AT == Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AT Likewise, all our other votes have only needed two weeks (or
AT less in the case of the recall votes) to resolve, so having an
AT extra week for DPL elections seems unnecessary.
DPL elections is the most complicated voting with many
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Anthony Towns wrote:
2. The election begins [-nine-] {+six+} weeks before the leadership
post becomes vacant, or (if it is too late already) immediately.
Is there any reason
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 11:52:58AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
AMENDMENT PROPOSAL
Point 2 remains as before; that is, it will still read:
2. The election begins nine weeks before the leadership post
becomes vacant, or (if it is too late already) immediately.
AMENDMENT PROPOSAL
Hi,
MJ Ray wrote:
AMENDMENT PROPOSAL
Point 2 remains as before; that is, it will still read:
2. The election begins nine weeks before the leadership post
becomes vacant, or (if it is too late already) immediately.
AMENDMENT PROPOSAL
Seconded.
Simon
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 08:04:52AM -0700, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
Debian Project Secretary wrote:
Hi,
The resolution passes, with 386 votes from 345 developers.
Hi Manoj,
Could this be posted to d-d-a too, please? I'm not subscribed to d-vote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06-08-2007 07:52, MJ Ray wrote:
AMENDMENT PROPOSAL
Point 2 remains as before; that is, it will still read:
2. The election begins nine weeks before the leadership post
becomes vacant, or (if it is too late already)
On Monday 06 August 2007 04:52:58 MJ Ray wrote:
I agree. No reason was given AFAICS, so I propose:
AMENDMENT PROPOSAL
Point 2 remains as before; that is, it will still read:
2. The election begins nine weeks before the leadership post
becomes vacant, or (if it is too
Hmmm... sorry.
Time to go sleep.
I retract my previous post.
Good night.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 11:52:58AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Anthony Towns wrote:
2. The election begins [-nine-] {+six+} weeks before the leadership
post becomes vacant, or
Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure if the formulation proposed by your amendment is totally
clear. [...]
It's as clear as it is now: DPL (not DPL-elect). The end of the
polling period is not necessarily the election date.
Notice polling closed before the DPL's election for a
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 11:52:58AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Anthony Towns wrote:
2. The election begins [-nine-] {+six+} weeks before the leadership
post becomes vacant, or (if it
Steve McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 11:52:58AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
I agree. No reason was given AFAICS, so I propose:
From AJ's original mail:
...
Likewise, all our other votes have only needed two weeks (or less in
the case of the recall votes) to resolve, so
12 matches
Mail list logo
