On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 10:06:30PM -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
[...]
> All my installations that use a separate filesystem for /boot/ use EXT2. It
> still
> works as good as ever for such an infrequent use environment, with no way to
> get
> ahead of Grub evolution. :)
There are more reasons
Cindy Sue Causey composed on 2023-02-19 15:30 (UTC-0500):
> Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
>> Hi.. This is just regurgitating something related to my coincidentally
>> referencing several years of GRUB non-boots yesterday. The latest on
>> this Linux From Scratch thread came into my inbox this morning,
I've just installed several machines with it (and spent a bunch of time
testing it last night)
The ext4 problem there has been fixed now, for example, and was down
to a new version of e2fsprogs
All the very best, sa ever,
Andy Cater
> However this works out, thank you, Developers!
>
> Cindy :)
> --
> Talking Rock, Pickens County, Georgia, USA
> * gettin' giddy about the next new unstable! *
>
Found a brand new 2023.02.15 Debian bugs reference for this..
On 2/19/23, Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
> Hi.. This is just regurgitating something related to my coincidentally
> referencing several years of GRUB non-boots yesterday. The latest on
> this Linux From Scratch thread came into my inbox
Hi.. This is just regurgitating something related to my coincidentally
referencing several years of GRUB non-boots yesterday. The latest on
this Linux From Scratch thread came into my inbox this morning, and it
just sounds like it might help some Users having booting problems
similar to what I've
permettant la récupération
de fichiers supprimés sur de l'ext. Je vois que ça a changé depuis…
Le rétroportage de « extundelete » en Squeeze requiert de rétroporter
« e2fsprogs », c'est-à-dire les paquets binaires suivants :
- libss2
- libcomerr2
- e2fslibs
- e2fsck-static
paketen: 100%
Förkonfigurerar paket ...
(Läser databasen ... 156231 filer och kataloger installerade.)
Förbereder att ersätta e2fsprogs 1.42.2-1 (med
.../e2fsprogs_1.42.2-2_i386.deb) ...
Packar upp ersättande e2fsprogs ...
dpkg-deb (underprocess): datadel: internt gzip-läsfel: fd:4:
incorrect data check
felkod 2
Läser förändringsloggar... Klar
Plockar ut mallar från paketen: 100%
Förkonfigurerar paket ...
(Läser databasen ... 156231 filer och kataloger installerade.)
Förbereder att ersätta e2fsprogs 1.42.2-1 (med
.../e2fsprogs_1.42.2-2_i386.deb) ...
Packar upp ersättande e2fsprogs ...
dpkg
2012/4/29 Sven Arvidsson s...@whiz.se:
Hej,
Fungerar det om du kör apt-get clean först och låter systemet ladda
ner ett nytt e2fsprogs-paket?
Tack Sven, clean var vad jag behövde.
Det var väldigt länge sedan jag var med om att något hakat sig i
apt-get så clean fanns inte ens i min hjärna
thanks for replies! Is it possible to slide partition using the
tools included with e2fsprogs package as well?
The e2fsprogs tools only deal with the needs specific to
ext[234] partitions. Sliding a partition can be done for any partition
you like with `dd'.
Stefan
. märts 2012 13:49 kirjutas Stefan Monnier
monn...@iro.umontreal.ca:
thanks for replies! Is it possible to slide partition using the
tools included with e2fsprogs package as well?
The e2fsprogs tools only deal with the needs specific to
ext[234] partitions. Sliding a partition can be done for any
Martin T:
Is it possible to make partition smaller starting from the beginning?
No.
If yes, do I need to somehow start file system from the end of the
partition?
AFAIK that's not possible. The solution for your problem (which involves
initial reformatting) is LVM.
J.
--
There is no
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 10:50:27PM +, Martin T wrote:
I have a 500GB((131072000*4096)/1024^3) ext3 filesystem:
[cut]
Is it possible to make partition smaller starting from the beginning?
If yes, do I need to somehow start file system from the end of the
partition?
Not directly. Try
Jochen, Darac:
thanks for replies! Is it possible to slide partition using the
tools included with e2fsprogs package as well? Or is the GNU Parted
only option here if I want to make changes over CLI?
regards,
martin
Kuupäeval 26. märts 2012 17:28 kirjutas Darac Marjal mailingl...@darac.org.uk
I have a 500GB((131072000*4096)/1024^3) ext3 filesystem:
root@debian:~#dumpe2fs /dev/sda9 | egrep Block count|Block size
dumpe2fs 1.41.12 (17-May-2010)
Block count: 131072000
Block size: 4096
root@debian:~#
..on a 904GB((1953523711-56924160)*512)/(1024^3)
On 2012-01-04, Scott Ferguson prettyfly.producti...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/01/12 19:08, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Apologies Alan, I overlooked your post.
On 04/01/12 03:08, Alan Greenberger wrote:
On 2012-01-03, Scott Ferguson prettyfly.producti...@gmail.com wrote:
The auto fsck/root problem
Apologies Alan, I overlooked your post.
On 04/01/12 03:08, Alan Greenberger wrote:
On 2012-01-03, Scott Ferguson prettyfly.producti...@gmail.com wrote:
The auto fsck/root problem (if ever encountered) could be got around by
using the Wheezy live CD/USB[*1] which is the path I chose thanks to
On 04/01/12 19:08, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Apologies Alan, I overlooked your post.
On 04/01/12 03:08, Alan Greenberger wrote:
On 2012-01-03, Scott Ferguson prettyfly.producti...@gmail.com wrote:
The auto fsck/root problem (if ever encountered) could be got around by
using the Wheezy live
Jegleim
On 2 January 2012 21:12, Jochen Spieker m...@well-adjusted.de wrote:
Camaleón:
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:27:50 +0100, Joar Jegleim wrote:
anybody got any foo on how to install e2fsprogs from wheezy into squeeze
?
[…]
Has anybody tried this, or got any hints ?
No hints, sorry. Sounds like
On 2012-01-03, Scott Ferguson prettyfly.producti...@gmail.com wrote:
The auto fsck/root problem (if ever encountered) could be got around by
using the Wheezy live CD/USB[*1] which is the path I chose thanks to
your chroot tip.
It looks like you have gotten Wheezy live to work. I have not been
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:27:50 +0100, Joar Jegleim wrote:
anybody got any foo on how to install e2fsprogs from wheezy into squeeze
?
It's tagged as an essential package. I would keep my paws out of it :-)
I really need +16TB partition support which was added in e2fsprogs
1.42 . Wheezy got
Camaleón:
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:27:50 +0100, Joar Jegleim wrote:
anybody got any foo on how to install e2fsprogs from wheezy into squeeze
?
[…]
Has anybody tried this, or got any hints ?
No hints, sorry. Sounds like a dangerous movement only suitable for a VM
(with a previous saved
On 03/01/12 07:12, Jochen Spieker wrote:
Camaleón:
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:27:50 +0100, Joar Jegleim wrote:
anybody got any foo on how to install e2fsprogs from wheezy into squeeze
?
[…]
Has anybody tried this, or got any hints ?
No hints, sorry. Sounds like a dangerous movement only
Hello,
I am trying to compile the latest version of e2fsprogs. I have the next
error during compilation:
make[2]: se ingresa al directorio `/usr/src/e2fsprogs/build/lib/ext2fs'
CC ../../../lib/ext2fs/alloc_tables.c
../../../lib/ext2fs/alloc_tables.c: In function
‘ext2fs_allocate_group_table
Adrian Chapela wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to compile the latest version of e2fsprogs. I have the next
error during compilation:
make[2]: se ingresa al directorio `/usr/src/e2fsprogs/build/lib/ext2fs'
CC ../../../lib/ext2fs/alloc_tables.c
../../../lib/ext2fs/alloc_tables.c: In function
Hi Celejar,
Thank you for the reply.
# more /etc/debian_version
3.1
How do you typically go about doing a full upgrade. I know one of the previous
posters said that sarge was being archived and might not be available for a
while.
Thank you,
Fu-Tung
--- On Tue, 10/28/08, Celejar [EMAIL
On Wed,29.Oct.08, 23:47:18, Fu-Tung Cheng wrote:
Hi Celejar,
Thank you for the reply.
# more /etc/debian_version
3.1
How do you typically go about doing a full upgrade. I know one of the
Read the release notes[1], they were written for this exact purpose.
[1]
debianutils e2fslibs e2fsprogs initrd-tools
initscripts libacl1 libattr1 libblkid1 libc6 libc6-dev libcomerr2
libdevmapper1.02 libedit2 libkrb53 libncurses5 libpam0g libselinux1
libsepol1 libss2 libssl0.9.8 libuuid1 lsb-base mktemp mount
openssh-blacklist openssh-client openssh-server sysv-rc
e2fsprogs due to a Conflicts/Pre-Depends loop. This
is often bad, but if you really want to do it, activate the
APT::Force-LoopBreak option.
E: Internal Error, Could not early remove e2fsprogs
This should NOT happen. How did you install this system, [what Debian
version (etch, lenny, sid) and what
On 2008-10-28 18:17 +0100, Fu-Tung Cheng wrote:
# apt-get install ssh
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
coreutils cramfsprogs dash debianutils e2fslibs e2fsprogs initrd-tools
initscripts libacl1 libattr1
Fehlermeldung die besagt das das Programm
e2fsprogs einen Konflikt auslöst.
Bei einer Neuinstallation diese Programm bekomme ich folgende Fehlermeldung:
E: This installation run will require temporarily removing the essential
package e2fsprogs due to aConflicts/Pre-Depends loop. This is often bad
Installationsprozess erscheint eine Fehlermeldung die besagt das das Programm
e2fsprogs einen Konflikt auslöst.
Bei einer Neuinstallation diese Programm bekomme ich folgende Fehlermeldung:
E: This installation run will require temporarily removing the essential
package e2fsprogs due to aConflicts
Mirror und vor dem eigentlichen
Installationsprozess erscheint eine Fehlermeldung die besagt das das Programm
e2fsprogs einen Konflikt auslöst.
Bei einer Neuinstallation diese Programm bekomme ich folgende Fehlermeldung:
E: This installation run will require temporarily removing the essential
hej
problem.
Jag vill installera libpcre3-dev och open embedded, men får ERROR
installationen vill temporärt ta bort e2fsprogs och vill att jag aktiverar
APT::Force LoopBreak option
det är en Conflicts/Pre-Depends loop
vad betyder detta? ska jag avinstallera e2fsprogs
jag är på debian 2.6.8-2
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005, eva s wrote:
Jag vill installera libpcre3-dev och open embedded, men får ERROR
installationen vill temporärt ta bort e2fsprogs och vill att jag aktiverar
APT::Force LoopBreak option
det är en Conflicts/Pre-Depends loop
vad betyder detta? ska jag avinstallera e2fsprogs
koolt det fungerade !!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Raj Kombiyil wrote:
Fellow uber-debianers,
I have a problem with e2fsprogs. (Trying to install uni2ascii for
example, which depends on e2fsprogs)
My environment: Debian gnu/linux testing/unstable, Kernel version
2.4.27(home brewed), libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22, sysvinit 2.84-2woody1
my sources.list
Fellow uber-debianers,I have a problem with e2fsprogs. (Trying to install uni2ascii for example, which depends on e2fsprogs)
My environment: Debian gnu/linux testing/unstable, Kernel version 2.4.27(home brewed), libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22, sysvinit 2.84-2woody1
my sources.list
=
snip
#security
pouvez lancer « apt-get update » pour corriger ces problèmes.
E: Cette installation va temporairement nécessiter l'enlèvement du
paquet essentiel e2fsprogs en raison d'une boucle entre les champs
Conflicts et Pre-Depends. C'est souvent une mauvaise chose, mais si vous
souhaitez réellement le faire
installation va temporairement nécessiter l'enlèvement du
paquet essentiel e2fsprogs en raison d'une boucle entre les champs
Conflicts et Pre-Depends. C'est souvent une mauvaise chose, mais si vous
souhaitez réellement le faire, activez l'option APT::Force-LoopBreak.
E: Internal Error, Could
i use 'testing' but occasionally installed packages fr sid or unstable.
now when i do 'apt-get install, i have the following error :
E: This installation run will require temporarily removing the
essential package e2fsprogs due to a Conflicts/Pre-Depends loop. This
is often bad, but if you
Frédéric Bothamy a écrit :
| apt-get -o APT::Force-LoopBreak=true install ...
|
| Mais je m'inquiéterais avant de savoir *pourquoi* cette manip est
| nécessaire, e2fsprogs est un paquet bien maintenu et sans bogue connu
| qui pourrait justifier celle-ci...
|
Merci.
J'hésite encore a utiliser
Zuthos a écrit :
Frédéric Bothamy a écrit :
| apt-get -o APT::Force-LoopBreak=true install ...
|
| Mais je m'inquiéterais avant de savoir *pourquoi* cette manip est
| nécessaire, e2fsprogs est un paquet bien maintenu et sans bogue connu
| qui pourrait justifier celle-ci...
|
Merci
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frédéric Bothamy a écrit :
* Wimpy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-09-26 19:22] :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
Zuthos a écrit :
Je dois upgrader e2fsprogs sur un pc. Seulement, apt se refuse
de le faire. Il me demande d'activer APT
boobz a écrit :
| Zuthos a écrit :
|
| Frédéric Bothamy a écrit :
|
| | apt-get -o APT::Force-LoopBreak=true install ...
| |
Finalement, je me suis lancé
J'ai croisé les doigt et .
Aucun Pb.
Ouf
merci a tous
--
Je ne veux ni dominer ni être dominé.
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Zuthos a écrit :
boobz a écrit :
| Zuthos a écrit :
|
| Frédéric Bothamy a écrit :
|
| | apt-get -o APT::Force-LoopBreak=true install ...
| |
Finalement, je me suis lancé
J'ai croisé les doigt et .
Aucun Pb.
Ouf
merci a tous
Par contre pense à enlever l'option une fois le logiciel
Je dois upgrader e2fsprogs sur un pc.
Seulement, apt se refuse de le faire.
Il me demande d'activer APT::force-LoopBreack
1) Je ne sais pas comment faire.
2) je ne sais pas si je dois vraiment le faire
3) je n'en connais pas les conséquence
4) je ne sais pas s'il y a un moyens d'éviter de le faire
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zuthos a écrit :
Je dois upgrader e2fsprogs sur un pc. Seulement, apt se refuse de
le faire. Il me demande d'activer APT::force-LoopBreack 1) Je ne
sais pas comment faire. 2) je ne sais pas si je dois vraiment le
faire 3) je n'en connais pas les
* Wimpy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-09-26 19:22] :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zuthos a écrit :
Je dois upgrader e2fsprogs sur un pc. Seulement, apt se refuse de
le faire. Il me demande d'activer APT::force-LoopBreack 1) Je ne
sais pas comment faire. 2) je ne sais pas si
Hola Listeros.
Bueno, he podido solucionar el problema de los repositorios y el paquete
e2fsprogs.
Les paso el detalle de lo sucedido por si a alguien le sirve la información.
1) El problema surgió hace 10 o 15 días al instalar mediante apt-get el
paquete openvpn (este problema me lo generó
://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=324550
Anyhow, I eventually discovered that linux-image-2.6.12-1-686
needs a newer e2fsprogs to build its initrd. So I upgraded
to the latest e2fsprogs (1.38-1.1), and linux-image was
happy and I rebooted and got my USB drive back.
So this is solved
/woody/backported/e2fsprogs/
vielen Dank für Deine schnelle Antwort, die mir aber leider
garnichts sagt. Sorry, bin völlig neu bei Debian (4xnewbie).
Dort ist ein aktuelles e2fsprogs Package. Das kannst du downloaden und
mit dpkg installieren.
Ich habe so meine Probleme mit den docs/howtos
Am Sonntag, 3. August 2003 15:07 schrieb Norbert Tretkowski:
* Rolf Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wie kann ich (vor oder nach) der Installation von woody auf 1.30
umrüsten bzw. knoppix unter 1.27 laufen lassen.
http://www.backports.org/debian/woody/backported/e2fsprogs/
Hallo Norbert
://www.backports.org/debian/woody/backported/e2fsprogs/
Hallo Norbert,
vielen Dank für Deine schnelle Antwort, die mir aber leider
garnichts sagt. Sorry, bin völlig neu bei Debian (4xnewbie).
Ums kurz und schlampig zu machen, du lädst dir das Paket, das du unter dem
Link findest (das das mit
gemountet werden können.
ABER: woody hat e2fsprogs 1.27
knoppix hat e2fsprogs 1.30
Wie kann ich (vor oder nach) der Installation
von woody auf 1.30 umrüsten bzw. knoppix unter
1.27 laufen lassen.
Problem: a) Woody kann Knoppix-fs 1.30 nicht checken.
b) Knoppix will Woody-fs
* Rolf Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wie kann ich (vor oder nach) der Installation von woody auf 1.30
umrüsten bzw. knoppix unter 1.27 laufen lassen.
http://www.backports.org/debian/woody/backported/e2fsprogs/
--
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ):
http://www.de.debian.org
Hi all,
i'm trying to configure a scsi disk:
I have 3 primary partitions
the command
mke2fs /dev/sdb1 works...
mke2fs /dev/sdb2 works...
mke2fs /dev/sdb3 don't. Here the output:
mke2fs /dev/sdb3
mke2fs 1.18, 11-Nov-1999 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09
mke2fs: Device not configured while
.
All generally works well except for installing the package e2fsprogs,
a required package in the hamm base packages.
I get conflicts with the package e2fslibsg and especially with the package
e2fsprogsg, two formerly essential packages.
But dpkg --purge of e2fslibsg/e2fsprogsg fails, and dselect
: considering removing e2fslibsg in favour of e2fsprogs ...
dpkg: yes, will remove e2fslibsg in favour of e2fsprogs.
dpkg: regarding e2fsprogs_1.10-17.deb containing e2fsprogs:
e2fsprogsg conflicts with e2fsprogs
e2fsprogs (version 1.10-17) is to be installed.
dpkg: error processing e2fsprogs_1.10-17.deb
.
[...]
I don't want to --force this, but I don't see any other way. Any
suggestions would be appreciated.
You probably have to use --force this time.
Neither of e2fslibsg or e2fsprogsg do exist now in hamm.
e2fsprogs is now the only package you will need.
Fortunately, upgrades from bo do not suffer
I decided to upgrade to e2fsprogs 1.10-17. Mistake..
It wants an newer version of dump which requires libe2p2. I can't find
this
package anywhere. Can anyone help ??
George
---
George Kapetanios
Churchill College
G Kapetanios [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
GK I decided to upgrade to e2fsprogs 1.10-17. Mistake.. It wants an
GK newer version of dump which requires libe2p2. I can't find this
GK package anywhere. Can anyone help ??
Running 'dpkg -s e2fsprogs' shows that e2fsprogs Provides: libe2p2, so
it should
there
with the idea of leaving immediately, with nothing
changed, and at trying to do so I was warned that
e2fsprogs conflict with e2fslibsg; however, both were
required! Leaving it to do at will, e2fslibsg got
(apparently) purged from the system.
3. Just before
On Sun, 3 May 1998, Bob Nielsen wrote:
On 3 May 1998, Torsten Hilbrich wrote:
Bob Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
midnight commander now requires e2fsligsg, but when I tried installing
that, it won't install because of a conflict with e2fsprogs. The packages
file says
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 3 May 1998, Torsten Hilbrich wrote:
The latter First force the removal of e2fsprogs (IIRC
--force-remove-essential) and then install e2fslibsg. You need a
package named comerr2g too.
No. comerr2g and e2fslibsg are obsolete and should be removed from
I did an 'apt-get upgrade', and apt went ahead and removed e2fslibsg in
favour of e2fsprogs without any messages or warnings. So now I have no
e2fslibsg, but everything seems to be fine, what will happen if I have to
reboot?
Thanks,
Timothy
PS, for the developers: apt-get upgrade
On Sat, 2 May 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did an 'apt-get upgrade', and apt went ahead and removed e2fslibsg
in
favour of e2fsprogs without any messages or warnings. So now I have no
e2fslibsg, but everything seems to be fine, what will happen if I have to
reboot?
Everything
Bob Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
midnight commander now requires e2fsligsg, but when I tried installing
that, it won't install because of a conflict with e2fsprogs. The packages
file says it conflicts with e2fsprogs = 1.10-7. but I have 1.10-15
installed. e2fsprogs says it conflicts
On 3 May 1998, Torsten Hilbrich wrote:
Bob Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
midnight commander now requires e2fsligsg, but when I tried installing
that, it won't install because of a conflict with e2fsprogs. The packages
file says it conflicts with e2fsprogs = 1.10-7. but I have 1.10
Bob Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dselect won't install e2fslibsg because of a conflict with
e2fsprogs, but it won't remove e2fsprogs because it is an essential
package. How do I resolve this dilemma?
I did it using the --force-remove-essential flag to dpkg while
removing. Make sure
midnight commander now requires e2fsligsg, but when I tried installing
that, it won't install because of a conflict with e2fsprogs. The packages
file says it conflicts with e2fsprogs = 1.10-7. but I have 1.10-15
installed. e2fsprogs says it conflicts with e2fslibsg (no version
listed). mc still
Dselect won't install e2fslibsg because of a conflict with e2fsprogs, but
it won't remove e2fsprogs because it is an essential package. How do I
resolve this dilemma?
Bob
Bob Nielsen Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson, AZ AMPRnet: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Dselect is having a fit about e2fslibsg and e2fsprogs conflicting. It is
happy with just installing e2fslibsg, but when I install e2fsprogs, quota
and mc complain -- even though e2fsprogs provides e2fslibsg.
I need e2fsprogs for obvious reasons -- fsck, etc.. Currently I have
e2fslibsg
/mkfs.ext2
I have e2fsprogs 1.10-10 on my hamm system. What version do
you have installed?
--
_
|_) _ |_ Robert D. Hilliard[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|_) (_) |_) Palm City, FL USAPGP Key ID: A8E40EB9
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe
I have just upgraded to e2fsprogs 1.10-11, and no they ARE the
same file. Sorry to bother you about a non-current version!
bob:vc-2:bobls -li /sbin/mkfs.ext2
86036 -rwxr-xr-x 2 root root17116 Jan 29 12:56
/sbin/mkfs.ext2*
bob:vc-2:bobls -li /sbin/mke2fs
86036 -rwxr-xr-x
Bob Hilliard wrote:
I have just upgraded to e2fsprogs 1.10-11, and no they ARE the
same file. Sorry to bother you about a non-current version!
bob:vc-2:bobls -li /sbin/mkfs.ext2
86036 -rwxr-xr-x 2 root root17116 Jan 29 12:56
/sbin/mkfs.ext2*
bob:vc-2:bobls -li /sbin
A while back there was a warning regarding the hamm version of the
e2fsprogs package - e2fsprogs_1.10-4.deb I believe. I now have
e2fsprogs_1.10-10.deb installed and have had a few weird problems
at home with a partition greater than 2GB in size. Is there a
known problem with this package
Hi,
How does one move to the libc6 e2fsprogs without using force in dpkg ? I
tried installing commer2g and dpkg tried removing e2fsprogs. How does go
about upgrading ?
Thanks
George
---
George Kapetanios
Churchill
Hi,
How does one move to the libc6 e2fsprogs without using force in dpkg ? I
tried installing commer2g and dpkg tried removing e2fsprogs. How does go
about upgrading ?
You should install e2fsprogsg. This name change is a bug in itself (appending
g is for the libc6-based shared libraries
79 matches
Mail list logo
