Hi.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 09:17:06AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Mon 09 Apr 2018 at 10:21:46 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> > Celejar wrote:
> > > On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 00:32:05 - (UTC)
> > > Dan Purgert wrote:
> > >> If you have a device repeating a WiFi signal, it *will* use the s
Hello debian-users,
I shut down a virtualbox sid VM, and it turned out it was running
"unattended upgrades". On next start, apt-get update fails:
=
Get:22 http://ftp2.de.debian.org/debian unstable/contrib amd64 Contents (deb)
[221 kB]
On 2018-04-14 17:24 +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
> I shut down a virtualbox sid VM, and it turned out it was running
> "unattended upgrades". On next start, apt-get update fails:
>
> =
> Get:22 http://ftp2.de.debian.org/debian unstable/contrib amd64 Co
On 04/14/2018 08:24 AM, Felix Natter wrote:
> apt-get update on sid: Hash Sum mismatch
That means try again later or try a different source. :)
Cheers!
--
Jimmy Johnson
Devuan Beowulf - TDE-Trinity R14.0.5 - AMD A8-7600 - EXT4 at sda8
Registered Linux User #380263
Hello.
A mass of torment to subscribe to this list stay behind. The reason for the
torment is ridiculous, the 'CONFIRM' for the subscription should be sent by
pressing "Reply", but I as a donkey always opened a new message to send a
'CONFIRM''!
Problem of expanded partition partially solved. Af
Hey folks,
This is a wonderful page —
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/SoftwareRaidRoot — is it still current
for Stretch?
I am looking to ensure that the RAID1 on boot install that I will try this
weekend goes well, and am looking for updated pointers.
Cheers!
--
Boyan Penkov
www.bo
Sven Joachim writes:
> On 2018-04-14 17:24 +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
>
>> I shut down a virtualbox sid VM, and it turned out it was running
>> "unattended upgrades". On next start, apt-get update fails:
>>
>> =
>> Get:22 http://ftp2.de.debian.org/d
Boyan Penkov wrote:
> This is a wonderful page —
> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/SoftwareRaidRoot — is it still
> current for Stretch?
>
> I am looking to ensure that the RAID1 on boot install that I will try this
> weekend goes well, and am looking for updated pointers.
IMO it looks
On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 21:37:00 +0200 deloptes said:
> Another raid (md1) is done for the LVM volume (rest of the disk). In such a
> way the second RAID can be first encrypted and then LVs can be created.
Anyway, when mixing LVM with any RAID, LVM should *always* be implemented as a
higher layer, on
Abdullah Ramazanoglu wrote:
> Anyway, when mixing LVM with any RAID, LVM should *always* be implemented
> as a higher layer, on top of -lower- RAID layer, and not the other way
> around.
>
> Encryption (or any other cause) is not a factor in that decision.
... and what is exactly your point?
en
Greetings all;
Wheezy on an atom board. Wheezy up to date.
This drive,mounted as /, has gone ro twice in 14 days. Doing nothing
but sitting there spinning and running wheezy's usual cron related stuffs.
Apr 14 07:54:58 shop kernel: [1221665.148392] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x10
SAct 0x7ff00201
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 2:47 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings all;
>
> Wheezy on an atom board. Wheezy up to date.
> This drive,mounted as /, has gone ro twice in 14 days. Doing nothing
> but sitting there spinning and running wheezy's usual cron related stuffs.
>
> Apr 14 07:54:58 shop kernel
12 matches
Mail list logo
