filtering on the server (for my user
> >> initially, then perhaps for others). My extensive googling reveals
> >> that there are many tutorials for filtering spam, but that's not
> >> really my problem.
> >
> > What you're looking for is an implementation of the Sieve
On 31/08/16 15:02, Dan Ritter wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 01:21:13PM +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
Hi list,
I'm running postfix under Wheezy on my VPS, using a more or less
out-of-the-box configuration. My users access their mail via IMAP.
I subscribe to a number of mail lists, such as
orials for filtering spam, but that's not
really my problem.
What you're looking for is an implementation of the Sieve
language/system for mail filtering. You don't say what IMAP
server you are using, but Dovecot has an implementation of this called
"Pigeonhole" that is very likely what you want
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 01:21:13PM +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm running postfix under Wheezy on my VPS, using a more or less
> out-of-the-box configuration. My users access their mail via IMAP.
>
> I subscribe to a number of mail lists, such as this one. I currently use
>
not
> really my problem.
What you're looking for is an implementation of the Sieve
language/system for mail filtering. You don't say what IMAP
server you are using, but Dovecot has an implementation of this called
"Pigeonhole" that is very likely what you want.
Perry
--
Perry
Hi list,
I'm running postfix under Wheezy on my VPS, using a more or less
out-of-the-box configuration. My users access their mail via IMAP.
I subscribe to a number of mail lists, such as this one. I currently use
Thunderbird's filtering capability to sort mail into a number of
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 04:47:43PM -0800, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
I've been been using mutt + offlineimap for great justice ... except for
filtering.
I've previously relied on procmail for local rules management. While
Gmail's rules are reasonably decent, not all IMAP providers are as
on 23:42 Fri 11 Mar, Joel Roth (jo...@pobox.com) wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 04:47:43PM -0800, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
I've been been using mutt + offlineimap for great justice ... except for
filtering.
I've previously relied on procmail for local rules management. While
Gmail's
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 03:41:02PM -0800, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
on 23:42 Fri 11 Mar, Joel Roth (jo...@pobox.com) wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 04:47:43PM -0800, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
I've been been using mutt + offlineimap for great justice ... except for
filtering.
I've
I've been been using mutt + offlineimap for great justice ... except for
filtering.
I've previously relied on procmail for local rules management. While
Gmail's rules are reasonably decent, not all IMAP providers are as
blessed.
I'd also like to trigger libnotify messages on certain messages as
This is a system generated acknowledgement.
Thank you for using our e-mail enquiry service.
We have received your e-mail and will look into it.
For clarifications, please call our Branch Office at 1800-8663030.
HDB Yishun Branch Office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 15:59, Pigeon wrote:
--snip--
The filter. dman has a useful exim config hack that makes exim use the
filter as a transport; this has been referred to on the list a few
times recently. His example uses spamassassin, which can do Bayesian
filtering as well as its other
* Rob Weir [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20030303 19:20 PST]:
If you prefer a GUI client, sylpheed and balsa seem to be good choices,
with an allegedly 'mutt-ish' feel. Also, some people use Mozilla Mail,
but it seems to have some issues with effectively filtering list mail.
AFAIK, any filtering issues
Hello,
I don't seem to be able to get either filter or sortmail working
with postfix, if that could cause problems. But I think the problem
is in the permissions: both would deliver mail only to files, owned
by nobody:nogroup. Isn't this silly? filter won't even read the
configuration unless I put
Do you know if maildrop can use qmail's variables? I'd like to avoid
separate filter files for every .qmail-ext I have.
Thanks!
-Paul
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002 22:18:46 -0500
Jamin W. Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002 23:00:42 -0400
Paul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm
Cool! I got it to work! Thanks!!!
-Paul
# cat .qmail
|maildrop .mailfilter Maildir/
# cat .qmail-ext
|maildrop .mailfilter mail/$EXT
# cat .mailfilter
if ( /^X-Spam-Status: Yes/ )
{
to $HOME/mail/SPAM/
}
else
{
to $HOME/$1
}
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002 00:20:08 -0400
Paul Miller [EMAIL
, 2002 5:00 AM
Subject: mail filtering / qmail - tangent to spam mail question
Hey all,
I'm using qmail/rblsmtpd, qmailscanner, and spamassassin. All my incoming
mail are marked with X-Spam-Status: and I'd like to have mail with spam
status of Yes put into a separate maildir. I'm using qmail
, 2002 5:18 AM
Subject: Re: mail filtering / qmail - tangent to spam mail question
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002 23:00:42 -0400
Paul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using qmail/rblsmtpd, qmailscanner, and spamassassin. All my
incoming mail are marked with X-Spam-Status: and I'd like to have mail
: Paul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jamin W. Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 6:20 AM
Subject: Re: mail filtering / qmail - tangent to spam mail question
Do you know if maildrop can use qmail's variables? I'd like to avoid
separate filter files
: Paul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 6:46 AM
Subject: Re: mail filtering / qmail - tangent to spam mail question
Cool! I got it to work! Thanks!!!
-Paul
# cat .qmail
|maildrop .mailfilter Maildir/
# cat .qmail-ext
Hey all,
I'm using qmail/rblsmtpd, qmailscanner, and spamassassin. All my incoming mail
are marked with X-Spam-Status: and I'd like to have mail with spam status of
Yes put into a separate maildir. I'm using qmail maildirs, and I'd like to
continue using maildirs. How can I filter my mail
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002 23:00:42 -0400
Paul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using qmail/rblsmtpd, qmailscanner, and spamassassin. All my
incoming mail are marked with X-Spam-Status: and I'd like to have mail
with spam status of Yes put into a separate maildir. I'm using qmail
maildirs, and
On Tuesday 16 October 2001 22:09, Sven Gaerner wrote:
Hi,
I used an IMAP server (I think the UW server) that stored al emails
per folder in one file. Sorting/Filtering works fine with deliver.
Now I switched to cyrus-imapd because no user needs a shell account
and accessing the server with
On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Nigel Pauli wrote:
Did you use a debian package for Cyrus? The latest knowledge I've got
is that someone was working on building a Cyrus 2 debian package but
that it wasn't ready yet.
Does anyone know what's happening on this front?
Look for the wnpp bug, and read
On Wednesday 17 October 2001 14:30, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Nigel Pauli wrote:
Does anyone know what's happening on this [Cyrus2] front?
Look for the wnpp bug, and read it... I have pre-beta packages up
already, but these weeks have been so ectic that I not
Hi,
I used an IMAP server (I think the UW server) that stored al emails
per folder in one file. Sorting/Filtering works fine with deliver.
Now I switched to cyrus-imapd because no user needs a shell account
and accessing the server with Windoze Clients or Netscape/Mozilla
works better.
Assuming that your cyrus imapd has sieve support, you do it with sieve.
Ask google about mail filtering with sieve for more info. Here is an
excerpt from my .sieve file:
require fileinto;
require envelope;
require vacation;
#vacation I am on vacation and will return on July 13;
if header
I would like to be able to take an existing mail spool file (e.g.
/var/spool/mail/USER) and pass it to slocal for processing. If I simply
do this...
cat MAILFILE | /usr/lib/mh/slocal -user USER
...all the messages get interpreted as one big message (no surprise
there, as slocal is designed to
I would like to be able to take an existing mail spool file (e.g.
/var/spool/mail/USER) and pass it to slocal for processing. If I simply
do this...
cat MAILFILE | /usr/lib/mh/slocal -user USER
...all the messages get interpreted as one big message (no surprise
there, as slocal is
Brian J. Stults writes:
Or perhaps there's a better tool for filtering in this manner.
Take a look at mailagent.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Phillip Deackes wrote:
I used to use procmail to deliver mail, but I prefer the Exim approach.
Thanks for the information on your .forward file. I also use procmail at
the moment. In my setup I can use the following script to produce a list
of all the email I have
Johann Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the information on your .forward file. I also use procmail
at
the moment. In my setup I can use the following script to produce a
list
of all the email I have received today:
grep `date \+ %a %b %e\` ~/.procmail/log | nl
Does
On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 07:59:36AM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Phillip Deackes wrote:
I used to use procmail to deliver mail, but I prefer the Exim approach.
Thanks for the information on your .forward file. I also use procmail at
the moment. In my setup I can use
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Ethan Benson wrote:
=I am wondering what different methods people here are using to filter
=your mail? (ie each mailing list to its own mailbox or other such
=techniques of dealing with several high volume lists)
I am using fetchmail+procmail+pine+postfix.
fetchmail -
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Ethan Benson wrote:
I am wondering what different methods people here are using to filter
your mail? (ie each mailing list to its own mailbox or other such
techniques of dealing with several high volume lists)
I fetch mail from my IP's POP3 mailserver using fetchmail.
Quoth Ethan Benson,
I am wondering what different methods people here are using to filter
your mail? (ie each mailing list to its own mailbox or other such
techniques of dealing with several high volume lists)
I'm on a couple of high-volume mailing lists, easily getting over 100
mails a
hi,
I am wondering what different methods people here are using to filter
your mail? (ie each mailing list to its own mailbox or other such
techniques of dealing with several high volume lists)
I am going to be switching to mutt soon and the filtering method I
have used on macos with
Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am wondering what different methods people here are using to filter
your mail? (ie each mailing list to its own mailbox or other such
techniques of dealing with several high volume lists)
I am going to be switching to mutt soon and the filtering
Hello,
I have in the past, depending on what MTA I am using used two different
filtering methods. When using exim I simply use the built in .forward
filtering which is very well described in there docs and on www.exim.org.
On another system (the one I am currently writing from actually) that
On Thu, Jan 27, 2000 at 04:52:04PM +, Ethan Benson wrote:
I am wondering what different methods people here are using to filter
your mail? (ie each mailing list to its own mailbox or other such
techniques of dealing with several high volume lists)
I am going to be switching to mutt
Hi,
I am trying debian after using redhat for awhile and have a question about
procmail.
With redhat I use fetchmail to download my email and as long as I have a
procmailrc set up in my home directory my mail would be filtered
automatically. I am using smail with debian since it was the default
In foo.debian-user, you wrote:
Hi,
I am trying debian after using redhat for awhile and have a question about
procmail.
With redhat I use fetchmail to download my email and as long as I have a
procmailrc set up in my home directory my mail would be filtered
automatically. I am using
On Tue, Dec 22, 1998 at 08:46:44PM -0500, Rick Knebel wrote:
This is my first exposure to smail which seems to be the default in Debian.
I had no trouble setting it up.
That's what you think. I'd check my From: line if I were you.
I have though.
This is my first exposure to smail which seems to be the default in Debian.
I had no trouble setting it up.
Alot of the filtering programs mention only using sendmail.
What is everyone using for mail filtering that is using smail.
Thanks Alot
Rick
--
Rick Knebel
[EMAIL
RK == Rick Knebel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RK What is everyone using for mail filtering that is using smail.
procmail.
You can set it up either as the MDA (so it is caled automaticaly for
every user), or you can call it in a user's .forward file.
Ciao,
Martin
Rick Macdonald wrote:
In order to deal with the high volume of traffic on this list, I just
tried turning on the mail filtering in Netscape 4.02 (Solaris24) but it
doesn't seem to do anything.
Has anybody tried this?
Well, to answer my own question, I'm having some success now setting
On Wed, 6 Aug 1997, Antonio M. Roldan wrote:
Rick Macdonald wrote:
In order to deal with the high volume of traffic on this list, I just
tried turning on the mail filtering in Netscape 4.02 (Solaris24) but it
doesn't seem to do anything.
Has anybody tried this?
Well
In order to deal with the high volume of traffic on this list, I just
tried turning on the mail filtering in Netscape 4.02 (Solaris24) but it
doesn't seem to do anything.
Has anybody tried this?
--
...RickM...
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL
48 matches
Mail list logo
