Henrique de Moraes Holschuh: > Note that the ideal implementation would
be to inherit the umask [...] Jonathan de Boyne Pollard: > Actually, the
ideal implementation from the GNOME point of view would be for > these
programs to pass the umask from the client process to the server, just >
like t
On Sat, 12 Aug 2017, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh:
> > Note that the ideal implementation would be to inherit the umask [...]
>
> Actually, the ideal implementation from the GNOME point of view would be for
> these programs to pass the umask from the client proces
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh:
Note that the ideal implementation would be to inherit the umask [...]
Actually, the ideal implementation from the GNOME point of view would be
for these programs to pass the umask from the client process to the
server, just like they pass open file handles, the
Greg Wooledge:
It's beginning to sound like GNOME applications aren't even launched
by GNOME at all, but rather by systemd/dbus. Somehow.
GNOME Editor and other GIO applications work like how 16-bit Windows
applications used to work.
GNOME Terminal goes yet farther and not even the first
Hi.
An update for the archives.
On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 08:09:16 -0400
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 01:27:02PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> > Or find gnome-session (or gnome-shell - I don't recall who exactly
> > spawns user applications in GNOME) process pid, execute something lik
Found this. Reuben Thomas reported this earlier in the year. Lot of guys
tracked down PIDs.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780622
- Original Message -
From: "Reco"
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2017 6:27:02 AM
Subject: Re: How to chan
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 01:27:02PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> Or find gnome-session (or gnome-shell - I don't recall who exactly
> spawns user applications in GNOME) process pid, execute something like
> this on login:
>
> gdb -p $(pidof gnome-session) -ex 'p umask(0077)' --batch
>
> You'll need gdb to
Hi.
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 03:47:48PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Mon 07 Aug 2017 at 20:00:10 (+), Garrett R. wrote:
> > Does anybody know, this gnome/systemd bug of umask, it this something that
> > I will have to wait for Debian 10 before it is fixed? Or will Debian 9
> > impl
On Mon, 07 Aug 2017, Garrett R. wrote:
> Does anybody know, this gnome/systemd bug of umask, it this something
> that I will have to wait for Debian 10 before it is fixed? Or will
> Debian 9 implement a fix when/if gnome/systemd issues a fix?
It is too early to tell. It depends on how complex the
On Mon 07 Aug 2017 at 20:00:10 (+), Garrett R. wrote:
> Does anybody know, this gnome/systemd bug of umask, it this something that I
> will have to wait for Debian 10 before it is fixed? Or will Debian 9
> implement a fix when/if gnome/systemd issues a fix?
>
> I was hoping to be able to mov
ginal Message -
From: "Dejan Jocic"
To: "Garrett R."
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 2:32:30 PM
Subject: Re: How to change default umask in Stretch?
On 07-08-17, Garrett R. wrote:
> No effect.
>
> I added "session optional pam_uma
g
it.
- Original Message -
From: "Dejan Jocic"
To: "Garrett R."
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 2:32:30 PM
Subject: Re: How to change default umask in Stretch?
On 07-08-17, Garrett R. wrote:
> No effect.
>
> I added "session optional
On 07-08-17, Garrett R. wrote:
> No effect.
>
> I added "session optional pam_umask.so umask=0077" to the end of
> /etc/pam.d/common-session. Then I confirmed /etc/login.defs has a umask
> entry. Then I logged out and back in.
>
> A new gedit document still reports permission rw-r--r--.
>
U
uot;Dejan Jocic"
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 2:00:37 PM
Subject: Re: How to change default umask in Stretch?
On 07-08-17, Garrett R. wrote:
> I just tried this, adding "session optional pam_umask.so umask=0077" to the
> end of the /
rg
> Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 1:11:02 PM
> Subject: Re: How to change default umask in Stretch?
>
> On 07-08-17, Garrett R. wrote:
> > I apologize for the omissions.
> >
> > I am booting debian to GDM. I login. I then open gedit (or libreoffice,
> > etc). I
I just tried this, adding "session optional pam_umask.so umask=0077" to the end
of the /etc/pam.d/login file.
No effect.
- Original Message -
From: "Dejan Jocic"
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 1:11:02 PM
Subject: Re: How to change defa
On 07-08-17, Garrett R. wrote:
> I apologize for the omissions.
>
> I am booting debian to GDM. I login. I then open gedit (or libreoffice, etc).
> I type document. I save it.
>
Have you tried to set in /etc/pam.d/login this:
session optional pam_umask.so umask=0077
Logout and login back aft
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 12:55:37PM -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> Garrett R. composed on 2017-08-07 15:25 (UTC):
>
> > Please advise on where "/etc/profile.local" is. I can find no such entry.
>
> Like any .local file, it's an optional file. Any .local files that may exist
> by
> default have uncom
On 07-08-17, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 07:02:14PM +0200, Dejan Jocic wrote:
> > Ehh, disregard please. Just checked with gnome-terminal here, and it did
> > respect umask settings in .profile. But gedit did not.
>
> If gnome-terminal is reading .profile, that means it must be
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 07:02:14PM +0200, Dejan Jocic wrote:
> Ehh, disregard please. Just checked with gnome-terminal here, and it did
> respect umask settings in .profile. But gedit did not.
If gnome-terminal is reading .profile, that means it must be running
your shell as a login shell, which i
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 06:54:13PM +0200, Dejan Jocic wrote:
> Depends on terminal. If you use xterm under Gnome, it will respect umask
> settings, wherever those are, global or local in .profile or .bashrc.
> But gnome-terminal does not respect those settings. Guess that you
> should file bug agai
On 07-08-17, Dejan Jocic wrote:
> On 07-08-17, Garrett R. wrote:
> > Terminal confirms my umask is 022. That is, my entries at login.defs,
> > xsessionrc, etc are not working.
> >
> > Thank you for your assistance, Greg. Before asking here, my research
> > indicated gnome is the problem and it i
Garrett R. composed on 2017-08-07 15:25 (UTC):
> Please advise on where "/etc/profile.local" is. I can find no such entry.
Like any .local file, it's an optional file. Any .local files that may exist by
default have uncommented content only if the /local/ admin creates any.
--
"The wise are know
On 07-08-17, Garrett R. wrote:
> Terminal confirms my umask is 022. That is, my entries at login.defs,
> xsessionrc, etc are not working.
>
> Thank you for your assistance, Greg. Before asking here, my research
> indicated gnome is the problem and it is because of systemd that there is a
> prob
debian, you might have some insight.
Thank you for your efforts, much appreciated.
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Wooledge"
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 12:14:43 PM
Subject: Re: How to change default umask in Stretch?
On Mon, Aug 07, 201
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 04:00:17PM +, Garrett R. wrote:
> I have created a file named ".xsessionrc" and it is in my home folder
> (~/.xsessionrc). Within this file I wrote this: umask 077.
>
> No change is evident. I first tried a relogin. No effect. I then rebooted.
> Also no effect. Creati
mentioned previously. So I have /etc/login.defs,
~/.profile and ~/.xsessionrc all with entry "umask 077". But the result is
rw-r--r--.
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Wooledge"
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 11:37:24 AM
Subject: Re: How
I apologize for the omissions.
I am booting debian to GDM. I login. I then open gedit (or libreoffice, etc). I
type document. I save it.
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Wooledge"
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 11:37:24 AM
Subject: Re: How
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 03:25:27PM +, Garrett R. wrote:
> I have set /etc/login.defs to a umask of 077. Also, I commented out the
> USERGROUPS_ENAB entry.
>
> When I create gedit documents (for example), I am getting rw-r--r--. This
> does not reflect umask 077.
>
> I then went to ~/.profil
cal.
- Original Message -
From: "Felix Miata"
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 12:50:35 AM
Subject: Re: How to change default umask in Stretch?
Garrett R. composed on 2017-08-06 20:50 (UTC):
> The "old" methods for changing the defa
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 08:50:05PM +, Garrett R. wrote:
> It appears systemd now manages umask. Can someone please describe how I can
> change the default umask setting in Stretch?
The umask *of what*? Of login shells? Of files uploaded via ftpd?
Of files uploaded via sshd/builtin sftp? Of
Garrett R. composed on 2017-08-06 20:50 (UTC):
> The "old" methods for changing the default umask no longer work in Debian
> Stretch.
> It appears systemd now manages umask. Can someone please describe how I can
> change the default umask setting in Stretch?
Is your question based on the documen
I think the default umask is defined in /etc/profile.
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Garrett R. wrote:
> The "old" methods for changing the default umask no longer work in Debian
> Stretch.
>
> It appears systemd now manages umask. Can someone please describe how I can
> change the default uma
33 matches
Mail list logo
