|
|--+--++---++-++---|
Kurt Roeckx
Debian Project Secretary
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
This is the fist call for votes for the DPL election of 2024.
Voting period starts 2024-04-06 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2024-04-19 23:59:59 UTC
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitution at
Here is the draft ballot:
Voting period starts 2024-04-06 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2024-04-19 23:59:59 UTC
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitution at https://www.debian.org/devel/constitution.
For voting
We're now into the campaigning period. We have 2 candidates this year:
- Andreas Tille
- Sruthi Chandran
I will make the platforms available when I have received them at:
https://www.debian.org/vote/2024/platforms/
Kurt Roeckx
Debian Project Secretary
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
round 2024-03-23.
Details and results for the vote will be published at:
http://www.debian.org/vote/2024/vote_001
Please make sure that nominations are sent to (or cc:'d to)
debian-vote, and are cryptographically signed.
Kurt Roeckx
Debian Project Secretary
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
This is the schedule for the DPL election:
Nomination period: Saturday 2024-03-09 Friday 2024-03-15
Campaigning period: Saturday 2024-03-16 Friday 2024-04-05
Voting period: Saturday 2024-04-06 Friday 2024-04-19
Kurt
Hi,
This is the first call for votes abouti:
Statement about the EU Legislation "Cyber Resilience Act and Product Liability
Directive"
Voting period starts 2023-12-09 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2023-12-22 23:59:59 UTC
This vote is being conducted as required by the
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 10:39:38PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've updated the page at https://www.debian.org/vote/2023/vote_002 which
> the current status.
Here is the draft ballot:
Voting period starts 2023-12-09 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2023
e next line. But it
might also just be fine. There is at least some code that only checks
the first few words or something like that.
Kurt
> Am 08.12.23 um 20:40 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> > The CRA and PLD will be detrimental to open source software
>
Kurt
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 04:43:09PM +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> May I suggest for proposal C:
> "The EU should not overrule DFSG 6 and FOSS licenses"
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 07:19:44AM +0300, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Can people make suggestions for the bal
Can people make suggestions for the ballot options text?
Kurt
On November 30, 2023 12:39:38 AM GMT+03:00, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I've updated the page at https://www.debian.org/vote/2023/vote_002 which
>the current status.
>
>We're at the maximum discussion period of 3
Hi,
I've updated the page at https://www.debian.org/vote/2023/vote_002 which
the current status.
We're at the maximum discussion period of 3 weeks, so the vote will
probably start the 10th of December.
Kurt
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 07:16:48PM +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> Hello, I hereby welcome seconds for adding this text to 2023/vote_002
> as a separate proposal.
I'm currently counting 3 seconds for this.
Kurt
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 11:21:47PM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Second version, taking into account feedback. Looking for seconds at
> this point:
So I'm still only counting 4 seconds at this point.
Kurt
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 10:26:09PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Dear Debian voters,
>
> While Debian has stakes in the CRA, and should issue a statement if
> only to show we exists, I am quite sure that a GR is not necessary for Debian
> to issue such statement, and I am quite unconvinced the
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 12:40:58AM +0100, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
> I second adding this version to the vote
I'm getting a bad signature on this.
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 at 00:22, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Second version, taking into account feedback. Looking for seconds at
> this point:
Maybe
On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 01:03:38PM -0600, Simon Quigley wrote:
> Just for good measure, seconded.
This is the 5th second.
Kurt
|455 | 89 | 44.695 | 9.50706 |
| 2022 | 1023 | 47.976 | 363 |354 | 73 | 34.604 | 7.37860 |
| 2023 | 996 | 47.339 | 283 |279 | 71 | 28.012 | 5.89363 |
|--+--++---++-++---|
Kurt Roeckx
Debian Project Secretary
On Sat, Apr 01, 2023 at 02:38:06AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems something broke devotee, as usual. I've stopped the
> processing of the mails, it will not send any reply. But you
> can send your vote and it will be processed later.
The ACKs should all be sent out now.
Kurt
Hi,
It seems something broke devotee, as usual. I've stopped the
processing of the mails, it will not send any reply. But you
can send your vote and it will be processed later.
Kurt
Hi,
Here is the draft ballot.
Voting period starts 2023-04-01 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2023-04-14 23:59:59 UTC
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitution at https://www.debian.org/devel/constitution.
For voting
We're now into the campaigning period. We have 1 candidate this
year:
- Jonathan Carter
The platform is available at:
https://www.debian.org/vote/2023/platforms/
Kurt Roeckx
Debian Project Secretary
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
round 2023-03-19.
Details and results for the vote will be published at:
http://www.debian.org/vote/2023/vote_001
Please make sure that nominations are sent to (or cc:'d to)
debian-vote, and are cryptographically signed.
Kurt Roeckx
Debian Project Secretary
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
This is the schedule for the DPL election:
Nomination period: Saturday 2023-03-04 Friday 2023-03-10
Campaigning period: Saturday 2023-03-11 Friday 2023-03-31
Voting period: Saturday 2023-04-01 Friday 2023-04-14
Kurt
Hi,
The results of the General Resolution about non-free firmware:
Option 5 "Change SC for non-free firmware in installer, one installer"
The details of the results are available at:
https://www.debian.org/vote/2022/vote_003
Kurt Roeckx
Debian Project Secretary
signature.asc
D
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 07:22:38AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> As far as I understand of what is going wrong is that gnupg tries to
> write to the status fd, but libgnupg-interface-perl is trying to read
> gnupg's stdout and they just deadlock.
So I applied this patch and things
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 04:27:56PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 07:22:38AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 12:51:48AM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is there any plan to support cv25519 key on de
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 12:51:48AM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any plan to support cv25519 key on devotee?
>
> Or could devotee send unencrypted ack to the voter? I really don't
> mind the vote secrecy... But I want to see my vote hash. I see dvt-ack
> has something like
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 02:34:14AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Vote acknowledgement are currently not being sent out. I've been looking
> at it, but currently can't get it to work again. I will look at this
> again in the morning.
All the acknowledgement are sent out now.
Kurt
Vote acknowledgement are currently not being sent out. I've been looking
at it, but currently can't get it to work again. I will look at this
again in the morning.
Kurt
Hi,
This is the first call for votes for the General Resolution about
non-free firmware.
Voting period starts 2022-09-18 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2022-10-01 23:59:59 UTC
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the
Hi,
This is the draft ballot.
Voting period starts 2022-09-18 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2022-10-01 23:59:59 UTC
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitution at https://www.debian.org/devel/constitution.
For voting
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 05:18:21PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes:
>
> > I welcome suggestion for the ballot texts.
>
> Tentative proposal, and the proponents of other options should jump in and
> correct these.
>
> A: "Only one installer,
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 12:28:23PM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 05:18:21PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Kurt Roeckx writes:
> >
> > > I welcome suggestion for the ballot texts.
> >
> > Tentative proposal, and the pro
Hi,
I will most likely start the voting period tomorrow evening, so
2022-09-18 00:00 UTC.
I did not have time to put the last option on the website, but it has
enough seconds.
I welcome suggestion for the ballot texts.
Kurt
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 04:50:41PM +, Philipp Kern wrote:
>
> Seconded. Thanks, Russ!
The signature check failed, and the discussion period is over.
Kurt
> seconded
Your message wasn't signed.
Kurt
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 08:33:51PM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 05:26:10PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 06:15:21PM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
> > >On Sun, Sep 04, 2022 at 03:43:36AM +0700, Judit Foglszinger wrote:
> > >> > I hereby propose the
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 08:09:15AM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-09-05 at 21:51 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > You can argue that the developers making the installer and live images,
> > and those maintaining the website can make those decisions. You can even
> > sa
On Sun, Sep 04, 2022 at 08:00:48PM -0500, Richard Laager wrote:
>
> Thus, a possible precursor to an interpretive GR is that some person/group
> (e.g. ftpmaster, Project Leader, TC, Secretary[1]) makes the interpretive
> decision.
>
> If someone can make the decision, then they can be
On Sun, Sep 04, 2022 at 09:57:45AM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 09:14:53PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 03:11:25PM -0500, Richard Laager wrote:
> > >
> > > > I like to discussion about any
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 10:39:57AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> As far as I can tell, both Steve's and Gunnar's proposal would make
> Debian less of a free software operating system than it is today. That
> makes me sad. My preference for an outcome would be along the following
> lines.
>
>
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 03:11:25PM -0500, Richard Laager wrote:
>
> > I like to discussion about anything related to this, so that I can at
> > least get an idea what the consensus is.
>
> DSC 1 and DSC 5 have some implications about "the Debian system" vis-a-vis
> non-free, but the plan here is
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 09:00:50PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Hi Kurt! Let's send this signed now,
>
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 04:26:40PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> >On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 11:26:51AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> Hey Wouter!
> >>
> &
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 03:27:46AM -0500, Richard Laager wrote:
> On 8/29/22 16:02, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > It's my current interpretation that all voting options, even if they
> > might conflict with the DSC, will be on the ballot, and might not
> > require a 3:1 majority. T
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 09:38:52PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Hi Kurt!
>
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 04:26:40PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> >On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 11:26:51AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> Hey Wouter!
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 19,
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 09:36:37AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Jonas Smedegaard writes:
>
> > I view the official Debian install image as a component of Debian, and
> > consequently if the (only) official Debian install image were to contain
> > non-free bits then we would violate DSC#1.
>
On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 10:52:42AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 07:26:04PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Kurt Roeckx writes:
> >
> > > That changes it from 5 to 4 seconds. It's unclear to me what I need to
> > > do with the discussion per
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 07:26:04PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes:
>
> > That changes it from 5 to 4 seconds. It's unclear to me what I need to
> > do with the discussion period because of this. If I process the message
> > in order, I think this was ac
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 03:56:25PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> That changes it from 5 to 4 seconds. It's unclear to me what I need to
> do with the discussion period because of this. If I process the message
> in order, I think this was accepted and A.1.4 changes the discuss
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 11:26:51AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Hey Wouter!
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 12:19:55PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 08:58:21PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> system will *also* be configured to use the non-free-firmware
> >> component
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 07:06:01AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2022-08-24 19:14:26)
> > Quoting Bart Martens (2022-08-24 10:12:48)
> > > =
> > >
> > > The Debian project is permitted to make distribution media (installer
> > > images
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 10:56:06AM -0400, Hubert Chathi wrote:
>
> s/Therefor/Therefore
I've adopted this change.
> > Thereby re-inforcing the interpretation that any installer or image
I've also changed that to reinforcing.
Let me know if that's not ok.
Kurt
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 10:39:57AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> As far as I can tell, both Steve's and Gunnar's proposal would make
> Debian less of a free software operating system than it is today. That
> makes me sad. My preference for an outcome would be along the following
> lines.
The
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 05:50:43PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> Seconded.
Your message was not signed.
Kurt
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 07:36:17AM -0500, Devin Prater wrote:
> Seconded, thanks for mentioning the accessibility aspect!
> Devin Prater
> r.d.t.pra...@gmail.com
Your message was not signed, nor can I find you in the list of Debian
Developers. So I'm not registering this as a second. There are
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 08:58:21PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> So, I propose the following:
>
> =
>
> We will include non-free firmware packages from the
> "non-free-firmware" section of the Debian archive on our official
> media (installer images and live
|455 | 89 | 44.695 | 9.50706 |
| 2022 | 1023 | 47.976 | 363 |354 | 73 | 34.604 | 7.37860 |
|--+--++---++-++---|
Kurt Roeckx
Debian Project Secretary
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
This is the first call for votes for the 2022 Debian Project Leader
election.
Voting period starts 2022-04-03 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2022-04-16 23:59:59 UTC
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitution at
Hi,
Here is the draft ballot.
Voting period starts 2022-04-03 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2022-04-16 23:59:59 UTC
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitution at https://www.debian.org/devel/constitution.
For voting
Hi,
The voting period should have be open by now. It will be delayed by 1
day.
Kurt
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 03:54:28PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> My understanding of the implications of this process (and Kurt is
> authoritative here, of course) is that if you rank NOTA equally with an
> option, that vote is not part of V(A,D) or V(D,A) since neither option is
> preferred
Hi,
The result of the General Resolution is:
Option 2 "Hide identities of Developers casting a particular vote and
allow verification"
The details of the results are available at:
https://www.debian.org/vote/2022/vote_001
Kurt Roeckx
Debian Project Secretary
signature.asc
Descri
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 12:26:51PM -0600, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "Kurt" == Kurt Roeckx writes:
>
>
> >> It inadvertently weakened the constitutional protection against
> >> changes to the constitution.
>
> Kurt> I
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 01:30:53PM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
> Hi Kurt,
>
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 11:03 AM Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> >
> > Clearly people don't think it's identical, otherwise it would not have
> > been an option, or people would have voted it equally
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 10:31:44AM -0700, felix.lech...@lease-up.com wrote:
> Dear Mr. Secretary,
>
> As a Second for the winning Option 2, I was personally happy with last
> night's vote, but I nonetheless object to your certification of these
> tentative results:
>
> > Option 2 defeats Option
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 12:22:09AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Apologies for this administrative question, but we have a couple of
> votes active at the moment, and so inquiring minds want to know.
>
> Due to an oversight, I managed to forget to update my GPG subkey's
> expiration date. I've
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 04:31:38PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx - Debian Project
Secretary wrote:
> We're now into the campaigning period. We have 3 candidates this
> year:
> - Felix Lechner
> - Jonathan Carter
> - Hideki Yamane
>
> I will make his platforms available when I have rece
We're now into the campaigning period. We have 3 candidates this
year:
- Felix Lechner
- Jonathan Carter
- Hideki Yamane
I will make his platforms available when I have received them at:
https://www.debian.org/vote/2022/platforms/
Kurt Roeckx
Debian Project Secretary
signature.asc
Hi,
A part of the ballot option in choice 2 was missing. Here is the
corrected ballot.
Voting period starts 2022-03-13 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2022-03-26 23:59:59 UTC
The following ballot is for voting on changing the resolution process.
This vote is being
Hi,
This is the first call for votes on the General Resolution about voting
secrecy.
Voting period starts 2022-03-13 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2022-03-26 23:59:59 UTC
The following ballot is for voting on changing the resolution process.
This vote is being conducted
An other update:
Voting period starts 2022-03-13 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2022-03-26 23:59:59 UTC
The following ballot is for voting on changing the resolution process.
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitution
Updated ballot:
Voting period starts 2022-03-13 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2022-03-26 23:59:59 UTC
The following ballot is for voting on changing the resolution process.
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitution
Here is the draft ballot:
Voting period starts 2022-03-13 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2022-03-26 23:59:59 UTC
The following ballot is for voting on changing the resolution process.
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the
On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 03:12:57PM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Judit" == Judit Foglszinger writes:
>
> >> I think it would be clearer to add "that" between "confirm" and
> >> "their":
> >>
> >> {+ public, but developers will be given an option to confirm that
> >>
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 07:33:05PM +, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2022 at 11:26:28AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > "Barak A. Pearlmutter" writes:
> >
> > > In the discussion of the "voting secrecy" resolution, people seem to
> > > have assumed that it is impossible for a voting
On Sat, Mar 05, 2022 at 06:30:35PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> When considering a voting system, there are a few important things to
> consider [1]:
>
> 1- vote-privacy: the fact that a particular voter voted in a particular way
> is not revealed to anyone.
> 2- Receipt-freeness: a voter does
Hi,
A general resolution about voting secrecy has been started. Details about
it are available at: https://www.debian.org/vote/2022/vote_001
Kurt Roeckx
Debian Project Secretary
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
round 2022-03-20.
Details and results for the vote will be published at:
http://www.debian.org/vote/2022/vote_002
Please make sure that nominations are sent to (or cc:'d to)
debian-vote, and are cryptographically signed.
Kurt Roeckx
Debian Project Secretary
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
I've put up an initial page about the GR at:
https://www.debian.org/vote/2022/vote_001
I didn't have time yet to properly record all the seconds yet, but
believe the 3 option there all have the required amount of seconds,
and are the only options that reached that. The 3rd option reached
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 11:54:19AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes:
>
> > I've been reading our new constitution about the discussion period. What
> > I find is this in A.1.1:
> > The discussion period starts when a draft resolution is proposed and
&g
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 01:12:23PM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> One easy way for you to do that would be to send a diff to the spacing.
> I could then update my branch and use the typo correction procedure in
> the constitution to get this fixed.
Or we can just leave it to the maintainer of the
On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 01:54:36PM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> I also believe this advances the end of the discussion period to next
> Thursday (although other actions may advance the end of the discussion
> period further).
I've been reading our new constitution about the discussion period.
I'm proposing the following vote timeline:
Nomination period: Saturday 2022-03-05 - Friday 2022-03-11
Campaigning period: Saturday 2022-03-12 - Friday 2022-04-01
Voting period: Saturday 2022-04-02 - Friday 2022-04-15
The new term will start on 2022-04-21
Kurt
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 02:44:10PM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Pierre-Elliott" == Pierre-Elliott Bécue writes:
>
> Pierre-Elliott> I sponsor the resolution quoted below.
>
> I haven't gone and checked signatures, but unless someone's signature is
> bad or something, I think that
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 08:06:20AM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> 2) In the General resolution system, in addition to the constitutional
> amendment, include a statement of the day asking the secretary to obtain
> sufficient project consensus before changing how voting works.
I plan to look at
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 10:31:54AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 11:41:51PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 11:23:35PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > As of this writing, the tally sheet is still the dummy tally sheet, and
>
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 11:23:35PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> As of this writing, the tally sheet is still the dummy tally sheet, and it
> has not been replaced with the real one.
I don't see a problem. This looks like the real tally sheet:
Hi,
The winner of the General Resolution is:
Choice 1: "Amend resolution process, set maximum discussion period"
The details of the results are available at:
https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_003
Kurt Roeckx
Debian Project Secretary
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
This is the first call for votes on the general resolution about
changing the resolution process.
Voting period starts 2022-01-15 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2022-01-28 23:59:59 UTC
The following ballot is for voting on changing the resolution process.
This vote
On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 08:20:18PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> As previously discussed, and given that there has been no further
> discussion, I am calling for a vote on the general resolution on the
> Debian resolution process, using the ballot currently on the web site at
>
On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 03:50:22PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 06:52:59PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 09:31:42AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > Wouter Verhelst writes:
> > >
> > > > aaand t
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 09:53:50AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Text of the GR
> > ==
> >
> > The Debian Developers, by way of General Resolution, amend the Debian
> > constitution under point 4.1.2 as follows. This General Resolution
> > requires a 3:1 majority.
> >
> >
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 07:25:45PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Section 6.3
> ---
>
> Replace 6.3.1 in its entirety with:
>
> 1. Resolution process.
>
>The Technical Committee uses the following process to prepare a
>resolution for vote:
>
>1. Any member of
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 09:31:42AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst writes:
>
> > aaand this should've been signed. Good morning.
>
> > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 09:50:14AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> >> All this changes my proposal to the below. I would appreciate if my
>
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 07:25:45PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Here is an updated version of my proposal, which incorporates the formal
> amendment to change the default option for TC resolutions to also be "None
> of the above" and fixes two typos.
I've updated the website and changed the start
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 08:19:26AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Timo Röhling writes:
>
> > I was under the impression that this amendment by the original
> > proposer does not require re-sponsoring, and my consent is
> > implicitly assumed unless I choose to object. Am I wrong?
>
> > (If I am,
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 10:04:07AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I propose the following General Resolution, which will require a 3:1
> majority, and am seeking sponsors.
This is now at:
https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_003
I did not add any of the corrections, you did not sign them, you
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 12:09:54AM +0100, Mathias Behrle wrote:
>
> Seconded.
Your message isn't signed.
Kurt
1 - 100 of 541 matches
Mail list logo
