Siju George sgeorge...@gmail.com :
since ext4 also has a limit
No, ext4 has not this limit.
The wikipedia article [1] is wrong.
Read [2]:
Right now the maximum possible number of sub directories contained in a
single directory in Ext3 is 32000. Ext4 breaks that limit and allows a
unlimited
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 07:17:22AM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
In English the slash is understood to mean or. There is no limit of
32000 files or folders under a folder in ext3.
There is a limit of 31998 directories under a directory. This is caused by
the ext3 hard link count limit being
On Seg, 26 Abr 2010, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 07:17:22AM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
This limit is rarely encountered in practice because it is so much more
efficient to use multiple directory levels, e.g.:
parent-
a-
able
alf
b-
beta
bravo
Hmm... what
On 04/26/2010 07:58 AM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 07:17:22AM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
In English the slash is understood to mean or. There is no limit of
32000 files or folders under a folder in ext3.
There is a limit of 31998 directories under a directory. This is
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 02:15:21PM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
and the proof is in the pudding ;-)
Actually, the etymology of that phrase is really interesting, because if you
think about it, unless it's an alcoholised pudding, there's no proof. The full
saying is: The proof of the pudding is
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Siju George sgeorge...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
ext3 can have only 32000 files/folders under a folder and I hit that limit.
Hi,
Sorry for the ambiguity.
by files/folders I meant the number of objects inside a directory.
But Mike showed there is no such limit
On 04/23/2010 11:13 PM, Siju George wrote:
Hi,
ext3 can have only 32000 files/folders under a folder and I hit that limit.
Which file system can I use to over come it?
I am planning for JFS
Does anybody has any recommendations?
Since Mike Bird has demonstrated your erroneous claim, plz show
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 03:03:57 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/23/2010 11:13 PM, Siju George wrote:
ext3 can have only 32000 files/folders under a folder and I hit that
limit. Which file system can I use to over come it? I am planning for
JFS
Does anybody has any recommendations?
Since
Siju George put forth on 4/23/2010 11:13 PM:
Hi,
ext3 can have only 32000 files/folders under a folder and I hit that limit.
Which file system can I use to over come it?
I am planning for JFS
Does anybody has any recommendations?
It's odd that you're leaning towards JFS, when XFS is
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 09:43:27AM +0530, Siju George wrote:
Hi,
ext3 can have only 32000 files/folders under a folder and I hit that limit.
Which file system can I use to over come it?
I am planning for JFS
Does anybody has any recommendations?
You are stating that you believe there to
On Saturday 24 April 2010 09:16:46 Camaleón wrote:
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 03:03:57 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/23/2010 11:13 PM, Siju George wrote:
ext3 can have only 32000 files/folders under a folder and I hit that
limit. Which file system can I use to over come it? I am planning for
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 13:46:45 +0100, Lisi wrote:
On Saturday 24 April 2010 09:16:46 Camaleón wrote:
Note that The max number of subdirectories in one directory is fixed
to 32000.
¹ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ext3
The article to which you link refers to subdirectories. The OP refers
to
On Sat April 24 2010 07:00:37 Camaleón wrote:
Well, I admit my English is not the very best it could be, but for sure
the OP concern was 32000 files/folders under a folder and if I read
^^
that in a correctly manner, it says something about
On Saturday 24 April 2010 15:00:37 Camaleón wrote:
Well, I admit my English is not the very best it could be, but for sure
the OP concern was 32000 files/folders under a folder and if I read
^^
that in a correctly manner, it says something
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:17:22 -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
On Sat April 24 2010 07:00:37 Camaleón wrote:
Well, I admit my English is not the very best it could be, but for sure
the OP concern was 32000 files/folders under a folder and if I read
^^
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 15:24:04 +0100, Lisi wrote:
On Saturday 24 April 2010 15:00:37 Camaleón wrote:
Well, I admit my English is not the very best it could be, but for sure
the OP concern was 32000 files/folders under a folder and if I read
^^
On Sat April 24 2010 07:30:33 Camaleón wrote:
And wasn't *that* the limit the OP was asking about or I misunderstood
something? :-?
OP wrote: ext3 can have only 32000 files/folders under a folder and I
hit that limit.
As I demonstrated, ext3 can have 5 files in a folder (directory).
Or as
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:58:17 -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
On Sat April 24 2010 07:30:33 Camaleón wrote:
And wasn't *that* the limit the OP was asking about or I misunderstood
something? :-?
OP wrote: ext3 can have only 32000 files/folders under a folder and I
hit that limit.
As I
Mike Bird wrote:
On Fri April 23 2010 21:13:27 Siju George wrote:
ext3 can have only 32000 files/folders under a folder and I hit that limit.
Which file system can I use to over come it?
I am planning for JFS
Does anybody has any recommendations?
There is no such limit. ext3 can handle as
Hi,
ext3 can have only 32000 files/folders under a folder and I hit that limit.
Which file system can I use to over come it?
I am planning for JFS
Does anybody has any recommendations?
Thanks
--Siju
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Siju George sgeorge...@gmail.com :
Hi,
ext3 can have only 32000 files/folders under a folder and I hit that
limit. Which file system can I use to over come it?
I am planning for JFS
Does anybody has any recommendations?
ext4 is unlimited.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ext4 is wrong in the section
On Fri April 23 2010 21:13:27 Siju George wrote:
ext3 can have only 32000 files/folders under a folder and I hit that limit.
Which file system can I use to over come it?
I am planning for JFS
Does anybody has any recommendations?
There is no such limit. ext3 can handle as many files per
22 matches
Mail list logo
