On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 04:09:58PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Okay, incorporating Manoj's proposed changes, and some other ideas:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 12:08:15PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
One of the issues Debian often stands for is transparency and openness
-- indeed, the openness of our
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
Okay, incorporating Manoj's proposed changes, and some other ideas:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 12:08:15PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
One of the issues Debian often stands for is transparency and openness
Op vr, 18-11-2005 te 16:09 +1000, schreef Anthony Towns:
Okay, incorporating Manoj's proposed changes, and some other ideas:
[...]
---
In accordance with principles of openness and transparency, Debian will
seek to declassify and publish posts of historical or ongoing significance
made to the
It seems my previous post got lost or ignored. Retrying:
Anthony Towns wrote:
* The team will automatically declassify and publish posts made to
that list that are three or more years old, with the following
exceptions:
I don't think we have any moral right and barely any legal
Em Sex, 2005-11-18 às 16:09 +1000, Anthony Towns escreveu:
Seconds so far:
Don Armstrong (original or Manoj's changes)
Joey Hess (original only, no comment on Manoj's changes)
Wouter Verhelst (Manoj's changes, no comment on original)
Bas Zoetekouw (Manoj's changes, no comment on
Em Sex, 2005-11-18 às 16:09 +1000, Anthony Towns escreveu:
Thus, I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
---
In accordance with principles of openness and transparency, Debian will
seek to declassify and publish posts of historical or ongoing significance
made to the Debian Private
Just to formalize what I've already said...
I think this should be considered for future -private content even if
the GR Proposal 2 (which I second) is rejected, considering one argument
against it is that people didn't expect to have it's private posts
revealed.
--
Thus, I propose that the
Monroe Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think we have any moral right and barely any legal standing
to publish messages which were made to a private mailing list under
the current regime. The veto option doesn't cover this if we have
lost contact with the author(s). Please add:
Any post
Daniel Ruoso wrote:
I change my position as it seems that's needed to take it to the vote.
I consider the whole proposal more important than the differences
between them
Me too, but I suspect Manoj will be happy with Aj's new proposal, so I
will limit myself to seconding it.
--
see shy jo
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 11:41:34AM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Just to formalize what I've already said...
I think this should be considered for future -private content even if
the GR Proposal 2 (which I second) is rejected, considering one argument
against it is that people didn't expect to
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 04:09:58PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Thus, I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
---
In accordance with principles of openness and transparency, Debian will
seek to declassify and publish posts of historical or ongoing significance
made to the Debian
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005, Anthony Towns wrote:
Thus, I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
---
In accordance with principles of openness and transparency, Debian will
seek to declassify and publish posts of historical or ongoing significance
made to the Debian Private Mailing List.
On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 12:36 -0600, Greg Norris wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 11:41:34AM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Just to formalize what I've already said...
I think this should be considered for future -private content even if
the GR Proposal 2 (which I second) is rejected,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Ruoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just to formalize what I've already said...
I think this should be considered for future -private content even if
the GR Proposal 2 (which I second) is rejected, considering one argument
against it is that
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 04:09:58PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Thus, I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
So, this has 7 sponsors now, namely:
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 11:41:34AM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
--
Thus, I propose that the Debian project resolve that the process
defined in GR Proposal 2 will be applied *only* for the future content
of debian-private mailing list.
--
So obviously as proposer of the origianl GR, I'm not
16 matches
Mail list logo
