On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 13:01 +1000, Alexander Samad wrote:
you haven't been affected by the bind to ipv6 setting ?
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Raven ra...@vp44.net wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 15:12 -0700, Kevin Ross wrote:
What the heck happened this afternoon??
I don't know,
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 12:44 +0200, Raven wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 13:01 +1000, Alexander Samad wrote:
you haven't been affected by the bind to ipv6 setting ?
[snip]
I am not using IPv6. All my firewall rules are for v4 only.
i know there was a recent change to sysctl (something), that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 01 May 2010 10:08:13 +1000
Alex Samad a...@samad.com.au wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 12:44 +0200, Raven wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 13:01 +1000, Alexander Samad wrote:
you haven't been affected by the bind to ipv6 setting ?
[snip]
Hi all.
Couple years ago I set up a very basic script to have a machine (running
SID) on my network to act as a router. Two network interfaces, one with
a public IP and the other on the local LAN subnet. It does NAT as well
as open some inbound ports (SSH, WWW).
Today, at roughly 4PM, the firewall
What the heck happened this afternoon??
I don't know, but I'd start by making sure your interface names and IP
addresses haven't changed for some reason.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 15:12 -0700, Kevin Ross wrote:
What the heck happened this afternoon??
I don't know, but I'd start by making sure your interface names and IP
addresses haven't changed for some reason.
Everything seems pretty kosher here:
r...@dl580:~# ifconfig
eth0 Link
you haven't been affected by the bind to ipv6 setting ?
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Raven ra...@vp44.net wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 15:12 -0700, Kevin Ross wrote:
What the heck happened this afternoon??
I don't know, but I'd start by making sure your interface names and IP
7 matches
Mail list logo
