On Wed 09 Oct 2019 at 16:16:55 +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Brian wrote:
> > Note that there isn't any LDOSUBSCRIBER in the headers of this mail.
>
> Your spam score worsened from -10.3 to 0.1 consequentially.
> Shall we still believe that you are you ?
The mail was also delayed for
Hi,
Brian wrote:
> Note that there isn't any LDOSUBSCRIBER in the headers of this mail.
Your spam score worsened from -10.3 to 0.1 consequentially.
Shall we still believe that you are you ?
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
On Tue 08 Oct 2019 at 00:25:44 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 18:42:38 (+0100), Brian wrote:
> > On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 15:09:09 +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > But how do Debian list servers know ?
> >
> > A good question. How are my mails matched with
I think this got attached to the wrong subthread.
On Tue 08 Oct 2019 at 09:08:40 (+0200), Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> i wrote:
> > > I wonder whether my mail provider would allow me to send via SMTP
> > > MAIL FROM:
> > > From: "Somebody Else"
>
> David Wright wrote:
> > It's fairly easy to
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 08:52:11 -0400
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 09:13:31AM +0100, Joe wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 00:25:44 -0500
> > David Wright wrote:
> > > Why would you use a "subscribed.address" (presumably an email
> > > address) for your HELO (presumably actually a
On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 09:13:31AM +0100, Joe wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 00:25:44 -0500
> David Wright wrote:
> > Why would you use a "subscribed.address" (presumably an email address)
> > for your HELO (presumably actually a EHLO). I was under the impression
> > that it should be a domain, ie a
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 00:25:44 -0500
David Wright wrote:
> >
> > "subscribed.address" is the HELO and can be what I want it to be.
> > See the headers of my previous mail.
>
> Why would you use a "subscribed.address" (presumably an email address)
> for your HELO (presumably actually a EHLO). I
Hi,
i wrote:
> > I wonder whether my mail provider would allow me to send via SMTP
> > MAIL FROM:
> > From: "Somebody Else"
David Wright wrote:
> It's fairly easy to find out by trying it out,
I have the technical means but not the courage to challenge my provider.
> Perhaps not as easy
On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 18:42:38 (+0100), Brian wrote:
> On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 15:09:09 +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > But how do Debian list servers know ?
>
> A good question. How are my mails matched with my subscribed address
> so that I am awarded the accolade of LDOSUBSCRIBER?
On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 15:09:09 (+0200), Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> i wrote:
> > > To my best knowledge, "X-Spam-Status: ... tests=...,LDOSUBSCRIBER,..."
> > > says that the "From:" address of the mail is subscribed.
>
> Brian wrote:
> > Are you sure it is the From: and not the envelope From? My
Hi,
i wrote:
> > But how do Debian list servers know [that Brian is subscribed] ?
> > [...] is it because the first mail hop added "envelope-from" to
> > its Received: header ?
Brian wrote:
> I can alter that too, and still be designated LDOSUBSCRIBER.
Hmm. I see you tinkered with the first
On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 15:09:09 +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
[...]
> But how do Debian list servers know ?
A good question. How are my mails matched with my subscribed address
so that I am awarded the accolade of LDOSUBSCRIBER? On the basis that
my past statements about the SMTP protocol
On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 15:09:09 +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i wrote:
> > > To my best knowledge, "X-Spam-Status: ... tests=...,LDOSUBSCRIBER,..."
> > > says that the "From:" address of the mail is subscribed.
>
> Brian wrote:
> > Are you sure it is the From: and not the envelope From?
Hi,
i wrote:
> > To my best knowledge, "X-Spam-Status: ... tests=...,LDOSUBSCRIBER,..."
> > says that the "From:" address of the mail is subscribed.
Brian wrote:
> Are you sure it is the From: and not the envelope From? My From: is
> not subscribed.
Interesting observation.
So the address by
14 matches
Mail list logo
