Andrei POPESCU (12020-04-06):
> Probably a case of competing standards.
That, and a case of gambit pileup when software try to be smart, to
out-smart the other software implementing the other standards to make
them interact with their own, while the other software do exactly the
same, and end up
On Lu, 06 apr 20, 09:46:50, Curt wrote:
> On 2020-04-06, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> >> This is getting well beyond Debian, but why would GNU/Linux in general have
> >> so many overlapping ways to register default applications?
> >
> > Probably a case of competing standards.
>
> Seems more like
On 2020-04-06, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
>> This is getting well beyond Debian, but why would GNU/Linux in general have
>> so many overlapping ways to register default applications?
>
> Probably a case of competing standards.
Seems more like the distinction between a user-defined preference
On Du, 05 apr 20, 16:20:42, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 05, 2020 at 11:03:07PM +0500, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
>
> > If I'm getting it right, you are using Xfce, so first place you should
> > look at is "exo-preferred-applications" [1] applet.
>
> And that was it. Thank you. Now if only
On Sun, Apr 05, 2020 at 10:52:23AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> Is it worth running rclone config with -vv, and --log-file pointing
> somewhere? The documentation suggests this will show what rclone is
> trying to do.
Not any more, since my ln -s trick worked. Thanks for the suggestions,
though.
On Sun, Apr 05, 2020 at 11:03:07PM +0500, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
> If I'm getting it right, you are using Xfce, so first place you should
> look at is "exo-preferred-applications" [1] applet.
And that was it. Thank you. Now if only rclone actually did what I needed
This is getting
On 05.04.2020 18:53, Carl Fink wrote:
> On 4/5/20 8:37 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>> The output above shows epiphany-browser as being the current selection.
> True. But not relevant.
>> Maybe rclone is not using x-www-browser, but some other mechanism (or
>> just hardcodes firefox).
>>
> I asked
On Sun 05 Apr 2020 at 09:53:13 (-0400), Carl Fink wrote:
> On 4/5/20 8:37 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > The output above shows epiphany-browser as being the current
> > selection.
> True. But not relevant.
> > Maybe rclone is not using x-www-browser, but some other mechanism (or
> > just hardcodes
On 4/5/20 8:37 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
The output above shows epiphany-browser as being the current selection.
True. But not relevant.
Maybe rclone is not using x-www-browser, but some other mechanism (or
just hardcodes firefox).
I asked what other mechanism could be used in the original,
On Du, 05 apr 20, 07:35:00, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 05, 2020 at 09:12:54AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > Please post the output of
> >
> > update-alternatives --config x-www-browser
>
> carlf@debian-NUCi5:~$ update-alternatives --config x-www-browser
> There are 4 choices for
On Sun, Apr 05, 2020 at 09:12:54AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 04 apr 20, 12:32:06, Carl Fink wrote:
> > So, I removed firefox-esr and replaced it with stable firefox. I ran
> > update-alternatives to point to firefox-esr. The current listing doesn't
> > even include firefox-esr:
>
>
On Sb, 04 apr 20, 12:32:06, Carl Fink wrote:
> So, I removed firefox-esr and replaced it with stable firefox. I ran
> update-alternatives to point to firefox-esr. The current listing doesn't
> even include firefox-esr:
This makes no sense to me, could you please rephrase? What browser do
you
So, I removed firefox-esr and replaced it with stable firefox. I ran
update-alternatives to point to firefox-esr. The current listing doesn't
even include firefox-esr:
root@debian-NUCi5:~# update-alternatives --list x-www-browser
/usr/bin/chromium
/usr/bin/epiphany-browser
/usr/bin/firefox
13 matches
Mail list logo
