On Sun, 30 Jan 2011, T o n g wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 23:01:09 -0500, Celejar wrote:
I've given up on s2ram, the kernel method (echo mem /sys/power/state)
works fine for me, at least with Kernel Mode Setting.
I just tried that method. At first, it seemed to work wonderfully -
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:32:15 +0100
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2011-01-25 22:44 +0100, Celejar wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:02:50 +0100
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
Yes, that's it (compare the output of free before and after
hibernating to convince yourself). If
Celejar:
I'm somewhat confused about this. My system has 2GB of RAM, and I have:
$ uptime
20:46:09 up 5 days, 5:30, 9 users, load average: 0.06, 0.09, 0.25
$ free
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem: 206517210473121017860
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 08:49:57 +0100
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2011-01-25 02:50 +0100, Celejar wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:41:07 -0600
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote:
...
tmpfs doesn't reserve much (if any) memory. So, unless it is being
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 09:42:24 +0100
Jochen Schulz m...@well-adjusted.de wrote:
Celejar:
I'm somewhat confused about this. My system has 2GB of RAM, and I have:
$ uptime
20:46:09 up 5 days, 5:30, 9 users, load average: 0.06, 0.09, 0.25
$ free
total used
On 2011-01-25 21:03 +0100, Celejar wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 08:49:57 +0100
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2011-01-25 02:50 +0100, Celejar wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:41:07 -0600
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote:
...
tmpfs doesn't reserve much (if
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:35:41 +0100
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2011-01-25 21:03 +0100, Celejar wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 08:49:57 +0100
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2011-01-25 02:50 +0100, Celejar wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:41:07 -0600
Boyd Stephen
On 2011-01-25 21:48 +0100, Celejar wrote:
You're right; I see now that 'free' reports only 317376 free. This is
a laptop, and I do hibernate it a couple of times a day, so I suppose
that the cache(s) are thrown away to use the RAM for hibernation (and
to avoid pointlessly saving cached disk
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:02:50 +0100
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2011-01-25 21:48 +0100, Celejar wrote:
You're right; I see now that 'free' reports only 317376 free. This is
a laptop, and I do hibernate it a couple of times a day, so I suppose
that the cache(s) are thrown away
On 2011-01-25 22:44 +0100, Celejar wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:02:50 +0100
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
Yes, that's it (compare the output of free before and after
hibernating to convince yourself). If you don't want to get your cache
blown away, use suspend (to RAM) rather than
On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 05:47 -0800, kellyremo wrote:
to memory means: mounting a ~2 GByte filesystem [ tmpfs?, or
ramfs? ], and put the /tmp on it. [ e.g.: 4 GByte ram in the pc ].
what to write in the /etc/fstab?
I would like to collect the [ answers too:P ]:
Advantages:
- Memory is way
Isn't messing with volatile /tmp somewhat a moot point, given that the
Linux memory manager manages virtual memory anyway? I mean, if /tmp is
heavily used by your system, it will be cached in memory anyway. With 4
GB of RAM (as mentioned by kellyremo), you'll end with probably your
In 821513319-1295910389-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-57593962-
@bda029.bisx.prod.on.blackberry, teddi...@tmo.blackberry.net wrote:
Isn't messing with volatile /tmp somewhat a moot point, given that the
Linux memory manager manages virtual memory anyway? I mean, if /tmp is
heavily used
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:41:07 -0600
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote:
...
tmpfs doesn't reserve much (if any) memory. So, unless it is being actively
used by files in the tmpfs, it can be used by other applications.
I'm somewhat confused about this. My system has 2GB of
On 2011-01-25 02:50 +0100, Celejar wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:41:07 -0600
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote:
...
tmpfs doesn't reserve much (if any) memory. So, unless it is being actively
used by files in the tmpfs, it can be used by other applications.
I'm
to memory means: mounting a ~2 GByte filesystem [ tmpfs?, or ramfs? ], and
put the /tmp on it. [ e.g.: 4 GByte ram in the pc ]. what to write in the
/etc/fstab?
I would like to collect the [ answers too:P ]:
Advantages:
- Memory is way faster then HDD/SSD, so it could speed things up
- SSD
hey, i am also intertested... :)
On 2011.01.23. 14:47, kellyremo wrote:
to memory means: mounting a ~2 GByte filesystem [ tmpfs?, or ramfs?
], and put the /tmp on it. [ e.g.: 4 GByte ram in the pc ]. what to
write in the /etc/fstab?
I would like to collect the [ answers too:P ]:
Advantages:
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, kellyremo wrote:
to memory means: mounting a ~2 GByte filesystem [ tmpfs?, or ramfs? ],
and put the /tmp on it. [ e.g.: 4 GByte ram in the pc ]. what to write
in the /etc/fstab?
tmpfs /tmptmpfs defaults,nosuid,nodev,mode=1777,size=1G
In squeeze,
Dne, 23. 01. 2011 15:08:27 je Henrique de Moraes Holschuh napisal(a):
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, kellyremo wrote:
to memory means: mounting a ~2 GByte filesystem [ tmpfs?, or
ramfs? ],
and put the /tmp on it. [ e.g.: 4 GByte ram in the pc ]. what to
write
in the /etc/fstab?
tmpfs
On Du, 23 ian 11, 15:46:20, Klistvud wrote:
Any opinions?
No, just facts ;)
$ free
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem: 20596521847748 211904 0 153008 885512
-/+ buffers/cache: 8092281250424
Swap: 975204
Hello,
Klistvud a écrit :
Isn't messing with volatile /tmp somewhat a moot point, given that the
Linux memory manager manages virtual memory anyway? I mean, if /tmp is
heavily used by your system, it will be cached in memory anyway. With 4
GB of RAM (as mentioned by kellyremo), you'll
Dne, 23. 01. 2011 17:19:41 je Pascal Hambourg napisal(a):
Tmpfs is not a RAM disk (RAM-based block device), it is a filesystem
in
virtual memory.
Didn't know that. Damn clever. I stand corrected.
--
Cheerio,
Klistvud
http://bufferoverflow.tiddlyspot.com
Dne, 23. 01. 2011 17:19:41 je Pascal Hambourg napisal(a):
P Tmpfs is not a RAM disk (RAM-based block device), it is a filesystem in
P virtual memory.
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 20:39:36 +0100,
Klistvud quotati...@aliceadsl.fr said:
K Didn't know that. Damn clever. I stand corrected.
On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 05:47 -0800, kellyremo wrote:
to memory means: mounting a ~2 GByte filesystem [ tmpfs?, or
ramfs? ], and put the /tmp on it. [ e.g.: 4 GByte ram in the pc ].
what to write in the /etc/fstab?
I would like to collect the [ answers too:P ]:
Advantages:
- Memory is way
24 matches
Mail list logo