.
So that would mean two sets of images. What is the advantage of this
section over pulling firmwares from non-free into a second set of
images?
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
the
release of lenny, but it might also be a release killing vote such as
we wont release lenny with DFSG violations. I hope a lenny ballot
wouldn't have such an option, but it might.
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
...
There was no such proposal during the discussion period.
It was your decision to make a single ballot out of these orthogonal
issues, do not present the situation as being the proposers' fault.
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
with the fact that we vote
on them separately or on a single ballot.
One reason it's worse is that we will effectively take only one
decision instead of at least 3 or 4.
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
of choice 1, this ballot doesn't empower us to
decide on the 4 different questions.
So I understand that we intend to honor all choices which beat NOTA,
i.e. not only the highest ranked choice.
Bye
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
or may not diverge in practice. This choice doesn't
have any practical impact and doesn't change any rule or project
opinion.
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
however do require all other freedoms that the DFSG mandate from
| components of our operating system, and
| c) such firmware can and should be part of our official installation media.
Looking for seconds now.
Thanks,
weasel
--
Loïc Minier
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
- Not everybody wants to be DD. [1]
- Not everybody deserves to be DD. [2]
- Everybody who is able to properly maintain a package according to our
rules should have the possibility to maintain that package.
But what if this results in higher
you couldn't be bothered to read Not everybody wants to be
DD. Please leave my imagination alone, thanks.
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Flamewars are actually fun, when done properly.
Oh right; the fun part must be an omission on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flaming -- unless
you meant the artistic type of flamewars. ;)
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007, Clown Adams wrote:
Are you referring to Frans or AJ when you say that?
Don't be jealous.
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ftpmasters rights which
should be exercized with judgment, it sounds pointless to discuss what
rights remain to them.
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
occasions.
it sounds pointless to discuss what rights remain to them.
I could not agree more: discussion has shown to be pointless indeed,
hence the GR. Or so I guess.
So, a pointless discussion in response to a pointless discussion? An
eye for an eye...
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED
Where's the vote.debian.org page?
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
discussion
I'm attaching the proposed WML page for this vote (vote_006.wml).
Bye,
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
define-tag pagetitleGeneral Resolution: Re-affirm support to the Debian Project Leader/define-tag
define-tag statusP/define-tag
#use wml::debian::template title=pagetitle BARETITLE=true
the short voting period. (This is also mentionned in the
proposed WML pages for the website.)
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.
I wish the vote starts as soon as possible. I am fine with either one
ballot or separates ballots. Denis, do you have a preference in the
number of ballots?
Bye,
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to see why the problems you describe were not problems two
months or two years ago.
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006, Sam Hocevar wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006, Loïc Minier wrote:
The Debian Project reaffirms its support to its DPL.
The Debian Project does not object to the experiment named Duck
Tank
I do not like how this not objecting might be interpreted as
support. I want
Resolution.
-8-
So, if this resolution wins the vote, it will contradict itself since
we will have had a GR on Dunc yet we find it not appropriate to
have one?
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
and
then call the leader a fraud? What if the article would claim that KDE
is sluggish in Debian?
I'm deeply disappointed by the french cabal supporting this DPL
bashing. Please do feel responsible for the fate of the project after
such a stupid vote.
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED
There's always None of the above, but I am pissed enough by the
attitude of some developers that I want to reaffirm support for the
elected DPL whatever he does to suppose Debian outside of the project.
(The text of the proposal is attached.)
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Debian
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006, Loïc Minier wrote:
The Debian Project does not object to the experiment named Duck Tank, lead
by
I'm sorry for the typo, it is Dunc-Tank. Updated text attached.
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Debian Project reaffirms its support to its DPL.
The Debian Project
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006, Loïc Minier wrote:
I'm sorry for the typo, it is Dunc-Tank. Updated text attached.
How embarassing. I keep making typos, I hope this cheers readers up.
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Debian Project reaffirms its support to its DPL.
The Debian Project does
Debian and who want to see Debian improve.
But Dunc is not endorsed by Debian, and Debian does not exercise any
control over how Dunc operates.
And http://www.dunc-tank.org/press.html:
Dunc-Tank.org is an independent group of developers, users and
supporters of Debian.
--
Loïc
sponsors.
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
understand it).
Please recall your GR proposal.
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or
helping towards the release of Etch., which is something which was
meant to be as consensual as we wish nice things to people wanting
nice thinkgs for Debian, but it seems to have failed.
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
by the energy and creativity Anthony found for this
issue, even if I strongely objected to his initial plan. Please, don't
be the one blocking innovation in Debian; be innovant instead.
Thanks,
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
is
clearly non-free.
Yes, that's why we (including Aurélien) want to keep it in non-free.
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
30 matches
Mail list logo
