On 1 October 2011 03:58, Eike Lantzsch wrote:
> Glad that you could solve the problem.
>
Eike
Thanks for the explanation- one can learn a lot from this list, as always!
Saki
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
On Friday 30 September 2011 19:39:46 ow...@netptc.net wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: Harry Putnam
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Sent: 9/30/2011 9:29:48 PM
> Subject: Re: Todays Nasty little problem: Defeat the BIOS
>
> Terence writes:
> > On 30
- Original Message -
From: Harry Putnam
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: 9/30/2011 9:29:48 PM
Subject: Re: Todays Nasty little problem: Defeat the BIOS
Terence writes:
> On 30 September 2011 21:27, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> Just reporting back. After pull
> If cleaning is as important as you say, its good to know it.
>
In one of your excellent country's sayings: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it"!
It's just one other thing to consider when a possibly physical problem rocks up.
One thing you can be sure of : Your Mileage May Vary!
Yours aye.
Saki
Terence writes:
> Thank you, Harry,
>
> Cleaning never does any harm, providing it's done properly!
>
> As you say, you may never know for sure, but cleaning contacts often
> does, in my experience, solve a number of problems.
>
> I noted the fact that card previously worked, but without the DVI
Thank you, Harry,
Cleaning never does any harm, providing it's done properly!
As you say, you may never know for sure, but cleaning contacts often
does, in my experience, solve a number of problems.
I noted the fact that card previously worked, but without the DVI
output. Perhaps the problem(s)
Terence writes:
> On 30 September 2011 21:27, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> Just reporting back. After pulling the card blowing everything out
>> and reinstalling the card, I got video back. Not only that but a DVI
>> outlet on that card that hasn't worked for a good while, began working
>> too.
>
On 30 September 2011 21:27, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Just reporting back. After pulling the card blowing everything out
> and reinstalling the card, I got video back. Not only that but a DVI
> outlet on that card that hasn't worked for a good while, began working
> too.
Can you give us more detai
Camaleón writes:
>> I've got a nasty little problem here this morning... My debian box will
>> not show anything on the monitor. I fear the graphics card has gone
>> south... I have one side off the box so removed the card and reinserted
>> hoping it might fix
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 08:00:05 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Equipment: Older P4 3.00Ghz running wheezy.
>
> I've got a nasty little problem here this morning... My debian box will
> not show anything on the monitor. I fear the graphics card has gone
> south... I have one
Hi, Harry,
First, do you hear the boot bleeps from your pc speaker, and checked
the diagnostics from that? That would certainly help.
Then allowing that I have no knowledge/expertise in by-passing the
BIOS (I'm not sure it can even be done), but my "First Aid Response)
would be to remove the hard
Equipment: Older P4 3.00Ghz running wheezy.
I've got a nasty little problem here this morning... My debian box
will not show anything on the monitor. I fear the graphics card has
gone south... I have one side off the box so removed the card and
reinserted hoping it might fix things.. of c
Joe writes:
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:42:58 -0500
> Harry wrote:
>
>> Joe writes:
>>
>> > 1) If you need a mail server but have no previous experience, have
>> > heard of sendmail and are unaware of anything else, then yes, I'll
>> > join in the recommendations that you pick a different one. It
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:42:58 -0500
Harry wrote:
> Joe writes:
>
> > 1) If you need a mail server but have no previous experience, have
> > heard of sendmail and are unaware of anything else, then yes, I'll
> > join in the recommendations that you pick a different one. It is
> > notoriously the
Joe writes:
> 1) If you need a mail server but have no previous experience, have heard
> of sendmail and are unaware of anything else, then yes, I'll join in the
> recommendations that you pick a different one. It is notoriously the
> most difficult to configure.
The thread has taken a turn away
Darac Marjal writes:
>> Do you know of a case where postfix was made to use Smarthost
>> smtp.comcast.net? I'd probably drop sendmail after years of use in
>> favor of postfix, but the several times I tried to configure it for
>> comcasts authentication, I failed miserably.
>>
>> I am probably
are all debian tools.
> - - --=-- - ---
> -
> Due to unbridled personal bungling, I've created a nasty mess while
> installing sendmail.
>
> I inadvertantly deleted /etc/init.d/sendmail. Well I thought I'd just
> reinstall se
On 28/09/11 11:39, Carl Fink wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:24:22AM -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
I inadvertantly deleted /etc/init.d/sendmail. Well I thought I'd just
reinstall sendmail to re-acquire that file.
...
Any attempt to uninstall it tells me it is not installed, any attempt
to i
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 09:28:29AM -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Carl Fink writes:
>
> > However my preferred method:
> >
> > "sudo aptitude install postfix"
> >
> > Postfix is a drop-in replacement for sendmail that can be configured by mere
> > mortals.
>
> Do you know of a case where postfix w
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 00:24:22 -0500
Harry Putnam wrote:
> Due to unbridled personal bungling, I've created a nasty mess while
> installing sendmail.
>
I've never been near sendmail, so I can't help directly with the
problem.
I've seen the other replies, and:
1)
Darac Marjal writes:
>> So, can anyone recommend some method to get past this, and get the
>> pkgs fully installed and configured?
>>
>
> I imagine that, while configuring sendmail, dpkg tries to stop the
> sendmail process by invoking the init script. The init script isn't
> there, so it thinks
Carl Fink writes:
> However my preferred method:
>
> "sudo aptitude install postfix"
>
> Postfix is a drop-in replacement for sendmail that can be configured by mere
> mortals.
Do you know of a case where postfix was made to use Smarthost
smtp.comcast.net? I'd probably drop sendmail after year
On 09/28/2011 01:39 PM, Carl Fink wrote:
However my preferred method:
"sudo aptitude install postfix"
Best: "sudo apt-get install exim4"
;-)
--
RMA.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
e to unbridled personal bungling, I've created a nasty mess while
> installing sendmail.
>
>
> So, can anyone recommend some method to get past this, and get the
> pkgs fully installed and configured?
Please seriously consider using a different mail server package. Choose
among
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:24:22AM -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
> I inadvertantly deleted /etc/init.d/sendmail. Well I thought I'd just
> reinstall sendmail to re-acquire that file.
...
> Any attempt to uninstall it tells me it is not installed, any attempt
> to install it ends with an error tha
l debian tools.
> - - --=-- - --- -
>
> Due to unbridled personal bungling, I've created a nasty mess while
> installing sendmail.
>
> I inadvertantly deleted /etc/init.d/sendmail. Well I thought I'd just
> reinstall sendmail to re-acquire that file.
>
gling, I've created a nasty mess while
installing sendmail.
I inadvertantly deleted /etc/init.d/sendmail. Well I thought I'd just
reinstall sendmail to re-acquire that file.
So uninstalled sendmail... with aptitude but it uninstalled a few
other parts of the tools too.
There appea
Do
away with card payments.
You can
force them to cease calling you.
Your Cr.
scores are not damaged.
Hi!
I think you know that 2.6 is not ready yet. Use a stable kernel.
Why? I always thought that even numbers are for stable kernels.
But, apart from that, your question indicates that the error is more
likely on the server's side?
Bye,
Kevin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Kevin Boergens wrote:
Hi!
I'm having trouble at a desktop PC running woody. It mounts /home via
NFS from a server running woody,too, but with a 2.6.1 homemade kernel.
I use the 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel.
Unfortunately, NFS does not work properly.
Jan 31 18:40:01 pceva kernel: nfs_notify_change: reva
Hi!
I'm having trouble at a desktop PC running woody. It mounts /home via
NFS from a server running woody,too, but with a 2.6.1 homemade kernel.
I use the 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel.
Unfortunately, NFS does not work properly.
Jan 31 18:40:01 pceva kernel: nfs_notify_change: revalidate failed,
error=-
I get some nasty pango and libgtk problems after upgrading:
Setting up libgtk2.0-common (2.2.0-2) ...
Updating the IM modules list for GTK+-2.2.0.../usr/bin/gtk-query-immodules-2.0:
relocation error: /usr/bin/gtk-query-immodules-2.0: undefined symbol: g_printf
dpkg: error processing libgtk2.0
on Mon, Jun 17, 2002, Gerhard Gaussling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Am Montag, 17. Juni 2002 01:36 schrieb Karsten M. Self:
>
> > > According the meaning of css-capabilities I define it as
> > > arranging page-elements pixel-by-pixel.
> >
> > That doesn't convey much, but if you mean what I think
I've only use Mozilla a little on Debian, but for my
money, Opera out performs it easily. You might want
to try it. It's available in a deb file.
http://www.opera.com/
--- Gerhard Gaussling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Karsten,
>
> Am Sonntag, 16. Juni 2002 08:17 schrieb Karsten M.
> Self:
Hi Karsten,
Am Montag, 17. Juni 2002 01:36 schrieb Karsten M. Self:
> > According the meaning of css-capabilities I define it as
> > arranging page-elements pixel-by-pixel.
>
> That doesn't convey much, but if you mean what I think you mean,
> you're wrong.
In a drawing it's really helpful for a
on Mon, Jun 17, 2002, Gerhard Gaussling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi Karsten,
>
> Am Sonntag, 16. Juni 2002 08:17 schrieb Karsten M. Self:
>
> > > [...]
> > > but I'm wondering if it breaks the page layout.
> >
> > Define "breaking page layout".
>
> According the meaning of css-capabiliti
Hi Karsten,
Am Sonntag, 16. Juni 2002 08:17 schrieb Karsten M. Self:
> > [...]
> > but I'm wondering if it breaks the page layout.
>
> Define "breaking page layout".
According the meaning of css-capabilities I define it as arranging
page-elements pixel-by-pixel.
> My experience is that web
on Sat, Jun 15, 2002, Gerhard Gaussling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Am Samstag, 15. Juni 2002 08:49 schrieb Karsten M. Self:
>
> > What happens if you disable font sizing via a user CSS? Like I
> > do ;-)
> >
> > http://kmself.home.netcom.com/Download/userContent.css
>
> That may stops mo
> That may stops mozilla from crashing x by rendering huge fonts, but
> I'm wondering if it breaks the page layout.
I think the latest mozilla from unstable fixed this problem with huge
fonts.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
Hi Karsten
Am Samstag, 15. Juni 2002 08:49 schrieb Karsten M. Self:
> What happens if you disable font sizing via a user CSS? Like I
> do ;-)
>
> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/Download/userContent.css
That may stops mozilla from crashing x by rendering huge fonts, but
I'm wondering if it
on Wed, Jun 12, 2002, Eric G. Miller (egm2@jps.net) wrote:
> See http://theregister.co.uk/content/55/25689.html for a nasty X
> crashing (and possibly machine crashing) bug regarding huge fonts.
>
> Guess it's back to links/lynx/w3m or whatever for a little while.
What happe
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 00:33, Travis Crump wrote:
Eric G. Miller wrote:
> See http://theregister.co.uk/content/55/25689.html for a nasty X
> crashing (and possibly machine crashing) bug regarding huge fonts.
>
> Guess it's back to links/lynx/w3m or whatever f
On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 00:33, Travis Crump wrote:
> Eric G. Miller wrote:
> > See http://theregister.co.uk/content/55/25689.html for a nasty X
> > crashing (and possibly machine crashing) bug regarding huge fonts.
> >
> > Guess it's back to links/lynx/w3
Eric G. Miller wrote:
> See http://theregister.co.uk/content/55/25689.html for a nasty X
> crashing (and possibly machine crashing) bug regarding huge fonts.
>
> Guess it's back to links/lynx/w3m or whatever for a little while.
>
already been fixed[I couldn't reproduce t
See http://theregister.co.uk/content/55/25689.html for a nasty X
crashing (and possibly machine crashing) bug regarding huge fonts.
Guess it's back to links/lynx/w3m or whatever for a little while.
--
Eric G. Miller
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, David Wright wrote:
> I think Bruce or some other god put together a posting which showed
> exactly what to do.
Here is that message:-
Quote.
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 13 12:09:47 1998
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 97 16:45 PDT
From: Bruce Perens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debia
On Wed, Aug 12, 1998 at 07:00:10PM +0100, David Wright wrote:
> I think that answers all the points raised, except perhaps to say
> that it isn't in the spirit of unix/linux to prevent you (as root)
> from trashing the system if you really want to.
Of course. But all I did was pick purge in dselec
On Thu, 13 Aug 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 1998 at 04:12:45PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Aug 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> >
> > > I just removed some of the old buzz/rex packages, base, timezone, bdflush.
> > > I did it in dselect, and apt quite happily obli
On Wed, Aug 12, 1998 at 04:12:45PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> > I just removed some of the old buzz/rex packages, base, timezone, bdflush.
> > I did it in dselect, and apt quite happily obliged.
>
> Aargh! you removed base? You might be in f
On Tue, 11 Aug 1998, Christopher Barry wrote:
> Yes, but it won't create past /dev/sd15. The last time I installed
> Debian I had put 16 partitions on my brand new 9.1GB SCSI disk and then
> found I only had sda devices numbered up to 15. I read the manpage for
> /dev/MAKEDEV and found it pretty u
On Tue, 11 Aug 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> I just removed some of the old buzz/rex packages, base, timezone, bdflush.
> I did it in dselect, and apt quite happily obliged.
Aargh! you removed base? You might be in for some trouble. Try to
run dpkg -i base-files.deb before you reboot. That
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
[...]
> creating sd will create all the way up to sdp.
Yes, but it won't create past /dev/sd15. The last time I installed
Debian I had put 16 partitions on my brand new 9.1GB SCSI disk and then
found I only had sda devices numbered up to 15. I read the manpage for
/dev/M
I just removed some of the old buzz/rex packages, base, timezone, bdflush.
I did it in dselect, and apt quite happily obliged.
After that, I had neither timezone NOR timezones installed (don't know why),
and removing base removed /usr/local (a symlink luckily, I've been bitten
before), most of /de
53 matches
Mail list logo
