I originally assumed you were the OP, but skimming the archives, it
appears that you are not.
I am th OP
The original poster posted a statement, not a question. The
statement was, I just did an upgrade in a machine running sid and
after that can't star a gnome terminal anymore.
big snip
You know what?
All you technical whizz bang, dumbass geeks haven't even given a link to
how to fix the problem. You've HINTED at what it is, but there's no
solution.
You're so fucking helpful.
-((
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
David Lloyd wrote:
big snip
You know what?
All you technical whizz bang, dumbass geeks haven't even given a link to
how to fix the problem. You've HINTED at what it is, but there's no
solution.
You're so fucking helpful.
-((
How is this for helpful:
wget
On (21/10/03 22:29), David Lloyd wrote:
big snip
You know what?
All you technical whizz bang, dumbass geeks haven't even given a link to
how to fix the problem. You've HINTED at what it is, but there's no
solution.
You're so fucking helpful.
Ouch ! Hi David
I'm not any sort of geek,
On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 08:59, David Lloyd wrote:
big snip
You know what?
All you technical whizz bang, dumbass geeks haven't even given a link to
how to fix the problem. You've HINTED at what it is, but there's no
solution.
You're so fucking helpful.
-((
http://bugs.debian.org
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 at 12:59 GMT, David Lloyd penned:
big snip
You know what?
All you technical whizz bang, dumbass geeks haven't even given a link
to how to fix the problem. You've HINTED at what it is, but there's no
solution.
You're so fucking helpful.
-((
It's generally
Clive,
Ouch ! Hi David
Yes; ouch indeed.
I'm not any sort of geek, dumbass or otherwise. The assumption is that
if you're running sid then you are a geek (or very brave). I run
woody because it is stable (and OK the packages are a bit old) with
KDE3.1.
I happen to be both. I've
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 at 22:34 GMT, David Lloyd penned:
snip
Look, I knew *something* was wrong and I had my suspicions about
libbonobo-activation4 but not about fontconfig. I'm not entirely adept
at backtracking versions of packages (I always get the syntax wrong
and I need to read more of
Monique,
I'm a little confused at this point.
I'm always confused--it's when I understand something that confuses me
even more ;-)
I originally assumed you were the OP, but skimming the archives, it
appears that you are not.
I wasn't.
But then you also mention your own troubles, to which
I just did an upgrade in a machine running sid and after that can't star
a gnome terminal anymore.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TR [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just did an upgrade in a machine running sid and after that can't star
a gnome terminal anymore.
Congratulations. I take it you've tracked down the nature of the
error, looked on http://bugs.debian.org/gnome-terminal, and reported
the bug if it hasn't already
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 05:09:19PM -0400, TR wrote:
I just did an upgrade in a machine running sid and after that can't star
a gnome terminal anymore.
Yes, and certainly you're going to get LOTS of help with that problem,
given this EXTREMELY informative report you've made. Why, I'll just bet
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 05:09:19PM -0400, TR wrote:
I just did an upgrade in a machine running sid and after that can't star
a gnome terminal anymore.
Yes, and certainly you're going to get LOTS of help with that problem,
given this EXTREMELY informative report you've made.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 04:55:16PM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 05:09:19PM -0400, TR wrote:
I just did an upgrade in a machine running sid and after that can't star
a gnome terminal anymore.
Yes, and certainly you're going to get LOTS of help with
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 04:55:16PM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
Marc Wilson wrote:
Feh. Why do these people think they should be running unstable?
perhaps because it's the only usable debian distro/version? the
stable is too old for desktops... testing is even worse than unstable...
I run
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 21:32, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 04:55:16PM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
Marc Wilson wrote:
Feh. Why do these people think they should be running unstable?
perhaps because it's the only usable debian distro/version? the
stable is too old for
16 matches
Mail list logo
