On Sun, 27 Apr 1997, Sam Ockman wrote:
> Message from Bruce Perens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > If you can do so, please try running your system with the date in the year
> > 2000 for a while. Richard Stallman asked if we had tested that GNU software
> > is free of year-2000 problems, and I think it's
Message from Bruce Perens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> If you can do so, please try running your system with the date in the year
> 2000 for a while. Richard Stallman asked if we had tested that GNU software
> is free of year-2000 problems, and I think it's a good idea. Fortunately
> we don't have too ma
Did anyone test _emacs_ for year-2000 problems?
Thanks
Bruce
--
Bruce Perens K6BP [EMAIL PROTECTED] 510-215-3502
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key.
PGP fingerprint = 88 6A 15 D0 65 D4 A3 A6 1F 89 6A 76 95 24 87 B3
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail
Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Perens) writes:
> > If you can do so, please try running your system with the date in the year
> > 2000 for a while. Richard Stallman asked if we had tested that GNU software
> > is free of year-2000 problems, and I think it's a good idea. Fo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Perens) writes:
> If you can do so, please try running your system with the date in the year
> 2000 for a while. Richard Stallman asked if we had tested that GNU software
> is free of year-2000 problems, and I think it's a good idea. Fortunately
> we don't have too many COB
If you can do so, please try running your system with the date in the year
2000 for a while. Richard Stallman asked if we had tested that GNU software
is free of year-2000 problems, and I think it's a good idea. Fortunately
we don't have too many COBOL programs :-) .
To do this, you'll probably ne
6 matches
Mail list logo