Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be writes:
Anyway, there is also this section in the constitution:
A.5. Expiry
If a proposed resolution has not been discussed, amended, voted on or
otherwise dealt with for 4 weeks the secretary may issue a statement
that the issue is being withdrawn. If
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 09:01:38AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:10:49PM -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
Project. [...]
I realise there are already sufficient seconds to make this a valid
option on the
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 04:09:43PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 09:01:38AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:10:49PM -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
Project. [...]
I realise there
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 02:12:17AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
Getting seconds is not a vote. It's a low-level check that there is
minimum support for an opinion.
It's also the most reliable way for a developer to issue a statement of
support that will be seen by voters
Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 02:12:17AM +0100, Frans Pop a écrit :
Fun! Maybe we should just dispense with the voting and just let the
highest number of seconds win?
That sounds like a good idea. Since it is a supermajority vote, I
recommend to the proposer to drop the GR
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 01:26:33PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
Are you promoting the practice of voting by I haven't got a clue what
this vote is about, but my friend X is supporting option C so I'll vote
for that here? I know it happens, but I'd prefer to make that harder
rather than
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:10:49PM -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
I am hereby proposing the amendment below to the general resolution
entitled Enhance requirements for General resolutions.
PROPOSAL START
=
General
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
PROPOSAL START
=
General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
Project. While over those years, some problems have arised during the
discussion and/or voting of
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net wrote:
Hi,
I am hereby proposing the amendment below to the general resolution
entitled Enhance requirements for General resolutions.
PROPOSAL START
=
General Resolutions are an
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net writes:
Hi,
I am hereby proposing the amendment below to the general resolution
entitled Enhance requirements for General resolutions.
PROPOSAL START
=
General Resolutions are an
Not that it makes much difference to 'further discussion', but:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:10:49PM -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
PROPOSAL START
=
General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
Project. While
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:25:34PM +, Matthew Vernon wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net writes:
Hi,
I am hereby proposing the amendment below to the general resolution
entitled Enhance requirements for General resolutions.
PROPOSAL START
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:10:49PM -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
PROPOSAL START
=
General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
Project. While over those years, some problems have arised during the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lucas Nussbaum writes ([Amendment] Reaffirm current requirements for GR
sponsoring):
I hope that Bill Allombert will rescind his own amendment. If he chooses
to keep it, I might rescind this one instead (we don't need two keep
things as is options
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 09:01:38AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:10:49PM -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
PROPOSAL START
=
General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
Project.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:26:59AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 09:01:38AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:10:49PM -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
PROPOSAL START
=
General
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:10:49PM -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
I am hereby proposing the amendment below to the general resolution
entitled Enhance requirements for General resolutions.
PROPOSAL START
=
General
Seconded!
I know it has been seconded by 5 other DDs already.
Fun! Maybe we should just dispense with the voting and just let the highest
number of seconds win [1]?
/me also watches Kurt scrambling to keep up with the amendmends, seconds
and rescinds and would like to note that he seems to be
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 02:12:17AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
Getting seconds is not a vote. It's a low-level check that there is
minimum support for an opinion.
It's also the most reliable way for a developer to issue a statement of
support that will be seen by voters prior to the vote. Many
Le Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 02:12:17AM +0100, Frans Pop a écrit :
Fun! Maybe we should just dispense with the voting and just let the highest
number of seconds win?
That sounds like a good idea. Since it is a supermajority vote, I recommend to
the proposer to drop the GR if he does not manage to
Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl writes:
Fun! Maybe we should just dispense with the voting and just let the highest
number of seconds win [1]?
One of the primary objections to this proposal is that it will be too hard
to get the new required number of seconds. It seems quite reasonable to
put
Ben Finney wrote:
A second is not a vote. That is, it's not a statement that the person
prefers that option above all others; it's merely a statement that the
person prefers that option to appear on the ballot.
Eh, I guess I could have been more obvious than prepending that sentence
with Fun!
Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl writes:
Eh, I guess I could have been more obvious than prepending that sentence
with Fun! to indicate that I was making a joke. But if you'd read on,
you'd have seen that I actually completely agree with you […]
Maybe I'll go read a dictionary tomorrow and
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 06:17:18PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
It's also the most reliable way for a developer to issue a statement of
support that will be seen by voters prior to the vote. Many voters
don't follow debian-vote and won't follow the pro/con discussions in
detail, but the
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:10:49PM -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
PROPOSAL START
=
General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
Project. While over those years, some problems have arised during the
Hi,
I am hereby proposing the amendment below to the general resolution
entitled Enhance requirements for General resolutions.
PROPOSAL START
=
General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
Project. While over
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
PROPOSAL START
=
General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
Project. While over those years, some problems have arised during the
discussion and/or voting of some resolutions, there
On 24/03/09 at 16:10 -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
I am hereby proposing the amendment below to the general resolution
entitled Enhance requirements for General resolutions.
PROPOSAL START
=
General Resolutions are an
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:49:54PM -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Since nobody sponsored it yet,
Actually, someone did, but:
I'm amending it to fix:
s/arised/arisen/
s/those years/the years/
Under A.1.6, you can fix spelling and grammar without having to re-solicit
seconds.
--
Steve
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:49:54PM -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 24/03/09 at 16:10 -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
I am hereby proposing the amendment below to the general resolution
entitled Enhance requirements for General resolutions.
PROPOSAL START
30 matches
Mail list logo
