On 2021/11/27 03:34, Russ Allbery wrote:
Here is a Salsa diff with the current version of the constitution:
https://salsa.debian.org/rra/webwml/-/compare/master...gr-2021-003?from_project_id=65952
Thank you! I've been meaning to do this for a while!
-Jonathan
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 08:19:26AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Timo Röhling writes:
>
> > I was under the impression that this amendment by the original
> > proposer does not require re-sponsoring, and my consent is
> > implicitly assumed unless I choose to object. Am I wrong?
>
> > (If I am,
Bill Allombert writes:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 10:04:07AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I propose the following General Resolution, which will require a 3:1
>> majority, and am seeking sponsors.
> Could you provide this as a patches series or similar ?
> I tried to read it several time and
> "Russ" == Russ Allbery writes:
Russ> Here is an updated version of my proposal, which incorporates
Russ> the formal amendment to change the default option for TC
Russ> resolutions to also be "None of the above" and fixes two
Russ> typos.
I still support this and my second
Russ Allbery dijo [Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 08:19:26AM -0800]:
> > I was under the impression that this amendment by the original
> > proposer does not require re-sponsoring, and my consent is
> > implicitly assumed unless I choose to object. Am I wrong?
>
> > (If I am, consider this my sponsoring of
Thanks, Russ.
Seconded.
Russ Allbery dijo [Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 07:25:45PM -0800]:
> Here is an updated version of my proposal, which incorporates the formal
> amendment to change the default option for TC resolutions to also be "None
> of the above" and fixes two typos.
>
>
> Rationale
>
Bill Allombert writes:
> Could you provide this as a patches series or similar ?
> I tried to read it several time and each time I felt I was missing the
> context, that fundamentally I did not understand what the result would
> be.
Yes, absolutely. Hopefully should be available by the end of
Timo Röhling writes:
> I was under the impression that this amendment by the original
> proposer does not require re-sponsoring, and my consent is
> implicitly assumed unless I choose to object. Am I wrong?
> (If I am, consider this my sponsoring of the amended version)
That's also my
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 10:04:07AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I propose the following General Resolution, which will require a 3:1
> majority, and am seeking sponsors.
Hello Russ,
Could you provide this as a patches series or similar ?
I tried to read it several time and each time I felt I
Let's try this signed. Seconded
On 2021/11/26 12:35, Kyle Robbertze wrote:
On 2021/11/23 09:53, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
aaand this should've been signed. Good morning.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 09:50:14AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
... and then I realize I *also* made a (small, but
On 2021/11/23 09:53, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
aaand this should've been signed. Good morning.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 09:50:14AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
... and then I realize I *also* made a (small, but crucial) mistake:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 05:15:34PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst
I second this.
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 07:25:45PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Section 4.2.4
> -
>
> Strike the sentence "The minimum discussion period is 2 weeks, but may be
> varied by up to 1 week by the Project Leader." (A modified version of
> this provision is added to section
* Pierre-Elliott Bécue [2021-11-26 09:49]:
Seconded.
I was under the impression that this amendment by the original
proposer does not require re-sponsoring, and my consent is
implicitly assumed unless I choose to object. Am I wrong?
(If I am, consider this my sponsoring of the amended
Russ Allbery wrote on 26/11/2021 at 04:25:45+0100:
> [[PGP Signed Part:No public key for 7D80315C5736DE75 created at
> 2021-11-26T04:25:45+0100 using RSA]]
> Here is an updated version of my proposal, which incorporates the formal
> amendment to change the default option for TC resolutions to
14 matches
Mail list logo
