Hi all,
thanks for pointing me to the wiki and the hint with the script. Yes, in the
meantime things have changed, I was not aware of the bindep-pkg command.
I looked into the manual, but this specific command I did not find, but lots
of very usefull other descriptions.
So, this little
Hans wrote:
I want to create a kernel package, which I can install with dpkg. There was a
command doing it instead of "make && make install", and I could not find it
any more. Last time I did it is a long time ago. Does someone know?
I also don't remember the old command,
On 10/7/22 11:00, Hans wrote:
Hi folks,
some easy questions.
I want to create a kernel package, which I can install with dpkg. There was a
command doing it instead of "make && make install", and I could not find it
any more. Last time I did it is a long time ago. Does some
Hi folks,
some easy questions.
I want to create a kernel package, which I can install with dpkg. There was a
command doing it instead of "make && make install", and I could not find it
any more. Last time I did it is a long time ago. Does someone know?
Second question:
e
target, you can download the package in unstable and install it. Care
must be taken when mixing distributions, but looking at the
dependencies (https://packages.debian.org/sid/kernel-package) one can
see that there are no specific versions required, and all the
dependencies are for fai
Hi Darac,
thanks again. I wasn't aware of the new target "make deb-pkg".
Best regards,
Karsten
On 2017-06-20 11:26 +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:05:01PM +0200, Karsten Wemheuer wrote:
>>Hi Darac,
>>
>>> It's a bug. The package tracker page for kernel-package
>>> <https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/kernel-package> states that
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:05:01PM +0200, Karsten Wemheuer wrote:
Hi Darac,
It's a bug. The package tracker page for kernel-package
<https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/kernel-package> states that
the package was removed from strech because the new version
introduced a new, serious-lev
Hi Darac,
> It's a bug. The package tracker page for kernel-package
> <https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/kernel-package> states that
> the package was removed from strech because the new version
> introduced a new, serious-level bug: #848066. The bug was not fixed
> in tim
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:26:26AM +0200, Karsten Wemheuer wrote:
Hi *,
I just want to do some tests with kernels in "stretch" and therefore
was looking for packet "kernel-package".
But
apt install kernel-package
leads to
E: Package 'kernel-package'
Hi *,
I just want to do some tests with kernels in "stretch" and therefore
was looking for packet "kernel-package".
But
apt install kernel-package
leads to
E: Package 'kernel-package' has no installation candidate
Is this a bug or is kernel building
For those of you having trouble with kernel-package and Linux Version 3,
I have an unofficial patch that may solve your problems, particularly if
you have CONFIG_LGUEST set in the kernel config file or you are trying
to build a headers package. The patch is available here:
http
Hi Debian users,
Upgrading from old stable (Lenny) to stable (Squeeze) broke X on my
machine. The problem centers around the video chip on the Asus M2A-VM
motherboard, and, perhaps the attached Samsung monitor attached.
I am not certain, but I believe this discussion at lkml.org pertains:
I've built a new 2.6.37 kernel with kernel-package where I use an
--append-to-version option to add a hostname a build number.
Due to a change in the kernel Makefile, make kernelrelease no longer
gets the kernel release from include/config/kernel.release , but instead
uses scripts/setlocalversion
Going to try a make-file patch when I get some time.
The patch was offered from a user on the Xen-user mailing list.
[1] http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2010-09/msg00396.html
-M
Subject: make-kpkg (from kernel-package) does not build xen
and the kernel-package is not applicable
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=574957)
It seems that when the kernel_image target is used, a System.map-2.6.34.4-xen
can not be generated, and therefore a FATAL error causes the make-kpkg process
to fail!
A System.map-2.6.34.4-xen can
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 05:01:03 +0100, Jen wrote:
I am blind, so selecting the kernel from the grub prompt is not
possible. I want to use the new kernel (not trunk) as my default.
OK, now I understand your problem. It is unfortunate that the trunk
version slipped into the normal repository and
.
Thanks for any help or suggestions,
Jen.
--
From: Wolodja Wentland wentl...@cl.uni-heidelberg.de
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:50 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Booting from newly installed Kernel package?
__ Information
to.
Cheers,
Jen.
--
From: Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 2:45 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Booting from newly installed Kernel package?
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:51:25 -0400 (EDT), Jen wrote
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Jen fluffy_bunny_1...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
I've installed linux-image-2.6.32-4-i686, but I can't boot in to the new
kernel. I have also installed the latest version of grub.
What do I now have to do to get my machine to boot from the new kernel? I've
been told
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 09:26 -, Jen wrote:
I've installed linux-image-2.6.32-4-i686, but I can't boot in to the
new kernel. I have also installed the latest version of grub.
I think I don't quite understand you. Stephen and I have pointed out the
reasons *why* the -trunk- kernel is still
Hello,
I have the latest version of the Kernel package installed, and have grub2.
Can you please tell me what I need to modify in order to get my machine to
boot from the 2.6.32-4-i686?
Thanks,
Jen.
--
From: Wolodja Wentland wentl...@cl.uni
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:51:25 -0400 (EDT), Jen wrote:
Hello,
I have the latest version of the Kernel package installed, and have grub2.
Can you please tell me what I need to modify in order to get my machine to
boot from the 2.6.32-4-i686?
Thanks,
Jen.
I'm not sure what you're
-heidelberg.de
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2010 2:02 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Booting from newly installed Kernel package?
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4966 (20100322) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Jen fluffy_bunny_1...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
Hello,
I can't read your message. I'm not sure if its because of the screen reading
software I'm using, so could you send it in plain text, in case it's my
accessibility software?
Cheers,
Jen!
snip
Hey,
Its a
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 21:33 -, Jen wrote:
Hello,
I can't read your message. I'm not sure if its because of the screen
reading software I'm using, so could you send it in plain text, in
case it's my accessibility software?
Well, no idea why you couldn't read it. The only thing i can
Hello,
I have installed the Kernel package Linux-image-2.6.32-4, but can't
automatically boot from it. I thought I could just change the default number in
/boot/grub/menu.lst, but the new kernel package is not listed in this file.
Can I manually ad its details, and assign it a number
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 13:12 -, Jen wrote:
I have installed the Kernel package Linux-image-2.6.32-4, but can't
automatically boot from it. I thought I could just change the default number
in
/boot/grub/menu.lst, but the new kernel package is not listed in this file.
Do you still have
As this one:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=561569
does not really work on debian lenny (although suggested on some
websites) and i had to work myself through to get it working, here's a
patch for the kernel-package 11.015, that's currently in debian lenny,
for the use
On Tuesday 01 September 2009 04:50:45 Arthur Barlow wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Arthur Barlow arthurbar...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:56 PM
Subject: Boot problem with Kernel Package kernels
To: debian-u...@debian.org
I'm been using Debian for over
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:24:51 -0400
From: Celejar cele...@gmail.com
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Boot problem with Kernel Package kernels
Message-Id: 20090831212451.bc3e3572.cele...@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Mon
-- Forwarded message --
From: Arthur Barlow arthurbar...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:56 PM
Subject: Boot problem with Kernel Package kernels
To: debian-u...@debian.org
I'm been using Debian for over a decade now, and it's always been my
practice to build new kernel
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:50:45 -0700
Arthur Barlow arthurbar...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I'm been using Debian for over a decade now, and it's always been my
practice to build new kernel with the kernel-package software that is part
of Debian's toolkit. Im noticed over the last few months that all
In b9384ad40908311750l59cdeb42t783461317bd51...@mail.gmail.com, Arthur
Barlow wrote:
No filesystem could mount root, tried:
Kenel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on
unknown-block(0,0)
My grub menu.lst looks like this:
titleDebian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.30
root
Bonjour,
depuis quelques mois en SID, le paquet kernel-package ne propose plus
l'option (fort utile) --added-patches. Bon j'ai lu le changelog et les
docs. Apparemment d'après ce que j'ai compris on doit patcher le noyau
à la main avant de compiler avec make-kpkg. Je trouve ça assez
dommage
I installed kernel-package 12.014 on a lenny host and indeed rebuilding
without clean in between works. Though a lot of file copying seems to
happen in every build, but that's not too much.
Thanks Manoj!
-Mikko
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hello debian-users
I have been pondering this for years and haven't found an answer: How
does one re-compile a custom kernel after fixing a bug or adding patch
with kernel-package _without_ rebuilding the whole kernel?
I want to test new kernels every now and then and usually the first
couple
On Wed, Jun 24 2009, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
Hello debian-users
I have been pondering this for years and haven't found an answer: How
does one re-compile a custom kernel after fixing a bug or adding patch
with kernel-package _without_ rebuilding the whole kernel?
I want to test new kernels
Hi you all,
yesterday I posted about problems with initrams and custom kernels... I
thought I made something wrong during kernel 2.6.29 config but today I guess
that something went wrong with kernel-package setup on my system.discovered
I currently unable to install any other kernel, not only
I dont understand the problem, when the new kernel was issued, I did run
apt-get update apt-get upgrade...
and I get this error
Unpacking replacement linux-image-2.6.26-2-686 ...
dpkg: error
processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-2.6.26-2-686_2.6.26-15lenny2_i386.deb
(--unpack):
gianni wrote:
I dont understand the problem, when the new kernel was issued, I did run
apt-get update apt-get upgrade...
and I get this error
Unpacking replacement linux-image-2.6.26-2-686 ...
dpkg: error
processing
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 5:51 PM, gianni giovanni.favor...@gmail.com wrote:
I dont understand the problem, when the new kernel was issued, I did run
apt-get update apt-get upgrade...
and I get this error
Unpacking replacement linux-image-2.6.26-2-686 ...
dpkg: error
processing
[Replying to debian-user, including OP's reply to me, which was
presumably intended for debian-user.]
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 6:32 PM, gianni giovanni.favor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Patrick
this is the result from df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 07:04:11PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
[Replying to debian-user, including OP's reply to me, which was
presumably intended for debian-user.]
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 6:32 PM, gianni giovanni.favor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Patrick
this is the result from df -h
On Friday 01 May 2009 17:52:54 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Fri, May 01 2009, Randy Patterson wrote:
My intention at this point is to make a detailed list of the
components on a particular system so I can remove everything that is
not needed. These would be older systems that will never be
-8---
cp /usr/share/kernel-package/examples/etc/kernel/postinst.d/yaird \
/etc/kernel/postinst.d/
cp /usr/share/kernel-package/examples/etc/kernel/postrm.d/yaird \
/etc/kernel/postrm.d/
--8---cut here---end---8---
Or, alternately
Randy Patterson wrote:
My intention at this point is to make a detailed list of the components on a
particular system so I can remove everything that is not needed. These would
be older systems that will never be upgraded or need new hardware so the
kernel don't need a lot of options
On Friday 01 May 2009 09:34:58 Dave Witbrodt wrote:
Faster? I promise that you would not notice the speedup. Conceivably
your kernel will boot slightly faster without having to carry out the
hardware detection for the 99% of modules that have no relevance for
your particular system, but you
Randy Patterson wrote:
So on a dedicated system that is used for nothing but running a processor
intensive application 24/7, do you think there would be any real increase in
performance from a custom kernel?
My gut reaction is no, but I do not claim to have data to back that
up. If there is
On Fri, May 01 2009, Randy Patterson wrote:
My intention at this point is to make a detailed list of the
components on a particular system so I can remove everything that is
not needed. These would be older systems that will never be upgraded
or need new hardware so the kernel don't need a
I'm looking to start using my own custom kernels for various reasons. At this
point I'm just researching the various options or ways in going about this and
in the process installed kernel-package. I learned the hard way a couple years
ago when I first started using Linux that before diving
Randy Patterson wrote :
I'm looking to start using my own custom kernels for various reasons. At this
point I'm just researching the various options or ways in going about this
and
in the process installed kernel-package. I learned the hard way a couple
years
ago when I first started
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 09:24:43AM -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
I'm looking to start using my own custom kernels for various reasons. At this
point I'm just researching the various options or ways in going about this
and
in the process installed kernel-package. I learned the hard way
this and in the process installed kernel-package. I learned the
hard way a couple years ago when I first started using Linux that before
diving into documentation I first need to try to determine it's age. So
after installing kernel-package the first thing I did was go to the
bottom of the man page and looked
* Randy Patterson t...@patterson-pcc.com [2009-04-30 10:28:00 -0500]:
I guess I assumed that kernel-package was to build the kernel from the source
used by the current Debian distro installed. So if that's not the case and I
decided to use the latest stable from kernel.org
this and in the process installed kernel-package. I learned the
hard way a couple years ago when I first started using Linux that before
diving into documentation I first need to try to determine it's age. So
after installing kernel-package the first thing I did was go to the
bottom of the man
On Thursday 30 April 2009 11:09:49 Dave Patterson wrote:
* Randy Patterson t...@patterson-pcc.com [2009-04-30 10:28:00 -0500]:
I guess I assumed that kernel-package was to build the kernel from the
source used by the current Debian distro installed. So if that's not the
case and I decided
* Randy Patterson t...@patterson-pcc.com [2009-04-30 11:29:33 -0500]:
Dave, with a last name like yours I must assume that this is excellent
advice!
:-) Thanks for everyone's input. I will now travel down the kernel-package
road.
The tutorial's old, but it stands the test of time
to choose what happens
when the kernel image is installed, by dropping scripts into
/etc/kernel -- by default, no action is taken
For example, to create an initramfs, I did:
--8---cut here---start-8---
cp /usr/share/kernel-package/examples/etc/kernel
Hi,
When I compile the kernel the file initrd is not created in spite
of I'm specifying the --initrd option in the command line. Exactly,
the command that I'm using to compile the kernel is:
make-kpkg --initrd --revision=1:xps.10 kernel_image
May be there is a problem with the
/delete the initramfs files. You can use yaird, or
initramfs-tools. For the latter, there are example scripts that you
could use as a starting point:
/usr/share/kernel-package/examples/etc/kernel/post{inst,rm}.d/initramfs
manoj
--
And then there was the lawyer that stepped in cow manure
in /etc/kernel/post{inst,rm}.d/ to
create/delete the initramfs files. You can use yaird, or
initramfs-tools. For the latter, there are example scripts that you
could use as a starting point:
/usr/share/kernel-package/examples/etc/kernel/post{inst,rm}.d/initramfs
manoj
I upgraded
.
`
So, drop in scripts in /etc/kernel/post{inst,rm}.d/ to
create/delete the initramfs files. You can use yaird, or
initramfs-tools. For the latter, there are example scripts that you
could use as a starting point:
/usr/share/kernel-package/examples/etc/kernel/post{inst,rm}.d
-package/examples/etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs \
/etc/kernel/postinst.d/
cp /usr/share/kernel-package/examples/etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs \
/etc/kernel/postrm.d/
--8---cut here---end---8---
To run grub, I have in /etc/kernel-img.conf
Hi,
This brings to an end an enhancement for kernel-package that
have been in development for over an year. These changes make
kernel-package more nimble (you can just update the sources, hack on a
file, and run make-kpkg and it should just work to incorporate your
changes, no need
Hi,
A few hours ago, a new version of kernel-package was uploaded to
Experimental. This is a major change, the new kernel-package is far
more nimble, more flexible, and supports people who make a minor change
to a kernel, or who update the kernel sources (via git or otherwise
Hello Manoj and other Kernel-Maintainers,
Thank you for doing this hard job...
I am ongoing to test the new kernel-package.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
24V Electronic Engineer
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
Hi folks,
A new version of kernel-package has made its way to unstable.
This is a extensive change, and addresses most of the problems that
have been plaguing kernel-package, partially thanks to patches provided
by other folk.
The new version works with the merged x86 code
Hi,
Be sure to get kernel-package_11.005_all.deb. The 11.005 fixes a
critical regression, born of a copypaste error from late night
hacking. Sorry for the inconvenience.
manoj
--
Old age and treachery will beat youth and skill every time. a coffee
cup
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
In 2.6.23 kernels this site told you how to rebuild the Debian kernel
package:
http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-common-tasks.html#s-common-official
In 2.6.23 I can no longer do it. It fails this:
fakeroot make -f debian/rules.gen setup-i386-none-686
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
In 2.6.23 kernels this site told you how to rebuild the Debian kernel
package:
http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-common-tasks.html#s-common-official
In 2.6.23 I can no longer do it. It fails this:
fakeroot make -f debian
Hi,
In 2.6.23 kernels this site told you how to rebuild the Debian kernel
package:
http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-common-tasks.html#s-common-official
In 2.6.23 I can no longer do it. It fails this:
fakeroot make -f debian/rules.gen setup-i386-none-686
That flavor no longer
Hugo Vanwoerkom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| You can either rebuild the kernel and turn that off (Note: but in
| that case I had hard hangs in qemu!) *or* use the descriptions
| in that page to rebuild the kbuild .deb and install nvidia so it does
| not mind paravirt.
Just to close out the
Hello.
I did a recent install of Debian etch on a system with an nVidia
graphics controller. I used module-assistant to install the nvidia
kernel module, and under kernel 2.6.18 from the install, that all
worked fine.
A few days later, I upgraded to kernel package 2.6.18.2-686 (from
lenny
upgraded to kernel package 2.6.18.2-686 (from
lenny) to resolve a problem with the on-board audio controller:
Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition Audio Controller
(rev 01)
The kernel upgrade did indeed resolve the problem with the audio
controller, but it meant a re
Do you use paravirtualization? If not, recompile a kernel with no
virtualization support. The problem here is that the NVidia driver is trying
to use a module symbol which has been declared for use with GPL drivers only.
If I remember correctly that means EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(somevariable) is
Jim McCloskey wrote:
Hello.
I did a recent install of Debian etch on a system with an nVidia
graphics controller. I used module-assistant to install the nvidia
kernel module, and under kernel 2.6.18 from the install, that all
worked fine.
A few days later, I upgraded to kernel package 2.6.18.2
worked fine.
A few days later, I upgraded to kernel package 2.6.18.2-686 (from
lenny) to resolve a problem with the on-board audio controller:
Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition Audio Controller
(rev 01)
The kernel upgrade did indeed resolve the problem with the audio
Hugo Vanwoerkom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Extensively discussed here:
| http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=90214
|
| The problem is that post 2.6.18 Debian kernels have PARAVIRT_CONFIG
| and nvidia does not like that.
|
| You can either rebuild the kernel and turn that off
gnashing and many bug reports, since the complexity of
the logic is one of the most bug-prone bits of the image postinst, it
also makes it harder to come up with alternatives to the algorithms or
to tweak the behavior -- since one needs to tweak kernel-package,
re-compile the kernel, and install
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does it mean when there are two version numbers on a package.
The -number is the Debian patchlevel: major.minor.patch-debpatch
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 08:43:31PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does it mean when there are two version numbers on a package.
The -number is the Debian patchlevel: major.minor.patch-debpatch
So in
linux-image-2.6.17-2-486_2.6.17-9_i386.deb
is the debpatch
On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 15:26 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 08:43:31PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does it mean when there are two version numbers on a package.
The -number is the Debian patchlevel: major.minor.patch-debpatch
the put out a whole new kernel package version --
linux-image-2.6.18-2-k7 with a new kernel version, say 2.6.18-3 and so
forth.
this is all a guess, and the numbers are made up.
A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
What does it mean when there are two version numbers on a package. For
example, one kernel package in the etch installer RC1 is
linux-image-2.6.17-2-486_2.6.17-9_i386.deb
Now clearly the 2.6.17-2-486
is part of the package name, making it possible to install more than one
kernel package
Please excuse the lateness of my reply.
I don't think this is going to work for me. A wrinkle that I failed
to mention earlier is that I'm compiling a custom kernel for these
machines, and the driver needs to be compiled against that kernel.
Ideally, I'd like to use make-kpkg to generate the
For my job, I have to install 3M's proprietary touchscreen drivers (distributed as an SRPM) for MicroTouch USB touchscreens. I am well aware that these screens are supported natively in the kernel; however, my experience with the in-kernel support (as of
2.6.12.3) for these touchscreens has been
Kit Peters wrote:
This means that I wish to wrap the 3M driver in a .deb. What is the best
way to go about this?
I'd proceed as normal (that is, build the RPMs like you did on the other
machines, debian has the rpm utility), but instead of installing the driver
through rpm, use alien to
using kernel-package 10.047.It might be a re-occurence of a similar bug.
I am using the same version and compiled the debian 2.6.17.rc3 packagesa couple of days ago. Perhaps it could be the vanilla source that iscausing it. (Though I doubt it). Well, I'll try the make-kpkg clean, but I'm
as debianized as possible (by which I mean installing everything via apt, and creating my own debs when necessary) I'm using kernel-package.
I have configured the kernel via menuconfig. Kernel sources are at $HOME/src/linux-2.6.17.1/. I execute 'CC=
gcc-4.1 make-kpkg --pgpsign [EMAIL PROTECTED
, but as I'm trying to keep this machine as
debianized as possible (by which I mean installing everything via apt, and
creating my own debs when necessary) I'm using kernel-package.
I have configured the kernel via menuconfig. Kernel sources are at
$HOME/src/linux-2.6.17.1/. I execute 'CC
to use fakeroot rather that a real root commandfor compiling.
Hm. I've never used fakeroot for anything. How would I compile a kernel in fakeroot?
You neglected to mention the version of kernel-package you are using. Isithttp://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=359832that you are seeing
/fakeroot/ in your command.
That should be it. You then don't have to enter your password, and there
is less chance of something going catastrophically wrong.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=359832
No, I'm using kernel-package 10.047.
It might be a re-occurence of a similar bug
is simply to know if installing a debian kernel package on
ubuntu is feasible or if it will lead to problems ?
TIA for any help...
Gregor
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with dpkg on her ubuntu box. So
my question is simply to know if installing a debian kernel package
on ubuntu is feasible or if it will lead to problems ?
I've done exactly that once or twice without any problems. Of course
YMMV.
- Felix
--
Felix C. Stegerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any
Am Freitag, 14. April 2006 18:18 schrieb Elimar Riesebieter:
Was sagt
$ head -6 /usr/src/linux/Makefile
VERSION = 2
PATCHLEVEL = 6
SUBLEVEL = 15
EXTRAVERSION =
NAME=Sliding Snow Leopard
$ head -3 /usr/src/linux/debian/changelog
linux-source-2.6.15.20060414y (2.6.15.20060414y-10.00.Custom)
| \
awk '$1 ~ /[hi]i/ { printf(%s-%s\n, $2, $3) }' debian/buildinfo
echo applied kernel patches: debian/buildinfo
echo done debian/stamp-build-kernel
== making target install/linux-image-2.6.15.20060414 [new prereqs: ]==
This is kernel package version 10.040.
echo The UTS Release version
On Fri, 14 Apr 2006 the mental interface of
Max Moritz Sievers told:
Hi,
ich versuche gerade auf Sarge mit einigen Paketen aus testing einen Kernel zu
kompilieren. Die Architektur ist AMD K8 aber die 32-Bit-Version.
[...]
Weiß jemand von Euch, was ich falsch mache?
Was sagt
$ head -6
After installing kernel 2.6.15 on my laptop, my laptop suddenly won't
boot from that kernel. It doesn't even get to init. It seems to not be
able to find the gzip module on startup. I wrote down the errors since
all I get is BusyBox when I boot:
... some hardware detection stuff here ...
Le 02.03.2006 18:13:49, mahashakti89 a écrit :
Bonsoir !
Comme le dit le sujet, je rencontre un petit problème lorsque je veux
compiler un nouveau noyau avec kernel-package, en effet au beau milieu
de la compilation la machine se fige et je suis obligé de passer par
un
reset Au départ
1 - 100 of 330 matches
Mail list logo
