On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:21:10AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Hi all,
I hope that our constitution has the answer to that question. If a GR needed
self-locking dispositions, that would go against the idea of having a
constitution at all. My personal opinion is that for things that
* Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org, 2012-05-09, 00:15:
considering that the resolution procedure already takes into account
make changes to correct minor errors (for example, typographical
errors or inconsistencies) or changes which do not alter the meaning,
providing noone objects within 24
I think I'm late but...
TEXT TO BE VOTED STARTS HERE
The Debian Project welcomes and encourages participation by everyone.
No matter how you identify yourself or how others perceive you: we
welcome you. We welcome contributions from everyone as long as they
interact
* Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx secret...@debian.org, 2012-05-08,
23:28:
http://www.debian.org/vote/2012/vote_002
Hmm. According to this page, the proposal[0] was seconded by Steve
Langasek. However, Steve seconded only the draft[1], which has different
wording.
[0]
On Thu, 10 May 2012, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx secret...@debian.org, 2012-05-08,
23:28:
http://www.debian.org/vote/2012/vote_002
Hmm. According to this page, the proposal[0] was seconded by Steve
Langasek. However, Steve seconded only the draft[1], which
5 matches
Mail list logo