understand) the rules makefile effectively tries to
make the build independent of the actual machine it is built on. Of
On Mon, Mar 02, 1998 at 10:15:03AM +0100, Joost Kooij wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 1998, joost witteveen wrote:
Isn't this because we want packages built on Intel systems to be the
same? If dpgk were to report Pentium, and some compiler is going
to create real Pentium code (that doesn't run on
On Mon, 2 Mar 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
Sorry, I missed the beginning of the thread, but these are the facts:
uname -a will report your machine type, the same as in cat /proc/cpuinfo.
Then, when you compile, you can specify an architecture. This can be i386,
i486, i586 for intel. BUT
In an attempt to save the world from disaster, Joost Kooij wrote:
On Mon, 2 Mar 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
Sorry, I missed the beginning of the thread, but these are the facts:
uname -a will report your machine type, the same as in cat
/proc/cpuinfo.
Then, when you compile,
On Tue, 3 Mar 1998, joost witteveen wrote:
[A very interesting and informative expose, thanks Joost!]
As it works now (as I understand) the rules makefile effectively tries to
make the build independent of the actual machine it is built on. Of course
this is great for maintainers who create a
I'm not so sure that it doesn't. That is certainly well within the
capabilities of make itself...
Joost Kooij wrote:
On Tue, 3 Mar 1998, joost witteveen wrote:
[A very interesting and informative expose, thanks Joost!]
As it works now (as I understand) the rules makefile effectively
On Fri, 27 Feb 1998, joost witteveen wrote:
Isn't this because we want packages built on Intel systems to be the
same? If dpgk were to report Pentium, and some compiler is going
to create real Pentium code (that doesn't run on i386), then you
wouldn't be able to build Intel packages on your
On Mon, Mar 02, 1998 at 10:15:03AM +0100, Joost Kooij wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 1998, joost witteveen wrote:
Isn't this because we want packages built on Intel systems to be the
same? If dpgk were to report Pentium, and some compiler is going
to create real Pentium code (that doesn't run on
In an attempt to save the world from disaster, Joost Kooij wrote:
Hi,
I've been playing with some package's source and now I have a question:
When I run ./debian/rules it prints lines containing:
-DHOSTTYPE='i486' -DOSTYPE='linux-gnu'
-DMACHTYPE='i486-debian-linux-gnu'
I think that the
Hi,
I've been playing with some package's source and now I have a question:
When I run ./debian/rules it prints lines containing:
-DHOSTTYPE='i486' -DOSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DMACHTYPE='i486-debian-linux-gnu'
I think that the it is the line
ARCH = $(shell dpkg --print-gnu-build-architecture)
that
10 matches
Mail list logo
