Hi Mick,
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 09:50:47PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> I have wondered about this, the actual infrastructure. I've noticed that the
> fiber optic cable is in places strung along with the electricity pylons.
> Presumably if you could somehow attach to that then you could be anybody
On 7/18/19, David Wright wrote:
> On Thu 18 Jul 2019 at 08:27:47 (-), Curt wrote:
>> On 2019-07-17, Dan Ritter wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Fibre is point-to-point, and any interference with it will cause a
>> >> significant drop in received signal, which will be investigated.
>> >
>> > And it will be
On Thu 18 Jul 2019 at 08:27:47 (-), Curt wrote:
> On 2019-07-17, Dan Ritter wrote:
> >>
> >> Fibre is point-to-point, and any interference with it will cause a
> >> significant drop in received signal, which will be investigated.
> >
> > And it will be located swiftly, thanks to time-domain
On 2019-07-17, Dan Ritter wrote:
>>
>> Fibre is point-to-point, and any interference with it will cause a
>> significant drop in received signal, which will be investigated.
>
> And it will be located swiftly, thanks to time-domain
> reflectrometry:
>
>
On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 17:04:46 -0400
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Joe wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 21:50:47 +0100
> > mick crane wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I have wondered about this, the actual infrastructure. I've
> > > noticed that the fiber optic cable is in places strung along with
> > > the
Joe wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 21:50:47 +0100
> mick crane wrote:
>
>
> >
> > I have wondered about this, the actual infrastructure. I've noticed
> > that the fiber optic cable is in places strung along with the
> > electricity pylons.
> > Presumably if you could somehow attach to that then
On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 21:50:47 +0100
mick crane wrote:
>
> I have wondered about this, the actual infrastructure. I've noticed
> that the fiber optic cable is in places strung along with the
> electricity pylons.
> Presumably if you could somehow attach to that then you could be
> anybody ?
>
On 2019-07-17 16:36, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi Mick,
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:39:57PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
well when I became aware of all this stuff, I thought this is great,
everybody can connect and do what they like, if of course following
protocols.
But you can't do that can you ? you
Hi Mick,
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:39:57PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> well when I became aware of all this stuff, I thought this is great,
> everybody can connect and do what they like, if of course following
> protocols.
> But you can't do that can you ? you have to connect through a service
>
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 11:54:41AM +0100, Joe wrote:
It's my main firewall, as I have little control over the ISP-supplied
router.
Ah I see: you need >1 NIC.
The Microserver takes around 35 Watts with two hard drives and a small
SSD aboard. The Pi consumption will be tiny, and by the time I
On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 10:26:04 +0100
Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:01:00AM +0100, Joe wrote:
> >I'm considering using something like a Raspberry Pi when the current
> >HP Microserver dies, but I'm not sure it will be a lot cheaper to
> >run, given that it will need external
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:01:00AM +0100, Joe wrote:
I'm considering using something like a Raspberry Pi when the current HP
Microserver dies, but I'm not sure it will be a lot cheaper to run,
given that it will need external hard drives and an external Ethernet
port.
Depending on why you feel
On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 10:51:43 +0200
wrote:
>
> I don't mail from my home machines. Instead I've got a virtual host
> "out there" (in my case it's a slice of a "real host" I share with
> a couple of friends).
>
> But I do know of people who do it from home.
>
Me for one. Once you have a
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 03:38:45AM -0500, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:39:57PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> > well when I became aware of all this stuff, I thought this is great,
> > everybody can connect and do what they like, if of course following
> > protocols.
> > But you
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:39:57PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> well when I became aware of all this stuff, I thought this is great,
> everybody can connect and do what they like, if of course following
> protocols.
> But you can't do that can you ? you have to connect through a service
> provider.
On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 22:39:57 +0100
mick crane wrote:
> On 2019-07-16 08:18, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Lu, 15 iul 19, 06:21:28, Dan Ritter wrote:
> >> Reco wrote:
> >>
> >> Why do you think they have that requirement?
> >>
> >> It's entirely because IPs without PTR records are more likely
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 05:54:56PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> mick crane wrote:
> >
> > well when I became aware of all this stuff, I thought this is great,
> > everybody can connect and do what they like, if of course following
> > protocols.
> > But you can't do that can you ? you have to
mick crane wrote:
>
> well when I became aware of all this stuff, I thought this is great,
> everybody can connect and do what they like, if of course following
> protocols.
> But you can't do that can you ? you have to connect through a service
> provider.
You can and you can't.
In theory
On 2019-07-16 08:18, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Lu, 15 iul 19, 06:21:28, Dan Ritter wrote:
Reco wrote:
Why do you think they have that requirement?
It's entirely because IPs without PTR records are more likely to
be spammers than those who do. Specfically, because it's an
indication that the
On Lu, 15 iul 19, 06:21:28, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Reco wrote:
>
> Why do you think they have that requirement?
>
> It's entirely because IPs without PTR records are more likely to
> be spammers than those who do. Specfically, because it's an
> indication that the person running the machine didn't
-0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > That's not a problem sending mail via a script; that's a
> > > > > problem with Google's view of the reputation of the mail
> > > > > server that you are using. (Which may be the machin
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 06:21:28AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > Reco wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 02:05:04PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > That's not a problem sending ma
On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 10:34:44 +
Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi Pierre,
>
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 06:17:50PM +0200, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> > I tried with mail.mailutils, and I get the following error:
> >
> ><< 550-5.7.1 [2a01:e35:8a7f:9c50:2e4d:54ff:fed0:5806] Our system
> > has detected
Hi Pierre,
On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 06:17:50PM +0200, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> I tried with mail.mailutils, and I get the following error:
>
><< 550-5.7.1 [2a01:e35:8a7f:9c50:2e4d:54ff:fed0:5806] Our system has
> detected that
><<< 550-5.7.1 this message does not meet IPv6 sending
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 01:28:40PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 06:21:28AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
[...]
> > Why do you think they have that requirement?
>
> An error message included a link to support.google.com. Along with the other
> things it says:
Heh. Great minds think
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 06:21:28AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Reco wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 02:05:04PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > >
> > > That's not a problem sending mail via a script; that's a problem with
> > > Go
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 06:21:28AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Reco wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 02:05:04PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > >
> > > That's not a problem sending mail via a script; that's a problem with
> > > Go
Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 02:05:04PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> >
> > That's not a problem sending mail via a script; that's a problem with
> > Google's view of the reputation of the mail server that you are using.
> > (Which may b
t; > regarding PTR
> ><<< 550-5.7.1 records and authentication. Please review
> ><<< 550-5.7.1 https://support.google.com/mail/?p=IPv6AuthError for more
> > information
> ><<< 550 5.7.1 . z19si9492793wml.107 - gsmtp
> >
/support.google.com/mail/?p=IPv6AuthError for more
> information
><<< 550 5.7.1 . z19si9492793wml.107 - gsmtp
>554 5.0.0 Service unavailable
>
> I didn't find any ueseful information on the given link.
>
That's not a problem sending mail via a script; that's
On Sun, 14 Jul 2019, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
hi,
I'm looking for a way to send a mail via a script What are the available
solutions ?
I tried with mail.mailutils, and I get the following error:
<< 550-5.7.1 [2a01:e35:8a7f:9c50:2e4d:54ff:fed0:5806] Our system has
detected that
<<<
31 matches
Mail list logo
